Key words
SCUBA diving - nitrox - underwater exercise - hyperoxia
Introduction
Ventilation (V̇E) is a critical factor for the duration and safety of a dive and might be affected
by the inspiratory fraction of oxygen (FIO2) in the breathing gas. This has already been reported in land-based studies for rest
and exercise [1]
[2]
[3]
[4], but only little work exists for the context of sport-diving with SCUBA (self-contained
underwater breathing apparatus) [5]
[6]
[7], where breathing gases with an elevated oxygen content are commonly used [8] and the amount of gas consumed per breath increases with depth. Several diving-specific
factors, like exertion during fin-swimming or physiological adaptions underwater might
influence this interaction in an applied setting.
Oxygen enriched air (EAN; i. e. inspiratory oxygen fraction (FIO2) above 21%) is the second most-used breathing gas besides air in sport-diving, with
the main purpose to replace nitrogen (N2) with oxygen (O2). When performing the same dive with EAN instead of air (AIR), N2 tissue saturation and decompression risks are reduced and no-decompression dive-times
prolonged [8]
[9]. One detrimental effect of oxygen-enriched air is oxygen toxicity (i. e. inspiratory
oxygen partial pressure (PIO2)>140 kPa), which is known as a limiting factor for FIO2 in the mix and maximum depth during the dive [8]
[10]. The risk of nitrogen narcosis, which affects responsiveness, well-being, and cognitive
performance under high PN2 [[11]
[12]
[13]
[14], is reduced when diving with EAN. Thus, diving with EAN as a breathing gas has become
extremely popular, especially if many repetitive dives are performed.
A higher FIO2 and PIO2, respectively, in the lungs (i. e. due to a raised FIO2 in the breathing gas) results in a higher arterial oxygen partial pressure (PaO2) and slightly more O2 in the blood. In healthy subjects, this increases solely the concentration of physically
dissolved O2, which is marginal compared to hemoglobin-bound O2. However, O2 delivery is a limiting factor for increased workload and especially for transitions
in work rate, like during incremental exercise until exhaustion. In those scenarios,
an increased O2 delivery (from an increase in PaO2) might be beneficial for O2 diffusion to the muscle and therefore delay the metabolic acidosis from lactate accumulation.
This is in line with several studies reporting decreased lactate accumulation during
hyperoxic exercise on the bicycle [15]
[16]
[17]
[18]
[19]
[20]. Furthermore, the over-proportional increase in V̇E, among other things as a result of metabolic acidosis, might be postponed. This can
explain higher peak workloads or longer submaximal exercise times [16]
[17]
[21]
[22]
[23]. Also, a lower perceived exertion was stated for hyperoxic exercise [24]
[25].
Peripheral arterial chemoreceptors, like in the carotid bodies, regulate V̇E by monitoring PO2, PCO2, and pH. Whereas hypoxemia leads to an increase of V̇E during rest, hyperoxia (i. e. higher PaO2) attenuates the sensitivity of those receptors [1]
[4]
[26]. Furthermore, a lower heart rate (HR) was observed in hyperoxia during rest [27]
[28] as a result of enhanced vascular resistance and during exercise [3], where a reduced sympathetic activation was suspected as the modulating factor at
steady-state exercise intensities.
In submersion studies with moderate exercise on a bicycle ergometer, a lower V̇E was observed at depth (470 kPa ambient pressure) with a PIO2 of 21 kPa [5], which suggests the sole influence of submersion, and under hyperoxia (175 kPa PIO2) [5]
[6]. These studies observed no effects on V̇E between 70 kPa and 130 kPa PIO2, which might be attributed to the counteracting effects of breathing gas density
at depth. However, most findings so far are from cycle ergometer experiments in the
laboratory or a pressure chamber and did not consider specific sport-diving aspects
like exercise modality (i. e. fin-swimming vs. cycling), the body-position in the
water (i. e. upright vs. supine), or immersion with potential influences on physiological
reactions such as metabolism, blood shift, and breathing resistance. In combination
with an increased FIO2 in the breathing gas (i. e. 56 kPa at 4 m water depth), exercise modality might affect
O2 consumption and whole blood lactate production, at least in transient phases, and
therefore the respiratory drive. In turn, factors like V̇E, HR, perceived exertion, and time to exhaustion (TTE) might be affected in an applied
context during incremental exercise. Therefore, former findings need verification
in an applied field setting for sport diving.
