Subscribe to RSS
DOI: 10.1055/a-2657-8212
Analyzing Mobility Indicators Using Machine Learning to Detect Mild Cognitive Impairment: A Systematic Scoping Review
Funding This work was supported by the AGE-WELL Catalyst Funding Program in Healthy Ageing (award number: AW-CAT-2023-08).

Abstract
Background
The global aging population is rapidly increasing, and the prevalence of age-related cognitive conditions, such as mild cognitive impairment (MCI), is becoming more common. This condition, which represents intermediate stages between normal aging and dementia, underscores the importance of early detection and timely intervention to address the growing demand for health services. Traditional cognitive assessments have limitations, such as the consistency of results, prompting the need for innovative technology-based solutions.
Objective
This study aimed to examine how technology-based mobility data collection methods and machine learning algorithms are used to detect MCI in adults.
Methods
A systematic scoping review was conducted to identify papers that analyzed mobility-related data using machine learning algorithms, focusing on adults aged 18 or older with MCI. Seven databases were searched: MEDLINE, EMBASE, IEEE Xplore, PsycINFO, Scopus, Web of Science, and ACM Digital Library, yielding 2,901 papers.
Results
Twenty-four papers met the inclusion criteria, highlighting 116 mobility indicators used to classify or indicate MCI. Wearable devices were the most common data collection method, with mobile applications being the least utilized. The most frequently reported mobility indicator for walking was walking speed. For driving, indicators included the number of hard braking events, the number of night trips, and speed. Logistic regression, random forest, and neural networks were the most used machine learning algorithms. Overall, the mean accuracy, sensitivity, and specificity of all the algorithms were 86.1% (standard deviation [SD] = 6.7%), 84% (SD = 6.5%), and 72.8% (SD = 12%), respectively. The mean area under the curve and the harmonic mean of precision and recall scores (F1) were 0.77 (SD = 0.08) and 0.83 (SD = 0.16), respectively.
Conclusion
This review highlights the use of technology-based methods, particularly wearable devices, in assessing mobility and applying machine learning algorithms to detect MCI. However, a notable gap in research on mobile app-based mobility monitoring suggests a promising direction for future studies.
Protection of Human and Animal Subjects
This scoping review did not involve direct research with human participants. All data analyzed in this study were obtained from previously published sources. Therefore, ethical approval and informed consent were not required.
Publication History
Received: 18 March 2025
Accepted: 16 July 2025
Article published online:
03 September 2025
© 2025. Thieme. All rights reserved.
Georg Thieme Verlag KG
Oswald-Hesse-Straße 50, 70469 Stuttgart, Germany
-
References
- 1 United Nations Department of Economic and Social Affairs. Population Division. World Population Ageing 2023: Challenges and opportunities of population ageing in the least developed countries. UN DESA/POP/2023/TR/NO.5. Published 2023. Accessed July 21, 2025 at: https://www.un.org/development/desa/pd/content/launch-World-Population-Ageing-2023
- 2 Hedden T, Gabrieli JDE. Insights into the ageing mind: a view from cognitive neuroscience. Nat Rev Neurosci 2004; 5 (02) 87-96
- 3 Harada CN, Natelson Love MC, Triebel KL. Normal cognitive aging. Clin Geriatr Med 2013; 29 (04) 737-752
- 4 Hafkemeijer A, Altmann-Schneider I, de Craen AJM, Slagboom PE, van der Grond J, Rombouts SARB. Associations between age and gray matter volume in anatomical brain networks in middle-aged to older adults. Aging Cell 2014; 13 (06) 1068-1074
- 5 Petersen RC, Roberts RO, Knopman DS. et al.; The Mayo Clinic Study of Aging. Prevalence of mild cognitive impairment is higher in men. Neurology 2010; 75 (10) 889-897
- 6 Winblad B, Palmer K, Kivipelto M. et al. Mild cognitive impairment–beyond controversies, towards a consensus: report of the International Working Group on Mild Cognitive Impairment. J Intern Med 2004; 256 (03) 240-246
