Subscribe to RSS
DOI: 10.1055/a-2769-0955
Improving Acute Care Surgery with Artificial Intelligence: A Practical Review
Authors
Abstract
Artificial intelligence (AI) and machine learning are poised to transform trauma care across the entire continuum, from prehospital triage to postoperative critical care. Trauma systems are uniquely suited for AI integration due to the time-sensitive, high-volume, and data-rich nature of care delivery. In this narrative review, we describe current and emerging AI applications across the trauma care spectrum, including triage, acute resuscitation, operative decision-making, intensive care, and detection of complications. We also examine AI's potential in nontraditional care environments, including prehospital, rural, and military settings, where resource constraints and variability in provider expertise pose significant challenges. Across multiple domains, AI models outperform conventional approaches in predicting injury severity, identifying patients in need of intervention, and detecting complications. Specific tools include AI-powered triage support, resuscitation sequencing systems, real-time imaging interpretation, and outcome prediction applications. Despite this promise, many AI applications remain investigational, and widespread adoption will require validation, transparency, and alignment with ethical and regulatory standards. Thoughtful implementation of AI in trauma care has the potential to enhance decision-making, improve patient outcomes, and address disparities in access to high-quality trauma care.
Keywords
artificial intelligence - trauma triage - resuscitation - acute care surgery - clinical decision supportPublication History
Article published online:
29 December 2025
© 2025. Thieme. All rights reserved.
Thieme Medical Publishers, Inc.
333 Seventh Avenue, 18th Floor, New York, NY 10001, USA
-
References
- 1 Mullins RJ. A historical perspective of trauma system development in the United States. J Trauma 1999; 47 (3, Suppl): S8-S14
- 2 Kortbeek JB, Al Turki SA, Ali J. et al. Advanced trauma life support, 8th edition, the evidence for change. J Trauma 2008; 64 (06) 1638-1650
- 3 Britt RC, Weireter LJ, Britt LD. Initial implementation of an acute care surgery model: implications for timeliness of care. J Am Coll Surg 2009; 209 (04) 421-424
- 4 Hoyt DB, Kim HD, Barrios C. Acute care surgery: a new training and practice model in the United States. World J Surg 2008; 32 (08) 1630-1635
- 5 Shafi S, Nathens AB, Cryer HG. et al. The trauma quality improvement program of the American College of Surgeons Committee on Trauma. J Am Coll Surg 2009; 209 (04) 521-530.e1
- 6 Berwick DM, Downey AS, Cornett EA. A national trauma care system to achieve zero preventable deaths after injury: recommendations from a National Academies of Sciences, Engineering, and Medicine report. JAMA 2016; 316 (09) 927-928
- 7 Leenen LP. Abdominal trauma: from operative to nonoperative management. Injury 2009; 40 (Suppl. 04) S62-S68
- 8 Schreiber MA. Damage control surgery. Crit Care Clin 2004; 20 (01) 101-118
- 9 Hanna K, Bible L, Chehab M. et al. Nationwide analysis of whole blood hemostatic resuscitation in civilian trauma. J Trauma Acute Care Surg 2020; 89 (02) 329-335
- 10 Degiannis E, Bowley DM, Smith MD. Minimally invasive surgery in trauma: technology looking for an application. Injury 2004; 35 (05) 474-478
- 11 Torres CM, Florecki K, Haghshenas J. et al. The evolution and development of a robotic acute care surgery program. J Trauma Acute Care Surg 2023; 95 (04) e26-e30
- 12 Cobianchi L, Piccolo D, Dal Mas F. et al; Team Dynamics Study Group. Surgeons' perspectives on artificial intelligence to support clinical decision-making in trauma and emergency contexts: results from an international survey. World J Emerg Surg 2023; 18 (01) 1
- 13 Mou Z, Godat LN, El-Kareh R, Berndtson AE, Doucet JJ, Costantini TW. Electronic health record machine learning model predicts trauma inpatient mortality in real time: a validation study. J Trauma Acute Care Surg 2022; 92 (01) 74-80
- 14 DeBaun MR, Chavez G, Fithian A. et al. Artificial neural networks predict 30-day mortality after hip fracture: insights from machine learning. J Am Acad Orthop Surg 2021; 29 (22) 977-983
- 15 Stonko DP, Guillamondegui OD, Fischer PE, Dennis BM. Artificial intelligence in trauma systems. Surgery 2021; 169 (06) 1295-1299
- 16 Dennis BM, Stonko DP, Callcut RA. et al. Artificial neural networks can predict trauma volume and acuity regardless of center size and geography: a multicenter study. J Trauma Acute Care Surg 2019; 87 (01) 181-187
- 17 Peng HT, Siddiqui MM, Rhind SG, Zhang J, da Luz LT, Beckett A. Artificial intelligence and machine learning for hemorrhagic trauma care. Mil Med Res 2023; 10 (01) 6
- 18 Morris RS, Karam BS, Murphy PB. et al. Field-triage, hospital-triage and triage-assessment: a literature review of the current phases of adult trauma triage. J Trauma Acute Care Surg 2021; 90 (06) e138-e145
- 19 Ehrlich H, McKenney M, Elkbuli A. The niche of artificial intelligence in trauma and emergency medicine. Am J Emerg Med 2021; 45: 669-670
- 20 Hashimoto DA, Rosman G, Rus D, Meireles OR. Artificial intelligence in surgery: promises and perils. Ann Surg 2018; 268 (01) 70-76
- 21 Hunter OF, Perry F, Salehi M. et al. Science fiction or clinical reality: a review of the applications of artificial intelligence along the continuum of trauma care. World J Emerg Surg 2023; 18 (01) 16
- 22 Lee S, Kang WS, Kim DW. et al. An artificial intelligence model for predicting trauma mortality among emergency department patients in South Korea: retrospective cohort study. J Med Internet Res 2023; 25: e49283
- 23 Gauss T, Ageron F-X, Devaud M-L. et al; French Trauma Research Initiative. Association of prehospital time to in-hospital trauma mortality in a physician-staffed emergency medicine system. JAMA Surg 2019; 154 (12) 1117-1124
- 24 MacKenzie EJ, Rivara FP, Jurkovich GJ. et al. A national evaluation of the effect of trauma-center care on mortality. N Engl J Med 2006; 354 (04) 366-378
- 25 Beuran M, Paun S, Gaspar B. et al. Prehospital trauma care: a clinical review. Chirurgia (Bucur) 2012; 107 (05) 564-570
- 26 Veldhuis LI, van der Weide L, Nanayakkara P, Ludikhuize J. The accuracy of predicting hospital admission by emergency medical service and emergency department personnel compared to the prehospital MEWS: a prospective multicenter study. BMC Emerg Med 2024; 24 (01) 111
- 27 Toy J, Warren J, Wilhelm K. et al. Use of artificial intelligence to support prehospital traumatic injury care: a scoping review. J Am Coll Emerg Physicians Open 2024; 5 (05) e13251
- 28 Weidman AC, Malakouti S, Salcido DD. et al. A machine learning trauma triage model for critical care transport. JAMA Netw Open 2025; 8 (06) e259639
- 29 Millarch AS, Folke F, Rudolph SS, Kaafarani HM, Sillesen M. Prehospital triage of trauma patients: predicting major surgery using artificial intelligence as decision support. Br J Surg 2025; 112 (04) znaf058
- 30 Kang D-Y, Cho K-J, Kwon O. et al. Artificial intelligence algorithm to predict the need for critical care in prehospital emergency medical services. Scand J Trauma Resusc Emerg Med 2020; 28 (01) 17
- 31 Abe D, Inaji M, Hase T. et al. A prehospital triage system to detect traumatic intracranial hemorrhage using machine learning algorithms. JAMA Netw Open 2022; 5 (06) e2216393-e2216393
- 32 Cook CH, Muscarella P, Praba AC, Melvin WS, Martin LC. Reducing overtriage without compromising outcomes in trauma patients. Arch Surg 2001; 136 (07) 752-756
- 33 Liu CW, Chacon M, Crawford L, Polydore H, Ting T, Wilson NA. Machine learning improves the accuracy of trauma team activation level assignments in pediatric patients. J Pediatr Surg 2024; 59 (01) 74-79
- 34 Nederpelt CJ, Mokhtari AK, Alser O. et al. Development of a field artificial intelligence triage tool: confidence in the prediction of shock, transfusion, and definitive surgical therapy in patients with truncal gunshot wounds. J Trauma Acute Care Surg 2021; 90 (06) 1054-1060
- 35 El-Menyar A, Naduvilekandy M, Asim M, Rizoli S, Al-Thani H. Machine learning models predict triage levels, massive transfusion protocol activation, and mortality in trauma utilizing patients hemodynamics on admission. Comput Biol Med 2024; 179: 108880
- 36 Taib BG, Karwath A, Wensley K, Minku L, Gkoutos GV, Moiemen N. Artificial intelligence in the management and treatment of burns: a systematic review and meta-analyses. J Plast Reconstr Aesthet Surg 2023; 77: 133-161
- 37 Yang S-Y, Huang C-J, Yen C-I. et al. Machine learning approach for predicting inhalation injury in patients with burns. Burns 2023; 49 (07) 1592-1601
- 38 Tran NK, Sen S, Palmieri TL. et al. Artificial intelligence and machine learning for predicting acute kidney injury in severely burned patients: a proof of concept. Burns 2019; 45 (06) 1350-1358
- 39 Tran NK, Albahra S, Pham TN. et al. Novel application of an automated-machine learning development tool for predicting burn sepsis: proof of concept. Sci Rep 2020; 10 (01) 12354
- 40 El Moheb M, Gebran A, Maurer LR. et al. Artificial intelligence versus surgeon gestalt in predicting risk of emergency general surgery. J Trauma Acute Care Surg 2023; 95 (04) 565-572
- 41 Villasante S, Fernandes N, Perez M. et al; Pancreatia Study Collaborators. Prediction of severe acute pancreatitis at a very early stage of the disease using artificial intelligence techniques, without laboratory data or imaging tests: the PANCREATIA study. Ann Surg 2024; 10: 1097
- 42 Li K, Kim MS, Zhang W. et al. Human intention recognition for trauma resuscitation: an interpretable deep learning approach for medical process data. J Biomed Inform 2025; 161: 104767
- 43 Yang S, Sarcevic A, Farneth RA. et al. An approach to automatic process deviation detection in a time-critical clinical process. J Biomed Inform 2018; 85: 155-167
- 44 Paydar S, Parva E, Ghahramani Z. et al. Do clinical and paraclinical findings have the power to predict critical conditions of injured patients after traumatic injury resuscitation? Using data mining artificial intelligence. Chin J Traumatol 2021; 24 (01) 48-52
- 45 Levy BE, Castle JT, Virodov A. et al. Artificial intelligence evaluation of focused assessment with sonography in trauma. J Trauma Acute Care Surg 2023; 95 (05) 706-712
- 46 Dreizin D, Staziaki PV, Khatri GD. et al. Artificial intelligence CAD tools in trauma imaging: a scoping review from the American Society of Emergency Radiology (ASER) AI/ML Expert Panel. Emerg Radiol 2023; 30 (03) 251-265
- 47 Arase M, Nekooei N, Sozzi M. et al. Accuracy, reliability, and utility of the extended focused assessment with sonography in trauma examination in the setting of thoracic gunshot wounds. J Trauma Acute Care Surg 2025; 98 (06) 867-874
- 48 Gosselin AR, Bargoud CG, Sawalkar A. et al. Dysregulated clot mechanics and kinetics impacted by injury severity, predict mortality after trauma. Shock 2025; 63 (04) 587-596
- 49 Richards JE, Yang S, Kozar RA, Scalea TM, Hu P. A machine learning-based Coagulation Risk Index predicts acute traumatic coagulopathy in bleeding trauma patients. J Trauma Acute Care Surg 2025; 98 (04) 614-620
- 50 Dumas RP, Vella MA, Hatchimonji JS, Ma L, Maher Z, Holena DN. Trauma video review utilization: a survey of practice in the United States. Am J Surg 2020; 219 (01) 49-53
- 51 Nolan B, Hicks CM, Petrosoniak A, Jung J, Grantcharov T. Pushing boundaries of video review in trauma: using comprehensive data to improve the safety of trauma care. Trauma Surg Acute Care Open 2020; 5 (01) e000510
- 52 Dumas RP, Cook C, Holena DN. et al. Roll the tape: implementing and harnessing the power of trauma video review. J Surg Educ 2022; 79 (06) e248-e256
- 53 Villarreal JA, Suh E, Forrester JD, Jopling JK, Dumas RP. Current state of artificial intelligence and trauma video review: insights for trauma resuscitation. Curr Trauma Rep 2025; 11 (01) 16
- 54 Cahill RA, Duffourc M, Gerke S. The AI-enhanced surgeon - integrating black-box artificial intelligence in the operating room. Int J Surg 2025; 111 (04) 2823-2826
- 55 Birkhoff DC, van Dalen ASHM, Schijven MP. A review on the current applications of artificial intelligence in the operating room. Surg Innov 2021; 28 (05) 611-619
- 56 Madani A, Namazi B, Altieri MS. et al. Artificial intelligence for intraoperative guidance: using semantic segmentation to identify surgical anatomy during laparoscopic cholecystectomy. Ann Surg 2022; 276 (02) 363-369
- 57 Nakano Y, Sonoda K, Abe Y. et al. New navigation for laparoscopic and robotic cholecystectomy using artificial intelligence. J Gastrointest Surg 2025; 29 (06) 102063
- 58 Protserov S, Hunter J, Zhang H. et al. Development, deployment and scaling of operating room-ready artificial intelligence for real-time surgical decision support. NPJ Digit Med 2024; 7 (01) 231
- 59 Endo Y, Tokuyasu T, Mori Y. et al. Impact of AI system on recognition for anatomical landmarks related to reducing bile duct injury during laparoscopic cholecystectomy. Surg Endosc 2023; 37 (07) 5752-5759
- 60 Fujinaga A, Endo Y, Etoh T. et al. Development of a cross-artificial intelligence system for identifying intraoperative anatomical landmarks and surgical phases during laparoscopic cholecystectomy. Surg Endosc 2023; 37 (08) 6118-6128
- 61 Corallino D, Balla A, Coletta D. et al. Systematic review on the use of artificial intelligence to identify anatomical structures during laparoscopic cholecystectomy: a tool towards the future. Langenbecks Arch Surg 2025; 410 (01) 101
- 62 Harvin JA, Kao LS, Liang MK. et al. Decreasing the use of damage control laparotomy in trauma: a quality improvement project. J Am Coll Surg 2017; 225 (02) 200-209
- 63 Harvin JA, Green CE, Pedroza C. et al. Using machine learning to identify change in surgical decision making in current use of damage control laparotomy. J Am Coll Surg 2019; 228 (03) 255-264
- 64 Zuo F, Su J, Li Y. et al. Development and validation of a machine learning-based model for predicting intraoperative blood loss during burn surgery. Surgery 2025; 184: 109445
- 65 Kouz K, Brockmann L, Timmermann LM. et al. Endotypes of intraoperative hypotension during major abdominal surgery: a retrospective machine learning analysis of an observational cohort study. Br J Anaesth 2023; 130 (03) 253-261
- 66 Holena DN, de Moya MA. Intraoperative trauma video review. JAMA Surg 2025; 160 (09) 1024-1025
- 67 Mascagni P, Padoy N. OR black box and surgical control tower: recording and streaming data and analytics to improve surgical care. J Visc Surg 2021; 158 (3S): S18-S25
- 68 Zbrzezny AM, Krzywicki T. Artificial intelligence in dermatology: a review of methods, clinical applications, and perspectives. Appl Sci (Basel) 2025; 15 (14) 7856
- 69 Stafie CS, Sufaru I-G, Ghiciuc CM. et al. Exploring the intersection of artificial intelligence and clinical healthcare: a multidisciplinary review. Diagnostics (Basel) 2023; 13 (12) 1995
- 70 Jakobsen RK, Bonde A, Sillesen M. Assessment of post-trauma complications in eight million trauma cases over a decade in the USA. Trauma Surg Acute Care Open 2021; 6 (01) e000667
- 71 Glance LG, Dick AW, Meredith JW, Mukamel DB. Variation in hospital complication rates and failure-to-rescue for trauma patients. Ann Surg 2011; 253 (04) 811-816
- 72 Shickel B, Loftus TJ, Adhikari L, Ozrazgat-Baslanti T, Bihorac A, Rashidi P. DeepSOFA: a continuous acuity score for critically ill patients using clinically interpretable deep learning. Sci Rep 2019; 9 (01) 1879
- 73 Maurer LR, Bertsimas D, Bouardi HT. et al. Trauma outcome predictor: an artificial intelligence interactive smartphone tool to predict outcomes in trauma patients. J Trauma Acute Care Surg 2021; 91 (01) 93-99
- 74 El Hechi M, Gebran A, Bouardi HT. et al. Validation of the artificial intelligence-based trauma outcomes predictor (TOP) in patients 65 years and older. Surgery 2022; 171 (06) 1687-1694
- 75 Lim S, Yi Y. Using machine learning to predict AKI in trauma patients: a single trauma center study with temporal validation: FR-PO039. J Am Soc Nephrol 2024; 35 (10) 10
- 76 Balcarcel DR, Mai MV, Mehta SD. et al. Development and validation of an electronic health record-based, pediatric acute respiratory distress syndrome subphenotype classifier model. Pediatr Crit Care Med 2025; 26 (05) e611-e621
- 77 Koneru M, Shaikh HA, Tonetti DA. et al. Early experience with artificial intelligence software to detect intracranial occlusive stroke in trauma patients. Cureus 2024; 16 (03) e57084
- 78 Blackmore AR, Leonard J, Madayag R, Bourg PW. Using the trauma quality improvement program metrics data to enhance clinical practice. J Trauma Nurs 2019; 26 (03) 121-127
- 79 Saad M, Dubovoy TZ, Kheterpal S, Colquhoun DA. Automated detection of postoperative reintubation using electronic health record data. Anesthesiology 2024; 140 (01) 173-175
- 80 Zhuang Y, Dyas A, Meguid RA. et al. Preoperative prediction of postoperative infections using machine learning and electronic health record data. Ann Surg 2024; 279 (04) 720-726
- 81 Stuart CM, Fei Y, Colborn KL. et al. Estimation of risk-adjusted outcomes for non-infectious postoperative complications using interpretable machine learning and electronic health record data. Ann Surg 2025; 10: 1097
- 82 Dyas A, Stuart CM, Fei Y. et al. Development and validation of models for preoperative prediction of risk and postoperative detection of non-infectious complications using interpretable machine learning and electronic health record data. Ann Surg 2025; 10: 1097
- 83 Hernandez N, Zagales R, Awan MU. et al. Factors contributing to disparities in trauma care between urban vs rural trauma centers: towards improving trauma care access and quality of care delivery. Injury 2024; 55 (12) 112017
- 84 Newgard CD, Fu R, Bulger E. et al. Evaluation of rural vs urban trauma patients served by 9-1-1 emergency medical services. JAMA Surg 2017; 152 (01) 11-18
- 85 Eder PA, Rashid A. Telemedicine for Prehospital Trauma Care: A Promising Approach. The High-Risk Surgical Patient. Springer; 2023: 683-689
- 86 Mullens CL, Hernandez JA, Murthy J. et al. Understanding the impacts of rural hospital closures: a scoping review. J Rural Health 2024; 40 (02) 227-237
- 87 Khanna NN, Maindarkar MA, Viswanathan V. et al. Economics of artificial intelligence in healthcare: diagnosis vs. treatment. Healthcare (Basel) 2022; 10 (12) 2493
- 88 Kindle RD, Badawi O, Celi LA, Sturland S. Intensive care unit telemedicine in the era of big data, artificial intelligence, and computer clinical decision support systems. Crit Care Clin 2019; 35 (03) 483-495
- 89 Garwe T, Newgard CD, Stewart K. et al. Enhancing utility of interfacility triage guidelines using machine learning: development of the Geriatric Interfacility Trauma Triage score. J Trauma Acute Care Surg 2023; 94 (04) 546-553
- 90 Huang K, Jiao Z, Cai Y, Zhong Z. Artificial intelligence-based intelligent surveillance for reducing nurses' working hours in nurse-patient interaction: a two-wave study. J Nurs Manag 2022; 30 (08) 3817-3826
- 91 Bin Abdul Baten R. How are US hospitals adopting artificial intelligence? Early evidence from 2022. Health Aff Sch 2024; 2 (10) qxae123
- 92 Woolley T, Round JA, Ingram M. Global lessons: developing military trauma care and lessons for civilian practice. Br J Anaesth 2017; 119 (Suppl. 01) i135-i142
- 93 Lurin I, Gorobeiko M, Lovin A, Gorobeyko B, Lovina N, Dinets A. Application of artificial intelligence in civil and military medicine. Georgian Med News 2024; (348) 94-98
- 94 Stallings JD, Laxminarayan S, Yu C. et al. Appraise-HRI: an artificial intelligence algorithm for triage of hemorrhage casualties. Shock 2023; 60 (02) 199-205
- 95 Convertino VA, Cardin S. Advanced medical monitoring for the battlefield: a review on clinical applicability of compensatory reserve measurements for early and accurate hemorrhage detection. J Trauma Acute Care Surg 2022; 93 (2S, Suppl 1): S147-S154
- 96 Jin X, Frock A, Nagaraja S, Wallqvist A, Reifman J. AI algorithm for personalized resource allocation and treatment of hemorrhage casualties. Front Physiol 2024; 15: 1327948
- 97 Lammers D, Marenco C, Morte K. et al. Machine learning for military trauma: novel massive transfusion predictive models in combat zones. J Surg Res 2022; 270: 369-375
- 98 Lammers D, Williams J, Conner J. et al. Utilization of machine learning approaches to predict mortality in pediatric warzone casualties. Mil Med 2024; 189 (1–2): 345-351
- 99 Rojas-Muñoz E, Couperus K, Wachs JP. The AI-Medic: an artificial intelligent mentor for trauma surgery. Comput Methods Biomech Biomed Eng Imaging Vis 2021; 9 (03) 313-321
- 100 Johnson-Mann CN, Loftus TJ, Bihorac A. Equity and artificial intelligence in surgical care. JAMA Surg 2021; 156 (06) 509-510
