CC BY-NC 4.0 · Arch Plast Surg 2013; 40(06): 705-710
DOI: 10.5999/aps.2013.40.6.705
Original Article

An Analytical Study of Mammalian Bite Wounds Requiring Inpatient Management

Young-Geun Lee
Department of Plastic Surgery, Korea University Guro Hospital, Korea University College of Medicine, Seoul, Korea
,
Seong-Ho Jeong
Department of Plastic Surgery, Korea University Guro Hospital, Korea University College of Medicine, Seoul, Korea
,
Woo-Kyung Kim
Department of Plastic Surgery, Korea University Guro Hospital, Korea University College of Medicine, Seoul, Korea
› Author Affiliations

Background Mammalian bite injuries create a public health problem because of their frequency, potential severity, and increasing number. Some researchers have performed fragmentary analyses of bite wounds caused by certain mammalian species. However, little practical information is available concerning serious mammalian bite wounds that require hospitalization and intensive wound management. Therefore, the purpose of this study was to perform a general review of serious mammalian bite wounds.

Methods We performed a retrospective review of the medical charts of 68 patients who were referred to our plastic surgery department for the treatment of bite wounds between January 2003 and October 2012. The cases were analyzed according to the species, patient demographics, environmental factors, injury characteristics, and clinical course.

Results Among the 68 cases of mammalian bite injury, 58 (85%) were caused by dogs, 8 by humans, and 2 by cats. Most of those bitten by a human and both of those bitten by cats were male. Only one-third of all the patients were children or adolescents. The most frequent site of injury was the face, with 40 cases, followed by the hand, with 16 cases. Of the 68 patients, 7 were treated with secondary intention healing. Sixty-one patients underwent delayed procedures, including delayed direct closure, skin graft, composite graft, and local flap.

Conclusions Based on overall findings from our review of the 68 cases of mammalian bites, we suggest practical guidelines for the management of mammalian bite injuries, which could be useful in the treatment of serious mammalian bite wounds.



Publication History

Received: 21 May 2013

Accepted: 02 August 2013

Article published online:
01 May 2022

© 2013. The Korean Society of Plastic and Reconstructive Surgeons. This is an open access article published by Thieme under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial License, permitting unrestricted noncommercial use, distribution, and reproduction so long as the original work is given appropriate credit. Contents may not be used for commercial purposes. (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/)

Thieme Medical Publishers, Inc.
333 Seventh Avenue, 18th Floor, New York, NY 10001, USA

 
  • REFERENCES

  • 1 Wolff KD. Management of animal bite injuries of the face: experience with 94 patients. J Oral Maxillofac Surg 1998; 56: 838-843
  • 2 Leung AK, Robson WL. Human bites in children. Pediatr Emerg Care 1992; 8: 255-257
  • 3 Griego RD, Rosen T, Orengo IF. et al. Dog, cat, and human bites: a review. J Am Acad Dermatol 1995; 33: 1019-1029
  • 4 Schultz RC, McMaster WC. The treatment of dog bite injuries, especially those of the face. Plast Reconstr Surg 1972; 49: 494-500
  • 5 Kim SH, You JY, Ryu JY. A comparison of characteristics in dog bite patients. J Korean Soc Traumatol 2005; 18: 135-140
  • 6 Song WJ, Choi HJ, Kang SG. Vacuum assisted closure therapy in snake bite wound: preliminary report. J Korean Soc Plast Reconstr Surg 2011; 38: 121-126
  • 7 Kizer KW. Epidemiologic and clinical aspects of animal bite injuries. JACEP 1979; 8: 134-141
  • 8 Kesting MR, Holzle F, Pox C. et al. Animal bite injuries to the head: 132 cases. Br J Oral Maxillofac Surg 2006; 44: 235-239
  • 9 Bernardo LM, Gardner MJ, Amon N. Dog bites in children admitted to Pennsylvania trauma centers. Int J Trauma Nurs 1998; 4: 121-127
  • 10 Marr JS, Beck AM, Lugo Jr JA. An epidemiologic study of the human bite. Public Health Rep 1979; 94: 514-521
  • 11 Parrish HM, Clack FB, Brobst D. et al. Epidemiology of dog bites. Public Health Rep 1959; 74: 891-903
  • 12 Stefanopoulos PK, Tarantzopoulou AD. Facial bite wounds: management update. Int J Oral Maxillofac Surg 2005; 34: 464-472
  • 13 MacBean CE, Taylor DM, Ashby K. Animal and human bite injuries in Victoria, 1998-2004. Med J Aust 2007; 186: 38-40
  • 14 Scarcella JV. Management of bites. Early definitive repair of bite wounds. Ohio State Med J 1969; 65: 25-31
  • 15 Snook R. Dog bites man. Br Med J (Clin Res Ed) 1982; 284: 293-294
  • 16 Palmer J, Rees M. Dog bites of the face: a 15 year review. Br J Plast Surg 1983; 36: 315-318
  • 17 Goldstein EJ, Citron DM, Wield B. et al. Bacteriology of human and animal bite wounds. J Clin Microbiol 1978; 8: 667-672
  • 18 Dire DJ. Emergency management of dog and cat bite wounds. Emerg Med Clin North Am 1992; 10: 719-736
  • 19 Maimaris C, Quinton DN. Dog-bite lacerations: a controlled trial of primary wound closure. Arch Emerg Med 1988; 5: 156-161
  • 20 Callaham M. Dog bite wounds. JAMA 1980; 244: 2327-2328
  • 21 Chambers GH, Payne JF. Treatment of dog-bite wounds. Minn Med 1969; 52: 427-430
  • 22 Perron AD, Miller MD, Brady WJ. Orthopedic pitfalls in the ED: fight bite. Am J Emerg Med 2002; 20: 114-117
  • 23 Earley MJ, Bardsley AF. Human bites: a review. Br J Plast Surg 1984; 37: 458-462
  • 24 Crikelair GF, Bates GS. Human bites of head and neck. Am J Surg 1950; 80: 645-648