Endoscopy 1997; 29(8): 732-740
DOI: 10.1055/s-2007-1004298
Original Article

© Georg Thieme Verlag KG Stuttgart · New York

Italian National Survey of Digestive Endoscopy Disinfection Procedures

G. B. Orsi1 , A. Filocamo1 , L. Di Stefano1 , A. Tittobello2
  • 1Institute of Hygiene, University of Rome “La Sapienza”, Rome, Italy
  • 2Gastroenterology Department, University of Milan
Weitere Informationen

Publikationsverlauf

Publikationsdatum:
08. Mai 2008 (online)

 

Abstract

Background and Study Aims: Inadequate disinfection of endoscopes and associated instrumentation can result in transmission of bacterial infections to patients. The aim of this study was to investigate the disinfection procedures carried out in the Italian centers of digestive endoscopy.

Materials and Methods: An anonymous postal questionnaire on the methods of cleaning and disinfecting endoscopy equipment in Italy was sent to 781 digestive endoscopy centers; 386 units (49.4 %) replied.

Results: Automatic washers were available in 47.6 % of units. Nearly all the respondets (99.2 %) cleaned the instruments before disinfection, using detergent, germicidal or enzymatic cleaner, but only 69.7 % carried out brushing. Most centers (89.2 %) used a glutaraldehydebased disinfectant (51 % used 2 % glutaraldehyde; 26.9 % used 0.4 % glutaraldehyde with 1.41 % phenol and 0.26 % sodium phenate; 5.9 % used either; 5.4 % did not specify glutaraldehyde formulation). The contact time of the disinfectant was < 10 minutes (1.8 %), between 10 and 19 minutes (47.4 %), between 20 and 29 minutes (31.9 %) and ≥ 30 minutes (16.6 %). The use-life of the disinfectant was ≥ 14 days in 27.3 % of the centers with automatic washers and 30.8 % in all centers. Only 25.4 % of the centers carried out some form of sterilization for biopsy forceps. The majority (83.4 %) modified their disinfection procedures in the case of infectious disease patients. Quality control tests on the efficacy of the endoscopy disinfection procedures were carried out in 44.6 % of units. Only 43 % of the centers were based in hospitals with an infection control (surveillance) program.

Conclusions: The data collected in the study showed that, in general, there is compliance with the Society Italiana di Endoscopia Digestiva (SIED) and Society Italiana di Gastroenterologia (SIGE) guidelines although with some important exceptions.

This article is only available in the printed issue

    >