Heterogenization of [Ru(bpy)₃]Cl₂ on Ordered Mesoporous Silica Materials for Photocatalytic Applications

Abstract

Herein, the preparation and characterization of three Ru-based heterogeneous photocatalysts supported on ordered mesoporous silica materials are reported. The photocatalytic activity of these catalysts was evaluated through oxidation, reduction, cycloaddition, and carboxylation reactions and their efficiencies are comparable to the parent [Ru(bpy)₃]Cl₂ under homogeneous conditions. These photocatalysts are efficiently recovered even after five reaction cycles offering new opportunities in sustainable chemistry.

Keywords

heterogeneous photocatalysis - ordered mesoporous silica - [Ru(bpy)₃]Cl₂ - sustainable chemistry

Publication History

Received: 10 April 2024

Accepted after revision: 30 April 2024

Accepted Manuscript online:
30 April 2024

Article published online:
11 June 2024

• References and Notes

• 1 Anastas PT. Chem. Rev. 2007; 107: 2167
• 2a Candish L, Collins KD, Cook CG, Douglas JJ, Gomez-Suarez A, Jolit A, Keess S. Chem. Rev. 2022; 122: 2907
• 2b McAtee C, McClain EJ, Stephenson CR. J. Trends Chem. 2019; 1: 111
• 2c Shaw MH, Twilton J, Macmillan DW. C. J. Org. Chem. 2016; 81: 6898
• 2d Goddard J.-P, Ollivier C, Fensterbank L. Acc. Chem. Res. 2016; 49: 1924
• 2e Prier CK, Rankic DA, MacMillan DW. C. Chem. Rev. 2013; 113: 5322
• 3 Sellet N, Cormier M, Goddard J.-P. Org. Chem. Front. 2021; 8: 6783
• 4a Savateev A, Antonietti M. ACS Catal. 2018; 8: 9790
• 4b Lang X, Chen X, Zhao J. Chem. Soc. Rev. 2014; 43: 473
• 5a Rana P, Kaushik B, Solanki K, Mohan Saini K, Sharla RK. Chem. Commun. 2022; 58: 11354
• 5b Yakushev AA, Abel AS, Averin AD, Beletskaya IP, Cheprakov AV, Ziankou IS, Bonneviot L, Bessmertnykh-Lemeune A. Coord. Chem. Rev. 2022; 458: 214331
• 5c Hong MakC, Han X, Du M, Kai J.-J, Tsang KF, Jia G, Cheng K.-C, Shen H.-H, Hsu H.-Y. J. Mater. Chem. A 2021; 9: 4454
• 6 Santiago-Portillo A, Baldovi HG, Carbonell E, Navalon S, Alvaro M, Garcia H, Ferrer B. J. Phys. Chem. C 2018; 122: 29190
• 7a Peng H, Romero T, Papaefthimiou V, Bertani P, Ritleng V. Mol. Catal. 2023; 545: 113183
• 7b Wang C.-A, Han Y.-F, Nie K, Li Y.-W. Mater. Chem. Front. 2019; 3: 1909
• 7c Zhang X, Li Y, Hao X, Jin K, Zhang R, Duan C. Tetrahedron 2018; 74: 1742
• 7d Liang Y, Bergbreiter DE. Catal. Sci. Technol. 2016; 6: 215
• 7e Priyadarshani N, Liang Y, Suriboot J, Bazzi HS, Bergbreiter DE. ACS Macro Lett. 2013; 2: 571
• 7f Wang J.-L, Wang C, deKrafft KE, Lin W. ACS Catal. 2012; 2: 417
• 8a Blanchard V, Asbai Z, Cottet K, Boissonnat G, Port M, Amara Z.. Org. Process Res. Dev. 2020; 24: 822
• 8b Teixeira RI, de Lucas NC, Garden SJ, Lanterna AE, Scaiano JC. Catal. Sci. Technol. 2020; 10: 1273
• 8c Tambosco B, Segura K, Seyrig C, Cabrera D, Port M, Ferroud C, Amara Z. ACS Catal. 2018; 8: 4383
