Open Access
Int Arch Otorhinolaryngol 2012; 16(04): 476-481
DOI: 10.7162/S1809-97772012000400008
Original Article
Thieme Publicações Ltda Rio de Janeiro, Brazil

Cochlear implants: our experience and literature review

Authors

  • Mariane Barreto Brandão Martins

    1   Doctor. Specializing in Otolaryngology.
  • Francis Vinicius Fontes de Lima

    1   Doctor. Specializing in Otolaryngology.
  • Ronaldo Carvalho Santos Júnior

    2   Doctor of Medicine (Otolaryngology), University of Sao Paulo. Head of the Department of Otorhinolaryngology, University Hospital, Faculty of Medicine, Federal University of Sergipe.
  • Arlete Cristina Granizo Santos

    3   Otorhinolaryngologist. Teacher of the Residents of Otorhinolaryngology of the University Hospital of the Faculty of Medicine of the Federal University of Sergipe.
  • Valéria Maria Prado Barreto

    4   Master of Health Sciences, Federal University of Sergipe. Teacher of the Residents of Otorhinolaryngology of the University Hospital of the Faculty of Medicine of the Federal University of Sergipe.
  • Eduardo Passos Fiel de Jesus

    3   Otorhinolaryngologist. Teacher of the Residents of Otorhinolaryngology of the University Hospital of the Faculty of Medicine of the Federal University of Sergipe.
Further Information

Publication History

19 April 2012

31 July 2012

Publication Date:
10 December 2013 (online)

Preview

Summary

Introduction: Cochlear Implants are important for individuals with severe to profound bilateral sensorineural hearing loss.

Objective: Evaluate the experience of cochlear implant center of Otorhinolaryngology through the analysis of records of 9 patients who underwent cochlear implant surgery.

Methods: This is a retrospective study performed with the patients records. Number 0191.0.107.000-11 ethics committee approval. We evaluated gender, etiology, age at surgery, duration of deafness, classification of deafness, unilateral or bilateral surgery, intraoperative and postoperative neural response and impedance of the electrodes in intraoperative and preoperative tests and found those that counter-indicated surgery.

Results: There were 6 pediatric and 3 adult patients. Four male and 5 female. Etiologies: maternal rubella, cytomegalovirus, ototoxicity, meningitis, and sudden deafness. The age at surgery and duration of deafness ranged from 2–46 years and 2–18 years, respectively. Seven patients were pre-lingual. All had profound bilateral PA. There were 7 bilateral implants. Intraoperative complications: hemorrhage. Complications after surgery: vertigo and internal device failure. In 7 patients the electrodes were implanted through. Telemetry showed satisfactory neural response and impedance. CT and MRI was performed in all patients. We found enlargement of the vestibular aqueduct in a patient and incudomalleolar malformation.

Conclusion: The cochlear implant as a form of auditory rehabilitation is well established and spreading to different centers specialized in otoaudiology. Thus, the need for structured services and trained professionals in this type of procedure is clear.