Download PDF
Zentralbl Chir 2008; 133(5): 433-439
DOI: 10.1055/s-2008-1076956
Übersicht

© Georg Thieme Verlag Stuttgart ˙ New York

Leistenhernienversorgung: Laparoskopisch oder konventionell?

Inguinal Hernia: Laparoscopic or Open Surgery?C. Wullstein1 , C. Strey1 , G. Woeste1 , W. O. Bechstein1
  • 1Klinik für Allgemein- und Gefäßchirurgie, Klinikum der Johann Wolfgang Goethe-Universität, Frankfurt am Main
Further Information

Publication History

Publication Date:
15 October 2008 (online)

Also available at
    Permissions and Reprints

Zusammenfassung

Hintergrund: Netzverfahren dominieren die Versorgung von Leistenhernien. Es stellt sich jedoch weiterhin die Frage, ob offene oder laparoskopische Verfahren bevorzugt werden sollten. Methode: Anhand von Meta-Analysen und großen prospektiven Studien werden die laparoskopischen und die offenen Operationsverfahren mit Netz hinsichtlich Rezidivrate, der Rate an chronischen Schmerzen, Rekonvaleszenz, Komplikationen und Kosten miteinander verglichen. Ergebnisse: Während zwischen offenen und laparoskopischen Netzverfahren kein Unterschied in der Rezidivrate besteht, zeigen die laparoskopischen Verfahren Vorteile in der Morbidität, der Rekonvaleszenz und besonders in dem selteneren Auftreten chronischer Leistenschmerzen. Die offenen Netzverfahren zeigen Vorteile hinsichtlich der seltenen schweren intraabdominellen Komplikationen und der besseren Kosteneffektivität. Schlussfolgerung: Sowohl laparoskopische als auch offene Netzverfahren sind in der Versorgung von Leistenhernien sicher und effektiv. Jedes Verfahren ist mit Vor- und Nachteilen behaftet, sodass die Datenlage es nicht zulässt, eines der aktuellen Verfahren als Gold-Standard zu definieren.

Abstract

Background: Today, mesh repair is the preferred technique in surgery of inguinal hernia. Whether the mesh should be placed laparoscopically or by open techniques is still controversial. Methods: A comparison of open mesh and laparoscopic techniques was made with the help of meta-analyses and prospective trials. Outcome variables analysed were recurrence, chronic pain, recovery, morbidity and costs. Results: With regard to recurrence rates, both techniques gave comparable results. The laparoscopic technique shows advantages in terms of morbidity, recovery and especially a lower rate of chronic pain. Open mesh repair has the advantage of a lower risk of some rare severe intra-abdominal complications and seems to be more cost-effective. Conclusion: Both techniques of inguinal hernia repair are effective and safe. Each technique has its advantages and disadvantages. Therefore, today no single technique can be recommended as a gold standard.

