Subscribe to RSS

DOI: 10.1055/a-2663-8259
A novel endoscopic lithotripsy technique for a huge common bile duct stone: endoscopic snare lithotripsy
Authors
Recently, large common bile duct (CBD) stones have been treated with endoscopic papillary large balloon dilation (EPLBD) [1] [2] or electronic hydraulic lithotripsy (EHL) [3] [4]; however, difficult-to-treat cases remain [5]. Here, we report a case in which a novel lithotripsy method using a snare was successfully used to treat a large stone occupying the entire CBD lumen.
An 85-year-old man with recurrent biliary obstruction secondary to obstructive cholangitis caused by a large CBD stone was referred to our hospital for stone removal.
Cholangiography confirmed the presence of a stone occupying the CBD lumen, and the end of the stone was delivered from the duodenal papilla ([Fig. 1]). Since neither EPLBD nor EHL could be performed, we attempted to grasp the delivered part with grasping forceps, but the stone just broke up gradually, and the procedure was unsuccessful ([Fig. 2]).




However, it was possible to grasp the stone without breaking it up using a snare (Snare Master Plus, 15 mm; Olympus, Tokyo, Japan) and to perform electronic stone cutting with snaring ([Fig. 3]).


We attempted to remove the stone by repeatedly pulling it out to a length at which it could not be pulled out any further, cutting it with the snare, leaving the part near the papilla that was being grasped, grasping it again, pulling it out, and repeating the cutting ([Fig. 4]). By repeating this process several times, we completely removed the large stone ([Fig. 5], [Video 1]).




This novel endoscopic snare lithotripsy may be a valuable option for removing difficult-to-treat large stones.
Endoscopy_UCTN_Code_TTT_1AR_2AH
E-Videos is an open access online section of the journal Endoscopy, reporting on interesting cases and new techniques in gastroenterological endoscopy.
All papers include a high-quality video and are published with a Creative Commons
CC-BY license. Endoscopy E-Videos qualify for HINARI discounts and waivers and eligibility is automatically checked during the submission
process. We grant 100% waivers to articles whose corresponding authors are based in
Group A countries and 50% waivers to those who are based in Group B countries as classified
by Research4Life (see: https://www.research4life.org/access/eligibility/).
This section has its own submission website at https://mc.manuscriptcentral.com/e-videos.
Conflict of Interest
The authors declare that they have no conflict of interest.
-
References
- 1 Park JS, Jeong S, Lee DK. et al. Comparison of endoscopic papillary large balloon dilation with or without endoscopic sphincterotomy for the treatment of large bile duct stones. Endoscopy 2019; 51: 125-132
- 2 Kogure H, Kawahata S, Mukai T. et al. Multicenter randomized trial of endoscopic papillary large balloon dilation without sphincterotomy versus endoscopic sphincterotomy for removal of bile duct stones: MARVELOUS trial. Endoscopy 2020; 52: 736-744
- 3 Veld JV, van Huijgevoort NCM, Boermeester MA. et al. A systematic review of advanced endoscopy-assisted lithotripsy for retained biliary tract stones: Laser, electrohydraulic or extracorporeal shock wave. Endoscopy 2018; 50: 896-909
- 4 Farrell JJ, Bounds BC, Al-Shalabi S. et al. Single-operator duodenoscope-assisted cholangioscopy is an effective alternative in the management of choledocholithiasis not removed by conventional methods, including mechanical lithotripsy. Endoscopy 2005; 37: 542-547
- 5 Angsuwatcharakon P, Kulpatcharapong S, Ridtitid W. et al. Digital cholangioscopy-guided laser versus mechanical lithotripsy for large bile duct stone removal after failed papillary large-balloon dilation: A randomized study. Endoscopy 2019; 51: 1066542-5471073
Correspondence
Publication History
Article published online:
22 August 2025
© 2025. The Author(s). This is an open access article published by Thieme under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License, permitting unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction so long as the original work is properly cited. (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/).
Georg Thieme Verlag KG
Oswald-Hesse-Straße 50, 70469 Stuttgart, Germany
-
References
- 1 Park JS, Jeong S, Lee DK. et al. Comparison of endoscopic papillary large balloon dilation with or without endoscopic sphincterotomy for the treatment of large bile duct stones. Endoscopy 2019; 51: 125-132
- 2 Kogure H, Kawahata S, Mukai T. et al. Multicenter randomized trial of endoscopic papillary large balloon dilation without sphincterotomy versus endoscopic sphincterotomy for removal of bile duct stones: MARVELOUS trial. Endoscopy 2020; 52: 736-744
- 3 Veld JV, van Huijgevoort NCM, Boermeester MA. et al. A systematic review of advanced endoscopy-assisted lithotripsy for retained biliary tract stones: Laser, electrohydraulic or extracorporeal shock wave. Endoscopy 2018; 50: 896-909
- 4 Farrell JJ, Bounds BC, Al-Shalabi S. et al. Single-operator duodenoscope-assisted cholangioscopy is an effective alternative in the management of choledocholithiasis not removed by conventional methods, including mechanical lithotripsy. Endoscopy 2005; 37: 542-547
- 5 Angsuwatcharakon P, Kulpatcharapong S, Ridtitid W. et al. Digital cholangioscopy-guided laser versus mechanical lithotripsy for large bile duct stone removal after failed papillary large-balloon dilation: A randomized study. Endoscopy 2019; 51: 1066542-5471073









