Endoscopy 2007; 39(3): 238-246
DOI: 10.1055/s-2007-966293
Reports

© Georg Thieme Verlag KG Stuttgart · New York

Highlights of United European Gastroenterology Week 2006

T.  Rösch1
  • 1Central Interdisciplinary Endoscopy Unit, Department of Gastroenterology, Hepatology and Metabolic Diseases, Charité University Hospitals, Campus Virchow Hospital, Berlin, Germany
Further Information

Publication History

Publication Date:
26 March 2007 (online)

The United European Gastroenterology Week (UEGW) of 2006 offered an interesting variety of topics, and included many randomized studies that had not been previously presented at major meetings. Papers presented at plenary sessions will be given some priority in the following paper, whereas the selection of topics from abstracts, on the basis of poster presentations, has been more limited, necessarily reflecting to some extent the personal taste of the reviewer.

References

  • 1 Kara M A, Peters F P, Rosmolen W D. et al . High-resolution endoscopy plus chromoendoscopy or narrow-band imaging in Barrett’s esophagus: a prospective randomized crossover study.  Endoscopy. 2005;  37 929-936
  • 2 Nadezhin A, Agamov A, Politov I. et al . Narrow band imaging (NBI) vs. high-magnification chromoendoscopy (HCM) in detection and endoscopic surveillance of Barrett’s esophagus (BE).  Endoscopy. 2006;  38 (Suppl II) A33
  • 3 Kara M A, Bergman J J. Autofluorescence imaging and narrow-band imaging for the detection of early neoplasia in patients with Barrett’s esophagus.  Endoscopy. 2006;  38 627-631
  • 4 Curvers W L, Wong-Kee Song L, Wang K. et al . Endoscopic tri-modal imaging for the detection of dysplastic lesions in Barrett’s esophagus; a multi-center feasibility study.  Endoscopy. 2006;  38 (Suppl II) A34
  • 5 Anagnostopoulos G K, Yao K, Kaye P. et al . Novel endoscopic observation in Barrett’s oesophagus using high resolution magnification endoscopy with narrow band imaging.  Endoscopy. 2006;  38 (Suppl II) A216
  • 6 Evans J A, Poneros J M, Bouma B E. et al . Optical coherence tomography to identify intramucosal carcinoma and high-grade dysplasia in Barrett’s esophagus.  Clin Gastroenterol Hepatol. 2006;  4 38-43
  • 7 Zagaynova E V, Gladkova N D, Zuccaro G. et al . OCT Accuracy in detection of neoplasia in Barett’s esophagus.  Endoscopy. 2006;  38 (Suppl II) A33-A34
  • 8 Kiesslich R, Burg J, Vieth M. et al . Confocal laser endoscopy for diagnosing intraepithelial neoplasias and colorectal cancer in vivo.  Gastroenterology. 2004;  127 706-713
  • 9 Kiesslich R, Gossner L, Goetz M. et al . In vivo histology of Barrett’s esophagus and associated neoplasia by confocal laser endomicroscopy.  Clin Gastroenterol Hepatol. 2006;  4 979-987 [Epub 2006 July 13]
  • 10 Kakeji Y, Yamaguchi S, Yoshida D. et al . Development and assessment of morphologic criteria for diagnosing gastric cancer using confocal endomicroscopy: an ex vivo and in vivo study.  Endoscopy. 2006;  38 886-890
  • 11 Barreiros A, Goetz M, Lammersdorf K. et al . In vivo diagnosis of amyloidosis in the gut by confocal laser endomicroscopy.  Endoscopy. 2006;  38 (Suppl II) A214
  • 12 Meining A, Saur D, Osdoit A. Real-time endomicroscopy of the upper GI tract using a portable confocal miniprobe - a feasibility study.  Endoscopy. 2006;  38 (Suppl II) A215