- 7 Prince M, Bryce R, Albanese E, Wimo A, Ribeiro W, Ferri CP. The global prevalence of dementia: A systematic review and metaanalysis. Alzheimers Dement 2013; 9 (01) 63-75.e2
- 8 Alzheimer Society of Canada. Dementia numbers in Canada. Accessed July 22, 2024 at: https://alzheimer.ca/en/about-dementia/what-dementia/dementia-numbers-canada
- 9 Wong W. Economic burden of Alzheimer disease and managed care considerations. Am J Manag Care 2020; 26 (8 Suppl): S177-S183
- 10 Albert MS, DeKosky ST, Dickson D. et al. The diagnosis of mild cognitive impairment due to Alzheimer's disease: recommendations from the National Institute on Aging-Alzheimer's Association workgroups on diagnostic guidelines for Alzheimer's disease. Alzheimers Dement 2011; 7 (03) 270-279
- 11 Gauthier S, Reisberg B, Zaudig M. et al.; International Psychogeriatric Association Expert Conference on mild cognitive impairment. Mild cognitive impairment. Lancet 2006; 367 (9518) 1262-1270
- 12 World Health Organization, Guidelines Review Committee. Global Recommendations on Physical Activity for Health. Geneva: World Health Organization; . Accessed July 21, 2025 at: https://www.who.int/publications/i/item/9789241599979
- 13 Faulkner GEJ, Buliung RN, Flora PK, Fusco C. Active school transport, physical activity levels and body weight of children and youth: a systematic review. Prev Med 2009; 48 (01) 3-8
- 14 Mouza C, Rigaux P. Mobility patterns. GeoInformatica 2005; 9 (04) 297-319
- 15 Fillekes MP, Giannouli E, Kim EK, Zijlstra W, Weibel R. Towards a comprehensive set of GPS-based indicators reflecting the multidimensional nature of daily mobility for applications in health and aging research. Int J Health Geogr 2019; 18 (01) 17
- 16 Kim SM, Kim DH, Yang Y, Ha SW, Han JH. Gait patterns in Parkinson's disease with or without cognitive impairment. Dement Neurocogn Disord 2018; 17 (02) 57-65
- 17 Hackett RA, Davies-Kershaw H, Cadar D, Orrell M, Steptoe A. Walking speed, cognitive function, and dementia risk in the English Longitudinal Study of Ageing. J Am Geriatr Soc 2018; 66 (09) 1670-1675
- 18 Montero-Odasso M, Verghese J, Beauchet O, Hausdorff JM. Gait and cognition: a complementary approach to understanding brain function and the risk of falling. J Am Geriatr Soc 2012; 60 (11) 2127-2136
- 19 Beauchet O, Dubost V, Revel Delhom C, Berrut G, Belmin J. French Society of Geriatrics and Gerontology. How to manage recurrent falls in clinical practice: guidelines of the French Society of Geriatrics and Gerontology. J Nutr Health Aging 2011; 15 (01) 79-84
- 20 Wang X, Yu H, Kold S, Rahbek O, Bai S. Wearable sensors for activity monitoring and motion control: A review. Biomim Intell Robot 2023; 3 (01) 100089
- 21 Wolfsgruber S, Kleineidam L, Guski J. et al.; DELCODE Study Group. Minor neuropsychological deficits in patients with subjective cognitive decline. Neurology 2020; 95 (09) e1134-e1143
- 22 Del Din S, Godfrey A, Mazzà C, Lord S, Rochester L. Free-living monitoring of Parkinson's disease: Lessons from the field. Mov Disord 2016; 31 (09) 1293-1313
- 23 Ravi D, Wong C, Lo B, Yang GZ. A deep learning approach to on-node sensor data analytics for mobile or wearable devices. IEEE J Biomed Health Inform 2017; 21 (01) 56-64
- 24 Schwenk M, Hauer K, Zieschang T, Englert S, Mohler J, Najafi B. Sensor-derived physical activity parameters can predict future falls in people with dementia. Gerontology 2014; 60 (06) 483-492
- 25 Lussier M, Lavoie M, Giroux S. et al. Early detection of mild cognitive impairment with in-home monitoring sensor technologies using functional measures: A systematic review. IEEE J Biomed Health Inform 2019; 23 (02) 838-847
- 26 Al-Hammadi M, Fleyeh H, Åberg AC, Halvorsen K, Thomas I. Machine learning approaches for dementia detection through speech and gait analysis: A systematic literature review. J Alzheimers Dis 2024; 100 (01) 1-27
- 27 Magno M, Martins AI, Pais J, Silva AG, Rocha NP. Diagnostic accuracy of digital solutions for screening for cognitive impairment: A systematic review and meta-analysis. Appl Sci 2024; 14 (06) 2640
