Open Access
J Brachial Plex Peripher Nerve Inj 2006; 01(01): e8-e13
DOI: 10.1186/1749-7221-1-4
Research article
Stendel et al; licensee BioMed Central Ltd.

Changes of medium-latency SEP-components following peripheral nerve lesion[*]

Ruediger Stendel
1   Department of Neurosurgery, Charité – Universitätsmedizin Berlin, Campus Benjamin Franklin, Berlin, Germany
,
Uwe Jahnke
2   Department of Neurology and Clinical Neurophysiology, Fachklinik Neustadt, Neustadt, Germany
,
Max Straschill
3   Department of Clinical Neurophysiology, Charité – Universitätsmedizin Berlin, Campus Benjamin Franklin, Berlin, Germany
› Author Affiliations

Subject Editor:
Further Information

Publication History

19 April 2006

20 October 2006

Publication Date:
20 August 2014 (online)

Preview

Abstract

Background Animal studies have demonstrated complex cortical reorganization following peripheral nerve lesion. Central projection fields of intact nerves supplying skin areas which border denervated skin, extended into the deafferentiated cortical representation area. As a consequence of nerve lesions and subsequent reorganization an increase of the somatosensory evoked potentials (SEPs) was observed in cats when intact neighbouring nerves were stimulated. An increase of SEP-components of patients with nerve lesions may indicate a similar process of posttraumatic plastic cortical reorganization.

Methods To test if a similar process of post-traumatic plastic cortical reorganization does occur in humans, the SEP of intact neighbouring hand nerves were recorded in 29 patients with hand nerve lesions. To hypothetically explain the observed changes of SEP-components, SEP recording following paired stimulation of the median nerve was performed in 12 healthy subjects.

Results Surprisingly 16 of the 29 patients (55.2%) showed a reduction or elimination of N35, P45 and N60. Patients with lesions of two nerves showed more SEP-changes than patients with a single nerve lesion (85.7%; 6/7 nerves; vs. 34.2%; 13/38 nerves; Fisher’s exact test, p < 0.05). With paired stimulation a suppression of the amplitude of N20, P25 and P45 (p < 0.05; sign test), and a marked increment of N35 (p < 0.05; sign test) and N60 (not significant; sign test) of the second response could be observed.

Conclusion The results of the present investigation do not provide evidence of collateral innervation of peripherally denervated cortical neurons by neurons of adjacent cortical representation areas. They rather suggest that secondary components of the excitatory response to nerve stimulation are lost in cortical areas, which surround the denervated region.

*This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.