Subscribe to RSS
Download PDF
DOI: 10.5999/aps.2016.43.1.128
Erratum: Scar Revision Surgery: The Patient's Perspective
Arch Plast Surg 2015;42:729-34. http://dx.doi.org/10.5999/aps.2015.42.6.729
This erratum is being published to correct the printing errors on page 730, 732, and 733.
1. In page 730, 16th line of the 'RESULTS', the value (24.45%) should have been (24.64%).
Before correction
When stratified by sex, females (85.52%) were more likely than males (75.36%) to report better satisfaction outcomes, hence males (24.45%) were more likely to report worse or no change in outcome vs. females (14.48%) (P<0.05) (Table 2).
After correction
When stratified by sex, females (85.52%) were more likely than males (75.36%) to report better satisfaction outcomes, hence males (24.64% ) were more likely to report worse or no change in outcome vs. females (14.48%) (P<0.05) (Table 2).
2. In page 732, the last line of right column, (Table 2) should have been '(Table 3)'.
Before correction
Pathogenesis sub-analysis by sex indicated that females (83.96%) who sustained scars in the elective setting were more likely to report better outcomes than males (63.83%) (P<0.01), hence males (36.17%) were more likely to report no change or worse outcomes versus females (16.04%) (P<0.01) (Table 2).
After correction
Pathogenesis sub-analysis by sex indicated that females (83.96%) who sustained scars in the elective setting were more likely to report better outcomes than males (63.83%) (P<0.01), hence males (36.17%) were more likely to report no change or worse outcomes versus females (16.04%) (P<0.01) (Table 3 ).
3. In page 732, the last (bottom right) graph of (Fig. 3) representing 'Overall' should have been as following one. The overall worse scar revision outcomes in elective setting should indicate 2.61% as described in the figure legend.
Before correction
After correction
4. In page 733, 3rd line of the left column, (Table 2) should have been '(Table 3)'.
Before correction
Furthermore, in the elective setting males (29.79%) were more likely than females (15.09%) to report no change in outcome (P=0.03) (Table 2).
After correction
Furthermore, in the elective setting males (29.79%) were more likely than females (15.09%) to report no change in outcome (P=0.03) (Table 3 ).
5. In page 733, 4th line of the left column, (Table 2) should have been '(Table 3)'.
Before correction
No inter-sex differences were demonstrated in the traumatic setting (Table 2).
After correction
No inter-sex differences were demonstrated in the traumatic setting (Table 3 ).
Conflict of Interest
No potential conflict of interest relevant to this article was reported.
Publication History
Article published online:
20 April 2022
© 2016. The Korean Society of Plastic and Reconstructive Surgeons. This is an open access article published by Thieme under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial License, permitting unrestricted noncommercial use, distribution, and reproduction so long as the original work is given appropriate credit. Contents may not be used for commercial purposes. (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/)
Thieme Medical Publishers, Inc.
333 Seventh Avenue, 18th Floor, New York, NY 10001, USA