Download PDF
MSK – Muskuloskelettale Physiotherapie 2021; 25(05): 242-249
DOI: 10.1055/a-1555-2124
Originalarbeit

Der Effekt von Action Observation Therapy auf die Extension nach einer vorderen Kreuzbandplastik: eine randomisierte kontrollierte Pilotstudie

PilotstudieThe Effect of Action Observation Therapy on Extension after Anterior Cruciate Ligament Reconstruction: A Randomized Controlled Pilot StudyPilot Study
Benoit Doutressoulles
1   PANOVIA, Hürth
,
Michael Richter
2   Physiotherapie am Michel, Hamburg
3   DFOMPT e. V.
› Author Affiliations
› Further Information
Also available at
   Permissions and Reprints

Zusammenfassung

Eine bekannte Komplikation nach einer Plastik des vorderen Kreuzbandes (VKB) ist das Extensionsdefizit (ED). Ziel dieser Studie war, zu erforschen, ob eine zusätzlich zu den klassischen Streckübungen eingesetzte einmalige Anwendung der „Action Observation Therapy“ (AOT) die Extension des Kniegelenks nach einer VKB-Plastik deutlicher verbessert als eine Therapiesitzung ohne AOT.

13 Proband(inn)en mit ED nach einer VKB-Plastik wurden in eine AOT-Gruppe (n = 8) und eine Kontrollgruppe (n = 5) randomisiert. Jede Gruppe erhielt eine Therapiesitzung. Die Therapie bestand aus dem Betrachten eines Videos, gefolgt von aktiven Extensionsübungen, wobei das Video der AOT-Gruppe Extensionsübungen und das der Kontrollgruppe Landschaftsaufnahmen zeigte. Primäres Outcome war das Bewegungsausmaß der aktiven Extension, als sekundäre Outcomes wurden das Bewegungsausmaß der passiven Extension und die Heel-Height Difference (HHD) gemessen. Die Messungen erfolgten direkt vor und nach der Behandlung.

Die aktive Extension verbesserte sich sowohl in der AOT-Gruppe (von ∅ –2,0° (± 6,3) auf ∅ 0,8° (± 3,9), p = 0,036) als auch in der Kontrollgruppe (von ∅ –8,2° (± 5,5) auf ∅ –5,6° (± 4,7), p = 0,049). Die aktive Extension war in der AOT-Gruppe nach der Intervention signifikant besser als in der Kontrollgruppe (p = 0,023). Für die passive Extension und die HHD gab es keine signifikanten Unterschiede zwischen beiden Gruppen.

Bei Patient(inn)en nach einer VKB-Plastik zeigte sich in der Gruppe mit AOT eine bessere aktive Knieextension als in der Kontrollgruppe ohne AOT. Weitere Arbeiten mit einer größeren Stichprobe und einer längeren Verlaufskontrolle sind notwendig, um diese Ergebnisse zu bestätigen.

Abstract

A frequent complication after the reconstruction of the anterior cruciate ligament (ACL) is an extension deficit (ED). It was the aim of this study to research whether a one-time application of Action Observation Therapy (AOT) in addition to classic extension exercises significantly improved extension of the knee joint after ACL reconstruction, relative to a therapeutic session without AOT.

13 subjects with ED after ACL reconstruction were randomly assigned to an AOT group (n = 8) and a control group (n = 5). Each group received one therapy session. Therapy consisted of watching a video, followed by active extension exercises. The video for the AOT group contained extension exercises, while the one shown to the control group contained landscape shots. Primary outcome measure was the ROM of active extension. Secondary outcome measures were the ROM of passive extension as well as heel height difference (HHD). The measurements were taken immediately before and directly after the intervention.

Active extension improved in the AOT group (from ∅ –2.0° (± 6.3) to ∅ 0.8° (± 3.9), p = 0.036) as well as in the control group (from ∅ –8.2° (± 5.5) to ∅ –5.6° (± 4.7), p = 0.049). However, after the intervention, active extension in the AOT group was significantly better than in the control group (p = 0.023). With regard to passive extension and HHD, there were no significant differences between the two groups.

For patients after an ACL reconstruction, the group that received AOT showed better active knee extension than the control group that did not receive AOT. Further studies with larger samples and longer follow-up periods are required to confirm these results.

Schlüsselwörter

VKB-Plastik - vorderes Kreuzband - Video-Therapie - Action Observation Therapy - Knieextension

Key words

ACL reconstruction - anterior cruciate ligament - video therapy - Action Observation Therapy - knee extension


Publication History

Received: 24 February 2021

Accepted: 26 March 2021

Article published online:
14 December 2021

© 2021. Thieme. All rights reserved.

