Int J Sports Med 2022; 43(07): 593-599
DOI: 10.1055/a-1710-1492
Physiology & Biochemistry

Fast-velocity Resistance Training Improves Force Development and Mobility in Multiple Sclerosis

1   International Chair of Sports Medicine, Universidad Católica San Antonio de Murcia, Murcia, Spain
2   Faculty of Sport, Universidad Católica San Antonio de Murcia, Murcia, Spain
,
Domingo Jesús Ramos-Campo
3   Department of Education, Universidad de Alcalá de Henares, Alcala de Henares, Spain
,
Linda H. Chung
4   UCAM Research Center for High Performance Sport, Universidad Católica San Antonio de Murcia, Murcia, Spain
,
Pedro Manonelles
1   International Chair of Sports Medicine, Universidad Católica San Antonio de Murcia, Murcia, Spain
,
5   LABIOMEP, University of Porto, Porto, Portugal
,
Jacobo Ángel Rubio-Arias
5   LABIOMEP, University of Porto, Porto, Portugal
› Author Affiliations
Funding This work has been supported partially by the Spanish Ministry of Education, Culture and Science through the National Program FPU.

Abstract

This study aimed to analyze the benefits of a lower-limb fast-velocity concentric resistance training on rate of force development, mobility, and quality of life in people with Multiple Sclerosis. A randomized controlled trial was conducted in 30 people with Multiple Sclerosis, who were randomly assigned to either an experimental (n=18) or a control (n=12) group. The experimental group carried out 10-weeks of fast-velocity concentric resistance training, while the control group did not perform any intervention. Early and late rate of force development during knee extension in both legs, sit-to-stand and Timed Up and Go tests and quality life questionnaire were evaluated before and after intervention. The training program evoked an increase in early rate of force development in experimental group (0–30; Rightleg: 63.9%, p<0.001; ES=-1.4; Leftleg: 52.7%, p<0.001; ES=-1.0) compared to control group (showed modest increases). Furthermore, experimental group improved mobility after training (Sit-to-stand: 22.2%, p<0.001; ES=1.0; Timed Up and Go Test: 10.1%, p<0.001; ES=1.1) and increased the perception of quality of life after training, while control showed no changes. The fast-velocity concentric resistance training has the potential to improve early rate of force development and mobility after 10-weeks of training. In addition, the increase in self-perceived quality of life following this training modality demonstrates promising results in the Multiple Sclerosis population.

Supplementary Material



Publication History

Received: 05 October 2021

Accepted: 28 November 2021

Accepted Manuscript online:
30 November 2021

Article published online:
02 February 2022

© 2022. Thieme. All rights reserved.

