Subscribe to RSS

DOI: 10.1055/a-2299-2307
Kill two birds with one stone: Flexible cholangioscopy for treatment of common bile duct stone and identification of suspicious gallbladder wall thickening
Authors
Supported by: Taishan Scholar Project of Shandong Province tsqn202312333
A 76-year-old man suffered from recurrent abdominal pain and distention. The contract-enhanced computed tomography (CT) and endoscopic ultrasound (EUS) exams revealed the presence of a stone in common bile duct (CBD) ([Fig. 1] a) and concerning evidence of gallbladder wall thickening, suggestive of either gallbladder adenomyosis or gallbladder carcinoma ([Fig. 1] b, c). In order to distinguish benign adenomyosis from malignant carcinoma, together with treatment of the CBD stone, we sequentially performed endoscopic basket retrieval and target biopsies of the gallbladder.


In the first procedure, contrast imaging revealed CBD dilation ([Fig. 2] a). Under the navigation of the guidewire, the cholangioscope was introduced into the CBD and the stone was then successfully extracted ([Fig. 2] b). Subsequently, another guidewire was advanced into the gallbladder lumen under the guidance of the cholangioscope ([Fig. 2] c), facilitating the subsequent placement of the stent along the segment extending from the gallbladder to Vater’s ampulla, creating an approach for subsequent cholangioscopy during the second procedure ([Fig. 2] d). Meanwhile, a double-pigtail stent was deployed within the CBD to ensure fluent bile drainage.


Three days later, we performed the second endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography (ERCP). The cholangioscope entered the gallbladder along the formally established pathway under the guidance of the guidewire. Owing to the excellent dexterity of the cholangioscope, retroflexion can be achieved in the constricted gallbladder lumen, so that we could directly observe the multifocal papillary neoplasm at the gallbladder neck ([Fig. 3] a, b). Subsequently, target biopsies were taken and then pathology confirmed high-grade intraepithelial neoplasia. Stents were removed during duodenoscope withdrawal ([Fig. 3] c, d; [Video 1]).


The patient then underwent laparoscopic cholecystectomy. Postoperative histopathology confirmed the presence of highly differentiated gallbladder adenocarcinoma.
As this case shows, while gallbladder neoplasms can be easily detected by US or CT, making a pathological diagnosis in the early stage remains challenging, often necessitating endoscopic ultrasound-guided fine needle aspiration (EUS-FNA) [1]. This case suggests a potential option for early precise diagnosis of a gallbladder neoplasm.
Endoscopy_UCTN_Code_TTT_1AR_2AD
E-Videos is an open access online section of the journal Endoscopy, reporting on interesting cases and new techniques in gastroenterological endoscopy.
All papers include a high-quality video and are published with a Creative Commons
CC-BY license. Endoscopy E-Videos qualify for HINARI discounts and waivers and eligibility is automatically checked during the submission
process. We grant 100% waivers to articles whose corresponding authors are based in
Group A countries and 50% waivers to those who are based in Group B countries as classified
by Research4Life (see: https://www.research4life.org/access/eligibility/).
This section has its own submission website at https://mc.manuscriptcentral.com/e-videos.
Conflict of Interest
The authors declare that they have no conflict of interest.
-
Reference
- 1 Roa JC, García P, Kapoor VK. et al. Gallbladder cancer. Nat Rev Dis Primers 2022; 8: 1-22
Correspondence
Publication History
Article published online:
24 April 2024
© 2024. The Author(s). This is an open access article published by Thieme under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License, permitting unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction so long as the original work is properly cited. (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/).
Georg Thieme Verlag KG
Rüdigerstraße 14, 70469 Stuttgart, Germany
-
Reference
- 1 Roa JC, García P, Kapoor VK. et al. Gallbladder cancer. Nat Rev Dis Primers 2022; 8: 1-22






