Key words tofogliflozin - renal impairment - urinary glucose excretion - type 2 diabetes mellitus
Introduction
The World Health Organization reports that an estimated 422 million adults were living
with diabetes worldwide in 2014 and that the global prevalence (age-standardized)
of diabetes has nearly doubled since 1980 (from 4.7 to 8.5%) in the adult population
[1 ]. This is due to the increasing numbers of people with risk factors for diabetes,
such as being overweight or obese. Diabetes is no longer a disease seen only in advanced
wealthy countries; its prevalence is increasing all over the world.
Sodium-glucose cotransporter-2 (SGLT2) inhibitors are the newest class of oral antidiabetic
agents. The hypoglycemic effect of SGLT2 inhibitors is elicited by inhibiting the
reabsorption of glucose through SGLT2 in the kidneys to increase urinary glucose excretion
(UGE). In addition to the blood glucose lowering effect, there is accumulating evidence
of comprehensive improvement of diabetes/obesity-associated metabolic abnormalities
due to the unique mode of action of SGLT2 inhibitors. Briefly, as a result of the
inhibition of reabsorption of glucose and sodium ions in the proximal renal tubules,
diuretic and hypotensive action and improvement of glomerular hyperfiltration are
expected [2 ]. Increased UGE leads to a reduction in body weight and to changes in metabolism
from glucose oxidation to lipid oxidation which contributes to an improvement of fatty
liver disease and a reduction in visceral adipose tissue [3 ]
[4 ]
[5 ]
[6 ]. Treatment with SGLT2 inhibitors also results in reduced serum uric acid [7 ]. Tofogliflozin is a novel, highly selective SGLT2 inhibitor recently approved and
launched in Japan for the treatment of type 2 diabetes mellitus (T2DM) [8 ]
[9 ]
[10 ]. Some of the basic pharmacokinetic characteristics of tofogliflozin have been reported.
The in vitro study has suggested that tofogliflozin is metabolized to the carboxylated
form (M1) and ketone form (M5) through hydroxylated derivatives (M4 and M2/3) by CYP2C18,
3A4/5, 4A11, and 4F3B, and tofogliflozin-derived substances are mainly eliminated
by urinary excretion [11 ]. The carboxylated form is a major metabolite in humans and pharmacologically inactive.
The ketone form is a minor metabolite in humans with weak pharmacological activity
[11 ]. A human mass balance study combined with intravenous microdosing has demonstrated
high oral bioavailability (BA) (97.5%) of tofogliflozin [12 ]. Tofogliflozin is rapidly and completely absorbed and approximately 76% of total
dose is excreted in urine and about 20% in feces within 72 h post-dose [13 ]. Urinary elimination of parent tofogliflozin however is a minor route of excretion,
renal clearance accounting for only 16% of the parent drug systemic clearance, suggesting
that dose adjustment of tofogliflozin in patients with renal impairment is unlikely
needed as long as renal impairment does not affect extra-renal disposition of tofogliflozin.
A moderate unbound fraction of 0.17 and presence of active tubular secretion of tofogliflozin
ensures a high exposure of the luminal region of the kidney as the target organ despite
the low contribution of renal clearance to total plasma clearance. Tofogliflozin exhibits
dose-proportional and time-independent pharmacokinetics (data on file) and achieves
readily steady-state plasma exposures due to an apparent terminal plasma half-life
of about 6 days. Basic pharmacokinetics (PK) and pharmacodynamics (PD) profiles of
tofogliflozin with healthy subjects are reported and tofogliflozin increases UGE as
the dose increases [14 ]. Single PK profile of tofogliflozin with or without representative anti-T2DM drugs
was evaluated in drug-drug interaction study and exposure of tofogliflozin was not
affected by concomitant drugs and vice versa [15 ].
The exposure level of some oral antidiabetic agents is affected by renal function,
and these agents should be prescribed carefully for such patients [16 ]. It is thus of great interest to understand the in-depth profiles of SGLT2 inhibitors
in T2DM patients with chronic renal impairment. Here we report the PK/PD profiles
of tofogliflozin treatment in T2DM patients who had either normal renal function or
chronic renal impairment.
