Effects of Advanced Footwear Technology on Running Economy and Endurance Performance: A Meta-Analysis

Abstract

This study aimed to evaluate the effects of advanced footwear technology (AFT) on running economy (RE) and endurance performance. A systematic search was conducted on Web of Science, PubMed, Cochrane Library, and Embase databases on February 9, 2025, using the search terms “advanced footwear technology,” “running economy,” and “running.” Main effect sizes were calculated using Hedges’ g, and meta-analyses were performed using R Studio. A total of 17 randomized crossover trials with a total of 281 participants were included. Results showed that AFT significantly reduced oxygen consumption (VO₂) [g=−0.44, 95% confidence interval (CI):−0.59,−0.30, p<0.001], energy cost (EC) (g=−0.35, 95% CI:−0.48,−0.22, p<0.001), and the cost of transport (g=−0.39, 95% CI:−0.65,−0.14, p<0.01) compared to conventional running shoes. Subgroup and regression analyses indicated that improvements in VO₂ (β=−0.041, p=0.200) and EC (β=−0.025, p=0.436) were inversely related to running speed, with higher speeds associated with greater improvements in RE. Additionally, AFT improved time trial performance (g=−0.23, 95% CI:−0.37,−0.10, p<0.001). These findings suggest that AFT offers a moderate advantage in improving running efficiency, and it can help athletes achieve faster times in competitive settings.

