Examining the Utility of Photovoice as an Audiological Counseling Tool

Abstract

Background:

Photovoice is a participatory action research method in which people take photographs to represent real-world experiences, so that issues of interest/concern can be documented. There are no published studies in which photovoice has been used in audiological rehabilitation (AR). The purpose of this feasibility study was to examine whether photovoice could have application in audiology.

Purpose:

A feasibility study was designed to determine whether photovoice could be adapted for use as a clinical auditory rehabilitation tool (1) to facilitate provision of tailored communication strategy counseling, (2) as a post–hearing aid fitting counseling tool, (3) to enhance communication between partners regarding hearing loss, and (4) to provide an understanding of the emotional impacts of hearing loss.

Research Design:

In this combined qualitative and quantitative feasibility study, a photovoice intervention was given to four groups of participants.

Study Sample:

Twenty-four individuals were recruited from a research subject data repository at the National Center for Rehabilitative Auditory Research.

Data Collection and Analysis:

The study involved two visits to the laboratory during which participants received instruction in photovoice methodology (visit 1) and then, one to two weeks later, discussed their photographs during a debriefing session (visit 2).

Results:

The mean number of photographs taken by participants was 12.6 (range: 4–29); the mean duration of the debriefing sessions was 40:39 min:sec (range: 14:30–66:22 min:sec). Participants reported that participating had made them think more about their hearing problems, appreciate their hearing aids more, and be more aware of the situations in which their hearing aids did and did not help. The taking and discussion of the photographs was also described as a learning tool, and it had facilitated conversations with others about hearing problems. Participants who completed the study with their communication partner (use case 3) said it had assisted with problem-solving and gave insight into the perspective of their partner. The research team noted that photovoice facilitated highly tailored counseling and provision of evidence-based recommendations for hearing assistive technology, enhanced interaction between communication partners, provided insight into participants’ lifestyle and communication needs, and seemed to generate rapport and trust.

Conclusions:

This feasibility study indicated that participants were willing to engage in photovoice and that it could be used to guide selection of rehabilitation recommendations and for postfitting counseling. Its application in audiological practice would seem timely and valuable for improving patient-centered and family-centered AR.

Key Words

auditory rehabilitation - counseling - hearing aids and assistive listening devices - photo voice

This study was supported by funding by the Department of Veterans Affairs (VA), Veterans Health Administration, VA Office of Research and Development award #C9230C.

Aspects of this work were presented at the American Auditory Society Meeting, Scottsdale, AZ, March 1–3, 2018.

The views are those of the authors and do not necessarily represent the position or policy of the US Department of Veterans Affairs or the US government.

