Subscribe to RSS

DOI: 10.1055/a-2477-2789
Needle tip insertion technique for accurate and safe puncture in endoscopic ultrasound-guided tissue acquisition
Endoscopic ultrasound-guided tissue acquisition (EUS-TA) is the gold standard for diagnosing pancreatic and gastrointestinal submucosal tumors [1]. However, inaccurate puncture can occasionally lead to adverse events or insufficient tissue samples [2] [3] [4]. In standard EUS-TA procedures, puncture is performed to confirm the alignment of the external sheath with the target lesion; however, several technical challenges can arise ([Fig. 1] a). Although the needle direction and distance to the target lesion are typically controlled by focusing on the external sheath, complications such as needle deviation from the expected direction, gastrointestinal membrane mobility, and breathing-induced target movement can lead to unsuccessful or inadequate punctures ([Fig. 1] a, [Fig. 2] a, b). Misalignment of the endoscope or external sheath can also result in needle loss from the EUS view ([Fig. 2] c, d, [Video 1]). Unintended puncture routes may subsequently increase the risk of adverse events, including vascular injury.




The needle tip insertion method (NTIM) is recommended to prevent such punctures ([Fig. 1] b). In NTIM, the needle tip is inserted a short distance from the external sheath and crimped to the gastrointestinal membrane ([Fig. 3] a). Needle crimping provides a stable puncture view unaffected by respiratory fluctuations and enables accurate measurement of the target distance, independent of mucosal mobility ([Fig. 3] b). Continuous visibility of the needle tip facilitates more precise distance measurements and allows for accurate assessment of the needle’s puncture direction and route, even when endoscope or external sheath misalignment occurs ([Fig. 3] c, [Video 1]).


NTIM is particularly beneficial for accessing technically challenging pancreatic tumors, such as those located deep within the pancreas or far from the puncture site ([Fig. 4] a, b). It also maintains stable visibility when targeting highly mobile microtumors in the pancreatic tail ([Fig. 4] c, d, [Video 1]). Additionally, NTIM is useful for puncturing submucosal and small hepatic tumors ([Fig. 5], [Video 1]). Therefore, incorporating NTIM into EUS-TA procedures may enhance both accuracy and safety.




Endoscopy_UCTN_Code_TTT_1AS_2AF
E-Videos is an open access online section of the journal Endoscopy, reporting on interesting cases and new techniques in gastroenterological endoscopy.
All papers include a high-quality video and are published with a Creative Commons
CC-BY license. Endoscopy E-Videos qualify for HINARI discounts and waivers and eligibility is automatically checked during the submission
process. We grant 100% waivers to articles whose corresponding authors are based in
Group A countries and 50% waivers to those who are based in Group B countries as classified
by Research4Life (see: https://www.research4life.org/access/eligibility/).
This section has its own submission website at https://mc.manuscriptcentral.com/e-videos.
#
Conflict of Interest
The authors declare that they have no conflict of interest.
-
References
- 1 Larghi A, Ibrahim M, Fuccio L. et al. Forward-viewing echoendoscope versus standard echoendoscope for endoscopic ultrasound-guided tissue acquisition of solid lesions: a randomized, multicenter study. Endoscopy 2019; 51: 444-451
- 2 Giri S, Afzalpurkar S, Anirvan P. et al. Risk of bleeding with endoscopic ultrasound-guided tissue acquisition in patients on antithrombotic therapy: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Dig Dis Sci 2023; 68: 1950-1958
- 3 Kawasaki Y, Hijioka S, Nagashio Y. et al. Diagnostic performance of EUS-guided tissue acquisition for solid pancreatic lesions ≤10 mm. Endosc Ultrasound 2024; 13: 115-122
- 4 Sagami R, Nakahodo J, Minami R. et al. True diagnostic ability of EUS-guided fine-needle aspiration/biopsy sampling for small pancreatic lesions ≤10 mm and salvage diagnosis by pancreatic juice cytology: a multicenter study. Gastrointest Endosc 2024; 99: 73-80
Correspondence
Publication History
Article published online:
12 December 2024
© 2024. The Author(s). This is an open access article published by Thieme under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License, permitting unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction so long as the original work is properly cited. (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/).
Georg Thieme Verlag KG
Oswald-Hesse-Straße 50, 70469 Stuttgart, Germany
-
References
- 1 Larghi A, Ibrahim M, Fuccio L. et al. Forward-viewing echoendoscope versus standard echoendoscope for endoscopic ultrasound-guided tissue acquisition of solid lesions: a randomized, multicenter study. Endoscopy 2019; 51: 444-451
- 2 Giri S, Afzalpurkar S, Anirvan P. et al. Risk of bleeding with endoscopic ultrasound-guided tissue acquisition in patients on antithrombotic therapy: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Dig Dis Sci 2023; 68: 1950-1958
- 3 Kawasaki Y, Hijioka S, Nagashio Y. et al. Diagnostic performance of EUS-guided tissue acquisition for solid pancreatic lesions ≤10 mm. Endosc Ultrasound 2024; 13: 115-122
- 4 Sagami R, Nakahodo J, Minami R. et al. True diagnostic ability of EUS-guided fine-needle aspiration/biopsy sampling for small pancreatic lesions ≤10 mm and salvage diagnosis by pancreatic juice cytology: a multicenter study. Gastrointest Endosc 2024; 99: 73-80