  • 13 Miyamoto S, Muto M, Hamamoto Y. et al . A new technique for endoscopic mucosal resection with an insulated-tip electrosurgical knife improves the completeness of resection of intramucosal gastric neoplasms.  Gastrointest Endosc. 2002;  55 576-582
  • 14 Yamamoto H, Kawata H, Sunada K. et al . Success rate of curative endoscopic mucosal resection with circumferential mucosal incision assisted by submucosal injection of sodium hyaluronate.  Gastrointest Endosc. 2002;  56 507-512
  • 15 Yonezawa J, Kaise M, Sumiyama K. et al . A novel double-channel therapeutic endoscope (”R-scope”) facilitates endoscopic submucosal dissection of superficial gastric neoplasms.  Endoscopy. 2006;  38 1011-1015
  • 16 Fujishiro M, Yahagi N, Kakushima N. et al . Successful nonsurgical management of perforation complicating endoscopic submucosal dissection of gastrointestinal epithelial neoplasms.  Endoscopy. 2006;  38 1001-1006
  • 17 Oka S, Tanaka S, Kaneko I. et al . Endoscopic submucosal dissection for residual/local recurrence of early gastric cancer after endoscopic mucosal resection.  Endoscopy. 2006;  38 996-1000
  • 18 Oka S, Tanaka S, Kaneko I. et al . Advantage of endoscopic submucosal dissection compared with EMR for early gastric cancer.  Gastrointest Endosc. 2006;  64 877-883
  • 19 Saito Y, Takizawa K, Yokio C. et al . Using a bipolar needle knife or an insulation-tipped knife is safe and effective for en-bloc endoscopic submucosal dissection of large superficial esophageal cancer.  Endoscopy. 2006;  38 (Suppl II) A11
  • 20 Kawahara Y, Takenaka R, Uaoka T. et al . Novel procedure of endoscopic submucosal dissection (ESD) using a new device (Mucosectome) for early esophageal cancer.  Endoscopy. 2006;  38 (Suppl II) A11
  • 21 Oyama T, Tomor A. Endoscopic submucosal dissection with hook knife for early esophageal cancer.  Endoscopy. 2006;  38 (Suppl II) A34
  • 22 Watanabe H, Kanke K, Suzuki M, Takerou K. et al . Endoscopic submucosal dissection (ESD) for early-stage gastric cancer.  Endoscopy. 2006;  38 (Suppl II) A160
  • 23 Furuta T, Nakamura Y, Itazu T. et al . The results of endoscopic submucosal dissection for tumors of the gastrointestinal tract in our institution.  Endoscopy. 2006;  38 (Suppl II) A159
  • 24 Jang J, Choi S, Han S. et al . Endoscopic submucosal dissection (ESD) for gastric adenoma and early gastric cancer.  Endoscopy. 2006;  38 (Suppl II) A237
  • 25 Hirasawa D, Fujita N. Endoscopic submucosal dissection for early gastric cancer with ulcer scar.  Gut. 2006;  55 (Suppl V) A286
  • 26 Oda I, Saito D, Tada M. et al . A multicenter retrospective study of endoscopic resection for early gastric cancer.  Endoscopy. 2006;  38 (Suppl II) A220
  • 27 Mashimo Y, Saito Y, Matsuda T, Ikehara T. et al . Usefulness of rectal endoscopic submucosal dissection for large rectal neoplastic lesions and local recurrent lesions.  Gut. 2006;  55 (Suppl V) A298
  • 28 Tamegai Y, Saito Y, Masaki N. Usefulness of endoscopic submucosal dissection (ESD) for colorectal tumors comparing with endoscopic piecemeal mucosal resection (EPMR).  Endoscopy. 2006;  38 (Suppl II) A66
  • 29 Fujishiro M, Kakushima N, Kodashima S. et al . Endoscopic submucosal dissection for colorectal epithelial neoplasms.  Gut. 2006;  55 (Suppl V) A1
  • 30 Sumiyoshi T, Kondo H. Risk factors related to delayed bleeding after endoscopic submucosal dissection for gastric neoplasms.  Gut. 2006;  55 (Suppl V) A212
