Z Geburtshilfe Neonatol 2021; 225(02): 134-139
DOI: 10.1055/a-1153-9387
Original Article

Association between the side of levator Ani muscle trauma and fetal position at birth – a prospective observational study

Assoziation zwischen der betroffenen Seite der Levatormuskelverletzung und der fetalen Position bei Geburt – eine prospektive Observationsstudie
1   Department of Obstetrics, University Hospital Zurich, Zurich, Switzerland
,
Jana Birri
1   Department of Obstetrics, University Hospital Zurich, Zurich, Switzerland
,
Roland Zimmermann
1   Department of Obstetrics, University Hospital Zurich, Zurich, Switzerland
,
Martina Kreft
1   Department of Obstetrics, University Hospital Zurich, Zurich, Switzerland
2   Sydney Ultrasound for Women, Sydney, Australia
› Author Affiliations
Funding Sources The study was supported by GE Healthcare, Zipf, Austria, by providing the ultrasound device (Voluson S10) and probes for the ultrasound examinations during the entire study period. The Heartbay Foundation (Vaduz, Liechtenstein) supported the project financially.

Abstract

Introduction Trauma of the levator ani muscle (LAM) is common after vaginal birth and can most reliably be diagnosed by 3-dimensional (3D) translabial ultrasound (TLUS). Multiple risk factors are known in general, but not in association to a specific side of the body. Therefore, our aim was to evaluate different impact factors which cause LAM trauma on either side of the body or bilateral by focusing on the fetal position at birth.

Material and Methods As part of a prospective cohort study between 3/2017 and 4/2019, we analyzed vaginal births of nulliparous women with singletons in vertex presentation≥36+0 gestational weeks. We evaluated their pelvic floor for hematomas, partial and complete LAM avulsions by 3D TLUS 2–4 days postpartum and searched for an association between the affected body side and different fetal, maternal and obstetrical factors.

Results 71 out of 213 women (33.3%) suffered from LAM trauma – 17 (23.9%) on the right side, 20 (28.2%) on the left side and 34 (47.9%) bilateral. No association between the different evaluated factors and the affected body side could be identified, except for the quality of fetal heart rate tracing.

Conclusions No significant impact factors of LAM trauma could be associated with a specific side of the body. Other possible mechanisms need investigation in the future, such as the time of the birth canal and the fetus to adapt to each other, including adequate time for the tissue to stretch and the fetus to rotate into the ideal position within the LAM hiatus.

Zusammenfassung

Einleitung Levatormuskelverletzungen sind häufig nach Vaginalgeburten und können zuverlässig mittels translabialem 3D-Ultraschall diagnostiziert werden. Diverse Risikofaktoren sind hierfür bekannt, allerdings keine hinsichtlich der Assoziation zu einer der beiden Körperseiten. Daher war das Ziel dieser Arbeit, verschiedene Einflussfaktoren im Rahmen vaginaler Geburten zu evaluieren, welche eine Levatorverletzung auf einer der beiden Körperseiten bzw. beidseitig begünstigen, v. a. hinsichtlich der Kindsposition im Geburtskanal.

Material und Methodik In einer prospektiven Kohortenstudie analysierten wir von 3/2017–4/2019 Erstgebärende mit vaginalen Einlingsgeburten aus Schädellage≥36+0 SSW. Wir evaluierten 2–4 Tage postpartal ihren Beckenboden mittels 3D-Ultraschall hinsichtlich Hämatomen sowie partiellen und kompletten Levatoravulsionen und suchten nach Assoziationen zwischen der betroffenen Körperseite und fetalen, maternalen und geburtshilflichen Einflussfaktoren.

Ergebnisse Von 213 Frauen erlitten 71 (33.3%) eine Levatorverletzung – 17 (23.9%) rechtsseitig, 20 (28.2%) linksseitig und 34 (47.9%) beidseitig. Es wurden keine Assoziationen zwischen den untersuchten Einflussfaktoren und der betroffenen Körperseite gefunden, bis auf die Qualität der fetalen Herzfrequenz.

Diskussion Es konnten keine signifikanten Einflussfaktoren für das Auftreten einer Levatorverletzung einer spezifischen Körperseite eruiert werden. Daher bedarf es in Zukunft der Untersuchung weiterer Mechanismen, wie der Adaptationsvorgänge von Geburtskanal und Fet und der adäquaten Zeit für das Gewebe zur notwendigen Dehnung, v. a. im Bereich der Levatoröffnung.



Publication History

Received: 04 February 2020

Accepted: 27 March 2020

Article published online:
07 May 2020

© 2020. Thieme. All rights reserved.