Georg Thieme Verlag KG
Rüdigerstraße 14, 70469 Stuttgart, Germany

 

  • Literatur

  • 1 Sanders TL, Maradit Kremers H, Bryan AJ. et al. Incidence of Anterior Cruciate Ligament Tears and Reconstruction: A 21-Year Population-Based Study. Am J Sports Med 2016; 44: 1502-1507
    CrossrefPubMedSearch in Google Scholar
  • 2 Robertson GA, Coleman SG, Keating JF. Knee stiffness following anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction: the incidence and associated factors of knee stiffness following anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction. Knee 2009; 16: 245-247
    CrossrefPubMedSearch in Google Scholar
  • 3 Mauro CS, Irrgang JJ, Williams BA. et al. Loss of extension following anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction: analysis of incidence and etiology using IKDC criteria. Arthroscopy 2008; 24: 146-153
    CrossrefPubMedSearch in Google Scholar
  • 4 McHugh MP, Tyler TF, Gleim GW. et al. Preoperative indicators of motion loss and weakness following anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction. J Orthop Sports Phys Ther 1998; 27: 407-411
    CrossrefPubMedSearch in Google Scholar
  • 5 Irrgang JJ, Harner CD, Fu FH. et al. Loss of Motion Following ACL Reconstruction: A Second Look. Journal of Sport Rehabilitation 1997; 6: 213-225
    CrossrefSearch in Google Scholar
  • 6 Irrgang JJ, Harner CD. Loss of Motion Following Knee Ligament Reconstruction. Sports Med 1995; 19: 150-159
    CrossrefPubMedSearch in Google Scholar
  • 7 Sachs RA, Daniel DM, Stone ML. et al. Patellofemoral problems after anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction. Am J Sports Med 1989; 17: 760-765
    CrossrefPubMedSearch in Google Scholar
  • 8 Christanell F, Hoser C, Huber R. et al. The influence of electromyographic biofeedback therapy on knee extension following anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction: a randomized controlled trial. Sports Med Arthrosc Rehabil Ther Technol 2012; 4: 41
    CrossrefPubMedSearch in Google Scholar
  • 9 Shelbourne KD, Urch SE, Gray T. et al. Loss of normal knee motion after anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction is associated with radiographic arthritic changes after surgery. Am J Sports Med 2012; 40: 108-113
    CrossrefPubMedSearch in Google Scholar
  • 10 Shelbourne KD, Gray T. Minimum 10-year results after anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction: how the loss of normal knee motion compounds other factors related to the development of osteoarthritis after surgery. Am J Sports Med 2009; 37: 471-480
    CrossrefPubMedSearch in Google Scholar
  • 11 Engelhardt M, Freiwald J, Rittmeister M. Rehabilitation nach vorderer Kreuzbandplastik. Der Orthopäde 2002; 31: 791-798
    CrossrefPubMedSearch in Google Scholar
  • 12 Lepley AS, Ly MT, Grooms DR. et al. Corticospinal tract structure and excitability in patients with anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction: A DTI and TMS study. NeuroImage: Clinical 2020; 25: 102157
    CrossrefPubMedSearch in Google Scholar
  • 13 Konishi Y, Konishi H, Fukubayashi T. Gamma loop dysfunction in quadriceps on the contralateral side in patients with ruptured ACL. Med Sci Sports Exerc 2003; 35: 897-900
    CrossrefPubMedSearch in Google Scholar
  • 14 Rice DA, McNair PJ. Quadriceps arthrogenic muscle inhibition: neural mechanisms and treatment perspectives. Semin Arthritis Rheum 2010; 40: 250-266
    CrossrefPubMedSearch in Google Scholar
  • 15 Sonnery-Cottet B, Saithna A, Quelard B. et al. Arthrogenic muscle inhibition after ACL reconstruction: a scoping review of the efficacy of interventions. Br J Sports Med 2019; 53: 289-298
    CrossrefPubMedSearch in Google Scholar
  • 16 Suso-Martí L, León-Hernández JV, La Touche R. et al. Motor Imagery and Action Observation of Specific Neck Therapeutic Exercises Induced Hypoalgesia in Patients with Chronic Neck Pain: A Randomized Single-Blind Placebo Trial. J Clin Med 2019; 8: 1019
    CrossrefPubMedSearch in Google Scholar
  • 17 Sarasso E, Gemma M, Agosta F. et al. Action observation training to improve motor function recovery: a systematic review. Archives of Physiotherapy 2015; 5: 14
    CrossrefPubMedSearch in Google Scholar
