Download PDF
Semin Hear 2007; 28(4): 227-260
DOI: 10.1055/s-2007-990713
© Thieme Medical Publishers

Secondary Benefits from Tinnitus Retraining Therapy: Clinically Significant Increases in Loudness Discomfort Level and Expansion of the Auditory Dynamic Range

Craig Formby1 , 2 , Susan L. Gold1 , Michael L. Keaser1 , Kimberly L. Block1 , Monica L. Hawley1
  • 1Department of Otorhinolaryngology-HNS, and the Tinnitus & Hyperacusis Center, University of Maryland School of Medicine, Baltimore, Maryland
  • 2Presently at: College of Arts & Science, Engineering and Medicine, Department of Communicative Disorders, University of Alabama, Tuscaloosa, Alabama
Further Information

Publication History

Publication Date:
17 October 2007 (online)

    Permissions and Reprints

ABSTRACT

In this report, the authors highlight clinically significant improvements in sound tolerance observed over the past decade among patients who were enrolled in tinnitus retraining therapy (TRT) at the University of Maryland Tinnitus and Hyperacusis Center. Pretreatment and TRT follow-up audiometric threshold, loudness discomfort level (LDL), and dynamic-range (DR) data are documented for (1) a group of 68 tinnitus patients who presented with primary complaints of sound intolerance, and (2) a second group of 70 patients who reported only tinnitus (and no sound tolerance problems). TRT-related increases in sound tolerance are (1) due to increases in LDLs and occur independently of changes in audiometric threshold, which were invariant with treatment; (2) statistically significant in tinnitus patients with and without sound tolerance problems, and with and without hearing loss; (3) observed among 81% of the patients with sound tolerance complaints and 44% of the patients who reported primary tinnitus; (4) independent of audiometric frequency over the range 1000 to 8000 Hz; and (5) seemingly independent of TRT treatment duration, which is consistent with recent experimental evidence of a rapid treatment effect (within the first month of TRT). The TRT treatment effects were clinically meaningful, offering new opportunities for expanding the auditory DR and improving sound tolerance in the general hearing-impaired population. The mechanism responsible for the plasticity underlying these treatment effects is uncertain, but appears consistent with a centrally mediated auditory gain control process. Sound tolerance problems were overpredicted among the authors' sample of tinnitus-only patients when existing objective audiometric criteria were used. This finding promoted the development of a new predictive model for sound tolerance problems, which is described in a companion report.

KEYWORDS

Tinnitus retraining therapy - loudness discomfort level - auditory dynamic range - tinnitus - hyperacusis

