Abstract
The asymptote of the hyperbolic power-duration relationship, critical power (CP),
demarcates sustainable from non-sustainable exercise. CP is a salient parameter within
the theoretical framework determining exercise tolerance. However, measuring CP is
time consuming – typically 4 constant-power exercise tests to intolerance, or a 3-min
all-out sprint is required.
To determine whether 30 s of maximal isokinetic cycling, immediately following the
limit of tolerance, approximates CP.
Fifteen participants (7 women, 8 men, 23±5 yr, 71±12 kg, V̇O2peak 4.39±1.04 L·min−1; 61±9 mL·kg·min−1) completed 4 constant supra-CP exercise tests to intolerance. Each test was followed
immediately by a 30 s maximal isokinetic effort at 80 rpm. Mean isokinetic power was
compared to the known CP.
Mean±SD CP was 159±47 W (CI95 133, 185 W). Maximal isokinetic power immediately following intolerance was greater
(p<0.05) than CP in all but one comparison (181±51 vs. 159±47 W; p>0.07). However, this closest estimation, following the longest duration constant-power
test, resulted in 21 W of mean bias and wide limits of agreement (±84 W).
Isokinetic power measured immediately following intolerance consistently overestimated
critical power. Thus, an adjunct of 30 s maximal isokinetic cycling immediately following
the limit of tolerance does not approximate critical power.
Key words
isokinetic - cycling - fatigue