Download PDF
DO - Deutsche Zeitschrift für Osteopathie 2020; 18(03): 4-10
DOI: 10.1055/a-1131-0353
Praxis
Visuelle Vorstellung

Die visuelle Vorstellung in der osteopathischen Palpation

Mario M. Kraml
› Further Information
Also available at
    Permissions and Reprints

Die Bedeutung der Hand liegt für den Osteopathen im wahrsten Sinn des Wortes auf der Hand. Meist ist sie es, die im Rampenlicht steht, wenn es um die Palpation, die Kernkompetenz von Osteopathen, geht. Kognitive Phänomene, wie die visuelle Vorstellung, werden dagegen eher stiefmütterlich behandelt. Welche Bedeutung sog. Top-down-Prozesse bei der Tastwahrnehmung von Osteopathen haben, soll in diesem Artikel aufgezeigt werden.

Publication History

Article published online:
22 June 2020

Georg Thieme Verlag KG
Stuttgart · New York

 

  • Literatur

  • 1 Aubin A, Gagnon K, Morin C. The seven-step palpation method: A proposal to improve palpation skills. International Journal of Osteopathic Medicine 2014; 17 (01) 66-72
    CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • 2 Barral JP, Mercier P. Lehrbuch der viszeralen Osteopathie. Band I. München: Elsevier; 2005
    Google Scholar
  • 3 Cathie AG. Osteopathic armamentarium Seventh Annual Academy Lecture. Newark: AAO; 1955: 87-97
    Google Scholar
  • 4 Cumming J, Hall C. Deliberate imagery practice: the development of imagery skills in competitive athletes. Journal of Sports Sciences 2002; 20 (02) 137-145
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 5 Debarnot U. et al. Experts bodies, experts minds: How physical and mental training shape the brain. Frontiers in Human Neuroscience 2014; 8: 1-17
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 6 DiGiovanna EL. Palpation. In: DiGiovanna EL, Schiowitz S, Dowling DJ. An Osteopathic Approach to Diagnosis and Treatment. Philadelphia: Lippincott Williams & Wilkins; 2005: 64-66
    Google Scholar
  • 7 Eggleston AA. A basis for the diagnosis of low-back conditions. Newark: AAO; 1966: 65-75
    Google Scholar
  • 8 Ellis RR, Lederman SJ. The golf-ball illusion: evidence for top-down processing in weight perception. Perception 1998; 27: 193-201
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 9 Esteves JE. Diagnostic palpation in osteopathic medicine: a putative neurocognitive model of expertise. http://www.researchgate.net/publication/259999664_Diagnostic_Palpation_in_Osteopathic_Medicine_A_Putative_Neurocognitive_Model_of_Expertise [letzter Zugriff: 29.11.2019]
    Google Scholar
  • 10 Galton F. Statistics of mental imagery. Mind 1880; 5: 301-318
    Google Scholar
  • 11 Galton F. Inquiries into Human Faculty and its Development. http://galton.org [letzter Zugriff: 29.11.2019]
    Google Scholar
  • 12 Hoover HV. Functional technic. Newark: AAO; 1958: 47-51
    Google Scholar
  • 13 Hruby RJ. Abdominal region. In: Chila AG. Foundations of Osteopathic Medicine. Philadelphia: Lippincott Williams & Wilkins; 2011: 660-668
    Google Scholar
  • 14 James W. The Principles of Psychology. Volume II. https://archive.org/details/principlespsych00myergoog [letzter Zugriff: 29.11.2019]
    Google Scholar
  • 15 Kazanas SA, Altarriba J. The survival advantage: Underlying mechanisms and extant limitations. Evolutionary Psychology 2015; 13 (02) 360-396
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 16 Klatzky RL, Lederman SJ, Matula DE. Imagined haptic exploration in judgments of object properties. Journal of Experimental Psychology 1991; 17 (02) 314-322
    Google Scholar
  • 17 Kosslyn SM. Image and Mind. Cambridge: Harvard University Press; 1980
    Google Scholar
  • 18 Kosslyn SM. Image and Brain: The Resolution of the Imagery Debate. Cambridge: MIT; 1996
    Google Scholar
  • 19 Kraml M. Die Rolle der mentalen Vorstellung in der osteopathischen Palpation [Masterthese]. Donau-Universität Krems; 2018
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 20 Kraml M, Besse JP. The Role of Mental Imagery in Osteopathic Palpation: a qualitative study. European Journal of Osteopathic Research 2019; 1 (01) 17-27
    CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • 21 Lacey S, Lawson R. Introduction. In: Lacey S, Lawson R. Multisensory imagery. New York: Springer; 2013: 1-8
    CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • 22 Lacey S. et al. Object familiarity modulates the relationship between visual object imagery and haptic shape perception. NeuroImage 2010; 49 (03) 1977-1990
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 23 Martin KA, Moritz SE, Hall CR. Imagery use in sport: A literature review and applied model. The Sport Psychologist 1999; 13 (03) 245-268
    CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • 24 Mast FW. Mit dem inneren Auge sehen – Wie hängen Wahrnehmung und Vorstellung zusammen?. http://www.degruyter.com/downloadpdf/j/nf.2005.11.issue-3/nf-2005-0302/nf-2005-0302.pdf [letzter Zugriff: 29.11.2019]
    Google Scholar
  • 25 McCole GM. A handbook of osteopathic guidelines for student and physician. Newark: AAO; 1972: 27-116
    Google Scholar
  • 26 McNorgan C. A meta-analytic review of multisensory imagery identifies the neural correlates of modality-specific and modality-general imagery. Frontiers in Human Neuroscience 2012; 6: 1-14
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 27 Mitchell FL. The training and measurement of sensory literacy in relation to osteopathic structural and palpatory diagnosis. Newark: AAO; 1976: 120-127
    Google Scholar
  • 28 Palermo L, Iaria G, Guariglia C. Mental imagery skills and topographical orientation in humans: a correlation study. Behavioural Brain Research 2008; 192: 248-253
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 29 Piaget J. Part I: Cognitive development in children: Piaget development and learning. Journal of Research in Science Teaching 1964; 2: 176-186
    CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • 30 Price R. Droodles. Los Angeles: Publishers; 1974
    Google Scholar
  • 31 Richardson A. Imagery: Definition and types. In: Sheikh AA. Imagery: Current theory, research, and application. New York: John Wiley; 1983: 3-42
    Google Scholar
  • 32 Roeckelein JE. Imagery in psychology: A reference guide. Westport: Praeger; 2004
    Google Scholar
  • 33 Saimpont A. et al. Motor imagery and aging. Journal of Motor Behavior 2013; 45: 21-28
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 34 Sathian K, Zangaladze A. Feeling with the mindʼs eye: the role of visual imagery in tactile perception. Optometry & Vision Science 2001; 78: 276-281
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 35 Sergueef N. Cranial osteopathy for infants, childrens and adolescents. New York: Churchill Livingstone; 2007
    Google Scholar
  • 36 Sternberg R, Sternberg K. Cognitive psychology. Belmont: Wadsworth; 2012
    Google Scholar
  • 37 Still AT. Philosophy of Osteopathy. Kirksville:: 1899. published by the author
    Google Scholar
  • 38 Still AT. The philosophy and mechanical principles of osteopathy. Kansas City: Hudson-Kimberley; 1902
    Google Scholar
  • 39 Still AT. Osteopathy research and practice. Kirksville:; 1910. published by the author;
    Google Scholar
  • 40 Stoesz MR. et al. Neural networks active during tactile form perception: common and differential activity during macrospatial and microspatial tasks. International Journal of Psychophysiology 2003; 50: 41-49
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 41 Thomas NJT. Mental imagery. Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy. Verfügbar unter (letzter Zugriff: 29.11.2019): http://plato.stanford.edu/entries/mental-imagery/index.html%23MeaConMenIma
    Google Scholar
  • 42 Trowbridge C. Andrew Taylor Still, 1828 – 1917. Kirksville: Jefferson University Press; 1991
    Google Scholar
  • 43 Zhang M. et al. Multisensory cortical processing of object shape and its relation to mental imagery. Cognitive, Affective & Behavioral Neuroscience 2004; 4: 251-259
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 44 Zimbardo PG, Gerrig RJ. Psychologie. München: Pearson; 2008
    Google Scholar