Subscribe to RSS

DOI: 10.5999/aps.2018.00248
The safety of one-per-mil tumescent infiltration into tissue that has survived ischemia

Background The aim of this study was to assess the safety of one-per-mil tumescent injections into viable skin flaps that had survived an ischemic insult, in order to assess the potential suitability of one-per-mil tumescent injections in future secondary reconstructive procedures such as flap revision and refinements after replantation.
Methods Forty groin flaps harvested from 20 healthy Wistar rats weighing 220 to 270 g were subjected to acute ischemia by clamping the pedicle for 15 minutes. All flaps showing total survival on the 7th postoperative day were randomly divided into group A (one-per-mil tumescent infiltration; n=14), group B (normal saline infiltration; n=13), and group C (control, with no infiltration; n=13) before being re-elevated. Transcutaneous oxygen tension (TcPO2) was measured before and after infiltration, and changes in TcPO2 were statistically analyzed using analysis of variance, the paired t-test, and the independent t-test. The viability of flaps was also assessed using the Analyzing Digital Images software at 7 days after the second elevation.
Results Thirty-nine flaps survived to the final assessment, with the sole exception of a flap from group A that did not survive the first elevation. TcPO2 readings showed significant decreases (P<0.05) following both one-per-mil tumescent (99.9±5.7 mmHg vs. 37.2±6.3 mmHg) and normal saline (103±8.5 mmHg vs. 48.7±5.9 mmHg) infiltration. Moreover, all groin flaps survived with no signs of tissue necrosis.
Conclusions One-per-mil tumescent infiltration into groin flap tissue that had survived ischemia did not result in tissue necrosis, although the flaps experienced a significant decrease of cutaneous oxygenation.
The author thanks Dr. Fransisca for providing assistance with manuscript preparation.
Publication History
Received: 11 March 2018
Accepted: 08 January 2019
Article published online:
03 April 2022
© 2019. The Korean Society of Plastic and Reconstructive Surgeons. This is an open access article published by Thieme under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial License, permitting unrestricted noncommercial use, distribution, and reproduction so long as the original work is given appropriate credit. Contents may not be used for commercial purposes. (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/)
Thieme Medical Publishers, Inc.
333 Seventh Avenue, 18th Floor, New York, NY 10001, USA
-
REFERENCES
- 1 Sabapathy SR, Bhardwaj P. Secondary procedures in replantation. Semin Plast Surg 2013; 27: 198-204
- 2 Larson JV, Kung TA, Cederna PS. et al. Clinical factors associated with replantation after traumatic major upper extremity amputation. Plast Reconstr Surg 2013; 132: 911-9
- 3 Flint P, Cummings C, Haughey B. et al. Cummings otolaryngology head & neck surgery. Philadelphia: Mosby Elsevier; 2010
- 4 Hui-Chou HG, Sulek J, Bluebond-Langner R. et al. Secondary refinements of free perforator flaps for lower extremity reconstruction. Plast Reconstr Surg 2011; 127: 248-57
- 5 Lalonde D, Martin A. Epinephrine in local anesthesia in finger and hand surgery: the case for wide-awake anesthesia. J Am Acad Orthop Surg 2013; 21: 443-7
- 6 Al Youha S, Lalonde DH. Update/review: changing of use of local anesthesia in the hand. Plast Reconstr Surg Glob Open 2014; 2: e150
- 7 Bueno Jr RA, Battiston B, Ciclamini D. et al. Replantation: current concepts and outcomes. Clin Plast Surg 2014; 41: 385-95
- 8 Pederson WC, Sherman R. Reconstructive surgery of the mutilated hand. In: Chang J, Neligan P. Plastic Surgery. 3rd ed. 6. New York: Elsevier Inc; 2013: 250-81
- 9 Klein JA. Tumescent technique for local anesthesia improves safety in large-volume liposuction. Plast Reconstr Surg 1993; 92: 1085-98
- 10 Hanke C, Sommer B, Sattler G. et al. Tumescent local anesthesia. Darmstadt: Springer-Veriag Berlin Heidelberg; 2001
- 11 Lalonde D, Martin A. Tumescent local anesthesia for hand surgery: improved results, cost effectiveness, and wideawake patient satisfaction. Arch Plast Surg 2014; 41: 312-6
- 12 Prasetyono TO, Biben JA. One-per-mil tumescent technique for upper extremity surgeries: broadening the indication. J Hand Surg Am 2014; 39: 3-12
- 13 Klein JA, Jeske DR. Estimated maximal safe dosages of tumescent lidocaine. Anesth Analg 2016; 122: 1350-9
- 14 Prasetyono TO, Adianto S. The relationship between oxygen saturation and color alteration of a compromised skin flap: experimental study on the rabbit. Arch Plast Surg 2013; 40: 505-9
- 15 Kagaya Y, Ohura N, Kurita M. et al. Examination of tissue oxygen saturation (StO2) changes associated with vascular pedicle occlusion in a rat Island flap model using near-Infrared spectroscopy. Microsurgery 2015; 35: 393-8
- 16 Adingupu DD, Thorn CE, Casanova F. et al. Blood oxygen saturation after ischemia is altered with abnormal microvascular reperfusion. Microcirculation 2015; 22: 294-305
- 17 Thornton JF, Gosman AA. Skin grafts and skin subtitutes and principles of flaps. Dallas: Selected Readings in Plastic Surgery; 2004
- 18 Ollague JE, Zabielinski M, Nouri K. Anesthesia in dermatologic surgery. In: Nouri K. Dermatologic surgery: step by step. Chichester: Wiley-Blackwell; 2012: 20-4
- 19 Venkataram J. Tumescent liposuction: a review. J Cutan Aesthet Surg 2008; 1: 49-57
- 20 Taylor AE, Moore TM. Capillary fluid exchange. Am J Physiol 1999; 277 (6 Pt 2) S203-10