REFERENCES

  • 1 Hazell J WP, Sheldrake J B. Hyperacusis and tinnitus. In: Aran J-M, Dauman R Tinnitus 91: Proceedings of the Fourth International Tinnitus Seminar. Amsterdam, The Netherlands; Kugler 1992: 245-248
    Google Scholar
  • 2 Gabriels P. Hyperacusis: can we help?.  Australian J Audiol. 1993;  15 1-4
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 3 Jastreboff P J, Gray W C, Gold S L. Neurophysiological approach to tinnitus patients.  Am J Otol. 1996;  17 236-240
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 4 Gold S L, Frederick E A, Formby C. Shifts in dynamic range for hyperacusis patients receiving tinnitus retraining therapy (TRT). In: Hazell J Proceedings of the Sixth International Tinnitus Seminar 1999. London, UK; The Tinnitus and Hyperacusis Centre 1999: 297-301
    Google Scholar
  • 5 McKinney C J, Hazell J WP, Graham R L. Changes in loudness discomfort level and sensitivity to environmental sound with habituation based therapy. In: Hazell J Proceedings of the Sixth International Tinnitus Seminar. London, UK; The Tinnitus and Hyperacusis Centre 1999: 499-501
    Google Scholar
  • 6 Wölk C, Seefeld B. The effects of managing hyperacusis with maskers (noise generators). In: Hazell J Proceedings of the Sixth International Tinnitus Seminar. London, UK; The Tinnitus and Hyperacusis Centre 1999: 512-514
    Google Scholar
  • 7 Jastreboff P J, Sheldrake J B, Jastreboff M M. Hyperacusis patients before and during tinnitus retraining therapy-audiometric categorization. Abstract presented at: the Twenty Fifth International Congress of Audiology August 27-31, 2000 The Hague, The Netherlands;
    Google Scholar
  • 8 Berry J A, Gold S L, Frederick E A, Gray W C, Staecker H. Patient-based outcomes in patients with primary tinnitus undergoing tinnitus retraining therapy.  Arch Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg. 2002;  128 1153-1157
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 9 Gold S L, Formby C, Frederick E A, Suter C. Incremental shifts in loudness discomfort level among tinnitus patients with and without hyperacusis. In: Patuzzi R Proceedings of the 7th International Tinnitus Seminar. Crawley, Australia; University of Western Australia 2002: 170-172
    Google Scholar
  • 10 Hazell J WP, Sheldrake J B, Graham R L. Decreased sound tolerance: predisposing factors, triggers and outcomes after TRT. In: Patuzzi R Proceedings of the Seventh International Tinnitus Seminar. Crawley, Australia; University of Western Australia 2002: 255-261
    Google Scholar
  • 11 Jastreboff P J, Jastreboff M M. Tinnitus retraining therapy (TRT) as a method for treatment of tinnitus and hyperacusis patients.  J Am Acad Audiol. 2000;  11 162-177
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 12 Jastreboff M M, Jastreboff P J. Decreased sound tolerance and tinnitus retraining therapy (TRT).  Aust N Z J Audiol. 2002;  24 74-81
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 13 Gold S L, Formby C, Gray W C. Celebrating a decade of evaluation and treatment: the University of Maryland Tinnitus & Hyperacusis Center.  Am J Audiol. 2000;  9 69-74
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 14 Henry J A, Schechter M A, Nagler S M, Fausti S A. Comparison of tinnitus masking and tinnitus retraining therapy.  J Am Acad Audiol. 2002;  13 559-581
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 15 Marriage J, Barnes N M. Is central hyperacusis a symptom of 5-hydroxytryptamine (5-HT) dysfunction?.  J Laryngol Otol. 1995;  109 915-921
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 16 Goldstein B, Shulman A. Tinnitus-hyperacusis and the loudness discomfort level test - a preliminary report.  Int Tinnitus J. 1996;  2 83-89
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 17 Phillips D P, Carr M M. Disturbances of loudness perception.  J Am Acad Audiol. 1998;  9 371-379
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 18 Anari M, Axelsson A, Eliasson A, Magnusson L. Hypersensitivity to sound.  Scand Audiol. 1999;  28 219-230
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 19 Andersson G, Lindvall N, Hursti T, Carlbring P. Hypersensitivity to sound (hyperacusis): a prevalence study conducted via the internet and post.  Int J Audiol. 2002;  41 545-554
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 20 Formby C, Gold S L. Modification of loudness discomfort level: evidence for adaptive chronic auditory gain and its clinical relevance.  Semin Hear. 2002;  23 21-34
    Article in Thieme ConnectPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 21 Nelting M. Hyperacusis: an overview of international literature and clinical experience. In: Patuzzi R Proceedings of the Seventh International Tinnitus Seminar. 2nd ed. Perth, Australia; University of Western Australia 2003: 218-221
    Google Scholar
  • 22 Jastreboff P J. Phantom auditory perception (tinnitus): mechanisms of generation and perception.  Neurosci Res. 1990;  8 221-254
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 23 Nelting M, Rienhoff N K, Hesse G, Lamparter U. Subjective distress from hyperacusis: a questionnaire on hypersensitivity to sound. In: Patuzzi R Proceedings of the Seventh International Tinnitus Seminar. Crawley, W.A., Australia; University of Western Australia 2002: 147-149
    Google Scholar
  • 24 Vernon J A. Hyperacusis: testing, treatment and a possible mechanism.  Aust N Z J Audiol. 2002;  24 68-73
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 25 Sammeth C A, Preves D A, Brandy W T. Hyperacusis: case studies and evaluation of electronic loudness suppression devices as a treatment approach.  Scand Audiol. 2000;  29 28-36
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 26 Fabijanska A, Rogowski M, Bartnik G, Skarzynski H. Epidemiology of tinnitus and hyperacusis in Poland. In: Hazell JWP Proceedings of the Sixth International Tinnitus Seminar. London, UK; The Tinnitus and Hyperacusis Centre 1999: 569-571