- 28 Chang CH, Lin CH, Lane HY. Machine learning and novel biomarkers for the diagnosis of Alzheimer's disease. Int J Mol Sci 2021; 22 (05) 1-12
- 29 Folstein MF, Folstein SE, McHugh PR. “Mini-mental state”. A practical method for grading the cognitive state of patients for the clinician. J Psychiatr Res 1975; 12 (03) 189-198
- 30 Nasreddine ZS, Phillips NA, Bédirian V. et al. The Montreal Cognitive Assessment, MoCA: a brief screening tool for mild cognitive impairment. J Am Geriatr Soc 2005; 53 (04) 695-699
- 31 Arksey H, O'Malley L. Scoping studies: Towards a methodological framework. Int J Soc Res Methodol 2005; 8 (01) 19-32
- 32 Tricco AC, Lillie E, Zarin W. et al. PRISMA extension for scoping reviews (PRISMA-ScR): Checklist and explanation. Ann Intern Med 2018; 169 (07) 467-473
- 33 Dickersin K, Scherer R, Lefebvre C. Identifying relevant studies for systematic reviews. BMJ 1994; 309 (6964) 1286-1291
- 34 Light R, Pillemer D. Summing up: The science of reviewing research. Psychology. Harvard University Press; . Published online October 1, 1984. Accessed July 17, 2024 at: https://scholars.unh.edu/psych_facpub/194
- 35 Castaneda AE, Tuulio-Henriksson A, Marttunen M, Suvisaari J, Lönnqvist J. A review on cognitive impairments in depressive and anxiety disorders with a focus on young adults. J Affect Disord 2008; 106 (1-2): 1-27
- 36 Pew Research Center. Millennials stand out for their technology use. Accessed July 22, 2024 at: https://www.pewresearch.org/short-reads/2019/09/09/us-generations-technology-use/
- 37 Huang Y, Talwar A, Chatterjee S, Aparasu RR. Application of machine learning in predicting hospital readmissions: a scoping review of the literature. BMC Med Res Methodol 2021; 21 (01) 96
- 38 G. SCImago. SCImago journal & country rank: Un nuevo portal, dos nuevos rankings. El Profesional de la Información 2007; 16 (06) 645-646
- 39 Ahmed SF, Alam MSB, Hassan M. et al. Deep learning modelling techniques: current progress, applications, advantages, and challenges. Artif Intell Rev 2023; 56 (11) 13521-13617
- 40 Qin SM, Verkasalo H, Mohtaschemi M, Hartonen T, Alava M. Patterns, entropy, and predictability of human mobility and life. PLoS ONE 2012; 7 (12) e51353
- 41 Amboni M, Ricciardi C, Adamo S. et al. Machine learning can predict mild cognitive impairment in Parkinson's disease. Front Neurol 2022; 13: 1010147
- 42 Jung D, Nguyen MD, Park M. et al. Walking-in-place characteristics-based geriatric assessment using deep convolutional neural networks. Annu Int Conf IEEE Eng Med Biol Soc 2020; 2020: 3931-3935
- 43 Chan LLY, Lord SR, Brodie MA. Is maximal or usual walking speed from large scale wrist sensor data better at predicting dementia, depression and death?. Annu Int Conf IEEE Eng Med Biol Soc 2023; 2023: 1-4
- 44 You Z, You Z, Li Y, Zhao S, Ren H, Hu X. Alzheimer's Disease Distinction Based On Gait Feature Analysis. Paper presented at: 2020 IEEE International Conference on E-health Networking, Application & Services (HEALTHCOM), Shenzhen, China; 2021: 1-6
- 45 Zolfaghari S, Khodabandehloo E, Riboni D. TraMiner: Vision-based analysis of locomotion traces for cognitive assessment in smart-homes. Cognit Comput 2022; 14 (05) 1549-1570
- 46 Matsuura T, Sakashita K, Grushnikov A, Okura F, Mitsugami I, Yagi Y. Statistical analysis of dual-task gait characteristics for cognitive score estimation. Sci Rep 2019; 9 (01) 19927
- 47 Bringas S, Salomón S, Duque R, Lage C, Montaña JL. Alzheimer's disease stage identification using deep learning models. J Biomed Inform 2020; 109: 103514
- 48 Noh B, Youm C, Lee M, Park H. Associating gait phase and physical fitness with global cognitive function in the aged. Int J Environ Res Public Health 2020; 17 (13) 1-11
- 49 Chen PH, Lien CW, Wu WC, Lee LS, Shaw JS. Gait-based machine learning for classifying patients with different types of mild cognitive impairment. J Med Syst 2020; 44 (06) 107
- 50 Varma VR, Ghosal R, Hillel I. et al. Continuous gait monitoring discriminates community-dwelling mild Alzheimer's disease from cognitively normal controls. Alzheimers Dement (N Y) 2021; 7 (01) e12131
