Methods Inf Med 2012; 51(03): 268-278
DOI: 10.3414/ME11-02-0017
Focus Theme – Original Articles
Schattauer GmbH

Progressive Data Transmission for Anatomical Landmark Detection in a Cloud

M. Sofka
1   Siemens Corporate Research, 755 College Road East, Princeton, NJ 08540, USA
,
K. Ralovich
2   Technical University of Munich, Boltzmannstr. 3, 85748 Garching, Germany
,
J. Zhang
1   Siemens Corporate Research, 755 College Road East, Princeton, NJ 08540, USA
,
S. K. Zhou
1   Siemens Corporate Research, 755 College Road East, Princeton, NJ 08540, USA
,
D. Comaniciu
1   Siemens Corporate Research, 755 College Road East, Princeton, NJ 08540, USA
› Author Affiliations
Further Information

Publication History

received:02 March 2011

accepted:06 April 2011

Publication Date:
20 January 2018 (online)

Summary

Background: In the concept of cloud-computing-based systems, various authorized users have secure access to patient records from a number of care delivery organizations from any location. This creates a growing need for remote visualization, advanced image processing, state-of-the-art image analysis, and computer aided diagnosis.

Objectives: This paper proposes a system of algorithms for automatic detection of anatomical landmarks in 3D volumes in the cloud computing environment. The system addresses the inherent problem of limited bandwidth between a (thin) client, data center, and data analysis server.

Methods: The problem of limited bandwidth is solved by a hierarchical sequential detection algorithm that obtains data by progressively transmitting only image regions required for processing. The client sends a request to detect a set of landmarks for region visualization or further analysis. The algorithm running on the data analysis server obtains a coarse level image from the data center and generates landmark location candidates. The candidates are then used to obtain image neighborhood regions at a finer resolution level for further detection. This way, the landmark locations are hierarchically and sequentially detected and refined.

Results: Only image regions surrounding landmark location candidates need to be trans- mitted during detection. Furthermore, the image regions are lossy compressed with JPEG 2000. Together, these properties amount to at least 30 times bandwidth reduction while achieving similar accuracy when compared to an algorithm using the original data.

Conclusions: The hierarchical sequential algorithm with progressive data transmission considerably reduces bandwidth requirements in cloud-based detection systems.