  • 31 Toyonaga T, Nishino E, Hirooka T. Effectiveness of endoscopic submucosal dissection using flush knife for gastrointestinal tumors.  Endoscopy. 2006;  38 (Suppl II) A65-A66
  • 32 Kobayashi M. Endoscopic submucosal dissection (ESD) using a spatula knife.  Endoscopy. 2006;  38 (Suppl II) A66
  • 33 Yamano H, Matsushita H, Kuroda K. et al . A new approach in endoscopic mucosal resection - the balloon associated EMR method.  Endoscopy. 2006;  38 (Suppl II) A231
  • 34 Kähler G FBA, Collet P H, Fischer K. et al . Water beam dissection for mucosal elevation - first clinical experiences.  Endoscopy. 2006;  38 (Suppl II) A225
  • 35 Kähler G FBA, Lingenfelder T, Fischer K. et al . Water beam dissection and needle knife combined as a hybrid-knife.  Endoscopy. 2006;  38 (Suppl II) A225-A226
  • 36 Morita Y, Toyoda M, Mitani T. et al . How can we overcome the difficult cases in early gastric cancer treatment with ESD method? Challenging new technique with ”double scope ESD“.  Endoscopy. 2006;  38 (Suppl II) A66
  • 37 Onogi F, Araki H, Yamazaki K. et al . Outcome and safety of endoscopic submucosal dissection for gastrointestinal lesions in elderly patients older than 75 years.  Endoscopy. 2006;  38 (Suppl II) A157
  • 38 Imagawa A, Fujiki S, Kawahara Y. et al . Endoscopic submucosal dissection (ESD) training program for performing procedure safely.  Gut. 2006;  55 (Suppl V) A158
  • 39 Kakushima N, Fujishiro M, Kodashima S. et al . A learning curve of endoscopic submucosal dissection for gastric neoplasia.  Endoscopy. 2006;  38 (Suppl II) A218
  • 40 Neuhaus H, Costamagna G, Deviere J. et al . Endoscopic submucosal dissection (ESD) of early neoplastic gastric lesions using a new double-channel endoscope (the ”R-scope“).  Endoscopy. 2006;  38 1016-1023
  • 41 Saito Y, Matsuda T, Kikuchi T. et al . Endoscopic submucosal dissection for recurrent colorectal tumors.  Endoscopy. 2006;  38 (Suppl II) A12
  • 42 Peters F P, Brakenhoff K PM, Curvers W L. et al . Endoscopic resection for early esophageal and gastric neoplasia in 140 patients.  Endoscopy. 2006;  38 (Suppl II) A163
  • 43 Deprez P, Aouattah T, Laurent S. et al . Endoscopic resection of superficial gastric tumors: Low numbers but high success rates!.  Gut. 2006;  55 (Suppl V) A285
  • 44 Amaro P, Dinis-Ribeiro M, Cipriano M A. et al . Endoscopic mucosal resection (EMR)of gastric superficial neoplastic lesions: a European series of CAP-assisted EMR (EMR-C).  Gut. 2006;  55 (Suppl V) A284-A285
  • 45 Shaheen N J, Crosby M A, Bozymski E M, Sandler R S. Is there publication bias in the reporting of cancer risk in Barrett’s esophagus?.  Gastroenterology. 2000;  119 333-338
  • 46 Martinek J, Spicak J, Vasicek M. et al . Prospective evaluation of a cohort of patients with Barrett’s esophagus: low incidence of adenocarcinoma and high grade dysplasia.  Gut. 2006;  55 (Suppl V) A263
  • 47 Repici A, Anna S, Conio M. et al . Can yearly surveillance and EMR for HGD cases prevent development of invasive cancer in Barrett’s patients? A 5-year prospective study on a large cohort of long-segment Barrett’s patients.  Gut. 2006;  55 (Suppl V) A266
  • 48 Giovannini M, Bories E, Pesenti C. et al . Circumferential endoscopic mucosal resection in Barrett’s esophagus with high-grade intraepithelial neoplasia or mucosal cancer. Preliminary results in 21 patients.  Endoscopy. 2004;  36 782-787
