Sphincter of Oddi Manometry: Comparison of Microtransducer and Perfusion Methods

Summary

There are two approaches to endoscopic sphincter of Oddi manometry, the microtransducer method and the perfusion method. Data reported by us and others are reviewed, with the aim of comparing the two techniques. Biliary pressure, pancreatic duct pressure, and sphincter of Oddi phasic wave activity can be measured by both of these methods. Easy handling and the capability of recording the mode of phasic wave propagation with a multilumen catheter are present advantages of perfusion manometry over the microtransducer method. Because there is no need for perfusion of fluid, the equipment needed for microtransducer manometry is simpler than that needed for the perfusion method, and the microtransducer technique may be more suitable for prolonged recording. An inter-study comparison of manometric data is easier with microtransducer manometry, but must await the collection of more data. Manometric differences between various diseases are still inconsistent, whereas there is no question of the effect of sphincterotomy on pressure values, with the exception of pancreatic duct and sphincter pressures. The possibilities of diagnosing sphincter of Oddi dysfunction, and of predicting the response to sphincterotomy have been received with enthusiasm. However, whether the findings obtained by endoscopic manometry over relatively short periods of time can be considered representative of overall sphincter function is now being questioned since the presence of physiologic cyclic changes in sphincter of Oddi phasic activity in phase with the migrating motor complex of the duodenum was demonstrated. Hormonal or pharmacological stimulation of sphincter activity may help us overcome this problem.

Key words:

Sphincter of Oddi - Manometry - Endoscopic sphincterotomy - Biliary dyskinesia - Post-cholecystectomy syndrome