CC BY-NC-ND 4.0 · Eur J Dent 2015; 09(01): 041-046
DOI: 10.4103/1305-7456.149638
Original Article
Dental Investigation Society

The effects of different nickel-titanium instruments on dentinal microcrack formations during root canal preparation

Yakup Ustun
1   Department of Endodontics, Faculty of Dentistry, Erciyes University, Kayseri, Turkiye
,
Tugrul Aslan
1   Department of Endodontics, Faculty of Dentistry, Erciyes University, Kayseri, Turkiye
,
Burak Sagsen
1   Department of Endodontics, Faculty of Dentistry, Erciyes University, Kayseri, Turkiye
,
Bertan Kesim
1   Department of Endodontics, Faculty of Dentistry, Erciyes University, Kayseri, Turkiye
› Author Affiliations
Further Information

Publication History

Publication Date:
04 September 2019 (online)

ABSTRACT

Objective: The aim of the present study was to investigate the incidence of dentinal microcracks caused by different preparation techniques. Materials and Methods: 120 extracted human mandibular incisor teeth were divided into five experimental groups and one control group (n = 20): Group 1: Hand preparation with balanced force technique up to #25 K-file. Group 2: Preparation with only ProTaper F2 instrument in a reciprocating movement. Group 3: Preparation with Reciproc R25 instrument in a reciprocating movement. Group 4: Preparation with ProTaper instruments up to F2 instrument. Group 5: Preparation with ProTaper Next instruments up to X2 instrument. No procedure was applied to control group. The roots were sectioned horizontally at 3, 6 and 9 mm from the apex and examined. Absence or presence of dentinal microcracks was noted. Results: The Chi-square test was performed to compare the appearance of cracked roots between all groups. There were no significant differences among the groups (P > 0.05). Conclusions: In conclusion, except the hand file and control group, all experimental groups showed microcrack formations.