In this study, we investigated the effects of either AIR (21% O2) or EAN (40% O2) as breathing gas on V̇E, HR, lactate concentration [Lac-], and TTE during underwater incremental fin-swimming. We hypothesized, that V̇E and HR are lowered for EAN at given fin-swimming speeds. Additionally, lower [Lac-] after exhaustive underwater fin-swimming was expected.
Materials and Methods
Participants
An a priori sample size calculation (G*Power 3.1.9.2) demanded a total sample size
of 10 participants to obtain an effect size f=0.5 and power of 1−β=0.80 with a mixed
design and a significance level of α<0.05. Eleven healthy, young, and physically-fit
sport students participated in the study (see [Table 1]). One female participant did not complete the velocity of 0.8 m·s−1 for both conditions and was excluded from the analysis (N=10; 25±4 years (mean±SD);
5 females). Each participant performed two test conditions with incremental underwater
fin-swimming until exhaustion, breathing either AIR or EAN. All tests were conducted
in an indoor pool (20 ×20 × 5 meters) in approximately 4 m water depth. A valid medical
examination for diving and diving experience of five or more open-water dives was
mandatory for participation. All divers were informed about the purpose and design
of the study and signed an informed consent form before participation. Termination
of participation was possible at all times without reasoning. An ethics committee,
following the declaration of Helsinki, approved the study [29].
Table 1 Table shows individual values, mean values, and standard deviation for the number
of open-water dives, overall and specific fin-swimming self-stated fitness level,
and weekly training hours for all participants (N=10).
Age [years]
|
Weight [kg]
|
Height [cm]
|
Open-water dives
|
physical training [h per week]
|
overall fitness level [self-stated]
|
fin-swimming fitness level [self-stated]
|
23
|
67
|
175
|
72
|
12
|
good
|
good
|
25
|
78
|
173
|
12
|
10
|
medium
|
medium
|
24
|
70
|
170
|
35
|
3
|
medium
|
medium
|
23
|
82
|
185
|
25
|
3
|
good
|
good
|
22
|
61
|
168
|
25
|
1
|
medium
|
medium
|
21
|
68
|
180
|
14
|
6
|
good
|
good
|
22
|
55
|
167
|
400
|
10
|
good
|
good
|
23
|
78
|
177
|
65
|
10
|
good
|
good
|
27
|
82
|
176
|
5
|
5
|
good
|
medium
|
36
|
72
|
178
|
14
|
2
|
medium
|
bad
|
25
|
71
|
175
|
67
|
6
|
|
|
4
|
8
|
5
|
113
|
4
|
|
|
Study Design
All participants performed two test conditions in a crossover, randomized and double-blind
design with a mandatory interval of 2–7 days to ensure full physical recovery. Neither
the test conductor nor the participants knew which gas was used in which test. Only
the study supervisor knew the organization of test conditions and gas logistics. In
one condition, the breathing gas was normal air (AIR), and in the other oxygen-enriched
air (40% O2, enriched air Nitrox: EAN). Test conditions differed solely by the breathing gas
(AIR, EAN). The diving gear was provided and consisted of a 3 mm wetsuit, a 10 L steel
tank, a commercially available buoyancy control device (BCD), a breathing regulator,
mask and fins.
The fit2dive-test’s underwater exercise parcours [30] was utilized for incremental fin-swimming. The test was developed to enable specific
exercise testing for sport divers, taking into account specific locomotion, equipment-induced
water drag, and fin-swimming technique. The parcours consisted of a 50 m-long rope
that was anchored to the bottom of the pool in the shape of a hexagon. Checkpoints
were marked with a buoy to allow for self-controlled fin-swimming velocity with a
marching-table and stopwatch. After a mandatory round of slow fin-swimming for familiarization,
participants then started swimming under the supervision of the test conductor. Fin-swimming
velocity was increased in 150 s-long steps of 0.4 m·s-1, 0.6 m·s-1
, 0.8 m·s-1
, and 1.0 m·s-1. The test ended if two consecutive checkpoints could not be reached according to
the marching chart. Participants then surfaced together with the test conductor and
stated their rating of perceived exertion (RPE) on a scale ranging from “very light”
(6) to “full exertion” (20) [31].
Measurements
Process during incremental exercise was tracked by the test conductor. The maximum
time to exhaustion was noted for every participant and condition. HR and tank pressure
was recorded with a heartrate-belt and pressure transmitter, respectively. Recordings
were made every 4 s and stored on the dive computer for later analysis. Before the
start of physical exercise , a 3-min HR-baseline measurement was recorded in the supine
position at 5 m water depth.
