Download PDF
Phlebologie 2015; 44(05): 231-236
DOI: 10.12687/phleb2274-5-2015
Original Article
Schattauer GmbH

Are side effects always undesirable?

Non-interventional study following treatment of varicose veins Article in several languages: English | deutsch
J. Cordes
1   UKSH, Campus Lübeck, Klinik für Urologie, Lübeck
,
M. Zimbelmann
1   UKSH, Campus Lübeck, Klinik für Urologie, Lübeck
,
B. Kahle
2   UKSH, Campus Lübeck, Klinik für Dermatologie, Allergologie und Venerologie, Lübeck, Germany
› Author Affiliations
Further Information

Publication History

Received: 22 July 2015

Accepted: 04 August 2015

Publication Date:
04 January 2018 (online)

    Permissions and Reprints

Summary

Introduction: The endovenous thermal ablation of the great saphenous vein due to varicosis changes the blood circulation in the groin. This could affect the venous drainage of the penis, especially the drainage of the corpus spongiosum over the external pudendal vein. There are a few cases in our clinic until now which had an enhanced swelling of the glans penis beside an erection.

Objective: Is the enhancement of penile swelling caused by the targeted thermal ablation of the GSV without affecting the saphenofemoral tributaries in the groin?

Material and Methods: To verify this enhanced swelling of the glans penis and change in the erectile function we want to ask 56 patients with a modified IIEF questionnaire.

The IIEF is a validated questionnaire with a additional question for the swelling of the glans. We check the reliability of the additional question with 16 healthy males.

Possible results: Hypothesis 1 (H+): There is an improvement of the erectile function. Hypothesis 2 (H-): There is a decrease of the erectile function. Hypothesis 3 (H0): There is no change of the erectile function. Schedule: 1.

Preliminary assessment: Sept. 2014: ethical approval, Reliability of the additional question. 2. Main assessment: Oct. 2014 to May 2016. 3. Analysis of the data: May 2016 to Aug. 2016 4. Report of data: August 2016.

Keywords

Endovenous thermal ablation - varicose veins - side effects - erectile function
 

  • References

  • 1 Schuller-Petrovic S, Schuller S, Schuller-Lukic B. Pavlovic. Side effects and occlusion rate after tumescentless treatment of the great saphenous vein with EVLA. Phlebologie 2015; 44: 63-65.
    Article in Thieme ConnectGoogle Scholar
  • 2 Murad MH, Coto-Yglesias F, Zumaeta-Garcia M. et al. A systematic review and meta-analysis of the treatments of varicose veins. J Vasc Surg 2011; 53: 49-65.
    Google Scholar
  • 3 Canat L, Cicek G, Atis G. et al. Is there a relationship between severity of coronary artery disease and severity of erectile dysfunction?. BJU Int 2013; 39: 465-473.
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 4 Acton A. Advances in Physiological Sexual Dysfunction Research and Treatment. Atlanta, Georgia: Scholary Edition 2012: 22.
    Google Scholar
  • 5 Haskins AE, Han PK, Lucas FL, Bristol I, Hansen M. Development of clinical models for predicting erectile function after localized prostate cancer treatment. Int J Urol 2014; 21: 1227-1233.
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 6 Valles-Antuna C, Fernandez-Gomez J, Fernandez-Gonzalez F. Peripheral neuropathy: an underdiag-nosed cause of erectile dysfunction. BJU Int 2011; 108: 1855-1859.
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 7 Wiltink J, Hauck EW, Phaedayanon M. et al. Validation of the German version of the International Index of Erectile Function (IIEF) in patients with erectile dysfunction, Peyronie’s disease and controls. Int J Impotence Research 2003; 15: 192-197.
    Google Scholar
  • 8 Dupont WD, Plummer WD. ‘Power and Sample Size Calculations: A Review and Computer Program’. Controlled Clinical Trials 1990; 11: 116-28.
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 9 Mulcahy John J. Male Sexual Function-A guide to clinical management. Totowa, New Jersey: Humana Press; 2006. Second Edition; 7.
    Google Scholar