Download PDF
J Neurol Surg B Skull Base 2023; 84(03): 201-209
DOI: 10.1055/a-1774-6281
Original Article

A Low Subfrontal Dural Opening for Operative Management of Anterior Skull Base Lesions

Samuel J. Cler 
1   Department of Neurosurgery, Washington University School of Medicine, St. Louis, Missouri, United States
,
Gavin P. Dunn
1   Department of Neurosurgery, Washington University School of Medicine, St. Louis, Missouri, United States
,
Gregory J. Zipfel
1   Department of Neurosurgery, Washington University School of Medicine, St. Louis, Missouri, United States
,
Ralph G. Dacey
1   Department of Neurosurgery, Washington University School of Medicine, St. Louis, Missouri, United States
,
Michael R. Chicoine 
1   Department of Neurosurgery, Washington University School of Medicine, St. Louis, Missouri, United States
› Author Affiliations Funding M.R.C. received funding from (1) IMRIS Inc. for an unrestricted educational grant to support an iMRI and brain tumor database and outcomes analysis project, the IMRIS Multicenter intraoperative MRI Neurosurgery Database (I-MiND), (2) the Head for the Cure Foundation, (3) Carol Rossfeld and The Alex & Alice Aboussie Family Charitable Foundation, and from (4) Barbara and George Holtzman. I-MiND maintained in The REDCap server at Washington University in St. Louis is supported by Clinical and Translational Science Award (CTSA) Grant [UL1 TR000448] and the Siteman Comprehensive Cancer Center and NCI Cancer Center Support Grant P30 CA091842. R.G.D. is an investor in and member of the Board of Directors of Elira, Inc. This company manufactures a cutaneous neuro-stimulating device to suppress appetite and enhance weight loss and has a minor equity interest in the Neurolutions, Inc. and Pulse Therapeutics, Inc. G.P.D. is a co-founder of Immunovalent and a member of the Scientific Advisory Board of Ziopharm Oncology. None of these affiliations have a relationship to the current manuscript. G.J.Z. receives grant funding via the NIH National Institute of Neurological Disorders and Stroke (NINDS). S.C. received funding from NIH T35 NHLBI Training Grant Fellowship. The authors have no personal financial or institutional interest in any of the drugs, materials, or devices described in this article.
› Further Information
    Permissions and Reprints

Abstract

Introduction A low subfrontal dural opening technique that limits brain manipulation was assessed in patients who underwent frontotemporal approaches for anterior fossa lesions.

Methods A retrospective review was performed for cases using a low subfrontal dural opening including characterization of demographics, lesion size and location, neurological and ophthalmological assessments, clinical course, and imaging findings.

Results A low subfrontal dural opening was performed in 23 patients (17F, 6M), median age of 53 years (range 23–81) with a median follow-up duration of 21.9 months (range 6.2–67.1). Lesions included 22 meningiomas (nine anterior clinoid, 12 tuberculum sellae, and one sphenoid wing), one unruptured internal carotid artery aneurysm clipped during a meningioma resection, and one optic nerve cavernous malformation. Maximal possible resection was achieved in all cases including gross total resection in 16/22 (72.7%), near total in 1/22 (4.5%), and subtotal in 5/22 (22.7%) in which tumor involvement of critical structures limited complete resection. Eighteen patients presented with vision loss; 11 (61%) improved postoperatively, three (17%) were stable, and four (22%) worsened. The mean ICU stay and time to discharge were 1.3 days (range 0–3) and 3.8 days (range 2–8).

Conclusion A low sub-frontal dural opening for approaches to the anterior fossa can be performed with minimal brain exposure, early visualization of the optico-carotid cistern for cerebrospinal fluid release, minimizing need for fixed brain retraction, and Sylvian fissure dissection. This technique can potentially reduce surgical risk and provide excellent exposure for anterior skull base lesions with favorable extent of resection, visual recovery, and complication rates.

Keywords

anterior fossa - skull base


Publication History

Received: 12 September 2021

Accepted: 14 February 2022

Accepted Manuscript online:
17 February 2022

Article published online:
03 May 2022

© 2022. Thieme. All rights reserved.

Georg Thieme Verlag KG
Rüdigerstraße 14, 70469 Stuttgart, Germany

 