• 9 Soria-Castro SM, Lebeau B, Cormier M, Neunlist S, Daou J, Goddard J.-P. Eur. J. Org. Chem. 2020; 1572
• 10 Mahmoud N, Awassa J, Toufaily J, Lebeau B, Daou TJ, Cormier M, Goddard J.-P. Molecules 2023; 28: 549
• 11a Wang Y, Zhao D. Chem. Rev. 2007; 107: 2821
• 11b Hoffmann F, Cornelius M, Morelle J, Fröba M. Angew. Chem. Int. Ed. 2006; 45: 3216
• 12a Roja-Luna R, Castillo-Rodriguez M, Ruiz JR, Jiménez-Sanchidrian C, Esquivel D, Romero-Salguero FJ. Dalton Trans. 2022; 51: 18708
• 12b Waki M, Shirai S, Yamanaka K.-I, Maegawa Y, Inagaki S. RSC Adv. 2020; 10: 13960
• 12c Takeda H, Ohashi M, Goto Y, Ohsuna T, Tani T, Inagaki S. Adv. Funct. Mater. 2016; 26: 5068
• 12d Jana A, Mondal J, Borah P, Mondal S, Bhaumik A, Zhao Y. Chem. Commun. 2015; 51: 10746
• 13 Walcarius A, Nasraoui R, Wang Z, Qu F, Urganova V, Etienne M, Göllü M, Demir AS, Gajdzik J, Hempelmann R. Bioelectrochemistry 2011; 82: 46
• 14 Zhao D, Huo Q, Feng J, Chmelka BF, Stucky GD. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 1998; 120: 6024
• 15 Kresge CT, Leonowicz ME, Roth WJ, Vartuli JC, Beck JS. Nature 1992; 359: 710
• 16 Vilà N, Ghanbaja J, Aubert E, Walcarius A. Angew. Chem. Int. Ed. 2014; 53: 2945
• 17 Despas C, Walcarius A, Bessière J. Langmuir 1999; 15: 3186
• 18 Condie AG, González-Gómez JC, Stephenson CR. J. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2010; 132: 1464
• 19 General Procedure for Photocatalyzed Aza-Henry Reaction 2-(4-Methoxyphenyl)-1,2,3,4-tetrahydroisoquinoline (8, 59.83 mg, 0.25 mmol, 1 equiv) and PCat (0.0025 mmol, 1 mol%) were added in 1 mL of freshly distilled MeNO₂ in a flask equipped with a magnetic stir bar. The mixture was stirred at room temperature and irradiated with a blue LED (420 nm) at 5 cm for 24 h under air. The mixture was evaporated under vacuum and purified by column chromatography on silica gel (pentane/diethyl ether, 80:20, v/v) to afford 9 as a yellow oil.
• 20 Maity S, Zhu M, Shinabery RS, Zheng N. Angew. Chem. Int. Ed. 2012; 51: 222
• 21 General Procedure for the Photocatalyzed [3+2] Cycloaddition N-Cyclopropylaniline (10, 26.64 mg, 0.2 mmol, 1 equiv), PCat (0.004 mmol, 0.02 equiv), styrene (11, 0.11 mL, 1 mmol, 5 equiv), and 1.12 mL of distilled and degassed MeNO₂ were added in a flask. The mixture was stirred at room temperature and irradiated with a blue LED (420 nm) at 5 cm for 24 h under air. The mixture was filtered over a Celite® pad with diethyl ether, and the filtrate was evaporated under vacuum. The mixture was purified by column chromatography on silica gel (PE/EtOAc, 95:5, v/v) to afford 12 as a yellow oil (dr = 60:40).
• 22 Tucker JW, Narayanam JM. R, Krabbe SW, Stephenson CR. J. Org. Lett. 2010; 12: 368