  • 18 Cuenca-Martínez F, Suso-Martí L, Sánchez-Martín D. et al. Effects of Motor Imagery and Action Observation on Lumbo-pelvic Motor Control, Trunk Muscles Strength and Level of Perceived Fatigue: A Randomized Controlled Trial. Res Q Exerc Sport 2020; 91: 34-46
    CrossrefPubMedSearch in Google Scholar
  • 19 Mizuguchi N, Kanosue K. Changes in brain activity during action observation and motor imagery: Their relationship with motor learning. Prog Brain Res 2017; 234: 189-204
    CrossrefPubMedSearch in Google Scholar
  • 20 Mulder T. Motor imagery and action observation: cognitive tools for rehabilitation. J Neural Transm 2007; 114: 1265-1278
    CrossrefPubMedSearch in Google Scholar
  • 21 Smith TO, Postle K, Penny F. et al. Is reconstruction the best management strategy for anterior cruciate ligament rupture? A systematic review and meta-analysis comparing anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction versus non-operative treatment. Knee 2014; 21: 462-470
    CrossrefPubMedSearch in Google Scholar
  • 22 Urbaniak GC, Plous S. Research Randomizer. 2013 Im Internet: https://www.randomizer.org/ (Stand: 29.01.2020)
    PubMedSearch in Google Scholar
  • 23 Norkin CC, White DJ. Measurement of Joint Motion: A Guide to Goniometry. 5th. ed.. Philadelphia: F. a. Davis Company; 2016
    Search in Google Scholar
  • 24 Hancock GE, Hepworth T, Wembridge K. Accuracy and reliability of knee goniometry methods. J Exp Orthop 2018; 5: 46
    CrossrefPubMedSearch in Google Scholar
  • 25 Schlegel TF, Boublik M, Hawkins RJ. et al. Reliability of heel-height measurement for documenting knee extension deficits. Am J Sports Med 2002; 30: 479-482
    CrossrefPubMedSearch in Google Scholar
  • 26 Bellelli G, Buccino G, Bernardini B. et al. Action observation treatment improves recovery of postsurgical orthopedic patients: evidence for a top-down effect?. Arch Phys Med Rehabil 2010; 91: 1489-1494
    CrossrefPubMedSearch in Google Scholar
  • 27 Villafañe JH, Isgrò M, Borsatti M. et al. Effects of action observation treatment in recovery after total knee replacement: a prospective clinical trial. Clin Rehabil 2017; 31: 361-368
    CrossrefPubMedSearch in Google Scholar
  • 28 Free stock video. Top 100 Free Stock Videos 4 K Review and Download in Pixabay. 2018 Im Internet: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=tnGaCZZ5Z28 (Stand: 27.09.2020)
    PubMedSearch in Google Scholar
  • 29 Park SD, Song HS, Kim JY. The effect of action observation training on knee joint function and gait ability in total knee replacement patients. J Exerc Rehabil 2014; 10: 168-171
    CrossrefPubMedSearch in Google Scholar
  • 30 Lebon F, Guillot A, Collet C. Increased muscle activation following motor imagery during the rehabilitation of the anterior cruciate ligament. Appl Psychophysiol Biofeedback 2012; 37: 45-51
    CrossrefPubMedSearch in Google Scholar
  • 31 Buccino G. Action observation treatment: a novel tool in neurorehabilitation. Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci 2014; 369: 20130185
    CrossrefPubMedSearch in Google Scholar
  • 32 Rio E, Kidgell D, Purdam C. et al. Isometric exercise induces analgesia and reduces inhibition in patellar tendinopathy. Br J Sports Med 2015; 49: 1277-1283
    CrossrefPubMedSearch in Google Scholar
  • 33 Rizzolatti G, Fogassi L. The mirror mechanism: recent findings and perspectives. Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci 2014; 369: 20130420
    CrossrefPubMedSearch in Google Scholar
  • 34 Lee D, Roh H, Park J. et al. Drinking Behavior Training for Stroke Patients Using Action Observation and Practice of Upper Limb Function. J Phys Ther Sci 2013; 25: 611-614
    CrossrefPubMedSearch in Google Scholar
  • 35 Hunt MA, Di Ciacca SR, Jones IC. et al. Effect of Anterior Tibiofemoral Glides on Knee Extension during Gait in Patients with Decreased Range of Motion after Anterior Cruciate Ligament Reconstruction. Physiother Can 2010; 62: 235-241
    CrossrefPubMedSearch in Google Scholar
  • 36 Wiggins AJ, Grandhi RK, Schneider DK. et al. Risk of Secondary Injury in Younger Athletes After Anterior Cruciate Ligament Reconstruction: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis. Am J Sports Med 2016; 44: 1861-1876
    CrossrefPubMedSearch in Google Scholar