CC BY-NC-ND 4.0 · Journal of Digestive Endoscopy 2018; 09(01): 006-009
DOI: 10.4103/jde.JDE_49_17
Original Article
Society of Gastrointestinal Endoscopy of India

Endoscopic Ultrasound-Guided Choledochoduodenostomy for Biliary Drainage in Patients with Lower End Common Bile Duct Block: A Single-Center Experience

Vikas Singla
Institute of Liver, Gastroenterology and Pancreaticobiliary Sciences, Sir Ganga Ram Hospital, New Delhi, India
,
Ritesh Prajapati
Institute of Liver, Gastroenterology and Pancreaticobiliary Sciences, Sir Ganga Ram Hospital, New Delhi, India
,
Shrihari Anil Anikhindi
Institute of Liver, Gastroenterology and Pancreaticobiliary Sciences, Sir Ganga Ram Hospital, New Delhi, India
,
Mandhir Kumar
Institute of Liver, Gastroenterology and Pancreaticobiliary Sciences, Sir Ganga Ram Hospital, New Delhi, India
,
Ashish Kumar
Institute of Liver, Gastroenterology and Pancreaticobiliary Sciences, Sir Ganga Ram Hospital, New Delhi, India
,
Praveen Sharma
Institute of Liver, Gastroenterology and Pancreaticobiliary Sciences, Sir Ganga Ram Hospital, New Delhi, India
,
Naresh Bansal
Institute of Liver, Gastroenterology and Pancreaticobiliary Sciences, Sir Ganga Ram Hospital, New Delhi, India
,
Anil Arora
Institute of Liver, Gastroenterology and Pancreaticobiliary Sciences, Sir Ganga Ram Hospital, New Delhi, India
› Institutsangaben
Weitere Informationen

Publikationsverlauf

Publikationsdatum:
19. September 2019 (online)

Abstract

Objective: Endoscopic ultrasound (EUS)-guided biliary drainage is evolving as an alternative technique in patients with failed endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography. The objective of this study was to find out the outcome of EUS-guided choledochoduodenostomy in patients with malignant mid and lower end biliary obstruction with inaccessible papilla presenting at our center. Methods: The present study was a single-center prospective observational study. Data of all the patients who underwent choledochoduodensotomy from January 2014 to December 2015 were recorded. Outcome measures were technical success and clinical success. Technical success was defined as successful placement of stent in the biliary system; clinical success was defined as 50% reduction in bilirubin at 2 weeks. Complications during the procedure and follow-up were recorded. Results: A total of 10 patients underwent EUS-guided choledochoduodenostomy. Cause of biliary obstruction was pancreatic cancer in eight patients, two patients had carcinoma gallbladder with mid-common bile duct (CBD) block due to compression by metastatic lymph nodes, and one patient had ampullary carcinoma. Mean bilirubin value was 16.4 mg/dL (±3.2 mg/dL). Technical and clinical success were 100% and 90%, respectively. No immediate procedure-related complication was noticed. Two patients had stent migration during the follow-up. Conclusion: EUS-guided choledochoduodenostomy is an effective and safe alternative for rescuing biliary drainage in patients with mid and lower end malignant CBD block with inaccessible papilla.

 
  • REFERENCES

  • 1 Schöfl R. Diagnostic endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography. Endoscopy 2001; 33: 147-57
  • 2 Park DH, Koo JE, Oh J, Lee YH, Moon SH, Lee SS. et al. EUS-guided biliary drainage with one-step placement of a fully covered metal stent for malignant biliary obstruction: A prospective feasibility study. Am J Gastroenterol 2009; 104: 2168-74
  • 3 Bories E, Pesenti C, Caillol F, Lopes C, Giovannini M. Transgastric endoscopic ultrasonography-guided biliary drainage: Results of a pilot study. Endoscopy 2007; 39: 287-91
  • 4 Winick AB, Waybill PN, Venbrux AC. Complications of percutaneous transhepatic biliary interventions. Tech Vasc Interv Radiol 2001; 4: 200-6
  • 5 Wiersema MJ, Sandusky D, Carr R, Wiersema LM, Erdel WC, Frederick PK. et al. Endosonography-guided cholangiopancreatography. Gastrointest Endosc 1996; 43: 102-6
  • 6 Terruzzi V, Radaelli F, Meucci G, Minoli G. Is the supine position as safe and effective as the prone position for endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography? A prospective randomized study. Endoscopy 2005; 37: 1211-4
  • 7 Sharma M, Pathak A, Shoukat A, Rameshbabu CS, Ajmera A, Wani ZA. et al. Imaging of common bile duct by linear endoscopic ultrasound. World J Gastrointest Endosc 2015; 7: 1170-80
  • 8 ASGE Technology Committee. Siddiqui UD, Banerjee S, Barth B, Chauhan SS, Gottlieb KT. et al. Tools for endoscopic stricture dilation. Gastrointest Endosc 2013; 78: 391-404
  • 9 Giovannini M, Moutardier V, Pesenti C, Bories E, Lelong B, Delpero JR. et al. Endoscopic ultrasound-guided bilioduodenal anastomosis: A new technique for biliary drainage. Endoscopy 2001; 33: 898-900
  • 10 Dhir V, Itoi T, Khashab MA, Park DH, Yuen Bun Teoh A, Attam R. et al. Multicenter comparative evaluation of endoscopic placement of expandable metal stents for malignant distal common bile duct obstruction by ERCP or EUS-guided approach. Gastrointest Endosc 2015; 81: 913-23
  • 11 Artifon EL, Aparicio D, Paione JB, Lo SK, Bordini A, Rabello C. et al. Biliary drainage in patients with unresectable, malignant obstruction where ERCP fails: Endoscopic ultrasonography-guided choledochoduodenostomy versus percutaneous drainage. J Clin Gastroenterol 2012; 46: 768-74
  • 12 Bapaye A, Dubale N, Aher A. Comparison of endosonography-guided vs. Percutaneous biliary stenting when papilla is inaccessible for ERCP. United European Gastroenterol J 2013; 1: 285-93
  • 13 Artifon EL, Marson FP, Gaidhane M, Kahaleh M, Otoch JP. Hepaticogastrostomy or choledochoduodenostomy for distal malignant biliary obstruction after failed ERCP: Is there any difference?. Gastrointest Endosc 2015; 81: 950-9
  • 14 Dhir V, Artifon EL, Gupta K, Vila JJ, Maselli R, Frazao M. et al. Multicenter study on endoscopic ultrasound-guided expandable biliary metal stent placement: Choice of access route, direction of stent insertion, and drainage route. Dig Endosc 2014; 26: 430-5
  • 15 Park DH, Jang JW, Lee SS, Seo DW, Lee SK, Kim MH. et al. EUS-guided biliary drainage with transluminal stenting after failed ERCP: Predictors of adverse events and long-term results. Gastrointest Endosc 2011; 74: 1276-84