• 23 General Procedure for Photocatalytic Reduction of Bromomalonate The corresponding substrate 13 (0.076 mmol, 1 equiv) and PCat (0.0008 mmol, 1 mol%) was added in a flask equipped with magnetic stir bar evacuated and back-filled with nitrogen (N₂) with 1 mL of freshly degassed DMF. Et₃N (0.021 mL, 0.15 mmol, 2 equiv) was added dropwise. The mixture was stirred at room temperature and irradiated with blue LED (420 nm) placed at 5 cm for 24 h. 25 mL of water were added, and the aqueous layer was extracted with diethyl ether (3 × 25 mL). The organic layers were combined, dried over MgSO₄, and evaporated under vacuum. Full conversions were observed for all the substrates, and the ratio of 14:15 was determined by ¹H NMR spectroscopy on the crude reaction.
• 24 Analytical Data for Dimethyl 2-[4-(1H-indol-1-yl)butyl]malonate (15b, n = 4) ¹H NMR (400 MHz, CDCl₃): δ = 7.66 (d, J = 7.9 Hz, 1 H), 7.39–7.32 (m, 1 H), 7.24 (d, J = 1.1 Hz, 1 H), 7.18–7.07 (m, 2 H), 6.52 (dd, J = 3.1, 0.6 Hz, 1 H), 4.13 (t, J = 7.0 Hz, 2 H), 3.73 (s, 6 H), 3.35 (t, J = 7.4 Hz, 1 H), 2.01–1.84 (m, 4 H), 1.36 (m, 2 H). ¹³C NMR (100 MHz, CDCl₃): δ = 169.7, 135.8, 128.6, 127.8, 121.4,121.0, 119.2, 109.3, 101.0, 52.5, 51.4, 45.9, 29.7, 28.3, 24.6. FT-IR (neat): 3026, 2951, 2865, 1730, 1511, 1462, 1434, 1335, 1313, 1243, 1226, 1195, 1148, 1010, 739 cm^–1. HRMS (ESI): m/z [M + Na]⁺ calcd for C₁₇H₂₁NaO₄Na: 326.1363; found: 326.1357.
• 25 Analytical Data for Dimethyl 2-[5-(1H-indol-1-yl)pentyl]malonate (15c, n = 5) ¹H NMR (400 MHz, CDCl₃): δ = 7.69 (d, J = 7.9 Hz, 1 H), 7.38 (d, J = 8.3 Hz, 1 H), 7.30–7.20 (m, 1 H), 7.19–7.08 (m, 2 H), 6.54 (d, J = 3.1 Hz, 1 H), 4.12 (t, J = 7.0 Hz, 2 H), 3.76 (s, 6 H), 3.38 (t, J = 7.5 Hz, 1 H), 1.89 (ddd, J = 20.1, 8.8, 5.5 Hz, 4 H), 1.44–1.30 (m, 4 H). ¹³C NMR (100 MHz, CDCl₃): δ = 169.7, 135.8, 128.5, 127.7, 121.3, 120.9, 119.1, 109.3, 100.9, 52.4, 51.5, 46.0, 29.8, 28.6, 26.8, 26.5. FT-IR (neat): 3023, 2952, 2862, 1731, 1511, 1484, 1462, 1435, 1313, 1253, 1200, 1153, 1047, 1012, 740 cm^–1. HRMS (ESI): m/z [M + Na]⁺ calcd for C₁₈H₂₃NO₄Na: 340.1519; found: 340.1516.
• 26 Yin Z.-B, Ye J.-H, Zhou W.-J, Zhang Y.-H, Ding L, Gui Y.-Y, Yan S.-S, Li J, Yu D.-G. Org. Lett. 2018; 20: 190
• 27 General Procedure for Photocatalytic for Oxy-Difluoroalkylation Compound 16 (45 mg, 0.20 mmol, 1 equiv), PCat (0.001 mmol, 0.5 mol%) and DABCO (0.039 mL, 0.4 mmol, 2 equiv) were added in 2.2 mL of anhydrous DMF (previously degassed with CO₂) into a Schlenk tube equipped with magnetic stir bar evacuated and backfilled with nitrogen (N₂). Then BrCF₂CO₂Et (0.038 mL, 0.3 mmol, 1.5 equiv) was added dropwise then CO₂ was bubbled into the solution. The mixture was stirred at room temperature and irradiated with a blue LED (420 nm) placed at 5 cm for 16 h. 25 mL of brine were added and the aqueous layer was extracted with EtOAc (3 × 25 mL). The organic layers were combined, dried over MgSO₄ and evaporated under vacuum. The mixture was purified by column chromatography on silica gel (PE/EtOAc, 80: 20, v/v) to afford 17 as a white solid.
• 28 Yeung CS. Angew. Chem. Int. Ed. 2019; 58: 5492