Whole blood [Lac-] was determined from earlobe blood samples once before submersion (i. e. after 30 min
of rest; baseline) and five times with one-minute intervals after exercise, the first
sample taken immediately after the termination of exercise and surfacing with the
participants (i. e. approx. 15 s after exercise). The maximum lactate concentration
[Lac-]max was determined as the highest value out of the five samples taken after exercise.
The samples were stored cooled and analyzed the same day in the laboratory.
Data Processing
V̇E was calculated for ambient pressure using tank-pressure and depth recordings from
the diving computer. In our formula, V̇E [L·min-1] is the amount of gas consumed per minute, ΔPtank [kPa] is the difference in tank pressure throughout 40 s, Vtank [L] is the volume of the tank, and Pdepth [kpa] is the mean of depth reading (recorded every 4 s) throughout 40 s multiplied
by 10 kPa+100 kPa. Means for V̇E and HR were determined during the last 20 s of every velocity.
V̇E =∆Ptank×Vtank×Pdepth
−1
The second ventilatory threshold (VT2) was estimated for both conditions by three
experienced evaluators as the point of over-proportional increase of V̇E in relation to HR (see [Fig. 1]), marking rapid lactate increase and hyperventilation [32]. VT2 was utilized to gain information on the participants' metabolism during exercise,
as we could not perform spiroergometric measurements or take lactate samples underwater.
Fig. 1 Data shows the determination of the ventilatory threshold at the disproportional
increase of Ventilation (V̇E) in ratio to heart rate (HR). Example of one subject.
[Table 2] shows means and standard deviations for V̇E, HR, and time at VT2 for the three independent estimations. Figures show means and
95% confidence intervals. Mean values for V̇E and HR throughout the exercise were calculated over the last 20 s at rest and for
every fin-swimming velocity.
Table 2 Mean values for ventilation (V̇E [L]) and heart rate (HR [min−1]) were calculated for the last 20 seconds of every velocity (Rest, 0.4, 0.6, and
0.8 m·s-1). The maximum whole blood lactate [Lac-]max [mmol·L−1] was the highest lactate sample taken after incremental exercise. The maximum time
to exhaustion (TTE) was the time accomplished during incremental exercise. The rating
of perceived exertion (RPE) was stated directly after exercise. HR, V̇E, and time for ventilatory threshold (VT2) were estimated by three experienced evaluators.
Table shows means±standard deviation. *P<0.05 for comparisons of breathing gases (AIR
vs. EAN).
|
Variable
|
EAN [40% O2]
|
AIR [21% O2]
|
Rest
|
[Lac-]
|
[mmol·L-1]
|
1.31±0.5
|
1.43±0.6
|
HR
|
[bpm]
|
96±12
|
96±13
|
V̇E
|
[L·min-1]
|
17±7
|
18±6
|
0.4 [m·s-1]
|
HR
|
[bpm]
|
111±8
|
108±14
|
V̇E
|
[L·min-1]
|
22±4
|
22±6
|
0.6 [m·s-1]
|
HR
|
[bpm]
|
145±14
|
140±19
|
V̇E
*
|
[L·min-1]
|
35±7
|
44±12
|
0.8 [m·s-1]
|
HR
|
[bpm]
|
171±10
|
170±14
|
V̇E
*
|
[L·min-1]
|
63±26
|
74±25
|
VT2
|
HR
|
[bpm]
|
149±19
|
153±13
|
V̇E
|
[L·min-1]
|
34±10
|
38±10
|
Time
|
[s]
|
327±74
|
344±83
|
Max
|
RPE
|
[a.u.]
|
16±2
|
15.9±1.7
|
TTE
|
[s]
|
480±62
|
480±71
|
[Lac-]max
|
[mmol·L-1]
|
6.9±1.2
|
7.1±1.4
|
Statistics
Using SPSS statistics 25 (IBM, USA), all variables were checked for a violation of
normal distribution using the Shapiro-Wilks test. Alpha was set to 0.05. Two-way ANOVAs
with repeated measures on the factors gas (AIR, EAN) and velocity (Rest, 0.4 m·s−1, 0.6 m·s−1
, and 0.8 m·s−1) were calculated for HR, V̇E and [Lac-]. Multiple mean value comparisons according to Bonferroni and one-tailed
pairwise comparisons were used to investigate significant results. The correlation
between [Lac-]max and TTE was investigated using the correlation coefficient from Spearman. For main-effects,
effect-sizes were estimated using partial eta squared (η2
p), where values=0.01 indicate a small effect, values=0.06 a medium effect, and values=0.14
a large effect. For post-hoc comparisons, Cohen’s d was computed as the quotient from
the difference between two means and the mean standard deviation, where values between
0.2 and 0.5 indicate a small effect, values between 0.5 and 0.8 indicate a medium
effect, and values > 0.8 indicate a large effect [33].
