RSS-Feed abonnieren

DOI: 10.1055/a-2291-9399
Endoscopic hemostasis with bipolar forceps coagulation for post-endoscopic sphincterotomy bleeding
Post-endoscopic sphincterotomy (EST) bleeding is a well-known complication; however, an optimal procedure for endoscopic hemostasis has not been determined [1]. Electrocoagulation using bipolar forceps (Hemostat Y; Pentax, Tokyo, Japan) has been documented as effective for gastrointestinal bleeding while minimizing the risk of excessive tissue injury [2] [3] [4] ([Fig. 1]). The bipolar forceps are available in both open and closed forms, and their soft and thin nature makes them compatible with the elevator system of a duodenoscope ([Fig. 2]).




A 78-year-old man with cholangitis underwent endoscopic transpapillary drainage, and EST was performed. Post-EST bleeding occurred on the third day; therefore, endoscopic hemostasis was performed by hypertonic saline epinephrine (HSE) injection and balloon compression ([Fig. 3]). However, rebleeding occurred on the seventh day ([Fig. 4], [Video 1]). During the emergency endoscopy using a duodenoscope (TJF-260; Olympus Medical Systems, Tokyo, Japan), spurting bleeding was observed from an exposed vessel behind the blood clot. A hemostatic clip was unsuitable as the bleeding point was located close to the orifice of the pancreatic duct. Attempts were made to grasp the vessel with bipolar forceps from the oral side; however, the oblique orientation of the papilla made hemostasis difficult. Despite coagulation with both the open and closed shape, pulsatile bleeding persisted. Subsequently, the bipolar forceps were inserted utilizing the elevator of the duodenoscope and the vessel was grasped. Finally, hemostasis was achieved, and HSE was injected to prevent rebleeding. No exposed vessels were observed in the post-EST ulcer 3 days later. Although bipolar forceps coagulation was repeatedly performed during endoscopic hemostasis, delayed perforation or pancreatitis was not observed.




To the best of our knowledge, this is the first report of a patient with post-EST bleeding undergoing endoscopic hemostasis with biopsy forceps coagulation. This technique was effective and feasible for spurting bleeding after EST.
Endoscopy_UCTN_Code_CPL_1AK_2AC
E-Videos is an open access online section of the journal Endoscopy, reporting on interesting cases and new techniques in gastroenterological endoscopy.
All papers include a high-quality video and are published with a Creative Commons
CC-BY license. Endoscopy E-Videos qualify for HINARI discounts and waivers and eligibility is automatically checked during the submission
process. We grant 100% waivers to articles whose corresponding authors are based in
Group A countries and 50% waivers to those who are based in Group B countries as classified
by Research4Life (see: https://www.research4life.org/access/eligibility/).
This section has its own submission website at https://mc.manuscriptcentral.com/e-videos.
#
Conflict of Interest
The authors declare that they have no conflict of interest.
-
References
- 1 Ryozawa S, Itoi T, Katanuma A. et al. Japan Gastroenterological Endoscopy Society guidelines for endoscopic sphincterotomy. Dig Endosc 2018; 30: 149-173
- 2 Kataoka M, Kawai T, Yagi K. et al. Clinical evaluation of emergency endoscopic hemostasis with bipolar forceps in non-variceal upper gastrointestinal bleeding. Dig Endosc 2010; 22: 151-155
- 3 Kataoka M, Kawai T, Hayama Y. et al. Comparison of hemostasis using bipolar hemostatic forceps with hemostasis by endoscopic hemoclipping for nonvariceal upper gastrointestinal bleeding in a prospective non-randomized trial. Surg Endosc 2013; 27: 3035-3038
- 4 ShinmuraKIkematsu H, Kojima M. et al. Safety of endoscopic procedures with monopolar versus bipolar instruments in an ex vivo porcine model. BMC Gastroenterol 2020; 20: 27
Correspondence
Publikationsverlauf
Artikel online veröffentlicht:
09. April 2024
© 2024. The Author(s). This is an open access article published by Thieme under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License, permitting unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction so long as the original work is properly cited. (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/).
Georg Thieme Verlag KG
Rüdigerstraße 14, 70469 Stuttgart, Germany
-
References
- 1 Ryozawa S, Itoi T, Katanuma A. et al. Japan Gastroenterological Endoscopy Society guidelines for endoscopic sphincterotomy. Dig Endosc 2018; 30: 149-173
- 2 Kataoka M, Kawai T, Yagi K. et al. Clinical evaluation of emergency endoscopic hemostasis with bipolar forceps in non-variceal upper gastrointestinal bleeding. Dig Endosc 2010; 22: 151-155
- 3 Kataoka M, Kawai T, Hayama Y. et al. Comparison of hemostasis using bipolar hemostatic forceps with hemostasis by endoscopic hemoclipping for nonvariceal upper gastrointestinal bleeding in a prospective non-randomized trial. Surg Endosc 2013; 27: 3035-3038
- 4 ShinmuraKIkematsu H, Kojima M. et al. Safety of endoscopic procedures with monopolar versus bipolar instruments in an ex vivo porcine model. BMC Gastroenterol 2020; 20: 27







