Download PDF
J Am Acad Audiol 2020; 31(06): 393-403
DOI: 10.3766/jaaa.19056
Research Article
American Academy of Audiology. All rights reserved. (2020) American Academy of Audiology

Preliminary Examination of the Accuracy of a Fall Detection Device Embedded into Hearing Instruments

Justin R. Burwinkel
1   Starkey Hearing Technologies, Eden Prairie, MN
,
Buye Xu
1   Starkey Hearing Technologies, Eden Prairie, MN
,
Jeff Crukley
1   Starkey Hearing Technologies, Eden Prairie, MN
› Author Affiliations Funding This study received financial support from Starkey Hearing Technologies.
Further Information

Publication History

Publication Date:
03 August 2020 (online)

   Permissions and Reprints

Abstract

Background Accidental falls are a significant health risk to older adults and patients seen in audiology clinics. Personal emergency response systems are effective in preventing long lies (defined as remaining on the floor or ground for greater than one hour after a fall), but some individuals would prefer to wear less-conspicuous devices than a traditional neck-worn pendant. No previous investigation has compared the accuracy of head-worn fall detection devices with those worn on other parts of the body. In this study, we compared the accuracy of one commonly used fall detection pendant with two variants of a new hearing instrument-based fall detection system.

Purpose The purpose of the study was to evaluate the accuracy of detecting falls by using inertial sensors embedded in hearing instruments.

Research Design A study with repeated measures for one group.

Study Sample Ten young adults served as participants. All participants had normal or corrected-to-normal vision during testing. Individuals were excluded if they had self-reported cardiac disorders, recent concussions, or musculoskeletal conditions.

Data Collection and Analysis Data were collected from inertial measurement unit (IMU) sensors, embedded into a binaural set of hearing instruments, during laboratory-based simulations of falls, near-falls, and activities of daily living (ADLs). The detection state of a fall detection pendant was simultaneously recorded during performance of each trial and compared with the outputs of offline hearing instrument firmware emulators.

Results One hearing instrument-based fall detection system was more accurate than the fall detection pendant. A second hearing instrument-based fall detection system performed similar to the fall detection pendant. Each of the three fall detection systems investigated were robust against false-positive detections during ADLs.

Conclusions Preliminary findings demonstrate that hearing instruments embedded with a fall detection device (FDD) may be a suitable alternative to more traditional forms of FDDs (e.g., pendant, wrist-worn device, etc.) for detecting falls and potentially preventing long lies.

Keywords

accelerometry - accidental falls - activities of daily living - adult - hearing aids and assistive listening devices - motion
 

