CC BY-NC 4.0 · Arch Plast Surg 2016; 43(01): 128-129
DOI: 10.5999/aps.2016.43.1.128
Erratum

Erratum: Scar Revision Surgery: The Patient's Perspective

Benjamin H Miranda
Department of Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery, Royal Free London NHS Foundation Trust, Royal Free Hospital, London, UK
,
Anna Y Allan
Department of Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery, Royal Free London NHS Foundation Trust, Royal Free Hospital, London, UK
,
Daniel P Butler
Department of Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery, Royal Free London NHS Foundation Trust, Royal Free Hospital, London, UK
,
Paul D Cussons
Department of Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery, Royal Free London NHS Foundation Trust, Royal Free Hospital, London, UK
› Author Affiliations

Arch Plast Surg 2015;42:729-34. http://dx.doi.org/10.5999/aps.2015.42.6.729

This erratum is being published to correct the printing errors on page 730, 732, and 733.

1. In page 730, 16th line of the 'RESULTS', the value (24.45%) should have been (24.64%).

Before correction

When stratified by sex, females (85.52%) were more likely than males (75.36%) to report better satisfaction outcomes, hence males (24.45%) were more likely to report worse or no change in outcome vs. females (14.48%) (P<0.05) (Table 2).


#

After correction

When stratified by sex, females (85.52%) were more likely than males (75.36%) to report better satisfaction outcomes, hence males (24.64% ) were more likely to report worse or no change in outcome vs. females (14.48%) (P<0.05) (Table 2).


#
#

2. In page 732, the last line of right column, (Table 2) should have been '(Table 3)'.

Before correction

Pathogenesis sub-analysis by sex indicated that females (83.96%) who sustained scars in the elective setting were more likely to report better outcomes than males (63.83%) (P<0.01), hence males (36.17%) were more likely to report no change or worse outcomes versus females (16.04%) (P<0.01) (Table 2).


#

After correction

Pathogenesis sub-analysis by sex indicated that females (83.96%) who sustained scars in the elective setting were more likely to report better outcomes than males (63.83%) (P<0.01), hence males (36.17%) were more likely to report no change or worse outcomes versus females (16.04%) (P<0.01) (Table 3 ).


#
#

3. In page 732, the last (bottom right) graph of (Fig. 3) representing 'Overall' should have been as following one. The overall worse scar revision outcomes in elective setting should indicate 2.61% as described in the figure legend.

Before correction

Zoom Image

#

After correction

Zoom Image

#
#

4. In page 733, 3rd line of the left column, (Table 2) should have been '(Table 3)'.

Before correction

Furthermore, in the elective setting males (29.79%) were more likely than females (15.09%) to report no change in outcome (P=0.03) (Table 2).


#

After correction

Furthermore, in the elective setting males (29.79%) were more likely than females (15.09%) to report no change in outcome (P=0.03) (Table 3 ).


#
#

5. In page 733, 4th line of the left column, (Table 2) should have been '(Table 3)'.

Before correction

No inter-sex differences were demonstrated in the traumatic setting (Table 2).


#
#

After correction

No inter-sex differences were demonstrated in the traumatic setting (Table 3 ).


#

Publication History

Article published online:
20 April 2022

© 2016. The Korean Society of Plastic and Reconstructive Surgeons. This is an open access article published by Thieme under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial License, permitting unrestricted noncommercial use, distribution, and reproduction so long as the original work is given appropriate credit. Contents may not be used for commercial purposes. (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/)

Thieme Medical Publishers, Inc.
333 Seventh Avenue, 18th Floor, New York, NY 10001, USA