Endoscopy
DOI: 10.1055/a-2718-4945
Original article

Gastric peroral endoscopic pyloromyotomy for refractory gastroparesis following esophagectomy: results from a multicenter series

Authors

  • Pierre-Jean Silete

    1   Hepatogastroenterology, CHU Dijon Bourgogne, Dijon, France (Ringgold ID: RIN36659)
  • Magdalena Houzvickova

    2   Hepatogastroenterology, Institute of Clinical and Experimental medicine, Prague, Czech Republic (Ringgold ID: RIN48214)
  • Thibault Degand

    3   Gastroenterology and Oncology, CHU Dijon, Dijon, France (Ringgold ID: RIN36659)
  • Kristina Hugova

    4   Hepatogastroenterology, IKEM, Prague, Czech Republic (Ringgold ID: RIN48214)
  • Sébastien Godat

    5   Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Lausanne University Hospital, Lausanne, Switzerland (Ringgold ID: RIN30635)
  • Julien Branche

    6   Gastroenterology, Lille University Hospital, Lille, France (Ringgold ID: RIN26902)
  • Jean-Philippe Ratone

    7   Gastroenterology, Paoli-Calmettes Institute, Marseille, France (Ringgold ID: RIN56181)
  • Fabrice Caillol

    8   Endoscopy Unit, Paoli-Calmettes Institute, Marseille, France (Ringgold ID: RIN56181)
  • Mathieu Pioche

    9   Gastroenterology, Hôpital Edouard Herriot, Lyon, France (Ringgold ID: RIN36609)
  • Jérôme Rivory

    9   Gastroenterology, Hôpital Edouard Herriot, Lyon, France (Ringgold ID: RIN36609)
  • Arthur Berger

    10   Hepatogastroenterology, Diabetes, Nutrition and Endocrinology, Centre Hospitalier Universitaire de Bordeaux, Bordeaux, France (Ringgold ID: RIN36836)
  • Geoffroy Vanbiervliet

    11   Digestive Endoscopy, Hôpital de L'Archet 2, Nice, France
  • Sarah Leblanc

    12   Endoscopy Unit, Hôpital Privé Jean Mermoz, Lyon, France (Ringgold ID: RIN89686)
  • Vincent Lépilliez

    12   Endoscopy Unit, Hôpital Privé Jean Mermoz, Lyon, France (Ringgold ID: RIN89686)
  • Maximilien Barret

    13   Gastroenterology, Hôpital Cochin, Paris, France (Ringgold ID: RIN26935)
  • Timothee Wallenhorst

    14   Endoscopy and Gastroenterology, University Hospital Centre Rennes, Rennes, France (Ringgold ID: RIN36684)
  • Antoine Debourdeau

    15   Hepatogastroenterology, CHU Montpellier, Montpellier, France (Ringgold ID: RIN26905)
  • Jan Mares

    2   Hepatogastroenterology, Institute of Clinical and Experimental medicine, Prague, Czech Republic (Ringgold ID: RIN48214)
  • Jeremie Jacques

    16   Hepatogastroenterology, CHU Dupuytren, Limoges, France (Ringgold ID: RIN37925)
  • Stephane Koch

    17   Hepatogastroenterology, Besançon University Hospital Center, Besancon, France (Ringgold ID: RIN55049)
  • Ludovic Caillo

    18   Gastroenterology, Centre Hospitalier Universitaire de Nimes, Nimes, France (Ringgold ID: RIN36672)
  • Philippe Ah-Soune

    19   Gastroenterology, Hôpital Sainte Musse, Toulon, France (Ringgold ID: RIN54895)
  • Marc Barthet

    20   Gastroenterology, Hôpital Nord, Marseille, France (Ringgold ID: RIN37059)
  • Jan Martinek

    21   Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Saint Anne's University Hospital, Brno, Czech Republic (Ringgold ID: RIN48215)
    22   Diabetology, Institute of Clinical and Experimental medicine, Prague, Czech Republic (Ringgold ID: RIN48214)
  • Jean-Michel Gonzalez

    20   Gastroenterology, Hôpital Nord, Marseille, France (Ringgold ID: RIN37059)

Clinical Trial:

Registration number (trial ID): NCT06068127, Trial registry: ClinicalTrials.gov (http://www.clinicaltrials.gov/), Type of Study: Retrospective multicenter



Graphical Abstract

Abstract

Background

Gastroparesis is predominantly caused by diabetes mellitus or vagal nerve injury post-surgery. About 30% of patients develop gastroparesis after esophagectomy with gastric pull-through. Standard treatments often fail, and endoscopic pyloromyotomy (G-POEM) has shown promising results. This study aimed to assess the efficacy and safety of G-POEM in patients with refractory gastroparesis after esophagectomy.

Methods

A multicenter retrospective cohort study was conducted across 18 expert centers. Patients who underwent G-POEM for refractory gastroparesis following esophagectomy from August 2014 to December 2023 were included. Inclusion criteria were confirmed gastroparesis by scintigraphy, a mean Gastroparesis Cardinal Symptom Index (GCSI) of at least 1.0, and a minimum of 6 months of follow-up. The primary outcome was treatment success at 6 months, defined as a ≥50% decrease in the GCSI score.

Results

Of 113 G-POEM procedures, 108 patients (median age 65 years; 75% men) met the inclusion criteria. The primary indication for esophagectomy was adenocarcinoma (75.5%). At 6 months, 63.5% (95%CI 54.1%–72.0%) achieved clinical success, with the mean GCSI significantly decreased to 1.2 (95%CI 1.0–1.4) from 2.9 (95%CI 2.7–3.1) preprocedure. Minor adverse events occurred in 2.8% of cases. Long-term follow-up showed sustained efficacy with success rates of 54.9% and 66.1% at 12 and 24 months, respectively.

Conclusion

G-POEM appears to be a safe and effective treatment for refractory gastroparesis in post-esophagectomy patients, achieving significant symptom relief in the majority of patients. Future prospective studies are necessary to further validate these findings and explore predictive factors for treatment success.



Publication History

Received: 25 November 2024

Accepted after revision: 20 September 2025

Article published online:
04 November 2025

© 2025. Thieme. All rights reserved.

Georg Thieme Verlag KG
Oswald-Hesse-Straße 50, 70469 Stuttgart, Germany