Materials and Methods
The following two clinical studies of tofogliflozin were conducted. (1) Single dose
(SD) study: a study in T2DM patients with normal renal function and T2DM patients
with mild, moderate and severe renal impairment. (2) Multiple dose (MD) study: an
open study in T2DM patients with normal renal function and T2DM patients with moderate
renal impairment over 24 weeks. All studies were conducted in accordance with the
Declaration of Helsinki [17 ], the Good Clinical Practice, and the International Conference on Harmonization guidelines.
The studies were approved by the Institutional Review Board of Rainier Clinical Research
Center and Russian Peoples’ Friendship University (for SD) and Tokyo Jikei University
School of Medicine, Katsushika Medical Center (for MD). All patients gave written
informed consent prior to participation. SD study was registered with ClinicalTrials.gov,
number NCT00933972 and MD study was registered with the Japanese Pharmaceutical Information
Center (registration number: JapicCTI-111572).
Patients
In the SD study, both male and female patients with T2DM and an estimated glomerular
filtration rate (eGFR; calculated with MDRD formula [18 ]) of >80 mL/min/1.73 m2 (normal renal function), ≥50 and ≤80 mL/min/1.73 m2 (mild renal impairment), ≥30 and <50 mL/min/1.73 m2 (moderate renal impairment) or <30 mL/min/1.73 m2 (severe renal impairment) were eligible for inclusion. The eGRF cut-offs for the
SD study were based on regulatory guidance at the time [19 ]
[20 ], however during the study it was decided to include up to 4 additional patients
with eGFR 90 mL/min/1.73 m2 as per regulatory recommendation to comply with the K/DOQI Clinical Practice Guideline
for Chronic Kidney Disease from the National Kidney Foundation [21 ]. At screening, patients were required to be ≥40 and <80 years of age, have a body
mass index (BMI) of ≥18 and <40 kg/m2 , and have a glycated hemoglobin level (HbA1c; NGSP) of ≥6% and <10.5%. In addition,
eligible patients had to have been treated with stable dose or regimen for renal impairment
or diabetes (except SGLT2 inhibitor) at least 2 months before study drug administration.
In the MD study, both male and female Japanese patients with T2DM and eGFR (calculated
with the Japanese GFR estimation equation recommended by the Japanese Society of Nephrology
[22 ]) of ≥90 mL/min/1.73 m2 (normal renal function) or ≥30 and <60 mL/min/1.73 m2 (moderate renal impairment) were eligible for inclusion in this study [21 ]. At screening, patients were required to be ≥20 and <75 years of age, have a BMI
of ≥18.5 and <45.0 kg/m2, and have an HbA1c of ≥6.8 and <10.3%. In addition, eligible
patients had to have been treated with either diet and exercise alone or diet and
exercise plus a stable dose of one oral hypoglycemic agent (except SGLT2 inhibitor)
for ≥8 weeks before screening. The concomitant therapies were kept during the study
in principle. In both studies, patients were excluded if they were diagnosed as having
type 1 diabetes or had had a complication and/or a history of diabetic ketoacidosis
or end stage renal disease requiring dialysis, severe hypoglycemic episode, or repeated
genitourinary tract infections within the 24 weeks before study drug administration
(for SD) or screening (for MD). Other key exclusion criteria included complications
and/or a history of malignant tumor, gastrointestinal disorder, respiratory disorder,
hematological disorder, neurological disorder, psychiatric disorder, or immunological
disorder.
Study design
SD study
This was a single-dose, non-randomized, open-label, parallel-group study. A group
matching procedure was chosen to ensures that the 4 groups were comparable with respect
to mean age (range of ±10 years), mean BMI (range of ±20%), and gender. Group matching
started with the selection of 2 to 3 patients from the mild or moderate renal impairment
group. Means for age and BMI of these patients were calculated as temporary means
to be used to determine the means±given ranges for age and BMI for the next 2 to 3
patients to be included into the study in the other category. The proportion of men
and women participating in each of the 4 groups was closely matched as much as possible
aiming for recruitment of at least 3 patients of each gender in each of the 4 renal
function groups. Patients with normal renal function were selected to match the patients
in the other renal function groups. Patients from the severe renal impairment group
were only enrolled once plasma PK, adverse events and clinical safety laboratory test
data of at least 6 patients in the moderate renal impairment group were favorably
assessed. Patients were orally administered a single dose of tofogliflozin (20 mg,
capsule) in a fasted condition (at least 8 h) on the morning of Day 1. Blood samples
for PK assessment were collected before administration and at 0.5, 1, 1.5, 2, 3, 4,
6, 8, 10, 12, 16, 24, 36, and 48 h after administration. Urine samples for PK and
PD assessment were collected for 48 h after administration.