Keywords

Advanced Footwear Technology - Running Economy - Energy cost

Publication History

Received: 23 February 2025

Accepted after revision: 16 June 2025

Accepted Manuscript online:
17 June 2025

Article published online:
17 July 2025

• References

• 1 Hoogkamer W, Kram R, Arellano CJ. How Biomechanical Improvements in Running Economy Could Break the 2-hour Marathon Barrier. Sports Med 2017; 47: 1739-1750
• 2 Barnes KR, Kilding AE. Strategies to improve running economy. Sports Med 2015; 45: 37-56
• 3 Jones AM, Carter H. The effect of endurance training on parameters of aerobic fitness. Sports Med 2000; 29: 373-386
• 4 Midgley AW, McNaughton LR, Wilkinson M. Is there an Optimal Training Intensity for Enhancing the Maximal Oxygen Uptake of Distance Runners?. Sports Med 2006; 36: 117-132
• 5 Saunders PU, Pyne DB, Telford RD, Hawley JA. Factors affecting running economy in trained distance runners. Sports Med 2004; 34: 465-485
• 6 Saunders PU, Pyne DB, Telford RD, Hawley JA. Reliability and variability of running economy in elite distance runners. Med Sci Sports Exerc 2004; 36: 1972-1976
• 7 Hoogkamer W, Snyder KL, Arellano CJ. Modeling the Benefits of Cooperative Drafting: Is There an Optimal Strategy to Facilitate a Sub-2-Hour Marathon Performance?. Sports Med 2018; 48: 2859-2867
• 8 Schickhofer L, Hanson H. Aerodynamic effects and performance improvements of running in drafting formations. J Biomech 2021; 122: 110457
• 9 da Silva ES, Kram R, Hoogkamer W. The metabolic cost of emulated aerodynamic drag forces in marathon running. J Appl Physiol (1985) 2022; 133: 766-776
• 10 Fuller JT, Bellenger CR, Thewlis D, Tsiros MD, Buckley JD. The Effect of Footwear on Running Performance and Running Economy in Distance Runners. Sports Med 2015; 45: 411-422
• 11 Hoogkamer W, Kipp S, Frank JH, Farina EM, Luo G, Kram R. A Comparison of the Energetic Cost of Running in Marathon Racing Shoes. Sports Med 2018; 48: 1009-1019
• 12 Hoogkamer W, Kipp S, Kram R. The Biomechanics of Competitive Male Runners in Three Marathon Racing Shoes: A Randomized Crossover Study. Sports Med 2019; 49: 133-143
• 13 Baltich J, Maurer C, Nigg BM. Increased vertical impact forces and altered running mechanics with softer midsole shoes. PLoS One 2015; 10: e0125196
• 14 Chambon N, Delattre N, Guéguen N, Berton E, Rao G. Is midsole thickness a key parameter for the running pattern?. Gait Posture 2014; 40: 58-63
• 15 Roy J.P., Stefanyshyn DJ. Shoe Midsole Longitudinal Bending Stiffness and Running Economy, Joint Energy, and EMG. Med Sci Sports Exer 2006; 38: 562-569
• 16 Stefanyshyn DJ, Nigg BM. Influence of midsole bending stiffness on joint energy and jump height performance. Med Sci Sports Exerc 2000; 32: 471-476
• 17 Langley JO, Langley B. The effect of advanced footwear technology on elite male marathon race speed. Eur J Appl Physiol 2024; 124: 1143-1149
• 18 Senefeld JW, Haischer MH, Jones AM. et al. Technological advances in elite marathon performance. J Appl Physiol (1985) 2021; 130: 2002-2008
• 19 Willwacher S, Mai P, Helwig J, Hipper M, Utku B, Robbin J. Does Advanced Footwear Technology Improve Track and Road Racing Performance? An Explorative Analysis Based on the 100 Best Yearly Performances in the World Between 2010 and 2022. Sports Med Open 2024; 10: 14
• 20 Rodrigo-Carranza V, González-Mohíno F, Santos-Concejero J, González-Ravé JM. The effects of footwear midsole longitudinal bending stiffness on running economy and ground contact biomechanics: A systematic review and meta-analysis. Eur J Sport Sci 2022; 22: 1508-1521
• 21 Knopp M, Muñiz-Pardos B, Wackerhage H. et al. Variability in Running Economy of Kenyan World-Class and European Amateur Male Runners with Advanced Footwear Running Technology: Experimental and Meta-analysis Results. Sports Med 2023; 53: 1255-1271
• 22 Page MJ, McKenzie JE, Bossuyt PM. et al. The PRISMA 2020 statement: an updated guideline for reporting systematic reviews. BMJ 2021; 372: n71
• 23 Cumpston M, Li T, Page MJ. et al. Updated guidance for trusted systematic reviews: a new edition of the Cochrane Handbook for Systematic Reviews of Interventions. Cochrane Database Syst Rev 2019; 10: ED000142
• 24 Sterne JAC, Savović J, Page MJ. et al. RoB 2: a revised tool for assessing risk of bias in randomised trials. BMJ 2019; 366: l4898
• 25 DerSimonian R, Laird N. Meta-analysis in clinical trials. Control Clin Trials 1986; 7: 177-188
• 26 Nakagawa S, Cuthill IC. Effect size, confidence interval and statistical significance: a practical guide for biologists. Biol Rev Camb Philos Soc 2007; 82: 591-605
• 27 Higgins JP, Thompson SG, Deeks JJ, Altman DG. Measuring inconsistency in meta-analyses. BMJ 2003; 327: 557-560
• 28 Binney ZO, Mansournia MA. Methods matter: (mostly) avoid categorising continuous data - a practical guide. Br J Sports Med 2024; 58: 241-243
• 29 Peters JL, Sutton AJ, Jones DR, Abrams KR, Rushton L. Contour-enhanced meta-analysis funnel plots help distinguish publication bias from other causes of asymmetry. J Clin Epidemiol 2008; 61: 991-996
• 30 Egger M, Davey Smith G, Schneider M, Minder C. Bias in meta-analysis detected by a simple, graphical test. BMJ 1997; 315: 629-634
• 31 Mavridis D, Salanti G. How to assess publication bias: funnel plot, trim-and-fill method and selection models. BMJ Ment Health 2014; 17: 30-30
• 32 Guyatt GH, Oxman AD, Vist GE. et al. GRADE: an emerging consensus on rating quality of evidence and strength of recommendations. BMJ 2008; 336: 924-926
• 33 Alda-Blanco A, Rodríguez-Barbero S, Rodrigo-Carranza V, Valero F, Chico P, González-Mohíno F. Influence of Running Surface Using Advanced Footwear Technology Spikes on Middle- and Long-Distance Running Performance Measures. Sports (Basel) 2024; 12: 329
• 34 Barnes KR, Kilding AE. A Randomized Crossover Study Investigating the Running Economy of Highly-Trained Male and Female Distance Runners in Marathon Racing Shoes versus Track Spikes. Sports Med 2019; 49: 331-342
• 35 Beck ON, Golyski PR, Sawicki GS. Adding carbon fiber to shoe soles may not improve running economy: a muscle-level explanation. Sci Rep 2020; 10: 17154
• 36 Castellanos-Salamanca M, Rodrigo-Carranza V, Rodríguez-Barbero S, Salinero JJ, González-Mohíno F. Effects of the increase of longitudinal bending stiffness of advanced footwear technology on 3,000m performance, pacing strategy, and biomechanics. Footwear Sci. 2024; 16: 163-169
• 37 Day E, Hahn M. Optimal footwear longitudinal bending stiffness to improve running economy is speed dependent. Footwear Sci 2020; 12: 3-13
• 38 Flores N, Delattre N, Berton E, Rao G. Does an increase in energy return and/or longitudinal bending stiffness shoe features reduce the energetic cost of running?. Eur J Appl Physiol 2019; 119: 429-439
• 39 Healey LA, Hoogkamer W. Longitudinal bending stiffness does not affect running economy in Nike Vaporfly Shoes. J Sport Health Sci 2022; 11: 285-292
• 40 Hébert-Losier K, Finlayson SJ, Driller MW, Dubois B, Esculier J-F, Beaven CM. Metabolic and performance responses of male runners wearing 3 types of footwear: Nike Vaporfly 4%, Saucony Endorphin racing flats, and their own shoes. J Sport Health Sci 2022; 11: 275-284
• 41 Hunter I, McLeod A, Valentine D, Low T, Ward J, Hager R. Running economy, mechanics, and marathon racing shoes. J Sports Sci 2019; 37: 2367-2373
• 42 Joubert DP, Dominy TA, Burns GT. Effects of Highly Cushioned and Resilient Racing Shoes on Running Economy at Slower Running Speeds. Int J Sports Physiol Perform 2023; 18: 164-170
• 43 Joubert DP, Oehlert GM, Jones EJ, Burns GT. Comparative Effects of Advanced Footwear Technology in Track Spikes and Road-Racing Shoes on Running Economy. Int J Sports Physiol Perform 2024; 19: 705-711
• 44 Liu Z, Yang F, Ma R, Ding L. Impact of footwear bending stiffness on lower-limb work redistribution and running economy. J Mech Med Biol 2024; 24: 2440044
• 45 Paradisis GP, Zacharogiannis E, Bissas A, Hanley B. Recreational Runners Gain Physiological and Biomechanical Benefits From Super Shoes at Marathon Paces. Int J Sports Physiol Perform 2023; 18: 1420-1426
• 46 Perry D, Lino H, Bertschy M, Hoogkamer W. Effects of longitudinal bending stiffness and midsole foam on running energetics. Footwear Sci 2024; 17: 1-7
• 47 Rodrigo-Carranza V, Hoogkamer W, González-Ravé JM, González-Mohíno F. Relationship Between Advanced Footwear Technology Longitudinal Bending Stiffness and Energy Cost of Running. Scand J Med Sci Sports 2024; 34: e14687
• 48 Rodrigo-Carranza V, Hoogkamer W, González-Ravé JM. et al. Influence of different midsole foam in advanced footwear technology use on running economy and biomechanics in trained runners. Scand J Med Sci Sports 2024; 34: e14526
• 49 Werkhausen A, Lund-Hansen M, Wiedenbruch L, Peikenkamp K, Rice H. Technologically advanced running shoes reduce oxygen cost and cumulative tibial loading per kilometer in recreational female and male runners. Sci Rep 2024; 14: 11903
• 50 McGuinness LA, Higgins JPT. Risk-of-bias VISualization (robvis): An R package and Shiny web app for visualizing risk-of-bias assessments. Res Synth Methods 2021; 12: 55-61
• 51 Burns GT, Joubert DP. Running Shoes of the Postmodern Footwear Era: A Narrative Overview of Advanced Footwear Technology. Int J Sports Physiol Perform 2024; 19: 975-986
• 52 Needles BJ, Grabowski AM. Does running speed affect the performance improvements experienced by elite distance runners wearing advanced footwear technology spikes?. J App Phys 2024; 137: 1690-1698
• 53 Mason J, Starc L, Morin J-B, McClelland EL, Zech A. Can the recent sex-specific evolutions in elite running performances be attributed to advanced footwear technology?. Front Sports Act Living 2024; 6: 1386627
• 54 Rodrigo-Carranza V, González-Mohíno F, Santos Del Cerro J, Santos-Concejero J, González-Ravé JM. Influence of advanced shoe technology on the top 100 annual performances in men’s marathon from 2015 to 2019. Sci Rep 2021; 11: 22458
• 55 Rodrigo-Carranza V, González-Mohíno F, Santos-Concejero J, González-Ravé JM. Impact of advanced footwear technology on elite men’s in the evolution of road race performance. J Sports Sci 2022; 40: 2661-2668
• 56 Muniz-Pardos B, Sutehall S, Angeloudis K, Guppy FM, Bosch A, Pitsiladis Y. Recent Improvements in Marathon Run Times Are Likely Technological, Not Physiological. Sports Med 2021; 51: 371-378
• 57 Hopkins WG, Schabort EJ, Hawley JA. Reliability of power in physical performance tests. Sports Med 2001; 31: 211-234
• 58 Hébert-Losier K, Finlayson SJ, Lamb PF. et al. Kinematics of recreational male runners in “super”, minimalist and habitual shoes. J Sports Sci 2022; 40: 1426-1435
• 59 Sun X, Lam W-K, Zhang X, Wang J, Fu W. Systematic Review of the Role of Footwear Constructions in Running Biomechanics: Implications for Running-Related Injury and Performance. J Sports Sci Med 2020; 19: 20-37
• 60 Ortega JA, Healey LA, Swinnen W, Hoogkamer W. Energetics and Biomechanics of Running Footwear with Increased Longitudinal Bending Stiffness: A Narrative Review. Sports Med 2021; 51: 873-894
• 61 Geisler C, Hannigan JJ. A biomechanical comparison of track spikes with advanced footwear technology to a traditional track spike in female distance runners. Sports Biomech 2024; 23: 3667-3679
• 62 Nigg BM, Cigoja S, Nigg SR. Teeter-totter effect: a new mechanism to understand shoe-related improvements in long-distance running. Br J Sports Med 2021; 55: 462-463
• 63 Subramanium A, Vienneau J, Nigg SR, Nigg BM. A methodological proof-of-concept of the teeter-totter effect. J Sports Sci 2024; 42: 1432-1438
• 64 Lindorfer J, Kröll J, Schwameder H. Does enhanced footwear comfort affect oxygen consumption and running biomechanics?. Eur J Sport Sci 2020; 20: 468-476
• 65 Van Alsenoy K, van der Linden ML, Girard O, Santos D. Increased footwear comfort is associated with improved running economy – a systematic review and meta-analysis. Eur J Sport Sci 2023; 23: 121-133