- 51 Jung D, Kim J, Kim M, Won CW, Mun KR. Classifying the risk of cognitive impairment using sequential gait characteristics and long short-term memory networks. IEEE J Biomed Health Inform 2021; 25 (10) 4029-4040
- 52 Seifallahi M, Hassani Mehraban A, Khamseh F. et al. Detection of mild cognitive Impairment from gait using Adaptive Neuro-Fuzzy Inference system. Biomed Signal Process Control 2022; 71: 103195
- 53 Zhou Y, van Campen J, Hortobágyi T, Lamoth CJ. Artificial neural network to classify cognitive impairment using gait and clinical variables. Intell Based Med 2022; 6: 100076
- 54 Shahzad A, Dadlani A, Lee H, Kim K. Automated prescreening of mild cognitive impairment using shank-mounted inertial sensors based gait biomarkers. IEEE Access 2022; 10: 15835-15844
- 55 Yoon E, Bae S, Park H. Gait speed and sleep duration is associated with increased risk of MCI in older community-dwelling adults. Int J Environ Res Public Health 2022; 19 (13) 7625
- 56 Wang X, Yu W, Huang L. et al. Gait indicators contribute to screening cognitive impairment: A single- and dual-task gait study. Brain Sci 2023; 13 (01) 154
- 57 Park J, Lee HJ, Park JS. et al. Development of a gait feature-based model for classifying cognitive disorders using a single wearable inertial sensor. Neurology 2023; 101 (01) e12-e19
- 58 Kim YJ, Park I, Choi HC. et al. Relationship of neural correlates of gait characteristics and cognitive dysfunction in patients with mild cognitive impairment. J Clin Med 2023; 12 (16) 5347
- 59 Jeon Y, Kang J, Kim BC, Lee KH, Song JI, Gwak J. Early Alzheimer's disease diagnosis using wearable sensors and multilevel gait assessment: A machine learning ensemble approach. IEEE Sens J 2023; 23 (09) 10041-10053
- 60 Duan Q, Zhang Y, Zhuang W. et al. Gait domains may be used as an auxiliary diagnostic index for Alzheimer's disease. Brain Sci 2023; 13 (11) 1599
- 61 Bayat S, Babulal GM, Schindler SE. et al. GPS driving: a digital biomarker for preclinical Alzheimer disease. Alzheimers Res Ther 2021; 13 (01) 115
- 62 Di X, Yin Y, Fu Y. et al. Detecting mild cognitive impairment and dementia in older adults using naturalistic driving data and interaction-based classification from influence score. Artif Intell Med 2023; 138: 102510
- 63 Moshfeghi S, Jan MT, Conniff J. et al. In-vehicle Sensing and Data Analysis for Older Drivers with Mild Cognitive Impairment. Paper presented at: 2023 IEEE 20th International Conference on Smart Communities: Improving Quality of Life using AI, Robotics and IoT (HONET); 2023: 140-145
- 64 Ghosh A, Puthusseryppady V, Chan D, Mascolo C, Hornberger M. Machine learning detects altered spatial navigation features in outdoor behaviour of Alzheimer's disease patients. Sci Rep 2022; 12 (01) 3160
- 65 Tohka J, van Gils M. Evaluation of machine learning algorithms for health and wellness applications: A tutorial. Comput Biol Med 2021; 132: 104324
- 66 Bovonsunthonchai S, Vachalathiti R, Hiengkaew V, Bryant MS, Richards J, Senanarong V. Quantitative gait analysis in mild cognitive impairment, dementia, and cognitively intact individuals: A cross-sectional case-control study. BMC Geriatr 2022; 22 (01) 767
- 67 Pieruccini-Faria F, Black SE, Masellis M. et al. Gait variability across neurodegenerative and cognitive disorders: Results from the Canadian Consortium of Neurodegeneration in Aging (CCNA) and the Gait and Brain Study. Alzheimers Dement 2021; 17 (08) 1317-1328
- 68 Auvinet B, Touzard C, Montestruc F, Delafond A, Goeb V. Gait disorders in the elderly and dual task gait analysis: a new approach for identifying motor phenotypes. J Neuroeng Rehabil 2017; 14 (01) 7
- 69 Firbank MJ, O'Brien JT, Taylor JP. Long reaction times are associated with delayed brain activity in Lewy body dementia. Hum Brain Mapp 2018; 39 (02) 633-643
- 70 Baldock MRJ, Mathias JL, McLean AJ, Berndt A. Self-regulation of driving and its relationship to driving ability among older adults. Accid Anal Prev 2006; 38 (05) 1038-1045