MD study
This was a randomized, open-label, parallel-group study. Patients were administered
tofogliflozin (40 mg, tablet) once daily at 15 min before breakfast for 24 weeks.
Blood samples for trough concentration assessment were collected before administration
and at Week 4, 8, 12, 16, 20 and 24 from all patients. Patients who consented to full
PK sampling protocol were subjected to frequent sampling; before and at 0.5, 1, 1.5,
2, 3, 4, 6, 8, 10, 12, 16 and 24 h after the first administration. Urine samples for
PK and PD assessment were collected from 24 h before to 24 h after the first administration
by the full PK sampling protocol. HbA1c and fasting plasma glucose (FPG) changes as
a glycemic parameter and body weight change were monitored during the study.
PK analysis
In the SD study, the plasma and urine concentrations of tofogliflozin and its metabolites
were measured in F. Hoffman-La Roche Ltd. (Basel, Switzerland). The lower limit to
upper limit of quantification range for tofogliflozin and the carboxylate metabolite
were the same and were 0.2–500 ng/mL and 5–1000 ng/mL for plasma and urine, respectively.
The plasma and urine quantification ranges for the ketone form were 0.5–500 ng/mL
and 10–1000 ng/mL for plasma and urine, respectively. In the MD study, the plasma
and urine concentrations of tofogliflozin and its metabolites were measured in Swiss
BioAnalytics AG (Birsfelden, Switzerland). The plasma and urine quantification range
for tofogliflozin were 0.200–500 ng/mL and 10.0–10000 ng/mL, respectively. The quantification
ranges for the carboxylated and ketone were the same and were 0.500–500 ng/mL and
10.0–10000 ng/mL for plasma and urine, respectively.
For all analytes, the PK parameters of Cmax (maximum plasma drug concentration), Tmax (time to reach Cmax ), t1/2 (elimination half-life), AUCinf (area under the plasma concentration–time curve from time zero to infinity), CL/F
(apparent oral clearance), Vd/F (apparent volume of distribution) and CLr (renal clearance) were determined by non-compartmental analysis using WinNonlin ver.
6.1 software (Pharsight Corporation, Mountain View, CA, USA).
PD analysis
In both studies, the PD profile of tofogliflozin was evaluated by UGE24h, i. e., cumulative
urinary glucose excretion 24 h after administration. Renal glucose reabsorption inhibition
was calculated as the ratio of renal glucose clearance over eGFR at same time interval
with SD study data.
Safety assessments
Safety was evaluated via adverse events (AEs), clinical laboratory tests, vital signs,
and standard 12-lead electrocardiogram (ECG) examinations. Fluid balance and glucose
monitoring were also performed as additional safety tests.
Results
Demographics of the subjects
In the SD study, 36 patients were considered eligible, and all patients were administered
the study drug: 11 patients with normal renal function, 8 patients with mild renal
impairment, 9 patients with moderate renal impairment and 8 patients with severe renal
impairment. 34 out of 36 patients were treated with concomitant antidiabetic medications
including biguanides (N=17), sulfonylureas (N=16), thiazolidinediones (N=3), GLP-1
agonist (N=1) and insulins (N=18). In the MD study, 13 patients were randomized in
the normal renal function group and 30 patients were randomized in the moderate renal
impairment group. Of the 15 patients who enrolled in the full PK sampling protocol,
8 had normal renal function and 7 had moderate renal impairment. 20 out of 43 patients
were treated with concomitant antidiabetic medications including sulfonylureas (N=15),
and DPP4 inhibitors (N=5). All patients completed the study and their demographics
and baseline characteristics are shown in [Table 1 ].