    Google Scholar
  • 27 Vernon J A, Press L. Treatment for hyperacusis. In: Vernon JA Tinnitus Treatment and Relief. Needham Heights, MA; Allyn & Bacon 1998: 223-227
    Google Scholar
  • 28 Henry J A, Jastreboff M M, Jastreboff P J, Schechter M A, Fausti S A. Assessment of patients for treatment with tinnitus retraining therapy.  J Am Acad Audiol. 2002;  13 523-544
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 29 Jastreboff P J. Tinnitus: the method of Pawel J Jastreboff. In: Gates G Current Therapy in Otolaryngology-Head and Neck Surgery. St. Louis; Mosby-Year Book 1998: 90-95
    Google Scholar
  • 30 Moore B JC. Perceptual Consequences of Cochlear Damage. New York; Oxford University Press 1995
    Google Scholar
  • 31 Sandlin R E, Olsson R J. Evaluation and selection of maskers and other devices used in the treatment of tinnitus and hyperacusis.  Trends Amplif. 1999;  4 6-26
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 32 Jastreboff P J, Sheldrake J B, Jastreboff M M. Audiometric characterization of hyperacusis patients before and during TRT. In: Hazell J Proceedings of the Sixth International Tinnitus Seminar. London, UK; The Tinnitus and Hyperacusis Centre 1999: 495-498
    Google Scholar
  • 33 Tyler R S, Conrad-Armes D. The determination of tinnitus loudness considering the effects of recruitment.  J Speech Hear Res. 1983;  26 59-72
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 34 Hazell J WP, Wood S M, Cooper H R et al.. A clinical study of tinnitus maskers.  Br J Audiol. 1985;  19 65-146
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 35 Vernon J A. Pathophysiology of tinnitus: A special case - hyperacusis and a proposed treatment.  Am J Otol. 1987;  8 201-202
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 36 Gold S L, Gray W C, Jastreboff P J. Audiological evaluation and follow-up. In: Reich GE, Vernon JA Proceedings of the Fifth International Tinnitus Seminar. Portland, OR; American Tinnitus Association 1996: 485-487
    Google Scholar
  • 37 Jastreboff P J, Hazell J WP. A neurophysiological approach to tinnitus: clinical implications.  Br J Audiol. 1993;  27 7-17
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 38 Hawley M, Keaser M, Formby C. Predicting hyperacusis in tinnitus patients.  Semin Hear. 2007;  28 261-275
    Article in Thieme ConnectPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 39 Gray W C, Jastreboff P J, Gold S L. Medical evaluation, diagnosis, and counseling of patients with tinnitus and hyperacusis. In: Reich GE, Vernon JA Proceedings of the Fifth International Tinnitus Seminar. Portland, OR; American Tinnitus Association 1996: 104-107
    Google Scholar
  • 40 Gold S L, Gray W C, Hu S, Jastreboff P J. Selection and fitting of noise generators and hearing aids for tinnitus patients. In: Reich GE, Vernon JA Proceedings of the Fifth International Tinnitus Seminar. Portland, OR; American Tinnitus Association 1996: 313-314
    Google Scholar
  • 41 Hughson W, Westlake H. Manual for program outline for rehabilitation of aural casualties, both military and civilian.  Trans Am Acad Ophthalmol Otolaryngol. 1944;  48(suppl) 1-15
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 42 Shapiro S S, Wilk M B. An analysis of variance test for normality (complete samples).  Biometrika. 1965;  52 591-611
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 43 Formby C, Sherlock L P, Gold S L. Adaptive recalibration of chronic auditory gain: interim findings. In: Patuzzi R VIIth International Tinnitus Seminar Proceedings. Perth, Australia; University of Western Australia 2002: 165-169
    Google Scholar
  • 44 Formby C, Sherlock L P, Gold S L. Adaptive recalibration of chronic auditory gain. In: Santi PA Abstracts of the 26th Annual Midwinter Meeting of the Association for Research in Otolaryngology. Mt. Royal, NJ; Association for Research in Otolaryngology February 23-27, 2003: 221
    Google Scholar
  • 45 Formby C, Sherlock L P, Gold S L. Adaptive plasticity of loudness induced by chronic attenuation and enhancement of the acoustic background.  J Acoust Soc Am. 2003;  114 55-58
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 46 Silverman S R. Tolerance for pure tone and speech in normal and defective hearing.  Ann Otol Rhinol Laryngol. 1947;  56 658-676
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 47 Byrne D, Dirks D. Effects of acclimatization and deprivation on non-speech auditory abilities.  Ear Hear. 1996;  17 29S-37S
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 48 Sherlock L P, Formby C. Estimates of loudness, loudness discomfort, and the auditory dynamic range: Normative estimates, comparison of procedures, and test-retest reliability.  J Am Acad Audiol. 2005;  16 85-100
    Article in Thieme ConnectPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 49 Davis H. Audiology. Hearing and Deafness. 3rd ed. New York; Holt, Rinehart and Winston 1947: 3-6
    Google Scholar
  • 50 Olsen S, Rasmussen A N, Nielsen L H, Borgkvist B V. Loudness perception is influenced by long-term hearing aid use.  Audiology. 1999;  38 202-205
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 51 Philibert B, Collet L, Vesson J-F, Veuillet E. Intensity-related performances are modified by long-term hearing aid use: a functional plasticity?.  Hear Res. 2002;  165 142-151
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 52 Hazell J WP. Tinnitus masking therapy. In: Hazell JWP Tinnitus. London, UK; Churchill Livingston 1987: 96-117
    Google Scholar

Craig FormbyPh.D. 

Dept. of Communicative Disorders, University of Alabama

700 University Blvd., Rm 1451, Box 870242, Tuscaloosa, AL 35487-0242

Email: cformby@as.ua.edu

      >