  • References

  • 1 Agmon M, Lavie L, Doumas M. The association between hearing loss, postural control, and mobility in older adults: a systematic review. J Am Acad Audiol 2017; 28: 575-588
    Article in Thieme ConnectPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 2 Aguiar B, Rocha T, Silva J, Sousa I. Accelerometer-based fall detection for smartphones. . In: 2014 IEEE International Symposium on Medical Measurements and Applications (MeMeA). Lisboa, Portugal 1-6 . Doi: 10.1109/MeMeA.2014.6860110
    Google Scholar
  • 3 Aziz O, Park EJ, Mori G, Robinovitch SN. Distinguishing the causes of falls in humans using an array of wearable tri-axial accelerometers. Gait Posture 2014; 39: 506-512
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 4 Bagala F, Becker C, Cappello A, Chiari L, Aminian K, Hausdorff JM, Zijlstra W, Klenk J. Evaluation of accelerometer-based fall detection algorithms on real-world falls. PLoS One 2012; 07: e37062
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 5 Berg R, Cassells J. , eds. Falls in older persons risk factors and prevention. In: Second Fifty Years: Promoting Health and Preventing Disability. Washington, DC: National Academies Press; 1992: 263-290 . https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/books/NBK235613/ . Accessed February 2, 2019.
    Google Scholar
  • 6 Bergen G, Stevens MR, Burns ER. Falls and fall injuries among adults aged $65 years-United States, 2014. MMWR Morb Mortal Wkly Rep 2016; 65: 993-998
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 7 Bourke AK, van de Ven P, Gamble M, O’ Connor R, Murphy K, Bogan E, McQuade E, Finucane P, ÓLaighin G, Nelson J. Evaluation of waist-mounted tri-axial accelerometer based fall-detection algorithms during scripted and continuous unscripted activities. J Biomech 2010; 43: 3051-3057
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 8 Chaudhuri S, Kneale L, Le T, Phelan E, Rosenberg D, Thompson H, Demiris G. Older adults’ perceptions of fall detection devices. J Appl Gerontol 2017; 36: 915-930
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 9 Choi WJ, Robinovitch SN, Ross SA, Phan J, Cipriani D. Effect of neck flexor muscle activation on impact velocity of the head during backward falls in young adults. Clin Biomech 2017; 49: 28-33
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 10 Choi WJ, Wakeling JM, Robinovitch SN. Kinematic analysis of video-captured falls experienced by older adults in long-term care. J Biomech 2015; 48: 911-920
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 11 Cola G, Avvenuti M, Piazza P, Vecchio A. Fall detection using a head-worn barometer. In: Perego P, Andreoni G, Rizzo G. , eds. Vol. 192. Wireless Mobile Communication and Healthcare. Heidelberg, Germany: Springer International Publishing; 2017: 217-224
    Google Scholar
  • 12 Criter RE, Honaker JA. Audiology patient fall statistics and risk factors compared to non-audiology patients. Int J Audiol 2016; 55: 564-570
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 13 Demiris G, Hensel BK, Skubic M, Rantz M. Senior residents’ perceived need of and preferences for ’’smart home’’ sensor technologies. Int J Technol Assess Health Care 2008; 24: 120-124
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 14 Fleming J, Brayne C. ; Cambridge City over-75s Cohort (CC75C) Study Collaboration. Inability to get up after falling, subsequent time on floor, and summoning help: prospective cohort study in people over 90. BMJ 2008; 337: a2227
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 15 Harvey LA, Close JCT. Traumatic brain injury in older adults: characteristics, causes and consequences. Injury 2012; 43: 1821-1826
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 16 Igual R, Medrano C, Plaza I. Challenges, issues and trends in fall detection systems. Biomed Eng Online 2013; 12: 66
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 17 Ingebrigtsen T, Mortensen K, Romner B. The epidemiology of hospital-referred head injury in Northern Norway. Neuroepidemiology 1998; 17: 139-146
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 18 Kangas M, Vikman I, Nyberg L, Korpelainen R, Lindblom J, Jamsa T. Comparison of real-life accidental falls in older people with experimental falls in middle-aged test subjects. Gait Posture 2012; 35: 500-505
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 19 Kim H, Hirano H, Edahiro A, Ohara Y, Watanabe Y, Kojima N, Kim M, Hosoi E, Yoshida Y, Yoshida H, Shinkai S. Sarcopenia: prevalence and associated factors based on different suggested definitions in community-dwelling older adults. Geriatr Gerontol Int 2016; 16: 110-122
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 20 Li Y, Zeng Z, Popescu M, Ho KC. Acoustic fall detection using a circular microphone array. Conf Proc IEEE Eng Med Biol Soc 2010; 2010: 2242-2245
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 21 Lin FR, Ferrucci L. Hearing loss and falls among older adults in the United States. Arch Intern Med 2012; 172: 369-371
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 22 Lindemann U, Hock A, Stuber M, Keck W, Becker C. Evaluation of a fall detector based on accelerometers: a pilot study. Med Biol Eng Comput 2005; 43: 548-551
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 23 Lipsitz LA, Tchalla AE, Iloputaife I, Gagnon M, Dole K, Su ZZ, Klickstein L. Evaluation of an automated falls detection device in nursing home residents. J Am Geriatr Soc 2016; 64: 365-368
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 24 MATLAB. version 9.4 (R2018a). Natick, MA: The MathWorks Inc.; 2018
    Google Scholar
  • 25 Philips Lifeline. Philips Lifeline AutoAlert Help Button: Instructions for Use. Rev 07. Framingham, MA: Philips Lifeline; 2013
    Google Scholar
  • 26 Project Catalyst and HITLAB. Designing Technology for Caregivers: Understanding What Works and Doesn’t. AARP Research. 2018. https://www.aarp.org/research/topics/care/info-2018/designing-technology-caregivers.html . Accessed November 9, 2018
    Google Scholar
  • 27 R Core Team. R: A Language and Environment for Statistical Computing; Vienna, Austria: R Foundation for Statistical Computing; 2018. https://www.R-project.org/ . Accessed April 9, 2019
  • 28 Rauterkus EP, Palmer CV. The hearing aid effect in 2013. J Am Acad Audiol 2014; 25: 893-903
    Article in Thieme ConnectPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 29 Revelle W. . psych: Procedures for Psychological, Psychometric, and Personality Research. Evanston, IL: Northwestern University; 2018. . https://CRAN.R-project.org/package=psych . Accessed April 9, 2019
  • 30 Robinovitch SN, Feldman F, Yang Y, Schonnop R, Leung PM, Sarraf T, Sims-Gould J, Loughin M. Video capture of the circumstances of falls in elderly people residing in long-term care: an observational study. Lancet 2013; 381: 47-54
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 31 Rougier C, Meunier J, St-Arnaud A, Rousseau J. Fall detection from human shape and motion history using video surveillance. 21st International Conference on Advanced Information Networking and Applications Workshops (AINAW’07), Niagara Falls, Ontario, Canada, Vol. 2, 2007; 02: 875-880
    Google Scholar
  • 32 Rubenstein LZ. Falls in older people: epidemiology, risk factors and strategies for prevention. Age Ageing 2006; 35 (02) ii37-ii41
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 33 Teo DB, Wong HC, Yeo AW, Lai YW, Choo EL, Merchant RA. Characteristics of fall-related traumatic brain injury in older adults. Intern Med J 2018; 48: 1048-1055
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 34 Tinetti ME, Kumar C. The patient who falls: “It’s always a trade-off.”. JAMA 2010; 303: 258-266
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 35 Tinetti ME, Liu W-L, Claus EB. Predictors and prognosis of inability to get up after falls among elderly persons. JAMA 1993; 269: 65-70
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar