Can Self-Reported Personal Audio System Volume Predict Actual Listening Levels in Young Adults?

Abstract

Background:

Most young adults report using personal audio systems (PAS) with earphones as part of their daily activities. PAS exposure is intermittent and research examining the levels these young adults are listening to is increasing. On average, preferred listening levels are below what would be considered at risk in an occupational setting.

Purpose:

The purpose of this study was to evaluate how two questions predicted preferred listening level in young adults with normal hearing; specifically, whether these young adults could identify if they listen at a high level or not.

Study Sample:

One hundred and sixty young adults (111 women, 49 men) with normal hearing completed a questionnaire that had questions about PAS listening habits and then had preferred listening level assessed using a probe microphone system while listening to 1 hour of music through earphones.

Data Collection and Analysis:

Otoscopy, tympanometry, and pure-tone thresholds were completed in a randomly determined test ear. As part of the Risk Factors Survey, two closed-set questions were completed. First, “For a typical day, what is the most common volume used during this day?” with the following response options “Low,” “Medium/Comfortable,” “Loud,” or “Very Loud.” And second, “Do you listen to your personal music system at a volume where you…” with the following response options “Easily hear people,” “Have a little trouble hearing people,” “Have a lot of trouble hearing people,” or “Cannot hear people.” Using a probe microphone, chosen listening level (A-weighted, diffuse-field correction and a conversion to free-field equivalent [L _DFeq]) was calculated over 1 hour while the participant listened to music with earphones. Sensitivity and specificity were determined to see how well young adults could identify themselves as listening at a high level (>85 dBA) or not. Linear regression analyses were performed to determine the amount of variance explained by the two survey questions as predictors of measured L _DFeq.

Results:

Almost half of the participants reported a longest single use of a PAS as <1 hour daily and more than half reported listening at a medium/comfortable volume and had a little trouble hearing people. Mean L _DFeq was 72.5 dBA, with young adult men having a significantly higher mean L _DFeq (76.5 dBA) compared with young adult women (70.8 dBA). Sensitivity was 88.9% and specificity was 70.6% for the question asking about volume on a typical day. For the question asking about being able to hear other people while listening to music sensitivity was 83.3% and specificity was 82.5%. Two variables, listening volume on a typical day and sex, accounted for 28.4% of the variability associated with L _DFeq; the answer to the question asking about being able to hear others and sex accounted for 22.8% of the variability associated with L _DFeq.

Conclusions:

About 11% of young adults in the present study listen to a PAS with earphones at a high level (>85 dBA) while in a quiet background. The participants who do report listening at a high level, however, do well at self-reporting this risk behavior in survey questions.

Key Words

listening levels - risk factors - young adults

• REFERENCES

• Clark K, Sowers M, Wallace RB, Anderson C. 1991; The accuracy of self-reported hearing loss in women aged 60–85 years. Am J Epidemiol 134 (07) 704-708
• Danhauer JL, Johnson CE, Byrd A, DeGood L, Meuel C, Pecile A, Koch LL. 2009; Survey of college students on iPod use and hearing health J Am Acad Audiol 20 (01) 5-27 quiz 83–84
• Dirks DD, Kincaid GE. 1987; Basic acoustic considerations of ear canal probe measurements. Ear Hear 8 (05) (Suppl) 60S-67S
• Epstein M, Marozeau J, Cleveland S. 2010; Listening habits of iPod users. J Speech Lang Hear Res 53 (06) 1472-1477
• Hodgetts WE, Rieger JM, Szarko RA. 2007; The effects of listening environment and earphone style on preferred listening levels of normal hearing adults using an MP3 player. Ear Hear 28 (03) 290-297
• Hoover A, Krishnamurti S. 2010; Survey of college students’ MP3 listening: habits, safety issues, attitudes, and education. Am J Audiol 19 (01) 73-83
• Johnson TA, Cooper S, Stamper GC, Chertoff M. 2017; Noise exposure questionnaire: a tool for quantifying annual noise exposure. J Am Acad Audiol 28 (01) 14-35
• National Institute for Occupational Safety and Health (NIOSH) 1998. Criteria for a Recommended Standard: Occupational Noise Exposure (Revised Criteria 1998). No. 98-126. Cincinnati, OH: US Department of Health and Human Services (NIOSH);
• Nondahl DM, Cruickshanks KJ, Wiley TL, Tweed TS, Klein R, Klein BEK. 1998; Accuracy of self-reported hearing loss. Audiology 37 (05) 295-301
• Occupational Safety & Health Administration (OSHA) 2007. Occupational Noise Exposure Standard (29 CFR 191.25). Code of Federal Regulations. Washington, DC: US Department of Labor;
• Park Y, Guercio D, Ledon V, Le Prell CG. 2017; Variation in music player listening level as a function of campus location. J Am Acad Audiol 28 (04) 295-313
• Torre 3rd P. 2008; Young adults’ use and output level settings of personal music systems. Ear Hear 29 (05) 791-799
• Torre 3rd P, Grace J. 2014; Changes in distortion product otoacoustic emission components after music exposure. J Am Acad Audiol 25 (09) 804-813
• Torre 3rd P, Grace J, Hansen C, Millman P, Martin H. 2013; Gender, music, and distortion product otoacoustic emission components. Ear Hear 34 (06) e74-e81
• Voeks SK, Gallagher CM, Langer EH, Drinka PJ. 1993; Self-reported hearing difficulty and audiometric thresholds in nursing home residents. J Fam Pract 36 (01) 54-58
• Worthington DA, Siegel JH, Wilber LA, Faber BM, Dunckley KT, Garstecki DC, Dhar S. 2009; Comparing two methods to measure preferred listening levels of personal listening devices. J Acoust Soc Am 125 (06) 3733-3741