Abstract
This investigation compared the effectiveness of the Cycles Approach with and without
auditory stimulation. Using an alternating treatment design (AATD), three preschool-aged
children with severe phonological disorders received a modified Cycles Approach targeting
two phonological patterns. Effectiveness was measured by the percentage of occurrence
of errors. Treatment outcomes were analyzed across experimental conditions and participants
with respect to the effectiveness of the Cycles Approach, modified by including and
excluding auditory stimulation. All participants demonstrated improvements in speech
sound production skills when auditory stimulation was withheld. Two participants demonstrated
a statistically significant change in speech intelligibility from baseline to intervention
regardless of auditory stimulation inclusion. One participant experienced a statistically
significant difference in speech intelligibility when auditory stimulation was withheld.
Parents of all participants indicated improvements in their child's speech intelligibility
on a posttreatment questionnaire. This investigation substantiates prior research
suggesting that a modified Cycles Approach is an effective intervention to treat preschool
children with phonological disorders. For the three participants in this study, implementing
auditory stimulation techniques did not improve or expedite speech intelligibility
outcomes, and for one participant, improved clinical outcomes were achieved without
the use of auditory stimulation.
Keywords
speech sound disorder - preschool - Cycles Approach - auditory stimulation - intervention