Results
The analysis of V̇E produced significant main effects for the factor gas (F(1, 9)=7.52; P=0.023; η2
p=0.455) and velocity (F(1.25, 11.21)=39.59; P<0.001; η2
p=0.815). An interaction effect for gas*velocity could not be found (F(1.51, 13.52)=2.52;
P=0.126; η2
p=0.220). Post-hoc, values for EAN were significantly lower compared to AIR during
the velocities of 0.6 m·s−1 (P=0.032; d=1.02) and 0.8 m·s−1 (P=0.037; d=0.47). Participants reached VT2 at a similar time during exercise (AIR,
EAN) with no significant differences for HR and V̇E (see [Fig. 2] and [Table 1]).
Fig. 2 The X-axis depicts rest and the velocities 0.4, 0.6, and 0.8 m·s-1. Means and 95% confidence intervals are shown for heart rate (upper two graphs) and
ventilation (V̇E, lower two graphs) for the conditions normal air (AIR) and oxygen-enriched air (EAN).
*P<0.05 for comparisons of breathing gases (AIR vs. EAN).
HR showed a significant main effect for velocity (F(1.75, 15.74)=154.27; P<0.001;
η2
p=0.945), but not for gas (F(1,9)=0.691; P=0.427; η2
p=0.071) or gas*velocity (F(1.58,14.18)=0.453; P=0.599; η2
p=0.048). [Lac-] did not show any significant variations between EAN and AIR (F(1, 9)=0.16; P=0.699;
η2
p=0.017, see [Fig. 3]). No difference for TTE or RPE during exercise was found between conditions (F(1,
9)=0.037; P=0.852; η2
p=0.004, see [Table 2]).
Fig. 3 Means and 95% confidence intervals for samples of whole blood lactate concentrations
[Lac-] from the earlobe. Samples were taken once before exercise (Rest) and every minute
for five times directly following incremental exercise (Post+x min).
For AIR, Spearman correlation coefficient showed a significant correlation for [Lac-] and TTE (rs=0.638; P=0.047). A correlation with EAN showed no significant effects (rs=0.329; P=0.353).
Discussion
Our results show a significantly lower V̇E with EAN for the fin-swimming velocities of 0.6 m·s−1 and 0.8 m·s−1 in shallow underwater settings compared to AIR. Surprisingly, [Lac-]max after exercise did not show any significant differences between AIR and EAN. We observed
no differences or correlations for HR, TTE, or the ventilatory threshold.
Thus, it can be speculated why the effect of a lower V̇E only shows for high velocities. In normobaric conditions, hemoglobin in arterial
blood is typically saturated for 97% or higher. Whereas increased PO2 has no relevant effects on hemoglobin saturation, the concentration of physically
dissolved oxygen increases linearly according to the ambient pressure (Henry’s law)
[34]. For normobaric conditions, the dissolved O2 concentration for an alveolar PO2 of 15 kilopascal (kPa) can be approximated to 3 mL·L-1 for AIR and 6.8 mL·L-1 for EAN (i. e. 34 kPa alveolar PO2), respectively, when assuming a physical solubility for O2 of 0.2 mL (L·kPa)-1
[35]. The inspiratory PIO2 for EAN in the present study results in more than two times the physically dissolved
O2 in the arterial blood [O2 art] when compared to AIR (see [Table. 3]). At 25 m, which is a common water depth in sport diving, breathing EAN leads to
an O2 art of 26.8 mL·L-1.
