CC BY 4.0 · Endoscopy 2023; 55(S 01): E1146-E1147
DOI: 10.1055/a-2183-6550
E-Videos

A neuroendocrine tumor improper for ligation with suction was resected en bloc by underwater endoscopic submucosal dissection

Department of Gastroenterology, Tokyo Womenʼs Medical University Yachiyo Medical Center, Chiba, Japan
,
Department of Gastroenterology, Tokyo Womenʼs Medical University Yachiyo Medical Center, Chiba, Japan
,
Yasuki Hatayama
Department of Gastroenterology, Tokyo Womenʼs Medical University Yachiyo Medical Center, Chiba, Japan
,
Harutoshi Sugiyama
Department of Gastroenterology, Tokyo Womenʼs Medical University Yachiyo Medical Center, Chiba, Japan
,
Makoto Arai
Department of Gastroenterology, Tokyo Womenʼs Medical University Yachiyo Medical Center, Chiba, Japan
,
Takayoshi Nishino
Department of Gastroenterology, Tokyo Womenʼs Medical University Yachiyo Medical Center, Chiba, Japan
› Author Affiliations
 

For rectal neuroendocrine tumors (NETs) smaller than 10 mm, a meta-analysis indicated that endoscopic mucosal resection with suction, such as using a cap-fitted endoscope or ligating device, had a higher complete resection rate and significantly shorter procedure time compared to endoscopic submucosal dissection (ESD) [1]. In contrast, for NETs 10 to 14 mm in diameter that are improper for ligation with suction, ESD is feasible, although the treatment strategy has been controversial [2]. Herein, we report a case of a rectal NET that was successfully resected by underwater ESD (U-ESD) within a short time.

A man in his seventies underwent colonoscopy and was determined to have a slightly depressed submucosal tumor 10 mm in size in his lower rectum ([Fig. 1]). The tumor was diagnosed as a NET histologically by biopsy. Endoscopic ultrasonography suggested the lesion was confined to the submucosa ([Fig. 2]). Because suction was difficult due to the size of the lesion, the surgeon decided to resect it with U-ESD. The tumor was dissected in a layer just above the muscle layer and resected en bloc ([Fig. 3], [Fig. 4]; [Video 1]). The time for resection lasted 8 minutes. The wound was completely closed with clips. Histological findings showed a NET G1 according to the World Health Organization classification with a negative margin ([Fig. 5]). There was no evidence of vascular invasion. U-ESD enables submucosal dissection utilizing a floating effect in a magnified view [3]. In this case, the advantages of underwater conditions made it easy to proceed with the dissection at a depth just above the muscle layer, facilitating vertical margin negative excision. In conclusion, for lesions larger than approximately 10 mm, U-ESD can be a useful option for en bloc resection within a time that is comparable to endoscopic mucosal resection with suction.

Zoom Image
Fig. 1 White light image before resection indicates a 10-mm yellowish, slightly depressed submucosal tumor located 2 cm from the anal verge in the lower rectum.
Zoom Image
Fig. 2 Endoscopic ultrasonography revealed the lesion was in the submucosa.
Zoom Image
Fig. 3 Submucosal dissection using a DualKnife J (KD-655Q; Olympus, Tokyo, Japan) just above the muscle layer was possible due to the floating effect in a magnified clear view in underwater conditions.
Zoom Image
Fig. 4 The tumor was resected in a layer just above the muscle layer.

Video 1 Underwater endoscopic submucosal dissection for a neuroendocrine tumor in the lower rectum.


Quality:
Zoom Image
Fig. 5 Histological findings of the tumor. The tumor was diagnosed as a neuroendocrine tumor G1 according to the World Health Organization classification, with a negative margin (hematoxylin–eosin staining).

Endoscopy_UCTN_Code_TTT_1AQ_2AD

Endoscopy E-Videos
https://eref.thieme.de/e-videos

E-Videos is an open access online section of the journal Endoscopy, reporting on interesting cases and new techniques in gastroenterological endoscopy. All papers include a high-quality video and are published with a Creative Commons CC-BY license. Endoscopy E-Videos qualify for HINARI discounts and waivers and eligibility is automatically checked during the submission process. We grant 100% waivers to articles whose corresponding authors are based in Group A countries and 50% waivers to those who are based in Group B countries as classified by Research4Life (see: https://www.research4life.org/access/eligibility/).

This section has its own submission website at https://mc.manuscriptcentral.com/e-videos


#

Competing interests

The authors declare that they have no conflict of interest.

  • References

  • 1 Pan J, Zhang X, Shi Y. et al. Endoscopic mucosal resection with suction vs. endoscopic submucosal dissection for small rectal neuroendocrine tumors: A meta-analysis. Scand J Gastroenterol 2018; 53: 1139-1145
  • 2 Hamada Y, Tanaka K, Mukai K. et al. Efficacy of endoscopic resection for rectal neuroendocrine tumors smaller than 15 mm. Dig Dis Sci 2023; 68: 3148-3157
  • 3 Maida M, Sferrazza S, Murino A. et al. Effectiveness and safety of underwater techniques in gastrointestinal endoscopy: A comprehensive review of the literature. Surg Endosc 2021; 35: 37-51

Corresponding author

Daisuke Murakami, MD
Department of Gastroenterology
Tokyo Womenʼs Medical University Yachiyo Medical Center
Owadashinden 477-96
Yachiyo-City, 276-8524
Japan   

Publication History

Article published online:
27 October 2023

© 2023. The Author(s). This is an open access article published by Thieme under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License, permitting unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction so long as the original work is properly cited. (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/)

Georg Thieme Verlag KG
Rüdigerstraße 14, 70469 Stuttgart, Germany

  • References

  • 1 Pan J, Zhang X, Shi Y. et al. Endoscopic mucosal resection with suction vs. endoscopic submucosal dissection for small rectal neuroendocrine tumors: A meta-analysis. Scand J Gastroenterol 2018; 53: 1139-1145
  • 2 Hamada Y, Tanaka K, Mukai K. et al. Efficacy of endoscopic resection for rectal neuroendocrine tumors smaller than 15 mm. Dig Dis Sci 2023; 68: 3148-3157
  • 3 Maida M, Sferrazza S, Murino A. et al. Effectiveness and safety of underwater techniques in gastrointestinal endoscopy: A comprehensive review of the literature. Surg Endosc 2021; 35: 37-51

Zoom Image
Fig. 1 White light image before resection indicates a 10-mm yellowish, slightly depressed submucosal tumor located 2 cm from the anal verge in the lower rectum.
Zoom Image
Fig. 2 Endoscopic ultrasonography revealed the lesion was in the submucosa.
Zoom Image
Fig. 3 Submucosal dissection using a DualKnife J (KD-655Q; Olympus, Tokyo, Japan) just above the muscle layer was possible due to the floating effect in a magnified clear view in underwater conditions.
Zoom Image
Fig. 4 The tumor was resected in a layer just above the muscle layer.
Zoom Image
Fig. 5 Histological findings of the tumor. The tumor was diagnosed as a neuroendocrine tumor G1 according to the World Health Organization classification, with a negative margin (hematoxylin–eosin staining).