• REFERENCES

• Angelo J, Egan R. 2015; Family caregivers voice their needs: a photovoice study. Palliat Support Care 13 (03) 701-712
• Baker TA, Wang CC. 2006; Photovoice: use of a participatory action research method to explore the chronic pain experience in older adults. Qual Health Res 16 (10) 1405-1413
• Bendapudi NM, Berry LL, Frey KA, Parish JT, Rayburn WL. 2006; Patients’ perspectives on ideal physician behaviors. Mayo Clin Proc 81 (03) 338-344
• Bowen DJ, Kreuter M, Spring B, Cofta-Woerpel L, Linnan L, Weiner D, Bakken S, Kaplan CP, Squiers L, Fabrizio C, Fernandez M. 2009; How we design feasibility studies. Am J Prev Med 36 (05) 452-457
• Clark PA. 2003; Medical practices’ sensitivity to patients’ needs: opportunities and practices for improvement. J Ambul Care Manage 26 (02) 110-123
• Clements K. 2012; Participatory action research and photovoice in a psychiatric nursing/clubhouse collaboration exploring recovery narrative. J Psychiatr Ment Health Nurs 19: 785-791
• Davis K, Schoenbaum SC, Collins KS, Tenney K, Hughes DL, Audet AJ. 2002. Room for Improvement: Patients Report on the Quality of Their Health Care. New York, NY: Commonwealth Fund;
• Ekberg K, Grenness C, Hickson L. 2014; a Addressing patients’ psychosocial concerns regarding hearing aids within audiology appointments for older adults. Am J Audiol 23: 337-350
• Ekberg K, Meyer C, Scarinci N, Barr K, Hickson L. 2014; b Disagreements between clients and family members regarding clients’ hearing and rehabilitation within audiology appointments for older adults. J Interactional Res Commun Disord 5: 217-244
• Ekberg K, Meyer C, Scarinci N, Grenness C, Hickson L. 2015; Family member involvement in audiology appointments with older people with hearing impairment. Int J Audiol 54 (02) 70-76
• Gill R, Black A, Dumont T, Fleming N. 2016; Photovoice: a strategy to better understand the reproductive and sexual health needs of young mothers. J Pediatr Adolesc Gynecol 29 (05) 467-475
• Ginicola MM, Smith C, Trzaska J. 2012; Counseling through images: using photography to guide the counseling process and achieve treatment goals. J Creat Ment Health 7: 310-329
• Grenness C, Hickson L, Laplante-Lévesque A, Meyer C, Davidson B. 2015; Communication patterns in audiologic rehabilitation history-taking: audiologists, patients, and their companions. Ear Hear 36 (02) 191-204
• Grenness C, Meyer C, Scarinci N, Ekberg K, Hickson L. 2016; The international classification of functioning, disability and health as a framework for providing patient- and family-centered audiological care for older adults and their significant others. Semin Hear 37 (03) 187-199
• Guerra SR, Rodrigues SP, Demain S, Figueiredo DM, Sousa LX. 2013; Evaluating proFamilies-dementia: adopting photovoice to capture clinical significance. Dementia 12 (05) 569-587
• Habanec OL, Kelly-Campbell RJ. 2015; Outcomes of group audiological rehabilitation for unaided adults with hearing impairment and their significant others. Am J Audiol 24 (01) 40-52
• Hallberg LRM, Barrenäs ML. 1994; Group rehabilitation of middle-aged males with noise-induced hearing loss and their spouses: evaluation of short-and long-term effects. Br J Audiol 28 (02) 71-79
• Houts PS, Doak CC, Doak LG, Loscalzo MJ. 2006; The role of pictures in improving health communication: a review of research on attention, comprehension, recall, and adherence. Patient Educ Couns 61 (02) 173-190
• Kowitt S, Woods-Jaeger B, Lomas J, Taggart T, Thayer L, Sutton S, Lightfoot AF. 2015; Using photovoice to understand barriers to and facilitators of cardiovascular health among African American adults and adolescents, North Carolina, 2011–2012. Prev Chronic Dis 12: E164
• Laplante-Lévesque A, Hickson L, Grenness C. 2014; An Australian survey of audiologists’ preferences for patient-centredness. Int J Audiol 53 (1, Suppl) S76-S82
• Linz S, Hanrahan NP, DeCesaris M, Petros R, Solomon P. 2016; Clinical use of an autovideography intervention to support recovery in individuals with severe mental illness. J Psychosoc Nurs Ment Health Serv 54 (05) 33-40
• Lorenz LS, Chilingerian JA. 2011; Using visual and narrative methods to achieve fair process in clinical care. J Vis Exp 48: e2342
• Meyer C, Scarinci N, Ryan B, Hickson L. 2015; “This is a partnership between all of us”: audiologists’ perceptions of family member involvement in hearing rehabilitation. Am J Audiol 24 (04) 536-548
• Oliffe JL, Bottorff JL. 2007; Further than the eye can see? Photo elicitation and research with men. Qual Health Res 17 (06) 850-858
• Orsmond GI, Cohn ES. 2015; The distinctive features of a feasibility study: objectives and guiding questions. OTJR 35 (03) 169-177
• Poost-Foroosh L, Jennings MB, Cheesman MF. 2015; Comparisons of client and clinician views of the importance of factors in client-clinician interaction in hearing aid purchase decisions. J Am Acad Audiol 26 (03) 247-259
• Pryce H, Hall A, Laplante-Lévesque A, Clark E. 2016; A qualitative investigation of decision making during help-seeking for adult hearing loss. Int J Audiol 55 (11) 658-665
• Rosen D, Goodkind S, Smith ML. 2011; Using photovoice to identify service needs of older African American methadone clients. J Soc Serv Res 37 (05) 526-538
• Sackett CR, Jenkins AM. 2015; Photovoice: fulfilling the call for advocacy in the counseling field. J Creat Ment Health 10: 376-385
• Safran DG, Taira DA, Rogers WH, Kosinski M, Ware JE, Tarlov AR. 1998; Linking primary care performance to outcomes of care. J Fam Pract 47 (03) 213-220
• Sandelowski M. 2000; Whatever happened to qualitative description?. Res Nurs Health 23 (04) 334-340
• Saunders GH, Frederick MT, Silverman SC, Nielsen C, Laplante-Lévesque A. 2017; Development and pilot evaluation of a novel theory-based intervention to encourage help seeking for adult hearing loss. J Am Acad Audiol 28 (10) 920-931
• Sciacca A, Meyer C, Ekberg K, Barr C, Hickson L. 2017; Exploring audiologists’ language and hearing aid uptake in initial rehabilitation appointments. Am J Audiol 26 (02) 110-118
• Singh G, Hickson L, English K, Scherpiet S, Lemke U, Timmer B, Buerkli-Halevy O, Montano J, Preminger J, Scarinci N, Saunders G, Jennings MB, Launer S. 2016; Family-centered adult audiologic care: a phonak position statement. Hear Rev 23 (04) 16
• True G, Rigg KK, Butler A. 2015; Understanding barriers to mental health care for recent war veterans through photovoice. Qual Health Res 25 (10) 1443-1455
• Wanzer MB, Booth-Butterfield M, Gruber K. 2004; Perceptions of health care providers’ communication: relationships between patient-centered communication and satisfaction. Health Commun 16 (03) 363-384