Table 1 Demographic and baseline characteristics.
Study
Renal Function
N
Age
Sexa
Body weight
BMI
HbA1c
eGFR
(years)
Male/Female
(kg)
(kg/m2 )
(%)
(mL/min/1.73 m2 )
SD
Normal
11
63.4 (5.3)
5/6
94.1 (13.4)
33.77 (4.048)
7.57 (1.20)
102.3 (17.6)
Mild
8
67.3 (4.1)
4/4
90.8 (11.0)
32.90 (3.598)
6.79 (0.536)
66.4 (8.1)
Moderate
9
63.4 (5.8)
4/5
89.3 (11.9)
33.31 (2.676)
7.51 (1.04)
38.6 (5.1)
Severe
8
63.5 (3.8)
5/3
91.0 (12.5)
33.16 (3.857)
7.00 (0.661)
18.5 (6.4)
MD
Normal
13
55.3 (12.4)
11/2
69.1 (12.4)
24.94 (3.030)
7.89 (0.755)
105.47 (15.042)
Moderate
30
64.2 (7.2)
24/6
69.9 (9.9)
26.05 (3.406)
7.33 (0.98)
49.25 (11.843)
Mean (SD)
a Number of subjects for male/female.
PK profile
In the SD study, plasma and urinary concentrations of tofogiflozin and 2 metabolites
were measured to investigate the effect of renal impairment on the PK profiles of
tofogliflozin and its metabolites. After rapid absorption, tofogliflozin concentrations
peaked 1 h after administration, and subsequently, tofogliflozin plasma concentration
declined in a biphasic manner indicative of a rapid distribution phase and a slower
elimination phase ([Fig. 1a ]). The tofogliflozin plasma concentration time profile was similar regardless of
the renal function status. Mean AUCinf was about 19%, 17% and 13% higher for patients with mild, moderate and severe renal
impairment, respectively, as compared to patients with normal renal function.
Fig. 1 Plasma concentration profile (mean±SD) of a tofogliflozin, b carboxylated form and c ketone form after single administration to T2DM patients with normal renal function
(□), mild (○), moderate (Δ) and severe renal impairment (◇).
The plasma concentration of the carboxylated form peaked at approximately 6 h after
administration of tofogliflozin and decreased slowly ([Fig. 1b ]). The plasma concentration-time profile of the ketone form peaked 1.5 h after administration
in patients with normal renal function and was parallel to the parent drug ([Fig. 1c ]). Unlike the parent drug, the elimination of the two metabolites was highly affected
by the renal function status, hence the mean exposure of the carboxylated form and
ketone form drastically increased with declining renal function. Mean AUCinf of thecarboxylated form in patients with moderate renal impairment and the ketone
form in patients with severe renal impairment was up to 3.6- and 4.1-fold of that
in patients with normal renal function, respectively. Renal clearance of all 3 measured
analytes distinctly decreased with declining renal function. In the PK assessment
of the MD study utilizing the full PK sampling protocol, the change in the PK profile
as renal function changed was similar to that observed in the SD study, even though
a higher dose was used. PK parameters of tofogliflozin, carboxylated form and ketone
form are summarized in [Table 2 ]
[3 ]
[4 ], respectively. The plasma trough concentration of tofogliflozin in patients with
normal renal function and patients with moderate renal impairment at week 24 were
29.8 (18.7) and 41.8 (50.3) ng/mL, respectively [mean (standard deviation; SD)]. The
plasma trough concentration of the carboxylated and ketone forms of tofogliflozin
were 54.5 (39.7) and 119 (71.9) ng/mL, respectively in patients with normal renal
function and 2.37 (1.51) and 8.37 (6.19) ng/mL, respectively in patients with moderate
renal impairment [mean (SD)].
Table 2 PK parameters of tofogliflozin.
