Open Access
CC BY 4.0 · Endoscopy 2024; 56(S 01): E994-E995
DOI: 10.1055/a-2452-5130
E-Videos

The “line-band closure” technique: a new endoscopic traction method for closure of a large defect

Fei Liu
1   Department of Gastroenterology, Second Affiliated Hospital of Soochow University, Suzhou, China (Ringgold ID: RIN105860)
,
Zhenyun Gong
1   Department of Gastroenterology, Second Affiliated Hospital of Soochow University, Suzhou, China (Ringgold ID: RIN105860)
,
Duanmin Hu
1   Department of Gastroenterology, Second Affiliated Hospital of Soochow University, Suzhou, China (Ringgold ID: RIN105860)
› Author Affiliations

Supported by: Pre-research fund of the Second Affiliated Hospital of Soochow University SDFEYLC2345
Supported by: Project of State Key Laboratory of Radiation Medicine and Protection, Soochow University GZK1202402
 

We describe the case of a 55-year-old woman with a solitary, yellow, subepithelial mass found in the large curvature of the stomach body on upper gastrointestinal endoscopy ([Fig. 1] a). The lesion had a size of 8 × 6 mm and was considered a neuroendocrine tumor. Endoscopic submucosal dissection (ESD) was performed to achieve complete resection of the lesion. After the lesion was removed, a 20 × 15 mm defect was left ([Fig. 1] b). In order to prevent delayed perforation and bleeding, the defect was closed.

Zoom
Fig. 1 Endoscopic characteristics of the lesion and stages of the “line-band closure” technique. a A yellow subepithelial mass in the large curvature of the stomach body, with a size of 8 × 6 mm. b After the lesion was removed, a 20 × 15 mm defect was left. c, d The clip with a rubber band narrowed the distance between the two sides of the defect. e A clip was used to grasp the dental floss and pass it through the band. f By extracorporeal traction, the defect was pulled up to form a tent-like peak, and the two sides of the defect were brought closer together and linearized. g The defect was gradually closed from the traction point to both sides with clips. h After the defect was completely closed, the floss was pulled out.

The procedure for defect closure was as follows ([Fig. 1] c–h, [Fig. 2], [Video 1]). 1) The clip with an orthodontic rubber band (5 mm in diameter; Xufei, Hangzhou, China) was attached to one side of the defect, and a second clip clamped the band and was attached to the opposite side of the defect to narrow the distance between the two sides. 2) A third clip was used to grasp a length of dental floss and pass it through the band. By extracorporeal traction, the defect was pulled up to form a tent-like peak, and the two sides of the defect were brought closer together and linearized. The defect was gradually closed from the traction point to both sides with clips. 3) After the defect was completely closed, the floss was slowly pull out.

Zoom
Fig. 2 Illustration of the “line-band closure” technique.
The “line-band closure” technique.Video 1

Pathological examination revealed a neuroendocrine tumor (G1) with a negative margin. The patient had no adverse events and was discharged after 3 days.

The closure of large post-ESD mucosal defects is a challenge. Although new endoscopic closure techniques have sprung up in recent years, most of them require complex or specialized equipment and are technically challenging [1] [2] [3] [4]. In this report, we used dental floss combined with a rubber band to apply extracorporeal traction on the defect. By traction, the defect forms a tent-like peak, bringing the two sides closer together and linearizing the pseudo-suture path. In addition, traction improves and maintains the endoscopic field of view, even if there is a large perforation in the gastrointestinal wall and the stomach cavity is difficult to fill. We call this technique “line-band closure,” and it is simple, feasible, and safe, and may represent a useful new endoscopic closure technique.

Endoscopy_UCTN_Code_TTT_1AO_2AO

E-Videos is an open access online section of the journal Endoscopy, reporting on interesting cases and new techniques in gastroenterological endoscopy. All papers include a high-quality video and are published with a Creative Commons CC-BY license. Endoscopy E-Videos qualify for HINARI discounts and waivers and eligibility is automatically checked during the submission process. We grant 100% waivers to articles whose corresponding authors are based in Group A countries and 50% waivers to those who are based in Group B countries as classified by Research4Life (see: https://www.research4life.org/access/eligibility/).

This section has its own submission website at https://mc.manuscriptcentral.com/e-videos.


Conflict of Interest

The authors declare that they have no conflict of interest.


Correspondence

Duanmin Hu, MD
Department of Gastroenterology, Second Affiliated Hospital of Soochow University
1055 Sanxiang Road
Suzhou, 215300 Jiangsu
China   

Publication History

Article published online:
13 November 2024

© 2024. The Author(s). This is an open access article published by Thieme under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License, permitting unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction so long as the original work is properly cited. (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/).

Georg Thieme Verlag KG
Oswald-Hesse-Straße 50, 70469 Stuttgart, Germany


Zoom
Fig. 1 Endoscopic characteristics of the lesion and stages of the “line-band closure” technique. a A yellow subepithelial mass in the large curvature of the stomach body, with a size of 8 × 6 mm. b After the lesion was removed, a 20 × 15 mm defect was left. c, d The clip with a rubber band narrowed the distance between the two sides of the defect. e A clip was used to grasp the dental floss and pass it through the band. f By extracorporeal traction, the defect was pulled up to form a tent-like peak, and the two sides of the defect were brought closer together and linearized. g The defect was gradually closed from the traction point to both sides with clips. h After the defect was completely closed, the floss was pulled out.
Zoom
Fig. 2 Illustration of the “line-band closure” technique.