Erratum to “Outcomes from homeopathic prescribing in veterinary practice: a prospective, research-targeted, pilot study” [Homeopathy 96 (2007) 27–34]

Please copy the URL and add it into your RSS Feed Reader.

Facebook Linkedin Weibo

Download PDF

Homeopathy 2007; 96(02): 140
DOI: 10.1016/j.homp.2007.01.001

Erratum

RT Mathie

,

L Hansen

Faculty of Homeopathy and British Homeopathic Association, Hahnemann House, 29 Park Street West, Luton LU1 3BE,UK

,

MF Elliot

Faculty of Homeopathy and British Homeopathic Association, Hahnemann House, 29 Park Street West, Luton LU1 3BE,UK

,

J Hoare

Faculty of Homeopathy and British Homeopathic Association, Hahnemann House, 29 Park Street West, Luton LU1 3BE,UK

Further Information

Publication Date:
13 December 2017 (online)

It is with regret that the column headings in [Table 3] were not corrected as requested by the author. The correct version appears as below:

Table 3
Summary of outcome scores of follow-up patients by medical category
Category	No. final FUs	% +2 or +3	% +1 or 0 or −1	% −2 or −3
DERM	138	57.3	36.2	3.6
MSK	119	66.4	32.8	0.0
BEH	46	69.6	21.7	4.4
ENT	41	56.1	39.0	4.9
CANCER	39	46.2	43.6	7.7
MISC	35	65.7	25.7	2.9
GI	32	56.3	40.6	0.0
URO	21	76.2	23.8	0.0
ENDO	18	55.6	44.4	0.0
EYE	14	78.6	21.4	0.0
RESP	11	54.6	36.4	9.1
CV	7	100.0	0.0	0.0
OG	6	83.3	16.7	0.0
NERVE	5	20.0	60.0	0.0
TR	5	40.0	40.0	0.0
MALE	2	100.0	0.0	0.0
TOTAL	539	61.6	33.4	2.6