Tofogliflozin
Study
Renal Function
N
Cmax
AUCinf
Tmax
a
t1/2
CL/F
Vd/F
CLr
(ng/mL)
(ng×h/mL)
(h)
(h)
(L/h)
(L)
(L/h)
SD (20 mg)
Normal
11
410 (107)
1740 (628)
1.00 (0.500–1.50)
6.21 (0.965)
13.0 (5.01)
119 (60.6)
1.36 (0.480)
Mild
8
391 (148)
2070 (984)
0.992 (0.970–1.58)
5.65 (0.851)
11.2 (3.89)
88.6 (26.4)
0.912 (0.452)
Moderate
9
399 (91.2)
2040 (419)
0.967 (0.500–1.50)
6.06 (1.23)
10.2 (2.31)
88.6 (22.1)
0.403 (0.125)
Severe
8
360 (118)
1970 (484)
1.23 (0.500–1.50)
6.52 (3.43)
10.7 (2.51)
101 (63.2)
0.222 (0.0924)
MD (40 mg)
Normal
8
931 (250)
4650 (1000)
1.00 (1.00–1.02)
6.08 (0.571)
8.96 (1.90)
77.3 (10.3)
2.38 (0.658)
Moderate
7
1230 (325)
7280 (3050)
0.95 (0.500–2.00)
8.44 (2.66)
6.38 (2.59)
69.9 (11.0)
0.794 (0.341)
Mean (SD)
a : Tmax are shown as median (minimum–maximum).
Table 3 PK parameters of carboxylated form of tofogliflozin.
Carboxylated form
Study
Renal Function
N
Cmax
AUCinf
Tmax
a
t1/2
CLr
(ng/mL)
(ng×h/mL)
(h)
(h)
(L/h)
SD (20 mg)
Normal
11
112 (24.3)
1610 (298)
6.00 (3.00–10.0)
6.56 (0.544)
4.26 (1.01)
Mild
8
159 (33.7)
2590 (434)
6.03 (4.00–8.17)
7.23 (1.06)
2.76 (0.563)
Moderate
9
198 (90.8)
4070 (2120)
6.03 (4.00–12.0)
9.37 (0.919)
1.73 (6.36)
Severe
8
230 (56.3)
5850 (1750)
10.0 (6.00–12.0)
11.8 (2.10)
0.774 (0.285)
MD (40 mg)
Normal
8
243 (64.9)
3450 (615)
4.00 (3.00–6.03)
8.23 (1.21)
4.32 (0.864)
Moderate
7
375 (104)
9270 (3620)
6.00 (5.92–6.00)
15.7 (5.75)
1.85 (0.737)
Mean (SD)
a : Tmax are shown as median (minimum–maximum).
Table 4 PK parameters of ketone form of tofogliflozin.
ketone form
Study
Renal Function
N
Cmax
AUCinf
Tmax
a
t1/2
CLr
(ng/mL)
(ng×h/mL)
(h)
(h)
(L/h)
SD (20 mg)
Normal
11
17.3 (4.42)
108 (21.9)
1.50 (0.98–2.00)
7.14 (1.18)
9.84 (2.42)
Mild
8
15.6 (4.07)
141 (34.4)
1.50 (1.50–4.08)
9.45 (2.58)
6.48 (1.82)
Moderate
9
17.7 (5.30)
211 (57.1)
1.50 (0.98–3.05)
13.4 (2.00)
3.81 (1.50)
Severe
8
21.5 (5.74)
440 (173)
2.00 (0.97–4.00)
19.5 (4.05)
1.42 (0.636)
MD (40 mg)
Normal
8
28.4 (7.56)
206 (35.1)
1.50 (1.00–2.00)
7.67 (0.847)
11.9 (2.56)
Moderate
7
38.9 (10.3)
575 (324)
1.50 (0.967–2.00)
14.4 (6.92)
4.22 (1.76)
Mean (SD)
a Tmax are shown as median (minimum–maximum).
