Imaging Nasal Obstruction: An Objective Evaluation for a Subjective Complaint

Abstract

Nasal obstruction (NO) is a common clinical symptom characterized by a subjective sensation of insufficient airflow through the nasal cavity and may result from various factors, including changes in nasal anatomy, inflammatory conditions, tumoral lesions, and other etiologies. While a thorough medical history and physical examination can often identify its cause, imaging is usually necessary to fully understand the problem. Computed tomography (CT) is the primary imaging modality used to evaluate the nasal cavity and paranasal sinuses, allowing for the identification of potential causes and structural abnormalities. However, when soft tissue characterization is required, magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) is also useful. Understanding the anatomical and pathological basis of NO is crucial for accurate diagnosis and appropriate management. Imaging techniques provide valuable information for identifying the underlying causes of NO and guiding treatment decisions. This article reviews the normal anatomy of the nasal cavity and adjacent paranasal sinuses as well as the several conditions that may affect breathing comfort (tumors, inflammatory diseases, bony and cartilaginous anatomical variants, and “nonobstructive” mucosal thickenings), showing their normal presentation on CT and MRI.

Keywords

nasal obstruction - CT - MRI

Publication History

Accepted Manuscript online:
28 November 2023

Article published online:
10 January 2024

• References

• 1 Osborn JL, Sacks R. Chapter 2: nasal obstruction. Am J Rhinol Allergy 2013; 27 (3, Suppl 1): S7-S8
• 2 Hsu DW, Suh JD. Anatomy and physiology of nasal obstruction. Otolaryngol Clin North Am 2018; 51 (05) 853-865
• 3 Anon JB. Upper respiratory infections. Am J Med 2010; 123 (4, Suppl): S16-S25
• 4 Joshi VM, Sansi R. Imaging in sinonasal inflammatory disease. Neuroimaging Clin N Am 2015; 25 (04) 549-568
• 5 Graviero G, Guastini L, Mora R, Salzano G, Salzano FA. The role of three-dimensional CT in the evaluation of nasal structures and anomalies. Eur Arch Otorhinolaryngol 2011; 268 (08) 1163-1167
• 6 O'Brien Sr WT, Hamelin S, Weitzel EK. The preoperative sinus CT: avoiding a “CLOSE” call with surgical complications. Radiology 2016; 281 (01) 10-21
• 7 Shapiro MD, Som PM. MRI of the paranasal sinuses and nasal cavity. Radiol Clin North Am 1989; 27 (02) 447-475
• 8 Sahin-Yilmaz A, Naclerio RM. Anatomy and physiology of the upper airway. Proc Am Thorac Soc 2011; 8 (01) 31-39
• 9 Wexler DB, Davidson TM. The nasal valve: a review of the anatomy, imaging, and physiology. Am J Rhinol 2004; 18 (03) 143-150
• 10 Cho GS, Kim JH, Jang YJ. Correlation of nasal obstruction with nasal cross-sectional area measured by computed tomography in patients with nasal septal deviation. Ann Otol Rhinol Laryngol 2012; 121 (04) 239-245
• 11 Camacho M, Zaghi S, Certal V. et al. Inferior turbinate classification system, grades 1 to 4: development and validation study. Laryngoscope 2015; 125 (02) 296-302
• 12 Xavier R, Azeredo-Lopes S, Menger DJ, Cyrne de Carvalho H, Spratley J. Which nasal airway dimensions correlate with nasal airflow and with nasal breathing sensation?. Facial Plast Surg Aesthet Med 2021;
• 13 Whyte A, Boeddinghaus R. Imaging of adult nasal obstruction. Clin Radiol 2020; 75 (09) 688-704
• 14 Dykewicz MS, Hamilos DL. Rhinitis and sinusitis. J Allergy Clin Immunol 2010; 125 (2, Suppl 2): S103-S115
• 15 Stewart M, Ferguson B, Fromer L. Epidemiology and burden of nasal congestion. Int J Gen Med 2010; 3: 37-45
• 16 Daines SM, Orlandi RR. Chronic rhinosinusitis. Facial Plast Surg Clin North Am 2012; 20 (01) 1-10
• 17 Rout MR, Mohanty D, Vijaylaxmi Y, Bobba K, Metta C. Adenoid hypertrophy in adults: a case series. Indian J Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg 2013; 65 (03) 269-274