  • References

  • 1 Abdel Aziz KM, Bhatia S, Tantawy MH. et al. Minimally invasive transpalpebral “eyelid” approach to the anterior cranial base. Neurosurgery 2011;69(2, suppl operative):ons195–ons206, discussion 206–207
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 2 Abu-Ghanem S, Fliss DM. Surgical approaches to resection of anterior skull base and paranasal sinuses tumors. Balkan Med J 2013; 30 (02) 136-141
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 3 Magill ST, Morshed RA, Lucas CG. et al. Tuberculum sellae meningiomas: grading scale to assess surgical outcomes using the transcranial versus transsphenoidal approach. Neurosurg Focus 2018; 44 (04) E9
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 4 Romani R, Laakso A, Kangasniemi M, Niemelä M, Hernesniemi J. Lateral supraorbital approach applied to tuberculum sellae meningiomas: experience with 52 consecutive patients. Neurosurgery 2012; 70 (06) 1504-1518 , discussion 1518–1519
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 5 Wanibuchi M. Craniotomy for parasellar meningiomas. Japanese Journal of Neurosurgery. 2017; 26 (06) 412-418
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 6 Chicoine MR, Jost S. Meningiomas of the sphenoid wing region: operative approaches to medial and lateral sphenoid wing, spheno-orbital, and cavernous sinus meningiomas. In: Neurosurgical Operative Atlas, Neuro-oncology. 2nd ed.. New York: AANS publications, Thieme Medical Publications; 2007
    Google Scholar
  • 7 Chicoine MR, Van Loveren HR. Surgical approaches to the cavernous sinus. In: Robertson JCH. ed. Cranial Base Surgery—Management, Complications and Outcome. London: Churchill Livingstone; 1999: 171-186
    Google Scholar
  • 8 Tew JM, Van Loveren HR. Atlas of Operative Microneurosurgery Volume 1: Aneurysms and Arteriovenous Malformations. WB Saunders Company; 1994
    Google Scholar
  • 9 Tew JM, Van Loveren HR, Keller JT. Atlas of Operative Microneurosurgery Volume 2: Brain Tumors. WB Saunders Company; 2001
    Google Scholar
  • 10 Aldea S, Cômes P-C, Gaillard S. How I do it-the eyebrow approach for anterior circle of Willis aneurysms. Acta Neurochir (Wien) 2018; 160 (09) 1749-1753
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 11 Andaluz N, Romano A, Reddy LV, Zuccarello M. Eyelid approach to the anterior cranial base. J Neurosurg 2008; 109 (02) 341-346
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 12 Owusu Boahene KD, Lim M, Chu E, Quinones-Hinojosa A. Transpalpebral orbitofrontal craniotomy: a minimally invasive approach to anterior cranial vault lesions. Skull Base 2010; 20 (04) 237-244
    Article in Thieme ConnectPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 13 de Divitiis E, Esposito F, Cappabianca P, Cavallo LM, de Divitiis O. Tuberculum sellae meningiomas: high route or low route? A series of 51 consecutive cases. Neurosurgery 2008; 62 (03) 556-563 , discussion 556–563
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 14 Jean WC. Mini-pterional craniotomy and extradural clinoidectomy for clinoid meningioma: optimization of exposure using augmented reality template: 2-dimensional operative video. Oper Neurosurg (Hagerstown) 2020; 19 (06) E610-E610
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 15 Jho HD. Orbital roof craniotomy via an eyebrow incision: a simplified anterior skull base approach. Minim Invasive Neurosurg 1997; 40 (03) 91-97
    Article in Thieme ConnectPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 16 Mitchell P, Vindlacheruvu RR, Mahmood K, Ashpole RD, Grivas A, Mendelow AD. Supraorbital eyebrow minicraniotomy for anterior circulation aneurysms. Surg Neurol 2005; 63 (01) 47-51 , discussion 51
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 17 Tullos HJ, Conner AK, Baker CM. et al. Mini-pterional craniotomy for resection of parasellar meningiomas. World Neurosurg 2018; 117: e637-e644
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 18 Algattas HN, Wang EW, Zenonos GA, Snyderman CH, Gardner PA. Endoscopic endonasal surgery for anterior cranial fossa meningiomas. J Neurosurg Sci 2021; 65 (02) 118-132
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 19 Zoli M, Guaraldi F, Pasquini E, Frank G, Mazzatenta D. The endoscopic endonasal management of anterior skull base meningiomas. J Neurol Surg B Skull Base 2018; 79 (Suppl. 04) S300-S310
    Article in Thieme ConnectPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 20 Chicoine MR. Low subfrontal dural opening for anterior clinoid meningioma. J Neurol Surg B Skull Base 2018; 79 (Suppl. 03) S273-S275
    Article in Thieme ConnectPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 21 Berhouma M, Jacquesson T, Jouanneau E. The fully endoscopic supraorbital trans-eyebrow keyhole approach to the anterior and middle skull base. Acta Neurochir (Wien) 2011; 153 (10) 1949-1954
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 22 Chiappini A, Marchi F, Reinert M, Robert T. Supraorbital approach through eyebrow skin incision for aneurysm clipping: how I do it. Acta Neurochir (Wien) 2018; 160 (06) 1155-1158
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 23 Andrews RJ, Bringas JR. A review of brain retraction and recommendations for minimizing intraoperative brain injury. Neurosurgery 1993; 33 (06) 1052-1063 , discussion 1063–1064