PD profile
UGE24h was analyzed for the SD study and part of the MD study, where the full PK sampling
protocol was applied. UGE24h is summarized in [Table 5 ]. UGE24h decreased with declining renal function. The UGE24h after single administration
of tofogliflozin for patients with normal renal function and patients with mild, moderate
and severe renal impairment were 81.5 (34.0), 47.2 (29.9) 21.2 (8.86) and 11.9 (7.27)
g, respectively [mean (SD)]. Scatterplot of UGE24h change from pre-dose versus eGFR,
using data from both the SD and the MD studies, revealed higher UGE24h change observed
in patients with higher eGRF ([Fig. 2 ]), while no significant correlation was found between the inhibition of renal glucose
reabsorption and eGFR in the SD study ([Fig. 3 ]). Values of percentage inhibition of renal glucose reabsorption in patients with
normal renal function and patients with mild, moderate and severe renal impairment
were 32.0 (11.0), 32.6 (15.1), 27.4 (11.6), 36.7 (13.4) %, respectively [mean (SD)].
Fig. 2 Relationship between UGE change from pre-dose and eGFR in T2DM patients with normal
renal function (□), mild (○), moderate (Δ) and severe renal impairment (◇) in the
SD study, and normal renal function (■) and moderate renal impairment (▲) in the MD
study. Black straight line indicates the smooth curve. Note: The definition of the
categories of renal function differs between SD and MD study [eGFR >80 mL/min/1.73 m2 (normal renal function), ≥50 and ≤80 mL/min/1.73 m2 (mild renal impairment), ≥30 and <50 mL/min/1.73 m2 (moderate renal impairment) or <30 mL/min/1.73 m2 (severe renal impairment) in SD study and eGFR ≥90 mL/min/1.73 m2 (normal renal function) or ≥30 and <60 mL/min/1.73 m2 (moderate renal impairment) in MD study].
Fig. 3 Relationship between glucose reabsorption inhibition and eGFR in T2DM patients with
normal renal function (□), mild (○), moderate (Δ) and severe renal impairment (◇)
in the SD study.
Table 5 Cumulative UGE up to 24 h before/after tofogliflozin administration.
Study
Renal Function
N
UGE Pre-dose (g)
UGE Post-dose (g)
UGE Change from Pre-dose (g)
SD (20 mg)
Normal
11
6.71 (8.77)
81.5 (34.0)
74.9 (31.0)
Mild
8
8.80 (17.0)
47.2 (29.9)
38.4 (17.3)
Moderate
9
2.00 (3.76)
21.2 (8.86)
19.2 (6.79)
Severe
8
0.553 (0.247)
11.9 (7.27)
11.3 (7.30)
MD (40 mg)
Normal
8
38.6 (40.4)
138 (41.7)
99.7 (28.9)
Moderate
7
2.46 (3.17)
47.0 (14.5)
44.6 (15.4)
Mean (SD)
Safety
In the SD study, 3 AEs were reported by 6 patients with normal renal function and
4 AEs by 3 patients with moderate renal impairment. There were no serious AEs reported
during the study. There was no apparent pattern of AEs according to severity of renal
impairment. All AEs were of mild intensity except one case of hypoglycemia (of moderate
intensity) in a patient with moderate renal impairment. Abnormal laboratory parameters
were reported during the study, but no obvious correlation according to severity of
renal impairment, and mean changes from baseline were minimal. In the MD study, 15AEs
in 8 patients with normal renal function and 24 AEs in 16 patients with moderate renal
impairment were reported. Of these, 7 AEs in 3 patients in the normal renal function
group and 5 AEs in 4 patients in the moderate renal impairment group were considered
as having an undeniable causal relationship with the study drug. Details are shown
in [Table 6 ]. There were no deaths. One serious AE related to the study drug (rectal cancer in
the normal renal function group) was reported, and it was the only case leading to
discontinuation. The severity of symptoms was mild in all cases with the exception
of the rectal cancer. No AEs with a clear imbalance of incidence attributable to the
difference in renal function were detected. Laboratory data with abnormal changes
identified in the normal renal function group were decreased neutrophil count, increased
blood triglycerides, and increased WBC count in urine, and the incidence was 7.7%
(1 of 13 patients) in each case. Laboratory data with abnormal changes identified
in the moderate renal impairment group were decreased neutrophil count, increased
blood urea nitrogen (BUN), increased blood triglycerides, increased creatinine phosphokinase
(CPK), increased occult protein in urine, and increased of urine WBC count in urine,
and the incidence was 3.3% (1 of 30 patients) in each case except for 10.0% (3 of
30 patients) of increased occult blood in urine.
