Endoscopy 2022; 54(10): E583-E584
DOI: 10.1055/a-1704-7548
E-Videos

Subtotal esophageal endoscopic submucosal dissection for long-segment Barrett’s esophagus and adenocarcinoma

Department of Gastroenterology, Graduate School of Medicine, The University of Tokyo, Tokyo, Japan
,
Yoshiki Sakaguchi
Department of Gastroenterology, Graduate School of Medicine, The University of Tokyo, Tokyo, Japan
,
Sayaka Nagao
Department of Gastroenterology, Graduate School of Medicine, The University of Tokyo, Tokyo, Japan
,
Yosuke Tsuji
Department of Gastroenterology, Graduate School of Medicine, The University of Tokyo, Tokyo, Japan
,
Department of Gastroenterology, Graduate School of Medicine, The University of Tokyo, Tokyo, Japan
› Author Affiliations
 

A 73-year-old man was referred to our department with a diagnosis of esophageal adenocarcinoma (EAC) in long-segment Barrett’s esophagus (BE), Prague classification C12M14. The long-segment BE extended to the upper thoracic esophagus and non-detectable adenocarcinoma was confirmed in multiple areas of the long-segment BE by random biopsies ([Fig. 1]). Esophageal endoscopic submucosal dissection (ESD) of the entire area of long-segment BE was therefore performed, with the patient under general anesthesia ([Video 1]). The lesion was resected en bloc ([Fig. 2]), in 220 minutes, with no adverse events. The total circumferential wound was 16 cm in length, and steroid injection and polyglycolic acid shielding were performed to prevent stenosis [1]. Histological assessment showed a curative resection, with adenocarcinoma invasion limited to the superficial muscularis mucosa, no lymphovascular invasion, and tumor-free margins ([Fig. 3]). After the patient’s discharge, local steroid injections were performed periodically. Squamous epithelium regeneration was found in the post-ESD area 6 months after ESD, with no recurrence of BE, and no evidence of stenosis ([Fig. 4]).

Zoom Image
Fig. 1 Endoscopic view showing long-segment Barrett’s esophagus (C12M14), within which biopsies detected esophageal adenocarcinoma in multiple depressed areas, and also within the surrounding mucosa (yellow arrows).

Video 1 Subtotal esophageal endoscopic submucosal dissection is performed to treat long-segment Barrett’s esophagus and adenocarcinoma.


Quality:
Zoom Image
Fig. 2 Photograph of the full circumferential resection specimen, which was wrapped around a 50-mL syringe.
Zoom Image
Fig. 3 Macroscopic appearance of the specimen, which was 111 × 91 mm and contained a lesion of 58 × 31 mm in size (red lines).
Zoom Image
Fig. 4 Endoscopic appearance on follow-up endoscopies showing: a after 1 month, regeneration of squamous epithelium; b after 6 months, further regeneration of squamous epithelium, without recurrence of Barrett’s esophagus, and with no evidence of stenosis.

Currently, radiofrequency ablation, cryotherapy, or hybrid argon plasma coagulation after endoscopic resection are recommended as treatment methods for BE, including where high grade dysplasia is present [2]; intraepithelial carcinoma has also been reported to be controllable by these methods. On the other hand, there is a risk of buried BE due to remnant BE after these endoscopic therapies [3]. In this case, ESD not only resulted in curative treatment of the EAC, confirmable by histologic assessment following R0 resection, but also resulted in complete en bloc resection of the BE, with no risk of remnant BE. Recent advances in endoscopic technology, resection methods, and the development of effective methods of prophylactic treatment for adverse events have enabled safe and effective extensive esophageal ESD [4] [5]. Curative treatment with just one session of ESD may become a new standard for treatment of EAC in BE.

Endoscopy_UCTN_Code_TTT_1AO_2AG

Endoscopy E-Videos
https://eref.thieme.de/e-videos

Endoscopy E-Videos is an open access online section, reporting on interesting cases and new techniques in gastroenterological endoscopy. All papers include a high quality video and all contributions are freely accessible online. Processing charges apply (currently EUR 375), discounts and wavers acc. to HINARI are available.