Georg Thieme Verlag KG
Rüdigerstraße 14, 70469 Stuttgart, Germany

 
  • References

  • 1 Dalgas U, Langeskov-Christensen M, Stenager E. et al. Exercise as medicine in multiple sclerosis – time for a paradigm shift: Preventive, symptomatic, and disease-modifying aspects and perspectives. Curr Neurol Neurosci Rep 2019; 19: 88
  • 2 Andreu-Caravaca L, Ramos-Campo DJ, Chung LH, Rubio-Arias JÁ. Dosage and effectiveness of aerobic training on cardiorespiratory fitness, functional capacity, balance, and fatigue in people with Multiple Sclerosis: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Arch Phys Med Rehabil 2021; 102: 1826-1839
  • 3 Platta ME, Ensari I, Motl RW, Pilutti LA. Effect of exercise training on fitness in multiple sclerosis: A meta-analysis. Arch Phys Med Rehabil 2016; 97: 1564-1572
  • 4 Kjølhede T, Vissing K, De Place L. et al. Neuromuscular adaptations to long-term progressive resistance training translates to improved functional capacity for people with multiple sclerosis and is maintained at follow-up. Mult Scler J 2015; 21: 599-611
  • 5 Jørgensen MLK, Dalgas U, Wens I, Hvid LG. Muscle strength and power in persons with multiple sclerosis – A systematic review and meta-analysis. J Neurol Sci 2017; 376: 225-241
  • 6 Blazevich AJ, Wilson CJ, Alcaraz PE, Rubio-Arias JA. Effects of resistance training movement pattern and velocity on isometric muscular rate of force development: A systematic review with meta-analysis and meta-regression. Sports Med 2020; 50: 943-963
  • 7 Da Rosa Orssatto LB, Cadore EL, Andersen LL, Diefenthaeler F. Why fast velocity resistance training should be prioritized for elderly people. Strength Cond J 2019; 41: 105-114
  • 8 da Rosa Orssatto LB, de la Rocha Freitas C, Shield AJ. et al. Effects of resistance training concentric velocity on older adults’ functional capacity: A systematic review and meta-analysis of randomised trials. Exp Gerontol 2019; 127: 110731
  • 9 Kjølhede T, Vissing K, Langeskov-Christensen D. et al. Relationship between muscle strength parameters and functional capacity in persons with mild to moderate degree multiple sclerosis. Mult Scler Relat Disord 2015; 4: 151-158
  • 10 Izquierdo M, Aguado X, Gonzalez R. et al. Maximal and explosive force production capacity and balance performance in men of different ages. Eur J Appl Physiol Occup Physiol 1999; 79: 260-267
  • 11 Dalgas U, Stenager E, Jakobsen J. et al. Fatigue, mood and quality of life improve in MS patients after progressive resistance training. Mult Scler 2010; 16: 480-490
  • 12 Kierkegaard M, Lundberg IE, Olsson T. et al. High-intensity resistance training in multiple sclerosis – An exploratory study of effects on immune markers in blood and cerebrospinal fluid, and on mood, fatigue, health-related quality of life, muscle strength, walking and cognition. J Neurol Sci 2016; 362: 251-257
  • 13 Keser I, Meric A, Kirdi N. et al. Comparing routine neurorehabilitation programme with callisthenic exercises in multiple sclerosis. NeuroRehabilitation 2011; 29: 91-98
  • 14 Dohoney P, Chromiak JA, Lemire D. et al. Prediction of one repetition maximum (1-RM) strength from a 4-6 RM and a 7-10 RM submaximal strength test in healthy young adult males. J Exerc Physiol Online 2002; 5: 54-59
  • 15 Andreu-Caravaca L, Chung LH, Ramos-Campo DJ. et al. Neuromuscular and mobility responses to a vibration session in hypoxia in multiple sclerosis. Int J Sports Med 2021; 42: 307-313
  • 16 Winters JD, Rudolph KS. Quadriceps rate of force development affects gait and function in people with knee osteoarthritis. Eur J Appl Physiol 2014; 114: 273-284
  • 17 Kera T, Kawai H, Takahashi J. et al. Association between ground reaction force in sit-to-stand motion and falls in community-dwelling older Japanese individuals. Arch Gerontol Geriatr 2020; 91: 104221
  • 18 Maffiuletti NA, Aagaard P, Blazevich AJ. et al. Rate of force development: physiological and methodological considerations. Eur J Appl Physiol 2016; 116: 1091-1116
  • 19 Aagaard P, Thorstensson A. Neuromuscular aspects of exercise – Adaptive responses evoked by strength training. In: Kjær M, Krogsgaard M, Magnusson P et al. (Eds). Textbook of Sports Medicine: Basic Science and Clinical Aspects of Sports Injury and Physical Activity. Wiley Publishers, Chester, England; 2003: 70–106.
  • 20 Dalgas U, Stenager E, Lund C. et al. Neural drive increases following resistance training in patients with multiple sclerosis. J Neurol 2013; 260: 1822-1832
  • 21 Freund HJ. Motor unit and muscle activity in voluntary motor control. Physiol Rev 1983; 63: 387-436
  • 22 Del Vecchio A, Negro F, Holobar A. et al. You are as fast as your motor neurons: speed of recruitment and maximal discharge of motor neurons determine the maximal rate of force development in humans. J Physiol 2019; 597: 2445-2456
  • 23 Yamada T, Demura S. Effectiveness of sit-to-stand tests for evaluating physical functioning and fall risk in community-dwelling elderly. Human Performance Measurement 2015; 12: 1-7
  • 24 Freire B, Dias CP, Oliveira LS. et al. Rate of force development and torque production assessment in spastic stroke survivors. Rev Bras Cineantrop e Desemp Hum 2015; 17: 1-9
  • 25 Aidar FJ, Carneiro AL, Costa Moreira O. et al. Effects of resistance training on the physical condition of people with multiple sclerosis. J Sports Med Phys Fitness 2018; 58: 1127-1134
  • 26 Coote S, Hughes L, Rainsford G. et al. Pilot randomized trial of progressive resistance exercise augmented by neuromuscular electrical stimulation for people with multiple sclerosis who use walking aids. Arch Phys Med Rehabil 2015; 96: 197-204
  • 27 Patrocinio de Oliveira CE, Moreira OC, Carrión-Yagual ZM. et al. Effects of classic progressive resistance training versus eccentric-enhanced resistance training in people with multiple sclerosis. Arch Phys Med Rehabil 2018; 99: 819-825
  • 28 Sabapathy NM, Minahan CL, Turner GT, Broadley SA. Comparing endurance-and resistance-exercise training in people with multiple sclerosis: a randomized pilot study. Clin Rehabil 2011; 25: 14-24
  • 29 Møller AB, Bibby BM, Skjerbæk AG. et al. Validity and variability of the 5-repetition sit-to-stand test in patients with multiple sclerosis. Disabil Rehabil 2012; 34: 2251-2258
  • 30 Provinciali L, Ceravolo MG, Bartolini M. et al. A multidimensional assessment of multiple sclerosis: Relationships between disability domains. Acta Neurol Scand 1999; 100: 156-162
  • 31 Ruiz-González D, Hernández-Martínez A, Valenzuela PL. et al. A. Effects of physical exercise on plasma brain-derived neurotrophic factor in neurodegenerative disorders: A systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials. Neurosci Biobehav Rev 2021; 128: 394-405
  • 32 Dodd KJ, Taylor NF, Shields N. et al. Progressive resistance training did not improve walking but can improve muscle performance, quality of life and fatigue in adults with multiple sclerosis: A randomized controlled trial. Mult Scler J 2011; 17: 1362-1374
  • 33 Frevel D, Mäurer M. Internet-based home training is capable to improve balance in multiple sclerosis: A randomized controlled trial. Eur J Phys Rehabil Med 2015; 51: 23-30
  • 34 Gonzales B, Chopard G, Charry B. et al. Effects of a training program involving body cooling on physical and cognitive capacities and quality of life in multiple sclerosis patients: A pilot study. Eur Neurol 2017; 78: 71-77
  • 35 Romberg A, Virtanen A, Ruutiainen R. Long-term exercise improves functional impairment but not quality of life in multiple sclerosis. J Neurol 2005; 252: 839-845