Table 6 Summary of safety profiles in MD study.
Normal renal function n=13
Moderate renal impairment n=30
Patients with at least one AE (%)
8 (61.5)
16 (53.3)
Patients with drug-related SAEs (%)
1 (7.7)
0 (0)
Patients with SAEs leading to discontinuation (%)
1 (7.7)
0 (0)
Any AE
15
24
Nasopharyngitis
3
5
Gastroenteritis
1
1
Bronchitis
1
Influenza
1
Upper respiratory tract infection
2
Urinary tract infection
1
Skin infection
1
Chronic sinusitis
1
Musculoskeletal pain
1
Osteoarthritis
2
Headache
1
1
Pollakiuria
3
Hyperlipidemia
1
Hypoglycemia
1
1
Xeroderma
1
Seborrhoeic dermatitis
2
Abdominal discomfort
1
Constipation
1
Thirst
1
Diabetic retinopathy
2
Rectal cancer
1
Blood ketone body increased
1
Blood pressure decreased
1
Regarding renal function, although serum creatinine was slightly increased in both
the normal renal function group and the moderate renal impairment group, eGFR was
slightly decreased in the normal renal function group whereas eGFR was unchanged in
the moderate renal impairment group at 24 week compared to baseline. Cystatin C was
slightly increased in the moderate renal impairment group whereas no change in the
normal renal function group and N-acetyl β-D-glucosaminidase (NAG) was slightly decreased
in both groups at 24 week from baseline. β2-microglobulin was no obvious change in
both groups during the study.
Glycemic parameters and body weight change
Values of HbA1c, FPG and body weight change from baseline to Week 24 were –0.65 (0.91)
%, –29.8 (32.0) mg/dL and –2.20 (3.46) kg, respectively in patients with normal renal
function (N=11) and –0.23 (0.67) %, –16.7 (22.3) mg/dL and –1.75 (2.00) kg, respectively
in patients with moderate renal impairment (N=29) [mean (SD)]. Time course of HbA1c,
FPG and body weight change from baseline to Week 24 are shown ([Fig. 4a-c ]). Control of glycemic parameters by tofogliflozin treatment was attenuated as renal
function declined. However, body weight decrease was not markedly affected by the
status of renal function.
Fig. 4 a Changes in HbA1c from baseline during the treatment period. b Changes in FPG from baseline during the treatment period. c Changes in body weight from baseline during the treatment period.
Discussion
These studies were conducted to understand the effect of different degrees of renal
impairment on the pharmacokinetics, pharmacodynamics and safety of single and multiple
doses of tofogliflozin.
Previous studies reveal that tofogliflozin is rapidly and completely absorbed and
approximately 76% of the total dose was excreted in urine and about 20% was found
in feces within 72 h post-dose [13 ]. The general PK profile of tofogliflozin was also reported by Kasahara-Ito et.al.
concluding that once daily treatment of tofogliflozin did not cause accumulation in
plasma with time [14 ]. The SD study demonstrated that renal impairment did not have a clinically significant
effect on the pharmacokinetics of tofogliflozin. The lack of effect of renal impairment
on tofogliflozin pharmacokinetics is consistent with urinary elimination being a minor
route of excretion for tofogliflozin, with renal clearance accounting for only 16%
of the parent drug systemic clearance [12 ]. As expected, renal clearance of tofogliflozin was clearly affected by renal impairment.
Mean AUCinf for both carboxylated form and ketone form increased with decreasing renal function
(3.6 times for carboxylted form, 4.1 times for ketone form in the severe renal impairment
group compared to the normal renal function group). Therefore, renal clearance is
an important route for the elimination of the metabolites and impaired renal function
results in increased exposure to those metabolites and increased metabolite to parent
ratio. Following once daily treatment for 24 weeks, plasma trough concentrations of
tofogliflozin and its metabolites did not change with time both in patients with normal
renal function and in patients with moderate renal impairment. PK profiles of tofogliflozin
were not affected to a clinically relevant degree by renal impairment. The higher
systemic exposure of the carboxylated form in patients with renal impairment is not
clinically relevant as it is an inactive metabolite. Furthermore, while the ketone
form had also a higher exposure in patients with renal impairment as compared to patients
with normal renal function, it is a minor metabolite in humans. Therefore, no dose
adjustment is required for the treatment of patients with impaired renal function
as far as investigated in these studies.
