Open Access
CC BY 4.0 · Endoscopy 2026; 58(S 01): E45-E47
DOI: 10.1055/a-2761-0478
E-Videos

A rare case of hepatic hilar lymphangioma diagnosed using endoscopic and transabdominal ultrasonography

Authors

  • Koichi Soga

    1   Department of Gastroenterology, Dokkyo Medical University Saitama Medical Center, Koshigaya, Japan (Ringgold ID: RIN26263)
  • Mayumi Yamaguchi

    1   Department of Gastroenterology, Dokkyo Medical University Saitama Medical Center, Koshigaya, Japan (Ringgold ID: RIN26263)
  • Masaru Kuwada

    1   Department of Gastroenterology, Dokkyo Medical University Saitama Medical Center, Koshigaya, Japan (Ringgold ID: RIN26263)
  • Ryosaku Shirahashi

    1   Department of Gastroenterology, Dokkyo Medical University Saitama Medical Center, Koshigaya, Japan (Ringgold ID: RIN26263)
  • Ikuhiro Kobori

    1   Department of Gastroenterology, Dokkyo Medical University Saitama Medical Center, Koshigaya, Japan (Ringgold ID: RIN26263)
  • Masaya Tamano

    1   Department of Gastroenterology, Dokkyo Medical University Saitama Medical Center, Koshigaya, Japan (Ringgold ID: RIN26263)
 

Lymphangiomas are rare benign tumors arising from congenital lymphatic system malformations. Intra-abdominal lymphangiomas are uncommon, accounting for less than 5% of lymphangioma cases [1]. Hepatic or hepatoduodenal ligament lymphangiomas are exceedingly rare and of particular clinical interest owing to their anatomical locations.

A 49-year-old woman experienced epigastric pain and nausea early in the morning, followed by pain-induced transient loss of consciousness. She was admitted to the cardiology department with a suspected celiac artery dissection. Subsequent imaging revealed a 4-cm mass in the hepatic hilum; however, a definitive diagnosis could not be established. Abdominal computed tomography (CT) at admission revealed a mildly hyperdense soft tissue area around the celiac artery, without contrast enhancement, suggesting arterial dissection or hematoma. Magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) revealed hematomas of different ages ([Fig. 1]).

Zoom
Fig. 1 Imaging studies performed for evaluation following emergency admission for epigastric pain. a Contrast-enhanced CT (arterial phase) showing a lesion with almost no enhancement, except for a faint linear enhancement within the mass, possibly reflecting septations or hemorrhage. b Positron emission tomography-CT showing no abnormal FDG uptake in the lesion with no elevation of the standardized uptake value, suggesting no evidence of malignancy. c A MRI T1-weighted image (DIXON opposed-phase) showing the lesion as hypointense, with heterogeneous signal intensity suggestive of an intralesional hemorrhage (asterisk). d A MRI T2-weighted image showing a hyperintense lesion with internal septations and fluid components, consistent with hemorrhage within a lymphangioma (asterisk). CT, computed tomography; MRI, magnetic resonance imaging.

No symptom recurrence occurred during the subsequent 3 months. A hepatic hilar mass was suspected as the cause, and the patient was referred to our department for further evaluation. Follow-up CT conducted 3 months later revealed shrinkage of the lesion, excluding the celiac artery dissection ([Fig. 2]).

Zoom
Fig. 2 Follow-up contrast-enhanced CT at 3 months following initial presentation. Delayed-phase imaging showing a slight reduction in tumor size, with faint linear enhancement observed along the tumor margin and within the lesion (asterisk). The patient remained asymptomatic without any recurrent abdominal pain during follow-up. CT, computed tomography.

Endoscopic ultrasonography (EUS) revealed a 40-mm mass in the hepatic hilum with internal hyperechoic spots and a marginal solid component believed to be a normal lymph node. Contrast-enhanced EUS using Sonazoid demonstrated minimal contrast within the internal septa, indicating a fibrotic lesion. Based on these findings, a hemorrhagic lymphangioma with secondary degeneration was suspected. Similar findings were obtained on transabdominal ultrasonography ([Fig. 3], [Fig. 4], [Video 1]).