  • 49 Seewald S, Akaraviputh T, Seitz U. et al . Circumferential EMR and complete removal of Barrett’s epithelium: a new approach to management of Barrett’s esophagus containing high-grade intraepithelial neoplasia and intramucosal carcinoma.  Gastrointest Endosc. 2003;  57 854-859
  • 50 Giovannini M, Lopes C, Monges G. et al . Circumferencial endoscopic resection of Barrett’s esophagus with high-grade displasia or early adenocarcinoma.  Endoscopy. 2006;  38 (Suppl II) A34
  • 51 Peters F P, Kara M A, Rosmolen W D. et al . Stepwise radical endoscopic resection is effective for complete removal of Barrett’s esophagus with early neoplasia: a prospective study.  Am J Gastroenterol. 2006;  101 1449-1457
  • 52 Peters F P, Curvers W L, Kara M A. et al . Stepwise radical endoscopic resection successfully eradicates the complete Barrett’s esophagus with early neoplasia.  Gut. 2006;  55 (Suppl V) A196
  • 53 Bergmann J JGH, Sondermeijer C MT, Peters F P. et al . Circumferential balloon-based radiofrequency ablation of Barrett’s esophagus in patients with low-grade dysplasia or high-grade dysplasia with and without a prior endoscopic resection using the HALO360 ablation system.  Gut. 2006;  55 (Suppl V) A14
  • 54 Curvers W L, Peters F P, Sondermeijer C M. et al . Complete endoscopic eradication of a Barrett’s esophagus containing mucosal cancer and high-grade intra-epithelial neoplasia using the combination of endoscopic resection and balloon-based radio-frequency ablation.  Endoscopy. 2006;  38 (Suppl II) A11-A12
  • 55 Peters F P, Curvers W L, Rosmolen W D. et al . Single step endoscopic resection of a 6 cm long Barrett’s segment with early cancer followed by temporary insertion of a plastic self-expandable stent.  Endoscopy. 2006;  38 (Suppl II) A12
  • 56 Hartmann H, Hüppe D, Felten G. et al . Screening colonoscopy for colorectal cancer detects less advanced tumors in asymptomatic adults compared to diagnostic colonoscopy in symptomatic patients: results of a single center prospective study in Germany.  Gut. 2006;  55 (Suppl V) A57
  • 57 Pinto A, Chaves P, Ferreira S G. et al . Colorectal cancer screening: a randomized controlled trial with annual fecal occult blood test or flexible simoidoscopy every 5 years - preliminary results.  Gut. 2006;  55 (Suppl V) A58
  • 58 Adler A, Papanikolaou I S, Setka E. et al . Narrow band imaging (NBI) vs. conventional wide-angle colonoscopy (c) in the detection of colorectal adenomas: a prospective randomized study.  Endoscopy. 2006;  38 (Suppl II) A16-A17
  • 59 East J E, Suzuki N, Guenther T. et al . al. Randomised trial of narrow band imaging (NBI) for polyp and adenoma detection in the colon: interim results.  Endoscopy. 2006;  38 (Suppl II) A17
  • 60 Uraoka T, Saito Y, Matsuda T. et al . Detectability of colorectal neoplastic lesions using narrow band imaging (NBI) system: a prospective pilot study.  Endoscopy. 2006;  38 (Suppl II) A17
  • 61 East J E, Suzuki N, Arebi N. et al . Position changes during colonoscope withdrawal improve polyp detection: Interim results from a randomised, crossover trial.  Endoscopy. 2006;  38 (Suppl II) A224
  • 62 Langhorst J, Kuchle C, Zoepf T. et al . MR colonography without bowel purgation fort he assessment of adenomatous colon polyps: preliminary results of a prospective study.  Endoscopy. 2006;  38 (Suppl. II) A17-A18