 
  • References

  • 1 Agarwal A, Henehan N, Somashekarappa V, Pandya AS, Kalva H, Furht B. A Cloud Comput-ing Based Patient Centric Medical InformationSystem. In: Furht B, Escalante A. editors. Handbook of Cloud Computing Springer US: 2010: 553-573.
  • 2 Haux R. Health information systems - past, present, future. Int J Med Inform 2006; 75 (3-4) 268-281.
  • 3 Blobel BGME, Engel K, Pharow P. Semantic Interoperability - HL7 Version 3 Compared to Advanced Architecture Standards. Methods Inf Med 2006; 45 (04) 343-353.
  • 4 Faggioni L, Neri E, Castellana C, Caramella D, Bartolozzi C. The future of PACS in healthcare enterprises. European Journal of Radiology 2011; 78 (02) 253-258.
  • 5 Ohmann C, Kuchinke W. Future Developments of Medical Informatics from the Viewpoint of Networked Clinical Research. Methods Inf Med 2009; 48 (01) 45-54.
  • 6 Estrella F, del Frate C, Odeh THRMM. Rogulin D, Amendolia SR, Schottlander D. et al. Resolving Clinicians Queries Across a Grids Infrastructure. Methods Inf Med 2005; 44 (02) 149-153.
  • 7 Handels H, Ehrhardt J. Medical Image Computing for Computer-supported Diagnostics and Therapy. Methods Inf Med 2009; 48 (01) 11-17.
  • 8 Weitzel M, Smith A, de Deugd S, Yates R. A Web 2.0 Model for Patient-Centered Health Informatics Applications. Computer 2010; 43 (07) 43-50.
  • 9 Rosenthal A, Mork P, Li MH, Stanford J, Koester D, Reynolds P. Cloud computing: A new business paradigm for biomedical information sharing. J Biomed Inform 2009; 43: 342-353.
  • 10 Glatard T, Pennec X, Montagnat J. Performance evaluation of grid-enabled registration algorithms using bronze-standards. In: Medical Image Computing and Computer-Assisted Intervention (MICCAI). Lecture Notes in Computer Science 2006: 152-160.
  • 11 Kanade T, Yin Z, Bise R, Huh S, Eom SE, Sandbothe M. et al. Cell Image Analysis: Algorithms, System and Applications. In: IEEE Workshop on Applications of Computer Vision (WACV) 2011
  • 12 Doukas C, Pliakas T, Maglogiannis I. Mobile Healthcare Information Management utilizing Cloud Computing and Android OS. In: Engineering in Medicine and Biology Society (EMBC), 2010 Annual International Conference of the IEEE. Buenos Aires; Argentina: 2010: 1037-1040.
  • 13 Tu Z. Probabilistic Boosting-Tree: Learning Discriminative Models for Classification, Recognition, and Clustering. CVPR 2005; 2: 1589-1596.
  • 14 Viola P, Jones MJ. Rapid object detection using a boosted cascade of simple features. CVPR 2001; 1: 511-518.
  • 15 Schiele PSMFSRB Discriminative structure learning of hierarchical representations for object detection. CVPR 2009: 2238-2245.
  • 16 Samaras WZGZD Real-time Accurate Object Detection using Multiple Resolutions. ICCV 2007
  • 17 Zhu L, Yuille AL. A Hierarchical Compositional System for Rapid Object Detection. NIPS 2005: 1633-1640.
  • 18 Sudderth EB, Torralba A, Freeman WT, Willsky AS. Describing Visual Scenes Using Transformed Objects and Parts. IJCV 2008; 77 (1-3) 291-330.
  • 19 Salembier VVFMP Binary Partition Trees for Object Detection. TIP 2008; 17 (11) 2201-2216.
  • 20 Butko NJ, Movellan JR. Optimal scanning for faster object detection. CVPR 2009: 2751-2758.
  • 21 Sofka M, Zhang J, Zhou SK, Comaniciu D. Multiple Object Detection by Sequential Monte Carlo and Hierarchical Detection Network. In: Proceedings of the IEEE Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition. San Francisco, CA: 2010
  • 22 Schelkens P, Skodras A, Ebrahimi T. JPEG 2000 Suite. John Wiley and Sons; 2009
  • 23 Ringl H, Schernthaner R, Sala E, El-Rabadi K, Weber M, Schima W. et al. Lossy 3D JPEG2000 Compression of Abdominal CT Images in Patients with Acute Abdominal Complaints: Effect of Compression Ratio on Diagnostic Confidence and Accuracy. Radiology 2008; 248: 476-484.
  • 24 Dufaux F, Ebrahimi T. Scrambling for Video Surveillance with Privacy. In: CVPR Workshop 2006
  • 25 Fleck S, Busch F, Biber P, Strasser W. 3D Surveillance A Distributed Network of Smart Cameras for Real-Time. In: CVPR Workshop 2006
  • 26 Schwing A, Zheng Y, Harder M, Comaniciu D. Method and System for Anatomic Landmark Detection Using Constrained Marginal Space Learning and Geometric Inference; 2009. US patent filed. Application number: 12/604,495, Publication number: US 2010/0119137 A1
  • 27 Foran DJ, Meer PP, Papathomas T, Marsic I. Compression guidelines for diagnostic telepathology. Information Technology in Biomedicine, IEEE Transactions on 1997; 1 (01) 55-60.
  • 28 Thielst CB. At the crossroads: NRTRC white paper examines trends driving the convergence of telehealth, EHRs and HIE. World Hosp Health Serv 2010; 46 (04) 17-23.
  • 29 Armbrust M, Fox A, Griffith R, Joseph AD, Katz R, Konwinski A. et al. A view of cloud computing. Commun ACM 2010; 53: 50-58.