Georg Thieme Verlag KG
Rüdigerstraße 14, 70469 Stuttgart, Germany

 
  • References

  • 1 van Delft K, Thakar R, Sultan AH. et al. Levator ani muscle avulsion during childbirth: a risk prediction model. BJOG 2014; 121: 1155-1163 discussion 63
  • 2 van Delft KW, Thakar R, Sultan AH. et al. The natural history of levator avulsion one year following childbirth: a prospective study. BJOG 2015; 122: 1266-1273
  • 3 Dietz HP. Pelvic floor trauma in childbirth. Aust N Z J Obstet Gynaecol 2013; 53: 220-230
  • 4 Shek KL, Dietz HP. Intrapartum risk factors for levator trauma. BJOG 2010; 117: 1485-1492
  • 5 Kearney R, Fitzpatrick M, Brennan S. et al. Levator ani injury in primiparous women with forceps delivery for fetal distress, forceps for second stage arrest, and spontaneous delivery. Int J Gynaecol Obstet 2010; 111: 19-22
  • 6 Gonzalez-Diaz E, Garcia-Mejido JA, Martin-Martinez A. et al. Are there differences in the damage to the pelvic floor between Malmstrom’s and Kiwi omnicup vacuums? A multicenter study. Neurourol Urodyn 2019; 39: 190-196
  • 7 Garcia Mejido JA, De la Fuente Vaquero P, Fernandez Palacin A. et al. Influence of difficulty of instrumentation with vacuum on the rate of levator ani muscle avulsion identified by 3-4 D transperineal ultrasound. J Matern Fetal Neonatal Med 2018; 31: 591-596
  • 8 Kamisan Atan I, Gerges B, Shek KL. et al. The association between vaginal parity and hiatal dimensions: a retrospective observational study in a tertiary urogynaecological centre. BJOG 2015; 122: 867-872
  • 9 Horak TA, Guzman-Rojas RA, Shek KL. et al. Pelvic floor trauma: does the second baby matter?. Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol 2014; 44: 90-94
  • 10 Dietz HP. Ultrasound imaging of the pelvic floor. Part II: three-dimensional or volume imaging. Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol 2004; 23: 615-625
  • 11 Dietz HP, Abbu A, Shek KL. The levator-urethra gap measurement: a more objective means of determining levator avulsion?. Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol 2008; 32: 941-945
  • 12 Dietz HP, Bernardo MJ, Kirby A. et al. Minimal criteria for the diagnosis of avulsion of the puborectalis muscle by tomographic ultrasound. Int Urogynecol J 2011; 22: 699-704
  • 13 Dietz HP, Garnham AP, Rojas RG. Is the levator-urethra gap helpful for diagnosing avulsion?. Int Urogynecol J 2016; 27: 909-913
  • 14 Radestad I, Olsson A, Nissen E. et al. Tears in the vagina, perineum, sphincter ani, and rectum and first sexual intercourse after childbirth: a nationwide follow-up. Birth 2008; 35: 98-106
  • 15 Skinner EM, Barnett B, Dietz HP. Psychological consequences of pelvic floor trauma following vaginal birth: a qualitative study from two Australian tertiary maternity units. Arch Womens Ment Health 2018; 21: 341-351
  • 16 Skinner EM, Dietz HP. Psychological and somatic sequelae of traumatic vaginal delivery: A literature review. Aust N Z J Obstet Gynaecol 2015; 55: 309-314
  • 17 Dietz HP, Schierlitz L. Pelvic floor trauma in childbirth – myth or reality?. Aust N Z J Obstet Gynaecol 2005; 45: 3-11
  • 18 Dannecker C, Lienemann A, Fischer T. et al. Influence of spontaneous and instrumental vaginal delivery on objective measures of pelvic organ support: assessment with the pelvic organ prolapse quantification (POPQ) technique and functional cine magnetic resonance imaging. Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol 2004; 115: 32-38
  • 19 Valsky DV, Lipschuetz M, Bord A. et al. Fetal head circumference and length of second stage of labor are risk factors for levator ani muscle injury, diagnosed by 3-dimensional transperineal ultrasound in primiparous women. Am J Obstet Gynecol 2009; 201: 91: e1-e7
  • 20 Aydin S, Tuncel MA, Aydin CA. et al. Do we protect the pelvic floor with non-elective cesarean? A study of 3-D/4-D pelvic floor ultrasound immediately after delivery. J Obstet Gynaecol Res 2014; 40: 1037-1045
  • 21 Kearney R, Miller JM, Ashton-Miller JA. et al. Obstetric factors associated with levator ani muscle injury after vaginal birth. Obstet Gynecol 2006; 107: 144-149
  • 22 Falkert A, Endress E, Weigl M. et al. Three-dimensional ultrasound of the pelvic floor 2 days after first delivery: influence of constitutional and obstetric factors. Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol 2010; 35: 583-588
  • 23 Caudwell-Hall J, Kamisan Atan I, Brown C. et al. Can pelvic floor trauma be predicted antenatally?. Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand 2018; 97: 751-757
  • 24 Caudwell-Hall J, Kamisan Atan I, Martin A. et al. Intrapartum predictors of maternal levator ani injury. Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand 2017; 96: 426-431
  • 25 van Delft K, Thakar R, Shobeiri SA. et al. Levator hematoma at the attachment zone as an early marker for levator ani muscle avulsion. Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol 2014; 43: 210-217
  • 26 Kimmich N, Burkhardt T, Kreft M. et al. Reducing birth trauma by the implementation of novel monitoring and documentation tools. Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand 2019; 98: 1223-1226
  • 27 Dietz HP, Moegni F, Shek KL. Diagnosis of levator avulsion injury: a comparison of three methods. Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol 2012; 40: 693-698
  • 28 Parente MP, Natal Jorge RM, Mascarenhas T. et al. The influence of pelvic muscle activation during vaginal delivery. Obstet Gynecol 2010; 115: 804-808
  • 29 Garcia Mejido JA, Suarez Serrano CM, Fernandez Palacin A. et al. Evaluation of levator ani muscle throughout the different stages of labor by transperineal 3D ultrasound. Neurourol Urodyn 2017; 36: 1776-1781