Subscribe to RSS
DOI: 10.1055/a-2654-4317
Encapsulation levels rather than elapsed time after the onset of acute pancreatitis are related to clinical outcomes of pancreatic walled-off necrosis
Authors
Supported by: Japanese Foundation for Research and Promotion of Endoscopy B/#1015

Abstract
Background
There is no consensus regarding the optimal timing of endoscopic ultrasound (EUS)-guided interventions for walled-off necrosis (WON) secondary to acute pancreatitis. Currently, intervention timing is primarily determined by the duration after the onset of acute pancreatitis, which potentially serves as a surrogate for fluid collection maturation. We hypothesized that the encapsulation status may be more strongly correlated with clinical outcomes.
Methods
Between January 2010 and November 2020, 222 patients who underwent EUS-guided WON treatment at 11 centers of the WONDERFUL consortium were included. The patients were divided into two groups based on their encapsulation status at drainage (partial/no vs. complete). The clinical outcomes were compared between groups.
Results
Technical success rates were similar between the groups. Complete encapsulation was associated with a higher clinical success rate (88.1% vs. 52.2%; P<0.001). When patients were classified by both time elapsed and encapsulation status, the encapsulation status was more strongly associated with clinical success. Complete encapsulation was associated with a lower overall adverse event rate (22.7% vs. 39.1%; P=0.04). Overall mortality was significantly higher in the partial/no encapsulation group (34.8% vs. 3.4%; P <0.001). In multivariable analysis, the encapsulation status and diameter of the WON were identified as significant factors associated with clinical success.
Conclusions
In patients undergoing EUS-guided WON treatment, the encapsulation status, rather than the time elapsed since disease onset, appeared to be more strongly associated with positive clinical outcomes.
Publication History
Received: 23 December 2024
Accepted after revision: 11 July 2025
Accepted Manuscript online:
12 July 2025
Article published online:
03 September 2025
© 2025. Thieme. All rights reserved.
Georg Thieme Verlag KG
Oswald-Hesse-Straße 50, 70469 Stuttgart, Germany
-
References
- 1 Banks PA, Bollen TL, Dervenis C. et al. Classification of acute pancreatitis--2012: revision of the Atlanta classification and definitions by international consensus. Gut 2013; 62: 102-111
- 2 Seewald S, Ang TL, Kida M. et al. EUS 2008 Working Group document: evaluation of EUS-guided drainage of pancreatic-fluid collections (with video). Gastrointest Endosc 2009; 69: S13-S21
- 3 Iwashita T, Sato T, Hamada T. et al. Risk of recurrence with or without plastic stent after EUS-guided treatment of peripancreatic fluid collections: A systematic review and meta-analysis. Endosc Int Open 2024; 12: E188-E198
- 4 Saito T, Omoto S, Takenaka M. et al. Risk factors for adverse outcomes at various phases of endoscopic ultrasound-guided treatment of pancreatic fluid collections: Data from a multi-institutional consortium. Dig Endosc 2024; 36: 600-614
- 5 Hamada T, Michihata N, Saito T. et al. Inverse association of hospital volume with in-hospital mortality rate of patients receiving EUS-guided interventions for pancreatic fluid collections. Gastrointest Endosc 2023; 98: 597-606 e2
- 6 Yasuda I, Takahashi K. Endoscopic management of walled-off pancreatic necrosis. Dig Endosc 2021; 33: 335-341
- 7 Arvanitakis M, Dumonceau JM, Albert J. et al. Endoscopic management of acute necrotizing pancreatitis: European Society of Gastrointestinal Endoscopy (ESGE) evidence-based multidisciplinary guidelines. Endoscopy 2018; 50: 524-546
- 8 Working Group IAP/APA Acute Pancreatitis Guidelines. IAP/APA evidence-based guidelines for the management of acute pancreatitis. Pancreatology 2013; 13 (Suppl. 02) e1-e15
- 9 Iwashita T, Iwata K, Hamada T. et al. Supportive treatment during the periprocedural period of endoscopic treatment for pancreatic fluid collections: a critical review of current knowledge and future perspectives. J Gastroenterol 2023; 58: 98-111
- 10 Hamada T, Iwashita T, Saito T. et al. Disconnected pancreatic duct syndrome and outcomes of endoscopic ultrasound-guided treatment of pancreatic fluid collections: Systematic review and meta-analysis. Dig Endosc 2022; 34: 676-686
- 11 Ru N, Linghu E, Chai N. Unexpected pathway of lumen-apposing metal stent deployed for pancreatic walled-off necrosis. Dig Endosc 2023; 35: 146
- 12 Liao YJ, Tonozuka R, Itoi T. Retrieval of a misdeployed lumen-apposing metal stent in walled-off necrosis by a parallel withdrawal technique using a double-channel endoscope. Dig Endosc 2023; 35: e41-e43
- 13 Takahashi S, Fujisawa T, Isayama H. Trans-delivery system injection method for deployment of a lumen-apposing metal stent in a walled-off necrosis occupied by massive necrotic tissue. Dig Endosc 2023; 35: e134-e135
- 14 Chantarojanasiri T, Yamamoto N, Nakai Y. et al. Comparison of early and delayed EUS-guided drainage of pancreatic fluid collection. Endosc Int Open 2018; 6: E1398-E1405
- 15 Oblizajek N, Takahashi N, Agayeva S. et al. Outcomes of early endoscopic intervention for pancreatic necrotic collections: a matched case-control study. Gastrointest Endosc 2020; 91: 1303-1309
- 16 Lu J, Cao F, Zheng Z. et al. How to identify the indications for early intervention in acute necrotizing pancreatitis patients: a long-term follow-up study. Front Surg 2022; 9: 842016
- 17 Kamal F, Khan MA, Lee-Smith WM. et al. Early versus late endoscopic treatment of pancreatic necrotic collections: A systematic review and meta-analysis. Endosc Int Open 2023; 11: E794-E799
- 18 Trikudanathan G, Tawfik P, Amateau SK. et al. Early (<4 weeks) versus standard (≥4 weeks) endoscopically centered step-up interventions for necrotizing pancreatitis. Am J Gastroenterol 2018; 113: 1550-1558
- 19 Mukai T, Nakai Y, Hamada T. et al. Early versus delayed EUS-guided drainage for postoperative pancreatic fluid collections: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Surg Endosc 2024; 38: 47-55
- 20 Nakai Y, Shiomi H, Hamada T. et al. Early versus delayed interventions for necrotizing pancreatitis: A systematic review and meta-analysis. DEN Open 2023; 3: e171
- 21 Ramai D, Enofe I, Deliwala SS. et al. Early (<4 weeks) versus standard (≥4 weeks) endoscopic drainage of pancreatic walled-off fluid collections: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Gastrointest Endosc 2023; 97: 415-421 e5
- 22 Boxhoorn L, van Dijk SM, van Grinsven J. et al. Immediate versus postponed intervention for infected necrotizing pancreatitis. NEJM 2021; 385: 1372-1381
- 23 Hamada T, Masuda A, Michihata N. et al. Comorbidity burden and outcomes of endoscopic ultrasound-guided treatment of pancreatic fluid collections: Multicenter study with nationwide data-based validation. Dig Endosc 2025; 37: 413-425
- 24 Hollemans RA, Bollen TL, van Brunschot S. et al. Predicting success of catheter drainage in infected necrotizing pancreatitis. Ann Surg 2016; 263: 787-792
- 25 Cotton PB, Eisen GM, Aabakken L. et al. A lexicon for endoscopic adverse events: report of an ASGE workshop. Gastrointest Endosc 2010; 71: 446-454
- 26 Watanabe Y, Mikata R, Yasui S. et al. Short- and long-term results of endoscopic ultrasound-guided transmural drainage for pancreatic pseudocysts and walled-off necrosis. World J Gastroenterol 2017; 23: 7110-7118
- 27 Mallick B, Dhaka N, Gupta P. et al. An audit of percutaneous drainage for acute necrotic collections and walled off necrosis in patients with acute pancreatitis. Pancreatology 2018; 18: 727-733
- 28 Troncone E, Amendola R, Gadaleta F. et al. Indications, techniques and future perspectives of walled-off necrosis management. Diagnostics (Basel) 2024; 14: 381
- 29 Besselink MG, Verwer TJ, Schoenmaeckers EJ. et al. Timing of surgical intervention in necrotizing pancreatitis. Arch Surg 2007; 142: 1194-1201
- 30 Trikudanathan G, Rana SS. Current controversies and challenges in endoscopic management of necrotizing pancreatitis. Clin Gastroenterol Hepatol 2022; 20: 2717-2721
- 31 Choudhury SR, Manoj M, Gupta P. et al. Wall maturation in necrotic collections in acute pancreatitis: a computed tomography based evaluation. Acta Gastroenterol Belg 2022; 85: 463-467
- 32 van Grinsven J, van Brunschot S, van Baal MC. et al. Natural history of gas configurations and encapsulation in necrotic collections during necrotizing pancreatitis. J Gastrointest Surg 2018; 22: 1557-1564
- 33 Ning N, Yu C, Sun W. et al. Early encapsulation of peripancreatic fluid/necrosis collections on imaging (CECT) in acute pancreatitis: influential factors and clinical significance for prognosis. BMC Gastroenterol 2024; 24: 53
- 34 Nakai Y, Hamada T, Saito T. et al. Time to think prime times for treatment of necrotizing pancreatitis: Pendulum conundrum. Dig Endosc 2023; 35: 700-710
- 35 van Santvoort HC, Bakker OJ, Bollen TL. et al. A conservative and minimally invasive approach to necrotizing pancreatitis improves outcome. Gastroenterology 2011; 141: 1254-1263
