Z Gastroenterol 2018; 56(12): 1475-1480
DOI: 10.1055/a-0755-2448
Originalarbeit
© Georg Thieme Verlag KG Stuttgart · New York

Hyperplastic polyps and nonadvanced adenomas, but not advanced polypoid lesions, are detected more frequently in the presence of colonic diverticula during screening colonoscopies

Vermehrter Nachweis von hyperplastischen Polypen und tubulären Adenomen bei gleichzeitig vorliegender Divertikulose in Vorsorgekoloskopien
Christoph Schramm
1   Department of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, University Hospital Cologne, Germany
,
Fabian Kütting
1   Department of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, University Hospital Cologne, Germany
,
Sonja Lang
1   Department of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, University Hospital Cologne, Germany
,
Philipp Kasper
1   Department of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, University Hospital Cologne, Germany
,
Seung-Hun Chon
2   General, Visceral and Cancer Surgery, University Hospital Cologne, Germany
,
Hans-Michael Steffen
1   Department of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, University Hospital Cologne, Germany
› Author Affiliations
Further Information

Publication History

10 August 2018

04 October 2018

Publication Date:
10 December 2018 (online)

Zusammenfassung

Hintergrund Die bisher veröffentlichte Studienlage zur Assoziation von Kolondivertikeln und kolorektalen Polypen einschließlich des kolorektalen Karzinoms (KRK) ist konträr. Ziel der Studie war es, die Assoziation für sämtliche relevanten histologischen Polypensubtypen, d. h. hyperplastische Polypen (HP), sessil und traditionell serratierte Adenome (SSA und TSA), klinisch relevante serratierte Polypen (krSP), tubuläre Adenome und fortgeschrittene Adenome in einer ausschließlichen Vorsorgekoloskopie-Kohorte zu untersuchen.

Material und Methoden Wir führten eine retrospektive Analyse von Personen ≥ 50 Jahre und einem durchschnittlichen Risiko für ein KRK, die eine Vorsorgekoloskopie zwischen dem 01.01.2012 und dem 14.12.2016 in einer Universitätsklinik und 6 gastroenterologischen Schwerpunktpraxen erhalten haben, durch. Ausschlusskriterien waren Erkrankungen mit einem erhöhten KRK-Risiko (z. B. chronisch-entzündliche Darmerkrankungen, KRK in der Vorgeschichte, hereditäre Karzinomsyndrome), eine vorherige Koloskopie und eine unvollständige Untersuchung.

Ergebnisse 4196 Koloskopien wurden eingeschlossen (mittleres Alter 63,4 Jahre, Standardabweichung ± 7,6 Jahre, 48,6 %). Bei Vorliegen von Divertikeln zeigten sich nach Adjustierung für Alter und Geschlecht erhöhte Odds-Ratios (OR) für den Nachweis von HP im gesamten (OR 1,340, 95 %-Konfidenzintervall 1,133 – 1,584, p = 0,001) und im distalen Kolon (OR 1,459, 95 %-KI 1,208 – 1,763, p < 0,001) sowie von tubulären Adenomen im distalen Kolon (OR 1,355, 95 %-KI 1,144 – 1,604, p < 0,001). Die mittlere Polypenanzahl pro Untersuchung mit dem Nachweis von mindestens einem Polypensubtypen unterschied sich nicht zwischen beiden Gruppen.

Schlussfolgerung Die Untersucher sollten beim Vorliegen einer Divertikulose wachsam für den Nachweis von vor allem distal gelegenen Adenomen sein.

Abstract

Background Studies investigating the association between colonic diverticula and colorectal polyps and colorectal cancer (CRC) have reported conflicting results. We aimed to evaluate this association for all relevant different histological polyp subtypes (i. e., hyperplastic polyps [HPs], sessile and traditionally serrated adenomas, clinically relevant serrated polyps, nonadvanced and advanced adenomas) in an exclusive colonoscopy screening cohort.

Material and methods We conducted a retrospective analysis of individuals ≥ 50 years of age with an average risk for CRC who underwent a screening colonoscopy between January 1, 2012, and December 14, 2016, at a tertiary academic hospital and 6 community-based private practices. Exclusion criteria were conditions with increased risk for CRC (e. g., inflammatory bowel disease, history of CRC, hereditary cancer syndromes), previous colonoscopy at the same institution, and incomplete procedures.

Results A total of 4196 colonoscopies were included (mean age: 63.4, standard deviation: ± 7.6 years, 48.6 % men). In the presence of colonic diverticula, significantly increased odds ratios (OR) were found for the detection of HPs overall (OR: 1.340, 95 % confidence interval [CI]: 1.133 – 1.584, p = 0.001) and in the distal colon (OR: 1.459, 95 % CI: 1.208 – 1.763, p < 0.001), as well as for nonadvanced adenomas (OR: 1.355, 95 % CI: 1.144 – 1.604, p < 0.001) in the distal colon after adjusting for age and gender. The mean numbers of different histological polyp subtypes detected per procedure with at least one of the histological polyp subtype did not differ between both groups.

Conclusions Endoscopists should be vigilant for the detection of adenomatous polyps in the distal colon when diverticula are present during colonoscopy.

