Download PDF
ZWR - Das Deutsche Zahnärzteblatt 2020; 129(07/08): 334-340
DOI: 10.1055/a-1200-0137
Fortbildung
Neue Technologien

Abformung ganzer Kiefer: Können Intraoralscanner mit der konventionellen Abformung mithalten?

Maximiliane Amelie Schlenz
,
Alexander Schmidt
,
Peter Rehmann
,
Bernd Wöstmann
› Further Information
Also available at
    Permissions and Reprints

Die Abformung von ganzen Kiefern oder Kieferabschnitten stellt mit der dreidimensionalen Erfassung intraoraler Strukturen die Basis zur Herstellung von Zahnersatz bzw. Hilfsmitteln wie Bohrschablonen, kieferorthopädischen Apparaturen oder Schienen dar. Somit entscheidet bereits die Qualität der Abformung über den späteren Behandlungserfolg [1].

Publication History

Article published online:
12 August 2020

© 2020. Thieme. All rights reserved.

Georg Thieme Verlag KG
Stuttgart · New York

 

  • Literatur

  • 1 Wöstmann B. Abformmaterialien. In: Rosentritt M, Ilie N, Lohbauer U. Hrsg. Werkstoffkunde in der Zahnmedizin. Stuttgart: Thieme; 2018: 23-54
    Google Scholar
  • 2 Wöstmann B, Powers J. Präzisionsabformungen – Ein Leitfaden für Theorie und Praxis. 3M. Im Internet (Stand: 24.06.2020): https://multimedia.3m.com/mws/media/604457O/3m-health-care-academy-impressioning-compendium-german.pdf
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 3 Rekow ED. Digital Dentistry: A Comprehensive Reference and Preview of the Future. Surrey: Quintessence Publishing Company Limited; 2018
    Google Scholar
  • 4 Joda T, Zarone F, Ferrari M. The complete digital workflow in fixed prosthodontics: a systematic review. BMC Oral Health 2017; 17: 124
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 5 Mangano F, Gandolfi A, Luongo G. et al. Intraoral scanners in dentistry: a review of the current literature. BMC Oral Health 2017; 17: 149
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 6 Goujat A, Abouelleil H, Colon P. et al. Marginal and internal fit of CAD-CAM inlay/onlay restorations: A systematic review of in vitro studies. J Prosthet Dent 2019; 121: 590-597.e3
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 7 Boeddinghaus M, Breloer ES, Rehmann P. et al. Accuracy of single-tooth restorations based on intraoral digital and conventional impressions in patients. Clin Oral Investig 2015; 19: 2027-2034
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 8 Chochlidakis KM, Papaspyridakos P, Geminiani A. et al. Digital versus conventional impressions for fixed prosthodontics: A systematic review and meta-analysis. J Prosthet Dent 2016; 116: 184-190.e12
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 9 Muallah J, Wesemann C, Nowak R. et al. Accuracy of full-arch scans using intraoral and extraoral scanners: an in vitro study using a new method of evaluation. Int J Comput Dent 2017; 20: 151-164
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 10 Ender A, Zimmermann M, Attin T. et al. In vivo precision of conventional and digital methods for obtaining quadrant dental impressions. Clin Oral Investig 2016; 20: 1495-1504
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 11 Ender A, Zimmermann M, Mehl A. Accuracy of complete- and partial-arch impressions of actual intraoral scanning systems in vitro. Int J Comput Dent 2019; 22: 11-19
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 12 Kuhr F, Schmidt A, Rehmann P. et al. A new method for assessing the accuracy of full arch impressions in patients. J Dent 2016; 55: 68-74
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 13 Ender A, Attin T, Mehl A. In vivo precision of conventional and digital methods of obtaining complete-arch dental impressions. J Prosthet Dent 2016; 115: 313-320
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 14 Logozzo S, Zanettia EM, Franceschini G. et al. Recent advances in dental optics – Part I: 3D intraoral scanners for restorative dentistry. Opt Lasers Eng 2014; 54: 203-221
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 15 Schmidt A, Benedickt CR, Schlenz MA. et al. Torsion and linear accuracy in intraoral scans obtained with different scanning principles. J Prosthodont Res 2020; 64: 167-174
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 16 Müller P, Ender A, Joda T. et al. Impact of digital intraoral scan strategies on the impression accuracy using the TRIOS Pod scanner. Quintessence Int 2016; 47: 343-349
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 17 Ender A, Mehl A. Influence of scanning strategies on the accuracy of digital intraoral scanning systems. Int J Comput Dent 2013; 16: 11-21
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 18 Passos L, Meiga S, Brigagão V. et al. Impact of different scanning strategies on the accuracy of two current intraoral scanning systems in complete-arch impressions: an in vitro study. Int J Comput Dent 2019; 22: 307-319
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 19 Rehmann P, Sichwardt V, Wöstmann B. Intraoral Scanning Systems: Need for Maintenance. Int J Prosthodont 2017; 30: 27-29
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 20 Arakida T, Kanazawa M, Iwaki M. et al. Evaluating the influence of ambient light on scanning trueness, precision, and time of intra oral scanner. J Prosthodont Res 2018; 62: 324-329
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 21 OʼToole S, Osnes C, Bartlett D. et al. Investigation into the accuracy and measurement methods of sequential 3D dental scan alignment. Dent Mater 2019; 35: 495-500
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 22 Haddadi Y, Bahrami G, Isidor F. Effect of Software Version on the Accuracy of an Intraoral Scanning Device. Int J Prosthodont 2018; 31: 375-376
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 23 Parfitt GJ. Measurement of the physiological mobility of individual teeth in an axial direction. J Dent Res 1960; 39: 608-618
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 24 Chang PK, Chen YC, Huang CC. et al. Distribution of micromotion in implants and alveolar bone with different thread profiles in immediate loading: a finite element study. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants 2012; 27: e96-e101
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 25 Winter W, Klein D, Karl M. Micromotion of Dental Implants: Basic Mechanical Considerations. J Med Eng 2013; 2013: 265412
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 26 Rau CT, Olafsson VG, Delgado AJ. et al. The quality of fixed prosthodontic impressions: An assessment of crown and bridge impressions received at commercial laboratories. J Am Dent Assoc 2017; 148: 654-660
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 27 Reich S, Yatmaz B, Raith S. Do “cut out-rescan” procedures have an impact on the accuracy of intraoral digital scans?. J Prosthet Dent 2020; DOI: 10.1016/j.prosdent.2019.11.018.
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 28 Jordan AR, Micheelis W. Fünfte Deutsche Mundgesundheitsstudie (DMS V). 2016. Köln: Deutscher Zahnärzte Verlag DÄV. Im Internet (Stand: 24.06.2020): https://www.bzaek.de/fileadmin/PDFs/dms/Zusammenfassung_DMS_V.pdf
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 29 Schlenz MA, Schmidt A, Wöstmann B. et al. In vitro comparison of analogue versus digital impressions of the periodontally compromised dentition focused on interdental areas. Int J Comput Dent 2019; 22: 131-138
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 30 Schlenz M, Rehmann P, Wöstmann B. Auf dem Weg zur digitalen Prothetik: Einblicke in den Praxisalltag. ZWR – Das Deutsche Zahnärzteblatt 2019; 128: 214-220
    Article in Thieme ConnectPubMedGoogle Scholar