- 71 Duchek JM, Carr DB, Hunt L. et al. Longitudinal driving performance in early-stage dementia of the Alzheimer type. J Am Geriatr Soc 2003; 51 (10) 1342-1347
- 72 Toups R, Chirles TJ, Ehsani JP. et al. Driving performance in older adults: current measures, findings, and implications for roadway safety. Innov Aging 2022; 6 (01) igab051
- 73 Aksan N, Anderson SW, Dawson JD, Johnson AM, Uc EY, Rizzo M. Cognitive functioning predicts driver safety on road tests 1 and 2 years later. J Am Geriatr Soc 2012; 60 (01) 99-105
- 74 Anstey KJ, Eramudugolla R, Kiely KM, Price J. Effect of tailored on-road driving lessons on driving safety in older adults: A randomised controlled trial. Accid Anal Prev 2018; 115: 1-10
- 75 Lincoln NB, Radford KA, Lee E, Reay AC. The assessment of fitness to drive in people with dementia. Int J Geriatr Psychiatry 2006; 21 (11) 1044-1051
- 76 Keshmiri S. Entropy and the brain: An overview. Entropy (Basel) 2020; 22 (09) 917
- 77 Wollesen B, Voelcker-Rehage C. Training effects on motor-cognitive dual-task performance in older adults: A systematic review. Eur Rev Aging Phys Act 2014; 11 (01) 5-24
- 78 Bryden KJ, Charlton J, Oxley J, Lowndes G. Wayfinding whilst driving, age and cognitive functioning. J Road Saf 2023; 34 (02) 22-37
- 79 Wolfe PL, Lehockey KA. Neuropsychological assessment of driving capacity. Arch Clin Neuropsychol 2016; 31 (06) 517-529
- 80 Derafshi R, Babulal GM, Bayat S. Impact of cognitive impairment on driving behaviour and route choices of older drivers: a real-world driving study. Sci Rep 2024; 14 (01) 14174
- 81 Jan MT, Furht B, Moshfeghi S. et al. Enhancing road safety: In-vehicle sensor analysis of cognitive impairment in older drivers. Multimed Tools Appl 2024; 84: 18711-18732
- 82 Bouchabou D, Grosset J, Nguyen SM, Lohr C, Puig X. A smart home digital twin to support the recognition of activities of daily living. Sensors (Basel) 2023; 23 (17) 7586
- 83 Demiris G, Hensel BK, Skubic M, Rantz M. Senior residents' perceived need of and preferences for “smart home” sensor technologies. Int J Technol Assess Health Care 2008; 24 (01) 120-124
- 84 Antic M, Papp I, Ivanovic S, Matic M. Learning from smart home data: Methods and challenges of data acquisition and analysis in smart home solutions. IEEE Consum Electron Mag 2020; 9 (03) 64-71
- 85 Chen J, Li K, Member S. et al. A parallel random forest algorithm for big data in a spark cloud computing environment. IEEE Trans Parallel Distrib Syst 2017; 28 (04) 919-933
- 86 Sarraf S, DeSouza DD, Anderson J, Tofighi G. for the Alzheimer's Disease Neuroimaging Initiative. DeepAD: Alzheimer's Disease Classification via deep convolutional neural networks using MRI and fMRI. bioRxiv Published online January 14, 2017
- 87 Appelboom G, Camacho E, Abraham ME. et al. Smart wearable body sensors for patient self-assessment and monitoring. Arch Public Health 2014; 72 (01) 28
- 88 Peters DM, O'Brien ES, Kamrud KE. et al. Utilization of wearable technology to assess gait and mobility post-stroke: a systematic review. J Neuroeng Rehabil 2021; 18 (01) 67
- 89 Li MH, Mestre TA, Fox SH, Taati B. Vision-based assessment of parkinsonism and levodopa-induced dyskinesia with pose estimation. J Neuroeng Rehabil 2018; 15 (01) 97
- 90 Tsakanikas V, Ntanis A, Rigas G. et al. Evaluating gait impairment in Parkinson's disease from instrumented insole and IMU sensor data. Sensors (Basel) 2023; 23 (08) 3902
- 91 Akl A, Taati B, Mihailidis A. Autonomous unobtrusive detection of mild cognitive impairment in older adults. IEEE Trans Biomed Eng 2015; 62 (05) 1383-1394
- 92 International Telecommunication Union (ITU). Facts and Figures 2023. Telecommunication Development Sector, ITU. Geneva: ITU. Accessed July 21, 2025 at: https://www.itu.int/itu-d/reports/statistics/facts-figures-2023/
- 93 Zhong R, Rau PP. A mobile phone-based gait assessment app for the elderly: Development and evaluation. JMIR Mhealth Uhealth 2020; 8 (02) e14453
- 94 Dickersin K, Min YI, Meinert CL. Factors influencing publication of research results. Follow-up of applications submitted to two institutional review boards. JAMA 1992; 267 (03) 374-378