 
  • References

  • 1 Leifeld L, Germer CT, Böhm S. et al. S2k guidelines diverticular disease/diverticulitis. Z Gastroenterol 2014; 52: 663-710
  • 2 Paspatis GA, Papanikolaou N, Zois E. et al. Prevalence of polyps and diverticulosis of the large bowel in the Cretan population. Int J Colorectal Dis 2001; 16: 257-261
  • 3 Choi CS, Choi SC, Seo GS. et al. Association between diverticulosis and colonic neoplasm in Koreans. Korean J Gastroenterol 2007; 49: 364-368
  • 4 Lee KM, Paik CN, Chung WC. et al. Clinical significance of colonic diverticulosis associated with bowel symptoms and colon polyp. J Korean Med Sci 2010; 25: 1323-1329
  • 5 Wong ER, Idris F, Chong CF. et al. Diverticular disease and colorectal neoplasms: association between left sided diverticular disease with colorectal cancers and right sided with colonic polyps. Asian Pac J Cancer Prev 2016; 17: 2401-2405
  • 6 Hirata T, Kawakami Y, Kinjo N. et al. Association between colonic polyps and diverticular disease. World J Gastroenterol 2008; 14: 2411-2413
  • 7 Schramm C, Mbaya N, Franklin J. et al. Patient- and procedure-related factors affecting proximal and distal detection rates for polyps and adenomas: results from 1603 screening colonoscopies. Int J Colorectal Dis 2015; 30: 1715-1722
  • 8 Muhammad A, Lamendola O, Daas A. et al. Association between colonic diverticulosis and prevalence of colorectal polyps. Int J Colorectal Dis 2014; 29: 947-951
  • 9 Rondagh EJA, Sanduleanu S, Le Clercq CMC. et al. Diverticulosis and colorectal polyps at younger age: a possible link?. Eur J Gastroenterol Hepatol 2011; 23: 1050-1055
  • 10 Ashktorab H, Panchal H, Shokrani B. et al. Association between diverticular disease and pre-neoplastic colorectal lesions in an urban African-American population. Digestion 2015; 92: 60-65
  • 11 Sharara AI, El-Halabi MM, Mansour NM. et al. Alcohol consumption is a risk factor for colonic diverticulosis. J Clin Gastroenterol 2013; 47: 420-425
  • 12 Peery AF, Martin CF, Levinson SE. et al. Colonic diverticula are not associated with an increased risk of colorectal adenomas. Am J Gastroenterol 2015; 110: 1694-1697
  • 13 Kieff BJ, Eckert GJ, Imperiale TF. Is diverticulosis associated with colorectal neoplasia? A cross-sectional colonoscopic study. Am J Gastroenterol 2004; 99: 2007-2011
  • 14 Wang FW, Chuang HY, Tu MS. et al. Prevalence and risk factors of asymptomatic colorectal diverticulosis in Taiwan. BMC Gastroenterol 2015; 15: 40
  • 15 Levine I, Rangnekar AS, Tokayer AZ. Low frequency of polyps in colonic regions with diverticulosis. Int J Colorectal Dis 2017; 32: 1597-1602
  • 16 Meurs-Sjojda MM, Terhaar sive Droste JS, Kuik DJ. et al. Diverticulosis and diverticulitis form no risk for polyps and colorectal neoplasia in 4241 colonoscopies. Int J Colorectal Dis 2008; 23: 979-984
  • 17 Loffeld RJ, Van Der Putten AB. Diverticular disease of the colon and concomitant abnormalities in patients undergoing endoscopic endoscopic evaluation of the large bowel. Colorectal Dis 2002; 4: 189-192
  • 18 Gohil VB, Patrie JT, Shami VM. et al. Colonic diverticulosis is associated with an increased adenoma detection rate in patients undergoing first-time screening colonoscopy. J Interv Gastroenterol 2012; 2: 70-75
  • 19 Terdiman JP, McQuaid KR. Surveillance guidelines should be updated to recognize the importance of serrated polyps. Gastroenterology 2010; 139: 1444-1447
  • 20 Ijspeert JEG, Bevan R, Senore C. et al. Detection rate of serrated polyps and serrated polyposis syndrome in colorectal cancer screening cohorts: a European overview. Gut 2017; 66: 1225-1232
  • 21 Lee SJ, Kim SA, Ku BH. et al. Association between colorectal cancer and colonic diverticulosis: a case-control study based on computed tomographic colonography. Abdom Imaging 2012; 37: 70-73
  • 22 Crowe FL, Appleby PN, Allen NE. et al. Diet and risk of diverticular disease in Oxford cohort of European Prospective Investigation into Cancer and Nutrition (EPIC): prospective study of British vegetarians and non-vegetarians. BMJ 2011; 343: d4131
  • 23 Crowe FL, Balkwill A, Cairns BJ. et al. Source of dietary fibre and diverticular disease incidence: a prospective study of UK women. Gut 2014; 63: 1450-1456
  • 24 Ben Q, Sun Y, Chai R. et al. Dietary fiber intake reduces risk for colorectal adenoma: a meta-analysis. Gastroenterology 2014; 146: 689-699
  • 25 Singh S, Singh PP, Murad MH. et al. Prevalence, risk factors, and outcomes of interval colorectal cancers: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Am J Gastroenterol 2014; 109: 1375-1389
  • 26 Robertson DJ, Greenberg ER, Beach M. et al. Colorectal cancer in patients under close colonoscopic surveillance. Gastroenterology 2005; 129: 34-41
  • 27 Kopylov U, Ben-Horin S, Lahat A. et al. Obesity, metabolic syndrome and the risk of development of colonic diverticulosis. Digestion 2012; 86: 201-205
  • 28 Andrade P, Riberio A, Ramalho R. et al. Routine colonoscopy after acute uncomplicated diverticulitis – challenging a putative indication. Dig Surg 2017; 34: 197-202
  • 29 Adler A, Lieberman D, Aminalai A. et al. Data quality of the German Screening Colonoscopy Registry. Endoscopy 2013; 45: 813-818