Zoom
Fig. 3 Endoscopic ultrasound (EUS) findings at 6 months after initial presentation. a EUS demonstrating a lymphangioma (triangle) arising continuously from a normal lymph node (asterisk). A mosaic pattern of mixed echogenicity, continuous with the lymph node structure, can be observed. b A focused EUS view of the lymphangioma showing heterogeneous echotexture with hypoechoic areas and septation-like structures, characteristic of lymphangiomas. c left: A conventional EUS image showing internal septation-like structures and cystic changes within the lesion. c right: Contrast-enhanced EUS taken using a Sonazoid system showing a linear inflow of contrast medium into the lesion, consistent with the faint linear enhancement pattern seen on delayed-phase CT (following on from [Fig. 2]). CT, computed tomography.
Zoom
Fig. 4 Transabdominal ultrasonography at 6 months after initial presentation. a–c Sequential images of the hepatic hilum demonstrating continuity from a lymph node to the lymphangioma. The proper hepatic artery passes through the region surrounded by the lymph node (asterisk) and the lymphangioma (triangle). Panel a presents a lymph node and a lymphangioma, panel b shows the transition from a lymph node to a mass lesion, and panel c depicts the main lymphangioma.
A rare case of hepatic hilar lymphangioma diagnosed using endoscopic and transabdominal ultrasonography.Video 1

The features of lymphangiomas are generally nonspecific, making diagnosis challenging. This case is remarkable as both EUS and transabdominal ultrasonography allowed detailed visualization of a hepatic hilar lymphangioma, which is extremely rare. Contrast-enhanced EUS enabled the noninvasive assessment of the internal tumor architecture, highlighting its potential diagnostic value in characterizing benign cystic or vascular lesions in the hepatic hilum.

Endoscopy_UCTN_Code_CCL_1AF_2AG_3AD


Contributorsʼ Statement

Koichi Soga: Conceptualization, Data curation, Formal analysis, Investigation, Methodology, Project administration, Resources, Software, Supervision, Validation, Visualization, Writing – original draft. Mayumi Yamaguchi: Writing – review & editing. Masaru Kuwada: Writing – review & editing. Ryosaku Shirahashi: Writing – review & editing. Ikuhiro Kobori: Writing – review & editing. Masaya Tamano: Writing – review & editing.

Conflict of Interest

The authors declare that they have no conflict of interest.


Correspondence

Koichi Soga, MD, PhD
Department of Gastroenterology, Dokkyo Medical University Saitama Medical Center
2-1-50 Minami-Koshigaya
Koshigaya, Saitama 343-8555
Japan   

Publication History

Article published online:
13 January 2026

© 2026. The Author(s). This is an open access article published by Thieme under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License, permitting unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction so long as the original work is properly cited. (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/).

Georg Thieme Verlag KG
Oswald-Hesse-Straße 50, 70469 Stuttgart, Germany


Zoom
Fig. 1 Imaging studies performed for evaluation following emergency admission for epigastric pain. a Contrast-enhanced CT (arterial phase) showing a lesion with almost no enhancement, except for a faint linear enhancement within the mass, possibly reflecting septations or hemorrhage. b Positron emission tomography-CT showing no abnormal FDG uptake in the lesion with no elevation of the standardized uptake value, suggesting no evidence of malignancy. c A MRI T1-weighted image (DIXON opposed-phase) showing the lesion as hypointense, with heterogeneous signal intensity suggestive of an intralesional hemorrhage (asterisk). d A MRI T2-weighted image showing a hyperintense lesion with internal septations and fluid components, consistent with hemorrhage within a lymphangioma (asterisk). CT, computed tomography; MRI, magnetic resonance imaging.
Zoom
Fig. 2 Follow-up contrast-enhanced CT at 3 months following initial presentation. Delayed-phase imaging showing a slight reduction in tumor size, with faint linear enhancement observed along the tumor margin and within the lesion (asterisk). The patient remained asymptomatic without any recurrent abdominal pain during follow-up. CT, computed tomography.
Zoom
Fig. 3 Endoscopic ultrasound (EUS) findings at 6 months after initial presentation. a EUS demonstrating a lymphangioma (triangle) arising continuously from a normal lymph node (asterisk). A mosaic pattern of mixed echogenicity, continuous with the lymph node structure, can be observed. b A focused EUS view of the lymphangioma showing heterogeneous echotexture with hypoechoic areas and septation-like structures, characteristic of lymphangiomas. c left: A conventional EUS image showing internal septation-like structures and cystic changes within the lesion. c right: Contrast-enhanced EUS taken using a Sonazoid system showing a linear inflow of contrast medium into the lesion, consistent with the faint linear enhancement pattern seen on delayed-phase CT (following on from [Fig. 2]). CT, computed tomography.
Zoom
Fig. 4 Transabdominal ultrasonography at 6 months after initial presentation. a–c Sequential images of the hepatic hilum demonstrating continuity from a lymph node to the lymphangioma. The proper hepatic artery passes through the region surrounded by the lymph node (asterisk) and the lymphangioma (triangle). Panel a presents a lymph node and a lymphangioma, panel b shows the transition from a lymph node to a mass lesion, and panel c depicts the main lymphangioma.