Schlüsselwörter

Leistenhernien - Netz - Laparoskopie - Chirurgie

Key words

inguinal hernia - groin hernia - mesh - laparoscopy - surgery

Literatur

  • 1 Alfieri S, Rotondi F, Di Giorgio A Groin Pain Trial Group et al.,. Influence of preservation versus division of Ilioinguinal, Iliohypogastic, and genital nerves during open mesh herniorraphy, prospective multicentric study of chronic pain.  Ann Surg. 2006;  243 553-558
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 2 Amid P K, Shulman A G, Lichtenstein I L. A critical evaluation of the Lichtenstein tension-free hernioplasty.  Int Surg.. 1994;  79 76-79
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 3 Bay-Nielsen M, Nilsson E, Nordin P Swedish Hernia Data Base, Danish Hernie Data Base et al.,. Chronic pain after open mesh and sutured repair of indirect inguinal hernia in young males.  Br J Surg. 2004;  91 1372-1376
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 4 Bayrische Arbeitsgemeinschaft für Qualitätssicherung in der stationären Versorgung (BAQ) .Leistenhernie Jahresauswertungen 2003, 2004, 2005, 2006.  http://www.baq-bayern.de
    Google Scholar
  • 5 Bittner R, Schmedt C G, Schwarz J et al. Laparoscopic transperitoneal procedure for routine repair of groin hernia.  Br J Surg. 2002;  89 1062-1066
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 6 Bundesgeschäftsstelle Qualitätssicherung gGmbH .Bundesauswertung 6.0 2003, Modul 12 / 3: Leistenhernie.  http://www.bqs-outcome.de/2003/ergebnisse
    Google Scholar
  • 7 Bringman S, Ramel S, Heillinen T J et al. Tension-free inguinal hernia repair: TEP versus Mesh-Plug versus Lichtenstein.  Ann Surg. 2003;  237 142-147
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 8 Bringman S, Wollert S, Österberg J et al. Three-year results of a randomized clinical trial of lightweight or standard polypropylene mesh in Lichtenstein repair of primary inguinal hernia.  Br J Surg. 2006;  93 1056-1059
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 9 Callesen T, Bech K, Kehlet H. Prospective study on chronic pain after groin hernia repair.  Br J Surg. 1999;  86 1528-1531
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 10 Chung R S, Roeland D Y. Meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials of laparoscopic vs conventional inguinal hernia repairs.  Surg Endosc. 1999;  13 689-694
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 11 EU Hernia Trialists Collaboration . Mesh compared with non-mesh methods of open groin hernia repair: systematic review of randomised controlled trials.  Br J Surg. 2000;  87 854-859
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 12 EU Hernia Trialists Collaboration . Repair of groin hernia with synthetic mesh, meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials.  Ann Surg. 2002;  235 322-332
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 13 Fränneby U, Sandblom G, Nordin P et al. Risk factors for long-term pain after hernia surgery.  Ann Surg. 2006;  244 212-219
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 14 Frey D M, Wildisen A, Hamel C T et al. Randomized clinical trial of Lichtenstein’s operation versus mesh plug for inguinal hernia repair.  Br J Surg. 2007;  94 36-41
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 15 Grant A M. The EU Hernia Trialists Collaboration . Laparoscopic versus open groin hernia repair: meta-analysis of randomised trials based on individual patient data.  Hernia. 2002;  6 2-10
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 16 Grant A M, Scott N W, O'Dwyer P J Laparoscopic Groin Hernia Trial Group et al.,. Five-year follow-up of a randomised trial to assess pain and numbness after laparoscopic or open repair of groin hernia.  Br J Surg. 2004;  91 1570-1574
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 17 Holzheimer R G. Low recurrence rate in hernia repair – results in 300 patients with open mesh repair of primary inguinal hernia.  Eur J Med Res. 2007;  12 1-5
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 18 Isemer F E, Dathe V, Peschka B et al. PerFix-plug repair for primary and recurrent inguinal hernias – a prospective study.  Surg Technol Int.. 2004;  12 129-136
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 19 Kapiris S A, Brough W A, Royston C M et al. Laparoscopic transabdominal preperitoneal (TAPP) hernia repair. A 7-year two-center experience in 3 017 patients.  Surg Endosc. 2001;  15 972-975
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 20 Kingsnorth A N, Porter C S, Bennett D H et al. Lichtenstein patch or Perfix Plug-and-Patch in inguinal hernia: a prospective double-blind-randomized controlled trial of short-term outcome.  Surgery. 2000;  127 276-283
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 21 Köninger J, Redecke J, Butters M. Chronic pain after hernia repair: a randomised trial comparing Shouldice, Lichtenstein and TAPP.  Langenbecks Arch Surg. 2004;  389 361-365
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 22 Kuhry E, van Veen R N, Langeveld H R et al. Open or endoscopic total extraperitoneal inguinal hernia repair? A systematic review.  Surg Endosc. 2007;  21 161-166
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 23 Kumar S, Wilson R G, Nixon S J et al. Chronic pain after laparoscopic and open mesh repair of groin hernia.  Br J Surg. 2002;  89 1476-1479