Table 3 Relation of inspiratory and alveolar oxygen partial pressure (PO2 [kPa]) and the related arterial O2 concentration [O2
art] for AIR (21% O2) and EAN (40% O2) as breathing gases. Data were calculated for normobaric (100 kPa) and hyperbaric
(140 kPa and 350 kPa, respectively) underwater conditions.
|
EAN [40% O2]
|
AIR [21% O2]
|
PO2 [kPa]
|
[O2art][mL·L−1]
|
PO2 [kPa]
|
[O2art][mL·L−1]
|
normobaric [100 kPa]
|
inspiratory
|
40
|
6.8
|
21.0
|
3.0
|
alveolar
|
34
|
15.0
|
hyperbaric [underwater] [140 kPa]
|
inspiratory
|
56
|
10.00
|
29.4
|
4.7
|
alveolar
|
50
|
23.4
|
hyperbaric [underwater] [350 kPa]
|
inspiratory
|
140
|
26.8
|
73.5
|
13.5
|
alveolar
|
134
|
67.5
|
We assume that during rest and low velocities (i. e. 0.4 m·s-1), the muscles’ oxygen demand is sufficiently covered. With increasing exercise intensity,
the delay of cardiovascular adaptations to the working muscles increased O2-demand then creates a local oxygen deficit [36]
[37]. An increased O2 supply and the accompanying greater amount of oxygen in the blood increase oxygen
uptake (V̇O2), and could enhance the diffusion of oxygen to the muscle [20]. As a result, additional glycogen oxidation could attenuate the accumulation of
lactate and respiratory acidosis [3]
[26]
[37]. Hyperoxia (e. g. hyperbaric conditions underwater) might reduce the amount of metabolic
anaerobic glycolysis at least during transient phases after increased exercise intensity
[38], thus reducing lactate production and maintaining a higher ph-value with a slower
increase in V̇E from an alleviated respiratory drive [26]
[38]. This seems especially relevant with a decreased oxygen deficit during work rate
transitions and high-intensity exercise [16]
[36]
[38], where the acceleration of V̇O2 kinetics must be assumed [38]
[39]. These metabolic adaptions and their influence on VT2 could be backed up in future
studies involving spirometric measurements.
It should be noted that other studies reported decreases in V̇E during hyperoxic exercise accompanied by a decrease in blood lactate [20]
[40]
[41]
[42], which is inconsistent with our data (see [37] for a review). Differences in [Lac-] might become clearer with measurements conducted during exercise, which was not
possible in this experimental setup. In this study, maximum values measured after exercise might not reflect the metabolic state during exercise. Some authors also emphasized the relevance of individual physical fitness
and exercise intensity [20] as well as recruited muscle mass [43] on lactate production during hyperoxic exercise. In line with our findings, Pederson
et al. reported only non-significantly lower [Lac-] during submaximal exercise involving small muscle groups [44]. Although these differences between underwater fin-swimming and modalities like
running and cycling might explain our findings, new technologies for continuous underwater
lactate measurements should be employed in future studies.
TTE and RPE, which did not differ between conditions in our study, most likely depend
on exercise modality (i. e. running vs. cycling), the applied exercise test (i. e.
time trials, constant work rate, incremental exercise), exercise duration, and FIO2
[37]. Some studies reported a prolonged TTE and RPE in hyperoxic settings [3]
[23]
[37]
[45], whereas Peeling et al. observed influences on RPE only with FIO2>100 kPa [25]. In the present study, work rate stages during incremental exercise were defined
by velocity rather than power. In contrast to exercise in the laboratory, water-resistance
underwater increases exponentially with velocity, thus making an increase in work
rate more difficult, especially during high-intensity exercise. The absence of a prolonged
TTE was likely dependent on the individual fin-swimming efficiency and leg strength,
and therefore individual physical exhaustion was not reached in every test. Future
studies should investigate these effects for different water depths, PO2 and prolonged constant work rates.
Conclusions
Our results reveal a significantly lower V̇E for high-intensity fin swimming (i. e.≥0.6 m·s-1) in shallow water in hyperoxia (PIO2=56 kPa) compared to normal air. No effects were observed for [Lac-]max, TTE, and RPE. Hyperoxic gases like EAN40 (=40% O2) are frequently used by sport divers and gas consumption plays a major role in planning
and executing dives with a limited gas supply. During a dive at 20 m water depth,
our results would suggest 270 L less gas consumed for 10 min of fin-swimming at 0.6 m·s-1, when using EAN instead of normal air (i. e. 27 bar or~400 psi less in a 10 L dive
tank). This velocity can be considered reasonable when swimming against a current.
Although exercise intensity, modality, ambient pressure (i. e. increased PIO2 at depth), and accompanying increased breathing gas density must be considered as
modulating factors, the use of hyperoxic gases in sport diving could lower V̇E in shallow water contexts and therefore increase the duration or safety of the dive
with higher gas reserves.
Declaration of Helsinki statement
Declaration of Helsinki statement
This study followed the rules of the declaration of Helsinki.