One Size Does Not Fit All: Prediction of Nerve Length in Implant-based Nipple–Areola Complex Neurotization

Abstract

Background

Breast reconstruction with sensory restoration is gaining recognition as an important goal. Successful reinnervation has been shown in autologous reconstruction but not widely studied in implant-based reconstruction (IBR). This article describes our technique for nipple–areola complex (NAC) neurotization to predict maximal nerve length. We also propose a novel equation that can be utilized preoperatively to estimate the total nerve length required for NAC neurotization.

Methods

This is a retrospective study of patients who underwent nerve reconstruction with IBR between April 2021 and May 2022. An equation based on the arc length of a circle was utilized to predict the total nerve length required. Postoperative assessment of sensation was performed at 3, 6, and 12 months using Semmes–Weinstein monofilament testing in all four breast quadrants and the NAC. Patients completed the Breast-Q Sensation Module preoperatively and at 3, 6, and 12 months.

Results

NAC neurotization was performed in 58 patients undergoing IBR. The average length of intercostal nerve (ICN) harvested was 5.3 cm for staged reconstructions and 5.6 cm for direct-to-implant reconstruction. The average total nerve length (allograft + mobilized ICN) was 12.3 cm. On average, 6.9 cm of nerve allograft was used. The mean difference between total nerve length and predicted nerve length was 0.47 cm (range −3.5 to 4.6 cm). There was a significant improvement in sensory monofilament values measured in all four breast quadrants and the NAC between 3 to 6 and 6 to 12 months postoperatively.

Conclusion

A thorough understanding of sensory anatomy and precise surgical techniques are essential to perform NAC neurotization successfully. Our early results suggest the positive impact of breast sensation on patient quality of life.

Keywords

breast neurotization - direct targeted nipple neurotization - NSM implant-based breast reconstruction

Publikationsverlauf

Eingereicht: 14. Juli 2024

Angenommen: 29. Oktober 2024

Artikel online veröffentlicht:
29. November 2024

• References

• 1 Colwell AS, Tessler O, Lin AM. et al. Breast reconstruction following nipple-sparing mastectomy: predictors of complications, reconstruction outcomes, and 5-year trends. Plast Reconstr Surg 2014; 133 (03) 496-506
• 2 Fu M, Chen Q, Zeng L. et al. Prognosis comparison between nipple-sparing mastectomy and total mastectomy in breast cancer: a case-control study after propensity score matching. Ann Surg Oncol 2022; 29 (04) 2221-2230
• 3 Colwell AS, Christensen JM. Nipple-sparing mastectomy and direct-to-implant breast reconstruction. Plast Reconstr Surg 2017; 140 (5S Advances in Breast Reconstruction): 44S-50S
• 4 Bijkerk E, van Kuijk SMJ, Beugels J. et al. Breast sensibility after mastectomy and implant-based breast reconstruction. Breast Cancer Res Treat 2019; 175 (02) 369-378
• 5 Hammond JB, Kandi LA, Armstrong VL. et al. Long-term breast and nipple sensation after nipple-sparing mastectomy with implant reconstruction: relevance to physical, psychosocial, and sexual well-being. J Plast Reconstr Aesthet Surg 2022; 75 (09) 2914-2919
• 6 Aygin D, Cengiz H. Life quality of patients who underwent breast reconstruction after prophylactic mastectomy: systematic review. Breast Cancer 2018; 25 (05) 497-505
• 7 Gfrerer L, Sager JE, Ford OA. et al. Targeted nipple areola complex reinnervation: technical considerations and surgical efficiency in implant-based breast reconstruction. Plast Reconstr Surg Glob Open 2022; 10 (07) e4420
• 8 Ducic I, Yoon J, Momeni A, Ahcan U. Anatomical considerations to optimize sensory recovery in breast neurotization with allograft. Plast Reconstr Surg Glob Open 2018; 6 (11) e1985
• 9 Knackstedt R, Grobmyer S, Djohan R. Collaboration between the breast and plastic surgeon in restoring sensation after mastectomy. Breast J 2019; 25 (06) 1187-1191
• 10 Knackstedt R, Gatherwright J, Cakmakoglu C, Djohan M, Djohan R. Predictable location of breast sensory nerves for breast reinnervation. Plast Reconstr Surg 2019; 143 (02) 393-396
• 11 Sarhadi NS, Shaw-Dunn J, Soutar DS. Nerve supply of the breast with special reference to the nipple and areola: Sir Astley Cooper revisited. Clin Anat 1997; 10 (04) 283-288
• 12 Djohan R, Scomacao I, Knackstedt R, Cakmakoglu C, Grobmyer SR. Neurotization of the nipple-areola complex during implant-based reconstruction: evaluation of early sensation recovery. Plast Reconstr Surg 2020; 146 (02) 250-254
• 13 Jaspars JJ, Posma AN, van Immerseel AA, Gittenberger-de Groot AC. The cutaneous innervation of the female breast and nipple-areola complex: implications for surgery. Br J Plast Surg 1997; 50 (04) 249-259
• 14 Coopey S, Keleher A, Daniele K. et al. Careful where you cut: strategies for successful nerve-preserving mastectomy. Plast Reconstr Surg Glob Open 2024; 12 (05) e5817
• 15 Horen SR, Hamidian Jahromi A, Konofaos P. Direct neurotization: past, present, and future considerations. Ann Plast Surg 2022; 88 (03) 308-312
• 16 Valero MG, Muhsen S, Moo TA. et al. Increase in utilization of nipple-sparing mastectomy for breast cancer: indications, complications, and oncologic outcomes. Ann Surg Oncol 2020; 27 (02) 344-351
• 17 O'Neill RC, Spiegel AJ. Modern approaches to breast neurotization. Clin Plast Surg 2023; 50 (02) 347-355
• 18 Lee SK, Wolfe SW. Peripheral nerve injury and repair. J Am Acad Orthop Surg 2000; 8 (04) 243-252
• 19 Contreras E, Traserra S, Bolívar S. et al. Repair of long nerve defects with a new decellularized nerve graft in rats and in sheep. Cells 2022; 11 (24) 4074
• 20 Peled AW, Peled ZM. Nerve preservation and allografting for sensory innervation following immediate implant breast reconstruction. Plast Reconstr Surg Glob Open 2019; 7 (07) e2332
• 21 Peled AW, von Eyben R, Peled ZM. Sensory outcomes after neurotization in nipple-sparing mastectomy and implant-based breast reconstruction. Plast Reconstr Surg Glob Open 2023; 11 (12) e5437
• 22 Isaacs J, Safa B. A preliminary assessment of the utility of large-caliber processed nerve allografts for the repair of upper extremity nerve injuries. Hand (N Y) 2017; 12 (01) 55-59
• 23 Rinker B, Zoldos J, Weber RV. et al. Use of processed nerve allografts to repair nerve injuries greater than 25 mm in the hand. Ann Plast Surg 2017; 78 (6S Suppl 5): S292-S295
• 24 Seddon HJ, Medawar PB, Smith H. Rate of regeneration of peripheral nerves in man. J Physiol 1943; 102 (02) 191-215
• 25 Braam MJ, Nicolai JPA. Axonal regeneration rate through cross-face nerve grafts. Microsurgery 1993; 14 (09) 589-591
• 26 Weissler JM, Koltz PF, Carney MJ, Serletti JM, Wu LC. Sifting through the evidence: a comprehensive review and analysis of neurotization in breast reconstruction. Plast Reconstr Surg 2018; 141 (03) 550-565