Background and study aims: An incisionless endoscopic peroral transgastric approach to the peritoneal cavity
has shown promise in animals as a potentially less invasive form of surgery. We
present our experience with various endoscopic peroral transgastric procedures,
reporting on the technical aspects and challenges that arose. Materials and methods: The following procedures were performed in 10 anesthetized pigs using a double-channel
endoscope: peritoneoscopy (10 pigs), liver biopsy (one pig), cholecystectomy (six
pigs), fallopian tube excision (one pig), and hysterectomy (one pig). Results: All the procedures were accomplished successfully. There were six minor intraoperative
complications. Complete gastric cleansing and elimination of all bacteria was
found to be impossible to achieve in the porcine model. Overinflation was a common
problem. The lack of adequate endoscope support was a major limitation. Safe closure
of the gastrotomy incision was difficult using the available clipping devices.
Six pigs made an uncomplicated recovery after a follow-up period of 4 - 6
weeks. Subsequent pathological examination revealed deep gastric ulceration in
one animal and a gastric wall abscess in another. Conclusions: Peroral transgastric surgery is technically feasible and safe in a porcine model.
Although all the procedures were performed successfully, the study highlights
some technical difficulties and illustrates the need for major technical innovations
and extensive animal studies in order to evaluate the merits of incisionless surgery.
References
1
Kalloo A N, Singh V K, Jagannath S B. et al .
Flexible transgastric peritoneoscopy: a novel approach to diagnostic and therapeutic
interventions in the peritoneal cavity.
Gastrointest Endosc.
2004;
60
114-117
2
Park P O, Bergstrom M, Ikeda K. et al .
Experimental studies of transgastric gallbladder surgery: cholecystectomy and
cholecystogastric anastomosis.
Gastrointest Endosc.
2005;
61
601-606
3
Kantsevoy S V, Jagannath S B, Niiyama H. et al .
Endoscopic gastrojejunostomy with survival in a porcine model.
Gastrointest Endosc.
2005;
62
287-292
4
Jagannath S B, Kantsevoy S V, Vaughn C A. et al .
Peroral transgastric endoscopic ligation of fallopian tubes with long-term survival
in a porcine model.
Gastrointest Endosc.
2005;
61
449-453
5
Swanstrom L L, Kozarek R, Pasricha P J. et al .
Development of a new access device for transgastric surgery.
J Gastrointest Surg.
2005;
9
1129-1137
6
Wagh M S, Merrifield B F, Thompson C C.
Endoscopic transgastric abdominal exploration and organ resection: initial experience
in a porcine model.
Clin Gastroenterol Hepatol.
2005;
3
892-896
7
Ikeda K, Fritscher-Ravens A, Mosse C A. et al .
Endoscopic full thickness resection with sutured closure in a porcine model.
Gastrointest Endosc.
2005;
62
122-129
8
Kantsevoy S V, Hu B, Jagannath S B. et al .
Transgastric endoscopic splenectomy: is it possible?.
Surg Endosc.
2006;
20
522-525
9
Kantsevoy S V, Hu B, Jagannath S B. et al .
Transgastric anastomosis by using flexible endoscopy in a porcine model (with
video).
Gastrointest Endosc.
2006;
63
307-312
10
Wagh M, Merrifield B, Thompson C.
Survival studies after endoscopic transgastric oophorectomy and tubectomy in
a porcine model.
Gastrointest Endosc.
2006;
63
473-478
11
Hashiba K, Carvalho A M, Diniz Jr G. et al .
Experimental endoscopic repair of gastric perforations with an omental patch
and clips.
Gastrointest Endosc.
2001;
54
500-504
12
Tsunada S, Ogata S, Ohyama T. et al .
Endoscopic closure of perforations caused by EMR in the stomach by application
of metallic clips.
Gastrointest Endosc.
2003;
57
948-951
13
Rattner D, Kalloo A N. SAGES/ASGE Working Group .
SAGES/ASGE Working Group on natural orifice transluminal endoscopic surgery.
Surg Endosc.
2006;
20
329-333
14
Bardaro S J, Swanstrom L.
Development of advanced endoscopes for natural orifice transluminal endoscopic
surgery (NOTES).
Minim Invasive Ther Allied Technol.
2006;
15
378-383
15
Fritscher-Ravens A, Mosse C A, Ikeda K. et al .
Endoscopic transgastric lymphadenectomy by using EUS for selection and guidance.
Gastrointest Endosc.
2006;
63
302-306
16
Bergstrom M, Ikeda K, Swain P, Park P O.
Transgastric anastomosis by using flexible endoscopy in a porcine model (with
video).
Gastrointest Endosc.
2006;
63
307-312
17
Fritscher-Ravens A, Mosse C A, Mukherjee D. et al .
Transgastric gastropexy and hiatal hernia repair for GERD under EUS control:
a porcine model.
Gastrointest Endosc.
2004;
59
89-95
18
Hu B, Chung S C, Sun L C. et al .
Eagle Claw II: a novel endosuture device that uses a curval needle for major
arterial bleeding: a bench study.
Gastrointest Endosc.
2005;
62
266-270
19
De la Mora J G, Rajan E, Rea D. et al .
In-vivo full thickness endoluminal gastroplication using tissue anchors in a
live pig model.
Gastrointest Endosc.
2005;
61
AB223
20
Sclabas G M, Swain P, Swanstrom L L.
Endoluminal methods for gastrotomy closure in natural orifice transenteric surgery
(NOTES).
Surg Innov.
2006;
13
23-30
C. FeretisMD, PhD
Department of Therapeutic Endoscopy Iaso General Hospital
Athens Greece
Fax: +30-210-6502966
Email: chrisferetis@gmail.com