  • 63 Endo K, Togashi K, Utano K. et al . Diagnostic accuracy of CT colonography for preoperative T staging of colorectal cancer.  Endoscopy. 2006;  38 (Suppl. II) A18
  • 64 Ell C, Fischbach W, Layer P. et al . Polyethylene glycol with electrolyte and ascorbic acid versus sodium phosphate for bowel cleansing before colonoscopy for cancer screening: a randomized, controlled trial.  Endoscopy. 2006;  38 (Suppl II) A18
  • 65 Rostom A, Jolicoeur E, Dube C. et al . A randomized prospective trial comparing different regimens of oral sodium phosphate and polyethylene glycol-based lavage solution in the preparation of patients for colonoscopy.  Gastrointest Endosc. 2006;  64 544-552
  • 66 Mathus-Vliegen E M, Kemble U M. A prospective randomized blinded comparison of sodium phosphate and polyethylene glycol-electrolyte solution for safe bowel cleansing.  Aliment Pharmacol Ther. 2006;  23 543-552
  • 67 Huppertz-Hauss G, Bretthauer M, Sauar J. et al . Polyethylene glycol versus sodium phosphate in bowel cleansing for colonoscopy: a randomized trial.  Endoscopy. 2005;  37 537-541
  • 68 Zakharash Y, Khohklova V, Radchenko L. et al . Single-blind, randomized monocentric, comparative study of the efficacy and tolerability of two different dosages of poly-ethyleneglycol vs. poly-ethyleneglycol + electolytes in bowel preparation for colonoscopy.  Endoscopy. 2006;  38 (Suppl II) A231
  • 69 Coron E, Ben Soussan E, Le Rhun M. et al . Self expending metallic stents (SEMS) with antireflux valve for distal esophageal carcinoma: results of a randomized trial.  Endoscopy. 2006;  38 (Suppl II) A34-A35
  • 70 Bichard P, Germain E, Dumas R. et al . Emergency treatment of malignant left colonic occlusion by self expanding metallic stent. A multicentric prospective study.  Endoscopy. 2006;  38 (Suppl II) A222-223
  • 71 Chiu P WY, Joeng H KM, Choi C LY. et al . The effect of scheduled second endoscopy against adjunctive omeprazole infusion in preventing peptic ulcer rebleeding - a prospective randomized study.  Gut. 2006;  55 (Suppl V) A47
  • 72 Chiu P W, Lam C Y, Lee S W. et al . Effect of scheduled second therapeutic endoscopy on peptic ulcer rebleeding: a prospective randomised trial.  Gut. 2003;  52 1403-1407
  • 73 Lee S Y, Kim S H, Park C K. et al . The effect of second look endoscopy in patients with bleeding peptic ulcers.  Gut. 2006;  55 (Suppl V) A47
  • 74 Rutgeerts P, Avgerinos A. Early administration of somatostatin before endoscopy to non cirrhotic patients with suspicion of peptic ulcer bleeding: The PUB double-blind, randomised, placebo-controlled trial.  Gut. 2006;  55 (Suppl V) A47
  • 75 Tan P C, Hou M C, Lin H C. et al . A randomized trial of endoscopic treatment of acute gastric variceal hemorrhage: N-butyl-2-cyanoacrylate injection versus band ligation.  Hepatology. 2006;  43 690-697
  • 76 Evrard S, Dumonceau J M, Delhaye M. et al . Endoscopic histoacryl obliteration vs. propranolol in the prevention of esophagogastric variceal rebleeding: a randomized trial.  Endoscopy. 2003;  35 729-735
  • 77 Sarin S K, Jain A K, Jain M, Gupta R. A randomized controlled trial of cyanoacrylate versus alcohol injection in patients with isolated fundic varices.  Am J Gastroenterol. 2002;  97 1010-1015