A pronounced UGE24h was observed after a single oral 20 or 40 mg dose of tofogliflozin
across all renal function categories as compared to baseline. UGE24h decreased with
increasing renal impairment. This is mainly explained by a reduction of filtered glucose
in the glomeruli due to decreased GFR as renal function decreased. Interestingly,
the inhibition of renal glucose reabsorption had no clear correlation with eGFR and
the percentage of inhibition tend to be constant regardless of the degree of renal
impairment. UGE24h observed in the SD study seems to be slightly lower than that observed
in the MD study. This might be due to somewhat more severe diabetic condition with
higher HbA1c in patients with normal renal function in the MD study compared to the
SD study. Furthermore, the adopted dose of tofogliflozin was 40 mg in the MD study,
although a tofogliflozin dose of 20 mg is close to the maximum effect for UGE induction
[14 ].
Multiple administration of tofogliflozin for 24 weeks was equally well-tolerated in
patients with normal renal function and with moderate renal impairment. Regarding
glycemic parameter, HbA1c and FPG changes from baseline were attenuated in patients
with moderate renal impairment compared to those in patients with normal renal function.
However, body weight reduction was almost the same between the two groups. This incongruity
is also observed in other SGLT2 inhibitors and the reason remains unclear [23 ]
[24 ]
[25 ]
[26 ]
[27 ]. The inhibition of renal glucose reabsorption was constant across all renal function
groups. This indicates that tofogliflozin reached its target in the kidney independent
of renal function. Body weight reduction might be regulated in some way by sensing
the renal glucose reabsorption inhibition.
It was recently reported that empagliflozin significantly lowered the risk of progression
of kidney disease, as defined by incidence of worsening nephropathy, in patients with
T2DM at high risk of cardiovascular events. That analysis was conducted according
to the pre-specified analysis plan for one of the secondary outcomes of the EMP-REG
OUTCOME trial [28 ]. In addition, the CANVAS study showed canagliflozin reduced cardiovascular and renal
outcomes both in T2DM patients with prior cardiovascular events and without prior
cardiovascular events [29 ]. One of putative mechanisms underlying the renoprotective effect would be driven
by hemodynamic changes. SGLT2 inhibitors reduce sodium reabsorption in the proximal
tubules, thereby increasing sodium delivery to the distal tubules where it leads to
modulation of afferent arteriole resistance in the glomeruli through the macula densa
and decreased filtration rate. The prognostic significance of diabetic hyperfiltration
has so far been controversial, but a recent cohort study shows hyperfiltration contributes
to renal function loss and to the onset or progression of nephropathy [30 ]
[31 ]. Further data accumulation will be needed, including that of other SGLT2 inhibitors,
to conclude whether SGLT2 inhibitors have a renoprotective effect. In a clinical setting,
when deciding on a prescription of SGLT2 inhibitor the prescriber should take into
consideration his/her age, disease condition, complication and lifestyle and assess
the benefit–risk balance for the patients.
Conclusions
The PK profiles of tofogliflozin were not affected to a clinically relevant degree
by declining renal function. Although systemic exposure of the metabolites measured
in the study was obviously increased with increasing renal impairment, their contribution
to the efficacy was considered low. Administration of tofogliflozin at single or multiple
doses for 24 weeks was safe and well tolerated in male and female patients with T2DM
and varying degrees of renal function. Therefore, as far as investigated in these
studies, no dose adjustment is required for patients with renal impairment. UGE24h
decreased with decreasing renal function which resulted in waning glycemic control
but no change in body weight reduction.
Author contributions
All authors meet the criteria for authorship as recommended by the International Committee
of Medical Journal Editors (ICMJE). D.S. designed the SD study, and D.S and A.P. contributed
to data acquisition of the SD study, and critically revised the draft manuscript.
S.Ikeda, Y.T., N.K., T.S., S.Iida analyzed all the data in the manuscript and wrote
the draft manuscript. All authors approved the final version to be published.
