Download PDF
Endoscopy 1995; 27(9): 654-658
DOI: 10.1055/s-2007-1005782
Original Article

© Georg Thieme Verlag KG Stuttgart · New York

Chronic Atrophic Fundic Gastritis Diagnosed by a Modified Congo Red Test

E. Tóth1,2 , K. Sjölund1 , F.-T. Fork2 , C. Lindström3
  • 1Department of Internal Medicine, University Hospital MAS, University of Lund, Malmö, Sweden
  • 2Department of Radiology, University Hospital MAS, University of Lund, Malmö, Sweden
  • 3Department of Pathology, University Hospital MAS, University of Lund, Malmö, Sweden
Further Information

Publication History

Publication Date:
17 March 2008 (online)

Also available at
  PDF Download  Permissions and Reprints

Abstract

Background and Study Aims: Chronic atrophic fundic gastritis (CAFG) is associated with several diseases, such as gastric cancer, gastric ulcer, pernicious anemia, and bacterial overgrowth. In spite of recent technical improvements, the gastroscopic diagnosis of CAFG remains uncertain. Congo red chromogastroscopy is capable of visualizing acid-producing normal fundic mucosa, but has hitherto not been suitable for routine use. The aim of our study was to establish a reliable endoscopic technique with which to diagnose CAFG.

Patients and Methods: This prospective study comprises 124 consecutive patients (71 women, 53 min) with a mean age of 65 years (range 36-92). Macroscopic evaluation of the gastric fundic mucosa in routine endoscopy using video techniques was compared with evaluation by means of a modified endoscopic Congo red test (MCRT). In routine gastroscopy, CAFG was recognized by the thin, friable mucosa, with a marked visible vascular pattern and fold atrophy. With MCRT, the diagnosis of CAFG was made within five minutes' observation when no red-to-blue color shift in the fundic mucosa could be induced by 0.2 µg / kg intravenous pentagastrin. The results were then compared with the histological examination of biopsies from the fundic mucosa.

Results: CAFG was confirmed by histology in 40 of 124 cases. The diagnostic sensitivity of MCRT was 1.0 (40/40), with a positive predictive value of 0.90, whereas the values for macroscopic gastroscopic evaluation were 0.25 (10/40) and 0.50, respectively.

Conclusions: We conclude that MCRT is a sensitive, fast, and cost-effective method of identifying patients with CAFG, and well suited for use in routine gastroscopy.

      >