  • 78 Santos M MM, Rodrigues R A, Nakao F S. et al . Endoscopic treatment of esophageal varices in cirrhotic patients: endoscopic variceal ligation versus cyanoacrylate injection.  Endoscopy. 2006;  38 (Suppl II) A158-A159
  • 79 Li W, Yang Y, Lu Z. et al . The role of double-balloon enteroscopy in diagnosis and treatment of small-intestinal disorders.  Endoscopy. 2006;  38 (Suppl II) A53-A54
  • 80 Lee M S, Ko B M, Kim J O. et al . Clinical role of double-balloon enteroscopy in diseases of the intestines: the Kasid multi-center study in Korea.  Endoscopy. 2006;  38 (Suppl II) A241
  • 81 Kojima Y, Kato T, Tsurumi H. et al . Detection of small intestinal lesions of malignant lymphoma and lymphoproliferative disorder by double-balloon enteroscopy.  Endoscopy. 2006;  38 (Suppl II) A240-A241
  • 82 Plum N, May A, Ell C. Peutz-Jeghers’ syndrome: endoscopic detection and treatment of small-bowel polyps by double-balloon enteroscopy.  Endoscopy. 2006;  38 (Suppl II) A241
  • 83 Marmo R, Rotondano G, D’Angella R. et al . Double balloon enteroscopy (DBE) vs. capsule endoscopy (CE): a prospective trial.  Endoscopy. 2006;  38 (Suppl II) A241
  • 84 Saurin J C, Delvaux M, Vahedi K. et al . Clinical impact of capsule endoscopy compared to push enteroscopy: 1-year follow-up study.  Endoscopy. 2005;  37 318-323
  • 85 Maniere T, Landi B, Edery J. et al . Diagnostic and therapeutic yield of push and pull enteroscopy (PPE) after a positive finding at videocapsule endoscopy (VCE). Comparison with push enteroscopy (PE).  Gut. 2006;  55 (Suppl V) A54
  • 86 Saurin J C, Delvaux M, Vahedi K. et al . Clinical impact of capsule endoscopy compared to push enteroscopy: 1-year follow-up study.  Endoscopy. 2005;  37 318-323
  • 87 Rondonotti E, Pennazio M. Small bowel tumors detected by video capsule endoscopy (VCE: Preliminary data from the ECEG (European Capsule Endoscopy Group) database.  Endoscopy. 2006;  38 (Suppl II) A54
  • 88 Edery J, Maniere T, Jian R, Cellier C. Diagnostic yield of videocapsule endoscopy (VCE) in patients with refractory celiac disease (RCD). Comparison between RCD type I and II.  Endoscopy. 2006;  38 (Suppl II) A242
  • 89 Itoi T, Itokawa F, Sofuni A. et al . Puncture of solid pancreatic tumors guided by endoscopic ultrasonography: a pilot study series comparing Trucut and 19-gauge and 22-gauge aspiration needles.  Endoscopy. 2005;  37 362-366
  • 90 Storch I, Jorda M, Thurer R. et al . Advantage of EUS Trucut biopsy combined with fine-needle aspiration without immediate on-site cytopathologic examination.  Gastrointest Endosc. 2006;  64 505-511
  • 91 Gines A, Wiersema M J, Clain J E. et al . Prospective study of a Trucut needle for performing EUS-guided biopsy with EUS-guided FNA rescue.  Gastrointest Endosc. 2005;  62 597-601
  • 92 Gines A, Fern G, Pellise M. et al . Comparison of EUS-guided Trucut with EUS-guided fine-needle aspiration in subepithelial tumors: preliminary results of a prospective study.  Endoscopy. 2006;  38 (Suppl II) A53
  • 93 Polkowski M, Gerke W, Nasierowska-Guttmejer A. et al . Endosonography-guided Trucut biopsy of hypoechoic submucosal tumors of the stomach.  Endoscopy. 2006;  38 (Suppl II) A53
  • 94 Giovannini M, Hookey L C, Bories E. et al . Endoscopic ultrasound elastography: the first step towards virtual biopsy? Preliminary results in 49 patients.  Endoscopy. 2006;  38 344-348