This section has its own submission website at https://mc.manuscriptcentral.com/e-videos


#

Competing interests

The authors declare that they have no conflict of interest.

  • References

  • 1 Sakaguchi Y, Tsuji Y, Shinozaki T. et al. Steroid injection and polyglycolic acid shielding to prevent stricture after esophageal endoscopic submucosal dissection: a retrospective comparative analysis (with video). Gastrointest Endosc 2020; 92: 1176-1186
  • 2 Sharma P, Shaheen NJ, Katzka D. et al. AGA Clinical Practice Update on endoscopic treatment of Barrett's esophagus with dysplasia and/or early cancer: Expert Review. Gastroenterology 2020; 158: 760-769
  • 3 Rouphael C, Anil Kumar M, Sanaka MR. et al. Indications, contraindications and limitations of endoscopic therapy for Barrettʼs esophagus and early esophageal adenocarcinoma. Therap Adv Gastroenterol 2020; 13: 1756284820924209
  • 4 Abe S, Wu SYS, Ego M. et al. Efficacy of current traction techniques for endoscopic submucosal dissection. Gut Liver 2020; 14: 673-684
  • 5 Hamada K, Kawano K, Yamauchi A. et al. Efficacy of endoscopic submucosal dissection of esophageal neoplasms under general anesthesia. Clin Endosc 2019; 52: 252-257

Corresponding author

Yoshiki Sakaguchi, MD, PhD
Department of Gastroenterology
Graduate School of Medicine
The University of Tokyo
7-3-1, Hongo, Bunkyo-ku
Tokyo, 113-8655
Japan   

Publication History

Article published online:
21 December 2021

© 2021. Thieme. All rights reserved.

Georg Thieme Verlag KG
Rüdigerstraße 14, 70469 Stuttgart, Germany

  • References

  • 1 Sakaguchi Y, Tsuji Y, Shinozaki T. et al. Steroid injection and polyglycolic acid shielding to prevent stricture after esophageal endoscopic submucosal dissection: a retrospective comparative analysis (with video). Gastrointest Endosc 2020; 92: 1176-1186
  • 2 Sharma P, Shaheen NJ, Katzka D. et al. AGA Clinical Practice Update on endoscopic treatment of Barrett's esophagus with dysplasia and/or early cancer: Expert Review. Gastroenterology 2020; 158: 760-769
  • 3 Rouphael C, Anil Kumar M, Sanaka MR. et al. Indications, contraindications and limitations of endoscopic therapy for Barrettʼs esophagus and early esophageal adenocarcinoma. Therap Adv Gastroenterol 2020; 13: 1756284820924209
  • 4 Abe S, Wu SYS, Ego M. et al. Efficacy of current traction techniques for endoscopic submucosal dissection. Gut Liver 2020; 14: 673-684
  • 5 Hamada K, Kawano K, Yamauchi A. et al. Efficacy of endoscopic submucosal dissection of esophageal neoplasms under general anesthesia. Clin Endosc 2019; 52: 252-257

Zoom Image
Fig. 1 Endoscopic view showing long-segment Barrett’s esophagus (C12M14), within which biopsies detected esophageal adenocarcinoma in multiple depressed areas, and also within the surrounding mucosa (yellow arrows).
Zoom Image
Fig. 2 Photograph of the full circumferential resection specimen, which was wrapped around a 50-mL syringe.
Zoom Image
Fig. 3 Macroscopic appearance of the specimen, which was 111 × 91 mm and contained a lesion of 58 × 31 mm in size (red lines).
Zoom Image
Fig. 4 Endoscopic appearance on follow-up endoscopies showing: a after 1 month, regeneration of squamous epithelium; b after 6 months, further regeneration of squamous epithelium, without recurrence of Barrett’s esophagus, and with no evidence of stenosis.