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 24 Lamb A D, Robson A J, Nixon S J. Recurrence after totally extraperitoneal laparoscopic repair: implications for operative technique and surgical training.  Surgeon. 2006;  4 299-307
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 25 Lammers B J, Meyer H J, Huber H G et al. Entwicklungen bei der Leistenhernie vor dem Hintergrund neu eingeführter Operationstechniken im Kammerbereich Nordrhein.  Chirurg. 2001;  72 448-452
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 26 Leibl B J, Jäger C, Kraft B et al. Laparoscopic hernia repair – TAPP or / and TEP?.  Langenbecks Arch Surg. 2005;  390 77-82
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 27 Lovisetto F, Zonta S, Rota E et al. Laparoscopic transabdominal preperitoneal (TAPP) hernia repair: surgical phases and complications.  Surg Endosc. 2007;  21 646-652
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 28 McCormack K, Wake B, Perez J et al. Laparoscopic surgery for inguinal hernia repair: systematic review of effectiveness and economic evaluation.  Health Technol Assess. 2005;  9 1-203, iii–iv
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 29 McCormack K, Wake B, Fraser C et al. Transabdominal pre-peritoneal (TAPP) versus totally extraperitoneal (TEP) laparosscopic techniques for inguinal hernia repair: a systematic review.  Hernia. 2005;  9 109-114
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 30 Memon M A, Cooper N J, Memon B et al. Meta-analysis of randomized clinical trials comparing open and laparoscopic inguinal hernia repair.  Br J Surg. 2003;  90 1479-1492
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 31 MRC Laparoscopic Groin Hernia Trial Group . Laparoscopic versus open repair of groin hernia: a randomised comparison.  Lancet. 1999;  354 183-188
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 32 Mui W L, Ng S, Fung T M et al. Prophylactic ilioinguinal neurectomy in open inguinal hernia repair: a double-blind randomized controlled trial.  Ann Surg. 2006;  244 27-33
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 33 Neumayer L, Giobbie-Hurder A, Jonasson O et al. Open mesh versus laparoscopic mesh repair of inguinal hernia.  N Engl J Med. 2004;  350 1819-1827
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 34 Neumayer L, Giobbie-Hurder A, Jonasson O. Correspondence: Open mesh versus laparoscopic mesh repair of inguinal hernia.  N Engl J Med. 2004;  351 1463-1465
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 35 Nienhuijs S W, van Oort I, Keemers-Gels M E et al. Randomized clinical trial comparing the Prolene Hernia System, mesh plug repair and Lichtenstein method for open inguinal hernia repair.  Br J Surg. 2005;  92 33-38
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 36 O'Dwyer P J, Kingsnorth A N, Molloy R G et al. Randomised clinical trial assessing impact of a lightweight or heavyweight mesh on chronic pain after inguinal hernia repair.  Br J Surg. 2005;  92 (2) 166-170
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 37 Pikoulis E, Daskalakis P, Psallidas N et al. Marlex mesh Prefix plug hernioplasty retrospective analysis of 865 operations.  World J Surg. 2005;  29 231-234
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 38 Schmedt C G, Sauerland S, Bitner R. Comparison of endoscopic procedures vs Lichtenstein and other open mesh techniques for inguinal hernia repair, a meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials.  Surg Endosc. 2005;  19 188-199
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 39 Scott N W, McCormack K, Graham P et al. Open mesh versus non-mesh for repair of femoral and inguinal hernia. Cochrane Database Syst Re 2002; (4): CD002197
    Google Scholar
  • 40 Stylopoulos N, Gazelle G S, Rattner D W. A cost-utility analysis of treatment options for inguinal hernia in 1 513 008 adult patients.  Surg Endosc. 2003;  17 180-189
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 41 Tamme C, Scheidbach H, Hampe C et al. Totally extraperitoneal endoscopic inguinal hernia repair (TEP).  Surg Endosc. 2003;  17 190-195
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 42 Vale L, Ludbrook A, Grant A. Assessing the costs and consequences of laparoscopic versus open methods of groin hernia repair: a systematic review.  Surg Endosc. 2003;  17 844-849
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 43 Voyles C R, Hamilton B J, Johnson W D et al. Meta-analysis of laparoscopic inguinal hernia trials favors open hernia repair with preperitoneal mesh prosthesis.  Am J Surg. 2002;  184 6-10
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 44 Wijsmuller A R, van Veen R N, Bosch J L et al. Nerve management during open hernia repair.  Br J Surg. 2007;  94 17-22
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 45 Wright D, Paterson C, Scott N et al. Five-year follow-up of patients undergoing laparoscopic or open groin hernia repair, a randomized controlled trial.  Ann Surg. 2002;  235 333-337
    PubMedGoogle Scholar

PD Dr. med. C. Wullstein

Klinik für Allgemein- und Gefäßchirurgie · Klinikum der Johann Wolfgang Goethe-Universität

Theodor-Stern-Kai 7

60590 Frankfurt am Main

Phone: 0 69 / 63 01 50 80

Fax: 0 69 / 63 01 74 62

Email: christoph.wullstein@web.de

      >