  • 95 Giovannini M, Bories E, Arcidiacono P. et al . EUS sono-elastography for lymph nodes and pancreatic masses staging - results of a prospective multicentric study on 222 patients.  Endoscopy. 2006;  38 (Suppl II) A52-A53
  • 96 Saftoiu A, Vilmann P, Hassan H. et al . Accuracy of endoscopic ultrasound elastography used for the diagnosis of malignant lymph nodes.  Endoscopy. 2006;  38 (Suppl II) A238
  • 97 Vila J J, Arin A, Borobio E, et . al. Prospecitive evaluation of the reliability of endoscopic ultrasonography to diagnose microlithiasis: comparison with microscopic bile examiniation.  Endoscopy. 2006;  38 (Suppl II) A3
  • 98 Omar S, Seewald S, Seitz U. et al . Reliability of EUS in exclusion of pancreatic cancer - results of the Hamburg-Eppendorf study.  Endoscopy. 2006;  38 (Suppl II) A65
  • 99 Eloubeidi M A, Gress F G, Savides T J. et al . Acute pancreatitis after EUS-guided FNA of solid pancreatic masses: a pooled analysis from EUS centers in the United States.  Gastrointest Endosc. 2004;  60 385-389
  • 100 Fernandez-Esparrach G, Garcia P, Trujillo O. et al . Hyperamylasemia after endoscopic ultrasound-guided fine-needle aspiration of pancreatic lesions: Incidence and clinical impact.  Endoscopy. 2006;  38 (Suppl II) A236
  • 101 Perez-Miranda M, Pons F, Saracibar E. et al . EUS-guided biliopancreatic drainage: multiple salvage options for selected patients.  Endoscopy. 2006;  38 (Suppl II) A25
  • 102 Terruzzi V, Radaelli F, Meucci G, Minoli G. Is the supine position as safe and effective as the prone position for endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography? A prospective randomized study.  Endoscopy. 2005;  37 1211-1214
  • 103 Tringali A, Mutignani M, Milano A. et al . Prone or supine position when performing ERCP? Results of a prospective randomized trial.  Endoscopy. 2006;  38 (Suppl II) A23-A24
  • 104 Bailey A A, Bourke M J, Williams S J. et al . Guidewire cannulation improves primary success rates but does not protect against post ERCP pancreatitis: final results of a prospective randomised trial.  Endoscopy. 2006;  (Suppl II) A24
  • 105 Barrioz T, Beauchant M. French Multicenter Group et al . Intravenous nitroglycerine for the prevention of pancreatitis after therapeutic endoscopic retrograde cholangiography: a randomized, double blind, placebo controlled multicenter trial.  Gut. 2006;  55 (Suppl V) A24
  • 106 Murray B, Carter R, Imrie C. et al . Diclofenac reduces the incidence of acute pancreatitis after endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography.  Gastroenterology. 2003;  124 1786-1791
  • 107 Sotoudehmanesh R, Khatibian M, Kolahdoozan S. et al . Does indomethacin reduce the incidence of acute pancreatitis after endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography?.  Gut. 2006;  55 (Suppl V) A24
  • 108 Sofuni A, Maguchi H, Itoi T. et al . The prevention effect of post-ERCP pancreatitis with endoscopic pancreatic spontaneous dislodgment stent - a randomized controlled, multicenter study.  Endoscopy. 2006;  38 (Suppl II) A24
  • 109 Disario J A, Freeman M L, Bjorkman D J. et al . Endoscopic balloon dilation compared with sphincterotomy for extraction of bile duct stones.  Gastroenterology. 2004;  127 1291-1299