• 18 Bhattacharyya N. Ambulatory sinus and nasal surgery in the United States: demographics and perioperative outcomes. Laryngoscope 2010; 120 (03) 635-638
• 19 Teixeira J, Certal V, Chang ET, Camacho M. Nasal septal deviations: a systematic review of classification systems. Plast Surg Int 2016; 2016: 7089123
• 20 Salihoglu M, Cekin E, Altundag A, Cesmeci E. Examination versus subjective nasal obstruction in the evaluation of the nasal septal deviation. Rhinology 2014; 52 (02) 122-126
• 21 Meusel T, Negoias S, Scheibe M, Hummel T. Topographical differences in distribution and responsiveness of trigeminal sensitivity within the human nasal mucosa. Pain 2010; 151 (02) 516-521
• 22 Liu SC, Lu HH, Cheng LH. et al. Identification of the cold receptor TRPM8 in the nasal mucosa. Am J Rhinol Allergy 2015; 29 (04) e112-e116
• 23 Jones AS, Wight RG, Durham LH. The distribution of thermoreceptors within the nasal cavity. Clin Otolaryngol Allied Sci 1989; 14 (03) 235-239
• 24 Saedi B, Rashan AR, Lipan M, Nayak JV, Most SP. Consistent ipsilateral development of the posterior extension of the quadrangular cartilage and bony spur formation in nasal septal deviation. Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg 2015; 152 (03) 444-448
• 25 Stallman JS, Lobo JN, Som PM. The incidence of concha bullosa and its relationship to nasal septal deviation and paranasal sinus disease. AJNR Am J Neuroradiol 2004; 25 (09) 1613-1618
• 26 Măru N, Rusu MC, Săndulescu M. Variant anatomy of nasal turbinates: supreme, superior and middle conchae bullosae, paradoxical superior and inferior turbinates, and middle accessory turbinate. Rom J Morphol Embryol 2015; 56 (03) 1223-1226
• 27 Lowe LH, Booth TN, Joglar JM, Rollins NK. Midface anomalies in children. Radiographics 2000; 20 (04) 907-922 , quiz 1106–1107, 1112
• 28 Belden CJ, Mancuso AA, Schmalfuss IM. CT features of congenital nasal piriform aperture stenosis: initial experience. Radiology 1999; 213 (02) 495-501
• 29 Smith JK, Castillo M, Mukherji S, Buenting J, Drake A. Imaging of nasopharyngeal atresia. AJNR Am J Neuroradiol 1995; 16 (09) 1936-1938
• 30 Spataro E, Piccirillo JF, Kallogjeri D, Branham GH, Desai SC. Revision rates and risk factors of 175 842 patients undergoing septorhinoplasty. JAMA Facial Plast Surg 2016; 18 (03) 212-219
• 31 Kobayashi T, Moody S, Komori M, Jibatake A, Yaegashi M. Early stage relapsing polychondritis diagnosed by nasal septum biopsy. Case Rep Med 2015; 2015: 307868
• 32 Hansson AS, Lu S, Holmdahl R. Extra-articular cartilage affected in collagen-induced, but not pristane-induced, arthritis models. Clin Exp Immunol 2002; 127 (01) 37-42
• 33 Kahana-Zweig R, Geva-Sagiv M, Weissbrod A, Secundo L, Soroker N, Sobel N. Measuring and characterizing the human nasal cycle. PLoS One 2016; 11 (10) e0162918
• 34 Jankowski R, Nguyen DT, Russel A, Toussaint B, Gallet P, Rumeau C. Chronic nasal dysfunction. Eur Ann Otorhinolaryngol Head Neck Dis 2018; 135 (01) 41-49
• 35 Ramey JT, Bailen E, Lockey RF. Rhinitis medicamentosa. J Investig Allergol Clin Immunol 2006; 16 (03) 148-155
• 36 Ginat DT, Schatz CJ. Imaging features of midface injectable fillers and associated complications. AJNR Am J Neuroradiol 2013; 34 (08) 1488-1495
• 37 Mundada P, Kohler R, Boudabbous S, Toutous Trellu L, Platon A, Becker M. Injectable facial fillers: imaging features, complications, and diagnostic pitfalls at MRI and PET CT. Insights Imaging 2017; 8 (06) 557-572
• 38 Cakmak O, Coşkun M, Celik H, Büyüklü F, Ozlüoğlu LN. Value of acoustic rhinometry for measuring nasal valve area. Laryngoscope 2003; 113 (02) 295-302
• 39 Tretiakow D, Tesch K, Meyer-Szary J, Markiet K, Skorek A. Three-dimensional modeling and automatic analysis of the human nasal cavity and paranasal sinuses using the computational fluid dynamics method. Eur Arch Otorhinolaryngol 2021; 278 (05) 1443-1453