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 24 Rosenørn J, Diemer NH. Reduction of regional cerebral blood flow during brain retraction pressure in the rat. J Neurosurg 1982; 56 (06) 826-829
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 25 Zhong J, Dujovny M, Perlin AR, Perez-Arjona E, Park HK, Diaz FG. Brain retraction injury. Neurol Res 2003; 25 (08) 831-838
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 26 Akbari SHA, Sylvester PT, Kulwin C. et al. Initial experience using intraoperative magnetic resonance imaging during a trans-sulcal tubular retractor approach for the resection of deep-seated brain tumors: a case series. Oper Neurosurg (Hagerstown) 2019; 16 (03) 292-301
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 27 Hawasli AH, Rubin JB, Tran DD. et al. Antiangiogenic agents for nonmalignant brain tumors. J Neurol Surg B Skull Base 2013; 74 (03) 136-141
    Article in Thieme ConnectPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 28 Karsy M, Akbari SH, Limbrick D. et al. Evaluation of pediatric glioma outcomes using intraoperative MRI: a multicenter cohort study. J Neurooncol 2019; 143 (02) 271-280
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 29 Leuthardt EC, Lim CCH, Shah MN. et al. Use of movable high-field-strength intraoperative magnetic resonance imaging with awake craniotomies for resection of gliomas: preliminary experience. Neurosurgery 2011; 69 (01) 194-205 , discussion 205–206
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 30 Shah MN, Leonard JR, Inder G. et al. Intraoperative magnetic resonance imaging to reduce the rate of early reoperation for lesion resection in pediatric neurosurgery. J Neurosurg Pediatr 2012; 9 (03) 259-264
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 31 Sylvester PT, Evans JA, Zipfel GJ. et al. Combined high-field intraoperative magnetic resonance imaging and endoscopy increase extent of resection and progression-free survival for pituitary adenomas. Pituitary 2015; 18 (01) 72-85
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 32 Yahanda AT, Patel B, Shah AS. et al. Impact of intraoperative magnetic resonance imaging and other factors on surgical outcomes for newly diagnosed grade II astrocytomas and oligodendrogliomas: a multicenter study. Neurosurgery 2020; 88 (01) 63-73
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 33 Yahanda AT, Patel B, Sutherland G. et al. A multi-institutional analysis of factors influencing surgical outcomes for patients with newly diagnosed grade I gliomas. World Neurosurg 2020; 135: e754-e764
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 34 Zenga J, Sharon JD, Santiago P. et al. Lower trapezius flap for reconstruction of posterior scalp and neck defects after complex occipital-cervical surgeries. J Neurol Surg B Skull Base 2015; 76 (05) 397-408
    Article in Thieme ConnectPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 35 Harris PA, Taylor R, Thielke R, Payne J, Gonzalez N, Conde JG. Research electronic data capture (REDCap)—a metadata-driven methodology and workflow process for providing translational research informatics support. J Biomed Inform 2009; 42 (02) 377-381
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 36 Louis DN, Perry A, Reifenberger G. et al. The 2016 World Health Organization classification of tumors of the central nervous system: a summary. Acta Neuropathol 2016; 131 (06) 803-820
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 37 van Loveren HR, Keller JT, el-Kalliny M, Scodary DJ, Tew Jr JM. The Dolenc technique for cavernous sinus exploration (cadaveric prosection). Technical note. J Neurosurg 1991; 74 (05) 837-844
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 38 Oya S, Matsui T. Ultra-early optic nerve decompression for the resection of anterior clinoidal meningioma. J Neurol Surg B Skull Base 2018; 79 (Suppl. 02) S231-S232
    Article in Thieme ConnectPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 39 Giammattei L, Starnoni D, Levivier M, Messerer M, Daniel RT. Surgery for clinoidal meningiomas: case series and meta-analysis of outcomes and complications. World Neurosurg 2019; 129: e700-e717
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 40 Lu VM, Goyal A, Rovin RA. Olfactory groove and tuberculum sellae meningioma resection by endoscopic endonasal approach versus transcranial approach: a systematic review and meta-analysis of comparative studies. Clin Neurol Neurosurg 2018; 174: 13-20
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 41 Kim RB, Fredrickson VL, Couldwell WT. Visual outcomes in spheno-orbital meningioma: a 10-year experience. World Neurosurg 2022; 158: e726-e734
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 42 Song SW, Kim YH, Kim JW. et al. Outcomes after transcranial and endoscopic endonasal approach for tuberculum meningiomas—a retrospective comparison. World Neurosurg 2018; 109: e434-e445
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 43 Zhang Y, Kim J, Andrews C. et al. Visual outcomes in surgically treated intracranial meningiomas. J Neuroophthalmol 2021; 41 (04) e548-e559
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 44 Muskens IS, Briceno V, Ouwehand TL. et al. The endoscopic endonasal approach is not superior to the microscopic transcranial approach for anterior skull base meningiomas-a meta-analysis. Acta Neurochir (Wien) 2018; 160 (01) 59-75
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar