Open Access
CC BY 4.0 · Endoscopy 2026; 58(S 01): E64-E65
DOI: 10.1055/a-2767-0801
E-Videos

Laser lithotripsy for refractory stones in the cystic duct and common bile duct

Authors

  • Haruo Miwa

    1   Gastroenterological Center, Yokohama City University Medical Center, Yokohama, Kanagawa, Japan (Ringgold ID: RIN26437)
  • Yugo Ishino

    1   Gastroenterological Center, Yokohama City University Medical Center, Yokohama, Kanagawa, Japan (Ringgold ID: RIN26437)
  • Kazuki Endo

    1   Gastroenterological Center, Yokohama City University Medical Center, Yokohama, Kanagawa, Japan (Ringgold ID: RIN26437)
  • Ritsuko Oishi

    1   Gastroenterological Center, Yokohama City University Medical Center, Yokohama, Kanagawa, Japan (Ringgold ID: RIN26437)
  • Yuichi Suzuki

    1   Gastroenterological Center, Yokohama City University Medical Center, Yokohama, Kanagawa, Japan (Ringgold ID: RIN26437)
  • Hiromi Tsuchiya

    1   Gastroenterological Center, Yokohama City University Medical Center, Yokohama, Kanagawa, Japan (Ringgold ID: RIN26437)
  • Shin Maeda

    2   Department of Gastroenterology, Yokohama City University Graduate School of Medicine, Yokohama, Kanagawa, Japan
 

Mirizzi syndrome caused by multiple cystic duct (CD) stones represents a challenging condition for endoscopic management [1]. Although peroral cholangioscopy (POCS)-guided lithotripsy is effective [2] [3], the optimal energy source, electrohydraulic lithotripsy (EHL) or laser lithotripsy remains undetermined [4]. Recently, a new Holimium:YAG-laser system (LithoEVO; Edap TMS, Lyon, France) has become available, offering enhanced energy control [5].

An 84-year-old man was referred to our hospital with cholangitis due to multiple stones in the CD and common bile duct (CBD; [Fig. 1]). POCS-guided lithotripsy with EHL failed to fragment the hard stone in the CD, even after three attempts. Because the patient declined surgical intervention, stent placement was performed; however, recurrent cholangitis occurred. Therefore, POCS-guided laser lithotripsy was undertaken ([Video 1]). During the first session, a 9-Fr eyeMAX cholangioscope (Micro-Tech, Nanjing, China) was advanced into the cystic duct. Although the cystic duct stones were extremely hard, effective fragmentation was achieved by increasing both laser frequency from 10 to 15 Hz and energy from 1.0 to 1.2 J. The characteristic green aiming beam enabled safe and precise targeting, even when the visualization was obscured by stone fragments filling the CD ([Fig. 2]). The crushed stones were subsequently retrieved using a mechanical lithotripter (Stone Smash; Boston Scientific Japan, Tokyo, Japan). In the second session, the stones in the CBD were crushed. A large and hard perihilar stone was successfully disintegrated with laser lithotripsy, followed by stone extraction using the lithotripter and a retrieval basket (8-wire basket, Medi-Globe, Germany; [Fig. 3]). After two sessions, the completer clearance of both the CD and CBD stones was confirmed with cholangioscopy. The patient was discharged without any complications.

This case demonstrates that laser lithotripsy using a novel Holmium: YAG laser system can achieve safe and effective stone clearance in refractory Mirizzi syndrome with multiple stones in the CD and CBD.

Zoom
Fig. 1 Images of biliary stones. a A magnetic resonance image shows a huge confluence stone and multiple stones in the cystic duct and common bile duct. b A computed tomographic image shows a calcified confluence stone.
Laser lithotripsy using a novel Holmium:YAG laser system for refractory Mirizzi syndrome with multiple stones in the CD and CBD. CD, cystic duct; CBD, common bile duct.Video 1

Zoom
Fig. 2 First session of cholangioscopy-guided laser lithotripsy. a Cholangiography shows a huge confluence stone and multiple cystic duct stones. b Laser lithotripsy was effective for cystic duct stones.
Zoom
Fig. 3 Second session of cholangioscopy-guided laser lithotripsy. a A large stone in the perihilar bile duct (Arrowhead) was effectively crushed. b Cholangiography after stone retrieval shows complete stone clearance.

Endoscopy_UCTN_Code_TTT_1AR_2AH


Contributorsʼ Statement

Haruo Miwa: Writing – original draft. Yugo Ishino: Writing – review & editing. Kazuki Endo: Writing – review & editing. Ritsuko Oishi: Writing – review & editing. Yuichi Suzuki: Writing – review & editing. Hiromi Tsuchiya: Writing – review & editing. Shin Maeda: Supervision, Writing – review & editing.

Conflict of Interest

The authors declare that they have no conflict of interest.


Correspondence

Haruo Miwa, MD, PhD
Gastroenterological Center, Yokohama City University Medical Center
4-57 Urafune-cho, Minami-ku
Yokohama, Kanagawa 232-0024
Japan   

Publication History

Article published online:
15 January 2026

© 2026. The Author(s). This is an open access article published by Thieme under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License, permitting unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction so long as the original work is properly cited. (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/).

Georg Thieme Verlag KG
Oswald-Hesse-Straße 50, 70469 Stuttgart, Germany


Zoom
Fig. 1 Images of biliary stones. a A magnetic resonance image shows a huge confluence stone and multiple stones in the cystic duct and common bile duct. b A computed tomographic image shows a calcified confluence stone.
Zoom
Fig. 2 First session of cholangioscopy-guided laser lithotripsy. a Cholangiography shows a huge confluence stone and multiple cystic duct stones. b Laser lithotripsy was effective for cystic duct stones.
Zoom
Fig. 3 Second session of cholangioscopy-guided laser lithotripsy. a A large stone in the perihilar bile duct (Arrowhead) was effectively crushed. b Cholangiography after stone retrieval shows complete stone clearance.