 
  • REFERENCES

  • 1 Arslan H, Barutcigil C, Karatas E, Topcuoglu HS, Yeter KY, Ersoy I. et al. Effect of citric acid irrigation on the fracture resistance of endodontically treated roots. Eur J Dent 2014; 8: 74-8
  • 2 Ertas H, Sagsen B, Arslan H, Er O, Ertas ET. Effects of physical and morphological properties of roots on fracture resistance. Eur J Dent 2014; 8: 261-4
  • 3 Wilcox LR, Roskelley C, Sutton T. The relationship of root canal enlargement to finger-spreader induced vertical root fracture. J Endod 1997; 23: 533-4
  • 4 Ferraz CC, Gomes NV, Gomes BP, Zaia AA, Teixeira FB, Souza-Filho FJ. Apical extrusion of debris and irrigants using two hand and three engine-driven instrumentation techniques. Int Endod J 2001; 34: 354-8
  • 5 Walia HM, Brantley WA, Gerstein H. An initial investigation of the bending and torsional properties of Nitinol root canal files. J Endod 1988; 14: 346-51
  • 6 Blum JY, Machtou P, Ruddle C, Micallef JP. Analysis of mechanical preparations in extracted teeth using ProTaper rotary instruments: Value of the safety quotient. J Endod 2003; 29: 567-75
  • 7 Shemesh H, van Soest G, Wu MK, Wesselink PR. Diagnosis of vertical root fractures with optical coherence tomography. J Endod 2008; 34: 739-42
  • 8 Bürklein S, Hinschitza K, Dammaschke T, Schäfer E. Shaping ability and cleaning effectiveness of two single-file systems in severely curved root canals of extracted teeth: Reciproc and WaveOne versus Mtwo and ProTaper. Int Endod J 2012; 45: 449-61
  • 9 Roane JB, Sabala CL, Duncanson Jr MG. The “balanced force” concept for instrumentation of curved canals. J Endod 1985; 11: 203-11
  • 10 Yared G. Canal preparation using only one Ni-Ti rotary instrument: Preliminary observations. Int Endod J 2008; 41: 339-44
  • 11 De-Deus G, Brandão MC, Barino B, Di Giorgi K, Fidel RA, Luna AS. Assessment of apically extruded debris produced by the single-file ProTaper F2 technique under reciprocating movement. Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol Endod 2010; 110: 390-4
  • 12 De-Deus G, Moreira EJ, Lopes HP, Elias CN. Extended cyclic fatigue life of F2 ProTaper instruments used in reciprocating movement. Int Endod J 2010; 43: 1063-8
  • 13 De-Deus G, Barino B, Zamolyi RQ, Souza E, Fonseca Jr A, Fidel S. et al. Suboptimal debridement quality produced by the single-file F2 ProTaper technique in oval-shaped canals. J Endod 2010; 36: 1897-900
  • 14 Alapati SB, Brantley WA, Svec TA, Powers JM, Mitchell JC. Scanning electron microscope observations of new and used nickel-titanium rotary files. J Endod 2003; 29: 667-9
  • 15 You SY, Bae KS, Baek SH, Kum KY, Shon WJ, Lee W. Lifespan of one nickel-titanium rotary file with reciprocating motion in curved root canals. J Endod 2010; 36: 1991-4
  • 16 Liu R, Hou BX, Wesselink PR, Wu MK, Shemesh H. The incidence of root microcracks caused by 3 different single-file systems versus the ProTaper system. J Endod 2013; 39: 1054-6
  • 17 Fidler A. Kinematics of 2 reciprocating endodontic motors: The difference between actual and set values. J Endod 2014; 40: 990-4
  • 18 Shemesh H, Bier CA, Wu MK, Tanomaru-Filho M, Wesselink PR. The effects of canal preparation and filling on the incidence of dentinal defects. Int Endod J 2009; 42: 208-13
  • 19 Bier CA, Shemesh H, Tanomaru-Filho M, Wesselink PR, Wu MK. The ability of different nickel-titanium rotary instruments to induce dentinal damage during canal preparation. J Endod 2009; 35: 236-8
  • 20 Yoldas O, Yilmaz S, Atakan G, Kuden C, Kasan Z. Dentinal microcrack formation during root canal preparations by different NiTi rotary instruments and the self-adjusting file. J Endod 2012; 38: 232-5
  • 21 Shemesh H, Roeleveld AC, Wesselink PR, Wu MK. Damage to root dentin during retreatment procedures. J Endod 2011; 37: 63-6
  • 22 Varela-Patiño P, Ibañez-Párraga A, Rivas-Mundiña B, Cantatore G, Otero XL, Martin-Biedma B. Alternating versus continuous rotation: A comparative study of the effect on instrument life. J Endod 2010; 36: 157-9
  • 23 Franco V, Fabiani C, Taschieri S, Malentacca A, Bortolin M, Del Fabbro M. Investigation on the shaping ability of nickel-titanium files when used with a reciprocating motion. J Endod 2011; 37: 1398-401
  • 24 Bürklein S, Schäfer E. Apically extruded debris with reciprocating single-file and full-sequence rotary instrumentation systems. J Endod 2012; 38: 850-2
  • 25 Bürklein S, Tsotsis P, Schäfer E. Incidence of dentinal defects after root canal preparation: Reciprocating versus rotary instrumentation. J Endod 2013; 39: 501-4
  • 26 Kansal R, Rajput A, Talwar S, Roongta R, Verma M. Assessment of dentinal damage during canal preparation using reciprocating and rotary files. J Endod 2014; 40: 1443-6
  • 27 Wu MK, R'oris A, Barkis D, Wesselink PR. Prevalence and extent of long oval canals in the apical third. Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol Endod 2000; 89: 739-43
  • 28 Capar ID, Arslan H, Akcay M, Uysal B. Effects of ProTaper Universal, ProTaper Next, and HyFlex instruments on crack formation in dentin. J Endod 2014; 40: 1482-4
  • 29 Versluis A, Messer HH, Pintado MR. Changes in compaction stress distributions in roots resulting from canal preparation. Int Endod J 2006; 39: 931-9
  • 30 De-Deus G, Silva EJ, Marins J, Souza E, Neves AdeA, Gonçalves BelladonnaF. et al. Lack of causal relationship between dentinal microcracks and root canal preparation with reciprocation systems. J Endod 2014; 40: 1447-50