  • 110 Baron T H, Harewood G C. Endoscopic balloon dilation of the biliary sphincter compared to endoscopic biliary sphincterotomy for removal of common bile duct stones during ERCP: a metaanalysis of randomized, controlled trials.  Am J Gastroenterology. 2004;  99 1455-1460
  • 111 Bergman J J, van Berkel A M, Bruno M J. et al . Is endoscopic balloon dilation for removal of bile duct stones associated with an increased risk for pancreatitis or a higher rate of hyperamylasemia?.  Endoscopy. 2001;  33 416-420
  • 112 Lai H K, Lin C K, Chan H H. et al . Long-term effect of endoscopic balloon dilation in the treatment of choledocholitiasis.  Endoscopy. 2006;  38 (Suppl II) A5
  • 113 Skekely A, Kurucsai G, Biro E. et al . Needle-knife precut access papillotomy versus persistence in standard techniques for difficult bile duct cannulation and sphincterotomy.  Endoscopy. 2006;  38 (Suppl II) A25
  • 114 Kahaleh M, Tokar J, Mullick T. et al . Prospective evaluation of pancreatic sphincterotomy as a precut technique for biliary cannulation.  Clin Gastroenterol Hepatol. 2004;  2 971-977
  • 115 Akashi R, Kiyozumi T, Jinnouchi K. et al . Pancreatic sphincter precutting to gain selective access to the common bile duct: a series of 172 patients.  Endoscopy. 2004;  36 405-410
  • 116 Goff J S. Long-term experience with the transpancreatic sphincter pre-cut approach to biliary sphincterotomy.  Gastrointest Endosc. 1999;  50 642-645
  • 117 Kapetanos D, Kokozidis G, Dimakopoulos K. et al . Safety and efficacy of transpancreatic septotomy in difficult bile duct cannulations.  Endoscopy. 2006;  38 (Suppl II) A25
  • 118 Familiary P, Mutignani M, Larghi A. et al . ERCP in pancreatico-duodenectomy patients: a single tertiary care centre experience.  Endoscopy. 2006;  38 (Suppl II) A25
  • 119 Aabakken L, Bretthauer M, Lundin K EA. ERCP in patients with a Roux-Y anastomosis using the double balloon enteroscope.  Endoscopy. 2006;  38 (Suppl II) A25
  • 120 Kita H, Yamamoto H, Tamada K. et al . Application of the double-balloon endoscopy to the anatomically altered gastrointestinal tract by Roux-en-Y reconstruction.  Endoscopy. 2006;  38 (Suppl II) A53
  • 121 Gincoul R, Napoleon B, Scoazec J. et al . Early risks of endoscopic ampullectomy: results of the first multicenter prospective study.  Gut. 2006;  55 (Suppl V) A15
  • 122 Deviere J, Ojeda Valdes G, Cuevas Herrea L. et al . Safety and feasibility of endoscopic transoral vertical gastroplasty: First pilot human multicentric study.  Gut. 2006;  55 (Suppl V) A77
  • 123 Imaeda H, Ichikawa H, Kashiwagi K. et al . A novel autofluorescence video endoscopy system (SAFE-3000) for diagnosis of gastric neoplasms.  Gut. 2006;  55 (Suppl V) A286
  • 124 Shastri Y, Hoepffner N, Tessmer A. et al . New introducer PEG-gastropexy without prophylactic antibiotics: a prospective randomised double blind trial.  Gut. 2006;  55 (Suppl V) A78
  • 125 Incarbone S, Aprile G, Puzzo L. et al . Bioptic evaluation of duodenal mucosa in adult dyspeptic patients (PTS): high prevalence of celiac disease (CD). A prospective study.  Gut. 2006;  55 (Suppl V) A97

T. Rösch, MD 

Central Interdisciplinary Endoscopy Unit

Department of Gastroenterology, Hepatology and Metabolic Diseases

Charité University Hospitals, Campus Virchow Hospital

Augustenburger Platz 1

13353 Berlin

Fax: +49-30-450553902

Email: Thomas.Roesch@charite.de

    >