Subscribe to RSS
DOI: 10.1055/a-2419-2195
Prophylactic saline-immersion snare-tip vessel coagulation after colorectal endoscopic resection
Endoscopic mucosal resection (EMR) for large colorectal adenomatous lesions is hampered by a relevant risk of post-EMR delayed bleeding [1] [2]. Patients who have proximal lesions and/or are on antithrombotic treatment are at higher risk for such delayed bleeding [3].
Post-EMR prophylactic vessel coagulation has been previously standardized as the application of a low-voltage current using hemostatic forceps [4]. However, this requires a time-consuming device exchange, as well as an additional cost. In addition, the application of a low-voltage current by a relatively large forceps may result in deep thermal injury.
A recent peroral endoscopic myotomy-based series reported that a high-voltage coagulation current delivered through a dedicated knife in a saline-immersion setting maximizes the coagulation effect, preventing unintentional cutting of the vessel wall [5].
We present the case of an 84-year-old woman who underwent an underwater piecemeal EMR (Captivator II, 15 mm; Boston Scientific, Marlborough, Massachusetts, USA) for a large (50 mm) right colon laterally spreading tumor granular-type without endoscopic features of submucosal invasive cancer. To prevent delayed bleeding, prophylactic saline-immersion coagulation was performed at the end of the procedure ([Video 1]).
Quality:
The snare tip was gently placed in contact with the visible vessels and a high-voltage coagulation current (ForcedCOAG E4.0, ERBE VIO3; ERBE Elektromedizin GmbH, Tübingen, Germany) was delivered. This resulted in progressive presealing of the vessels without any cutting effect ([Fig. 1]). The patient was discharged 4 hours after the procedure with no relevant post-procedural symptoms. No delayed bleeding or other adverse events were reported up to 30 days after the procedure.
This novel technique aims to reduce the risk of delayed bleeding after endoscopic resection using a one-device, cost-effective, and time-sparing approach. It also highlights the potential applications of saline-immersion coagulation in the field of endoscopy, which appear to be universal and irrespective of the technique, device, or type of current adopted.
Endoscopy_UCTN_Code_TTT_1AQ_2AZ
E-Videos is an open access online section of the journal Endoscopy, reporting on interesting cases and new techniques in gastroenterological endoscopy. All papers include a high-quality video and are published with a Creative Commons CC-BY license. Endoscopy E-Videos qualify for HINARI discounts and waivers and eligibility is automatically checked during the submission process. We grant 100% waivers to articles whose corresponding authors are based in Group A countries and 50% waivers to those who are based in Group B countries as classified by Research4Life (see: https://www.research4life.org/access/eligibility/).
This section has its own submission website at https://mc.manuscriptcentral.com/e-videos.
Endoscopy 2024; 56: E622–E623. doi: 10.1055/a-2353-6039
#
Conflict of Interest
A. Capogreco is a consultant for ERBE. R. Maselli is a consultant for ERBE, Fujifilm, 3DMatrix and Boston Scientific. C. Hassan is a consultant for Alpha-Sigma, Fujifilm, Medtronic, Norgine, Olympus and Pentax. A. Repici is a consultant for Medtronic, ERBE, Fujifilm and Olympus.
-
References
- 1 Ferlitsch M, Moss A, Hassan C. et al. Colorectal polypectomy and endoscopic mucosal resection (EMR): European Society of Gastrointestinal Endoscopy (ESGE) Clinical Guideline. Endoscopy 2017; 49: 270-297
- 2 Albéniz E, Montori S, Rodríguez De Santiago E. et al. Preventing postendoscopic mucosal resection bleeding of large nonpedunculated colorectal lesions. Am J Gastroenterol 2022; 117: 1080-1088
- 3 Spadaccini M, Albéniz E, Pohl H. et al. Prophylactic clipping after colorectal endoscopic resection prevents bleeding of large, proximal polyps: meta-analysis of randomized trials. Gastroenterology 2020; 159: 148-158
- 4 Bahin FF, Naidoo M, Williams SJ. et al. Prophylactic endoscopic coagulation to prevent bleeding after wide-field endoscopic mucosal resection of large sessile colon polyps. Clin Gastroenterol Hepatology 2015; 13: 724-730
- 5 Capogreco A, Hassan C, De Blasio F. et al. Prophylactic underwater vessel coagulation for submucosal endoscopy. Gut 2024; 73: 1049-1051
Correspondence
Publication History
Article published online:
28 November 2024
© 2024. The Author(s). This article was originally published by Thieme in Endoscopy 2024; 56: E622–E623 as an open access article under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License, permitting unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction so long as the original work is properly cited. (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/).
Georg Thieme Verlag KG
Oswald-Hesse-Straße 50, 70469 Stuttgart, Germany
-
References
- 1 Ferlitsch M, Moss A, Hassan C. et al. Colorectal polypectomy and endoscopic mucosal resection (EMR): European Society of Gastrointestinal Endoscopy (ESGE) Clinical Guideline. Endoscopy 2017; 49: 270-297
- 2 Albéniz E, Montori S, Rodríguez De Santiago E. et al. Preventing postendoscopic mucosal resection bleeding of large nonpedunculated colorectal lesions. Am J Gastroenterol 2022; 117: 1080-1088
- 3 Spadaccini M, Albéniz E, Pohl H. et al. Prophylactic clipping after colorectal endoscopic resection prevents bleeding of large, proximal polyps: meta-analysis of randomized trials. Gastroenterology 2020; 159: 148-158
- 4 Bahin FF, Naidoo M, Williams SJ. et al. Prophylactic endoscopic coagulation to prevent bleeding after wide-field endoscopic mucosal resection of large sessile colon polyps. Clin Gastroenterol Hepatology 2015; 13: 724-730
- 5 Capogreco A, Hassan C, De Blasio F. et al. Prophylactic underwater vessel coagulation for submucosal endoscopy. Gut 2024; 73: 1049-1051